Jpullokaran

Welcome!

Here are some cookies to welcome you! :D

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jpullokaran! My name is Possum. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some pages that will help you edit Wikipedia:   Wikipedia:How to edit a page   Tutorial   Sandbox, the place where you can experiment   Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.   Wikipedia:Five pillars   Wikipedia:Manual of Style

Here are some ways you can help improve Wikipedia:   Write an article   Fight vandalism   Translate an article   Improve illustrations and upload new images   Perform maintenance tasks   Become a member of a project that interests you

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --RyanLupin | (talk) 18:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Vaidya2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vaidya2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rothgo (talk) 17:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Rothgo (talk) 17:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Vaidya1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Vaidya1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Rothgo (talk) 17:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Naveen.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Naveen.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sasikiran (talk) 06:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Thrissur City1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Thrissur City1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:07, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Lulu Convention Centre

A tag has been placed on Lulu Convention Centre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Lulu Convention Centre and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Thrissur Railway Station.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Thrissur Railway Station.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 19:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Frankly.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Frankly.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 07:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ESAF Microfinance & Investments Ltd

A tag has been placed on ESAF Microfinance & Investments Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NeutralHomer • Talk • 18:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 18:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ESAF Microfinance & Investments Ltd

A tag has been placed on ESAF Microfinance & Investments Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Thrissur Railway Station entrance.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Thrissur Railway Station entrance.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Istcol (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Newshour.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Newshour.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Feast of Saint Raphael, Ollur

The article Feast of Saint Raphael, Ollur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete, appears to be a non notable local festival to a saint.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Feast of Saint Raphael, Ollur

I have nominated Feast of Saint Raphael, Ollur, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feast of Saint Raphael, Ollur. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ollur Feast 3.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Ollur Feast 3.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 15:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ollur Feast 4.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Ollur Feast 4.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 15:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ollur Feast 2.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Ollur Feast 2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Oushadhi

I have nominated Oushadhi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oushadhi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SGGH ^ping! 14:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vaidyaratnam Oushadhasala

The article Vaidyaratnam Oushadhasala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Less than notable manufacturer

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 04:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sitaram Ayurvedic Pharmacy Ltd

A tag has been placed on Sitaram Ayurvedic Pharmacy Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:23, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Trichur Heart Hospital

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Trichur Heart Hospital, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://hospitalskerala.com/thrissur_hospitals/trichur_heart_hospitals/index.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trichur Heart Hospital

A tag has been placed on Trichur Heart Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 16:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Mart Mariam Big Church

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mart Mariam Big Church, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.churchoftheeastindia.org/martmariambigchurch%20.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maharaja’s Technological Institute

A tag has been placed on Maharaja’s Technological Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andyzweb (talk) 22:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 10 things to do in Thrissur

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, 10 things to do in Thrissur. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Thrissur. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Thrissur - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Beach drifter (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

..and has been deleted. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a travel guide. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:51, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valappila Communications

The article Valappila Communications has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Skates close to a speedy for advertising.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — e. ripley\^talk 12:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Valappila Communications

I have nominated Valappila Communications, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valappila Communications. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — e. ripley\^talk 13:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Images

Look, you just cannot upload images taken from random places on the internet (forums, picasa, google searches) and claim they were freely licensed without providing evidence. I've listed some of your files at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 May 25#File:Front of Basilica of Our Lady of Dolours.jpg and subsequent sections, and for quite a few more of your uploads I've used {{db-filecopyvio}}. If you do have written (e-mail) permissions by the copyright owners of all these photos to publish them here under a free license, then forward these permissions to WP:OTRS, stating clearly to which images the permissions apply. Otherwise, these images will be deleted as copyright violations. (The same also applies to the Commons!) Cheers, Lupo 15:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emmanuval Silks

A tag has been placed on Emmanuval Silks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jimmy Pitt talk 13:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalyan Silks

A tag has been placed on Kalyan Silks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WackyWace ^{you talkin' to me?} 13:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kalyan Group

