Anarcham
Anarcham, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Anarcham! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
thanks for stepping in
editat Emma Goldman. I just wrote the editor who made those "Citation needed" edits, but didn't have Living My Life on hand and was struggling through Wexler's book for the info. Life is good, Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 22:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure if I should look through volume 2 and actually try to cite the numerous times this was referenced or if just citing the book would be sufficient. Anarcham (talk) 02:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- I did not think any citation was needed, that's Emma Goldman 101, but the guy who did the edit has an . . ...... interesting user page that, for me, shed a bit of light on his bs. Carptrash (talk) 02:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
apologies
editI wasn't aware I couldn't remove the template myself, but the people who keep reverting me to add the template are also removing content about Rob Delaney that I added to help explain the significance and importance of the subject. Clam Digging Johnson (talk) 20:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- The notification about the deletion tag says Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself and you had two other warnings to stop removing it. Anarcham (talk) 20:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Deletion from the external links of Oral Cancer
editOral Cancer
Information icon Hello, I'm Anarcham. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Anarcham (talk) 13:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Sir, our website is a treasure trove of information on Oral cancer with many photographs and enormous literature. I dont know why should you delete it from the links. Do at-least see the website for its content and then delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sndarvekar (talk • contribs) 14:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sure it is a very nice website from a very nice organization but if every charity not matter how small were to add links all over the place things would get out of hand quickly. Anarcham (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- But I have not asked for any charity from anybody. It is an information website because oral cancer is the number one cancer killing almost 1.2 million people in India. It is a huge epidemic raging here and we are trying to inform the masses about the dangers of tobacco use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sndarvekar (talk • contribs) 14:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't say you were asking for charity but that you were adding your charity to the article. Anarcham (talk) 16:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)