The article Kalyan Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable organisation. Only sources are company's own.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 17:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Emmanuval Silks

An article that you have been involved in editing, Emmanuval Silks, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuval Silks. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:18, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kalyan Group

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kalyan Group, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalyan Group. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steel & Industrial Forgings Ltd

A tag has been placed on Steel & Industrial Forgings Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kudpung (talk) 19:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:ShakthanThampuranBusStand.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ShakthanThampuranBusStand.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:ShakthanThampuranBusStand.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:ShakthanThampuranBusStand.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 17:24, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:ShakthanThampuranBusStand.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:ShakthanThampuranBusStand.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:-Mathrubhumi Office.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:-Mathrubhumi Office.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Peechi-Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peechi-Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.prd.kerala.gov.in/peechi.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:16, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

You have again pasted content with minimal alteration into Wikipedia. On November 11th, you copied content from [1] into Kerala Forest Research Institute. Content you added included the following:

The Kerala Forest Research Institute (KFRI) is an institution of the Government of Kerala under its Science and Technology Department, situated in Thrissur District of Kerala State in India. The KFRI is dedicated to research in tropical forestry, environment and biodiversity conservation. The institution was established in 1975 and later in 2003, when the Government of Kerala-owned R&D institutions were re-organized to constitute the Kerala State Council for Science and Technology (KSCSTE), KFRI also became part of the latter.

The source says:

Established in 1975, the Kerala Forest Research Institute (KFRI) is an institution of the Government of Kerala under its Science and Technology Department. The Institute is dedicated to research in tropical forestry, environment and biodiversity conservation. In 2003, when the State owned R & D institutions were re-organized to constitute the Kerala State Council for Science and Technology (KSCSTE), KFRI also became part of the latter.

There was more.

You cannot copy content into Wikipedia, except in the form of brief clearly marked quotations. Otherwise, unless you can verify that the content is public domain or compatibly licensed, you must write it in your own words. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:16, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of COSTFORD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on COSTFORD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 17:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Only warning, POV pushing

This is the only warning you will receive for your continuous POV pushing in favor of Thrissur, including it in unrelated articles etc. If you continue to do so, your will be blocked from editing for a longer period of time. —SpacemanSpiff 17:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sakthan Thamparan.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sakthan Thamparan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 17:40, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peechi-Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Peechi-Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 18:39, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Chit fund

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Chit fund, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.aiacf.net/history.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Chit fund and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Chit fund, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Chit fund with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Chit fund. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Chit fund saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! —SpacemanSpiff 19:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jpullokaran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock my account. I know I had done a copyright violation. But ‘Chit Fund’ article is not copied. I had researched from other sources and blogs to expand this article.

Decline reason:

It was copied. It's perfectly obvious that it was copied and that you ignored previous warnings not to violate copyright. Your lucky to have only gotten a two week block, I would have made it indefinite. Creating copyright violations isn't just a bad editing practice, it exposes the Wikimedia Foundation to legal risks. If you can't contribute without copy/pasting from other sites then you can't edit Wikipedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Final warning

Almost all your contributions that I have gone through so far are copyright violations (note, since you were blocked I've deleted three articles of yours and tagged another two). Based on the number of prior and current copyright violations you will be blocked indefinitely. However, if you are willing to clean up your violations we can reconsider that. Please list out here all your articles and where you copied them from and we can work out cleaning up the mess. —SpacemanSpiff 18:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles

I have edited and created more than 50 articles. Many of the articles were written from the source of newspaper articles. If you can tell me, which all articles you want me to rewrite, I can do it. But if you ask me the articles name, SORRY. I don’t know!

Inner Voice 18:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Oh, look here and you'll pretty much find all of your copyright violations. There's a difference between using a source and plagiarizing a source. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:17, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Unlock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jpullokaran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think I can contribute more to Wikipedia from my own words other than others. So I am looking forward for a conflict less relationship with Wikipedians

Decline reason:

That does not address the reason for your block. In addition, I think there is more than enough reason to maintain the current block. Beeblebrox said in connection with your last block that you were lucky to have such a short block, and that it could well have been indefinite. I can only echo that sentiment in connection with this block. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why One month

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jpullokaran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First you blocked for me for two weeks and now for one month. Is there any clear authority policy from Wikipedia? Is there a conflict of interest against me. For copyright violations, you people are giving me punishment in tranches, like 48 hour, the 2 week and now one month. Sorry dude, I am leaving Wikipedia. I know it will not make any difference for you. Better you block for lifetime, it is easy for me. Good Bye.

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for increasing periods of time because of your apparent inability to follow copyright policy here. You have given no reason now to unblock. Blocking you at your own request would be against wikipedia policy, but you are not required to edit here after your block expires. You are, however, welcome to do so, given only that you conform to copyright policies. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Inner Voice 17:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

• I have extended your block as you have continued to edit using your IP without bothering to address any of the other copyright violations you have created. —SpacemanSpiff 18:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Bye

{{db-u1}}.)

User talk pages are not deleted on request; see WP:DELTALK. Favonian (talk) 17:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manappuram Jewellery

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Manappuram Jewellery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Manappuram Jewellery and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. H66666666 (talk) 11:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Ironholds (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This has been wtihdrawn. I have pointed out to Ironholds that you have had recent issues with copyright. In fact, I'm afraid that content you added in December to Economy of Thrissur is inadequately rewritten. For example, you wrote, "Thrissur’s goldsmiths boast of a tradition spanning several centuries, from the days when pepper, spices, precious stones and textiles were traded for the gold and other metals from Roman and Arab traders in the lost port city of Muziris in Kodungallur" to Economy of Thrissur in this edit. The 2006 source says, "Its goldsmiths boast of a tradition spanning several centuries, from the days when pepper and other spices were exchanged for the metal from Roman and Arab traders." Other content also follows closely on that source, and "The repeal of the Gold Control Act, introduction of provisions relating to gold in the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the grant of permission to non-resident Indians (NRIs) to bring in up to 5 kg (subsequently raised to 10 kg) of gold on payment of a small duty (Rs 220 per 10 gram) in foreign exchange" is copied verbatim.

It is not compliant with our copyright policies to add content that is minimally altered from previously published sources. If sources are under copyright (and most are), you must rewrite from scratch. You cannot alter content by adding or omitting a few words, even changing a few words, without creating a "derivative work", which the United States law that governs Wikipedia will not permit you to do.

I do not believe that you are yet ready to submit articles to Wikipedia that are not flagged for review. You would likely benefit by reading over Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". (It also constitutes plagiarism on Wikipedia to closely follow previously published text without acknowledging that you are doing so; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism.) Once you are clearly able to take information from your sources without borrowing distinctive language or structure, there should be no further concerns.

I note that you recently created an article, Gold business in Thrissur, which is copied from Economy of Thrissur. Unless you are able to verify that you are the sole author of content, you must acknowledge that content is copied when moving text from one page to another. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It seems likely that you may be the sole content contributor at Economy of Thrissur, but that can't be verified if you edit it logged out. Accordingly, that copy should be attributed. Please let me know if you need assistance with the attribution process; I'll be happy to provide more information or to help. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for for repeated copyright violations. You have been blocked before for the same reasons and also asked to clear up the copyright mess, but then today, with this edit, you copied content from here without attribution or any sort of rewriting.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 18:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

I admit my mistakes

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jpullokaran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I admit my mistake which I had done now and earlier also. I recognise the importance of copyright violations Wikipedia stresses and I tried to do my best to avoid it. My purpose of coping History of Thrissur to the Thrissur section and Gold business in Thrissur was in a good intention. I know some thing about Thrissur that is why I work on particular topic called Thrissur. I am slowly editing out my copyright mess which I have created in Wikipedia. But it take time and sometime mistakes do haapen. Wikipedia is so much cluttered with polices and frameworks, sometime I lost in it. Inner Voice 15:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Not good enough. You were blocked before for the same thing. What are you going to change in your editing behaviour to absolutely ensure that you do not commit the same error in the future?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

After your indefinite block above, you edited Arnab Goswami as an IP and introduced copyvios from this source. —SpacemanSpiff 06:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done by me

It is my office IP address. Anyone can edit from that IP.

Inner Voice 08:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

CCI

There currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. —SpacemanSpiff 17:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles

Water supply in Thrissur, Thrissur Solid Waste Management and Thrissur Municipal Corporation are the three articles where I have copied from an ADB document. I don’t think it have any copyright problem because it was like a presentation.

Inner Voice 14:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

I can do that

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jpullokaran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

After going through my articles which I was created, I decided to change my editing behaviour. The articles which you have listed in Contributor copyright investigations, I can edit out articles which violate the copyright polices of Wikipedia. In the time of indefinite block, I have not edited any article from that said IP. I am afraid that articles which I had created by research will also be get deleted. Chit fund article was an example for this. I researched for that article and created it. But afterwards it was labelled as copied. So I don’t want good articles also be deleted. I can clean up the articles which found to be copyrighted.

Decline reason:

This is the third time that you have been blocked for copyright problems. You'll have show that you thoroughly understand the issues that led to your block before unblocking can be considered (and even then, it's not guaranteed). TNXMan 16:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One more time

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jpullokaran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I accept that this is third time I have been blocked. Give me one more chance so that i can prove that I understood Wikipedia's Copyright policies. 114.143.76.2 (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Request must be made from the account itself, not an anonymous IP address. Favonian (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One more time

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jpullokaran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

accept that this is third time I have been blocked. Give me one more chance so that i can prove that I understood Wikipedia's Copyright policies. Inner Voice 19:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have been asked to show that you thoroughly understand the issues leading to your block; therefore, please describe what you have done wrong in the past, and indicate how you will change your editing practice to avoid making the same errors in the future. I am afraid that after three blocks a simple affirmation will not do. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jpullokaran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have copied from documents which under Wikipedia’s policy are wrong and can be prosecuted in US Federal Courts. If I want use these materials, I want get the permission from the original user or that particular document which must be in public use. And Wikipedia seriously consider copyright problems. The last block which I got is for copying within Wikipedia. That’s it.

Decline reason:

Per comment below. This is your fourth request without really making a new argument; I think it's time we shut down this talk page so you won't be wasting any more administrative time. At least not so publicly; if you really want to keep playing this game we have a mailing list linked in all the block notices. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No. You were copying from an external website as was clearly explained in my block note. What you have been doing consistently doing is copying from outside on to one article, then recopying part of the same content on to other articles within Wikipedia. Over the past three months since your first block, you have not demonstrated any understanding of the copyright policy or any interest in following it. —SpacemanSpiff 18:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jos Alukka & Sons

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Jos Alukka & Sons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Shekure (talk) 10:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sobha City

The article Sobha City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article on a real estate project which does not meet general notability criteria - Not covered on reliable third party sources. Article has a promotional tone. Claims to be first gated community in Kerala; however, provides no sources. A Google search on Gated community in Kerala throws up many results. If this township can have a wikipedia article, every residential colony in the world can have one. Hence, proposing for deletion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shekure (talk) 12:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Jpullokaran, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

• File:Swaraj Round.jpg
• File:VilangankunnuPark.jpg

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:File:Swaraj Round.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:File:Swaraj Round.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elite Mission Hospital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elite Mission Hospital, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sobha City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sobha City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sobha City (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shaktan Thampuran Private Bus Stand

The article Shaktan Thampuran Private Bus Stand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN bus station, does not meet GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MB 01:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sitaram Ayurvedic Pharmacy Ltd

The article Sitaram Ayurvedic Pharmacy Ltd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a sufficiently notable company. Could not find any coverage about it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M4DU7 (talk) 07:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manjilas

The article Manjilas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication here that this could pass WP:NCORP, sourced only to press-releases and its own website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manjilas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manjilas, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Equine-man (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Manjilas Double Horse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manjilas Double Horse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manjilas Double Horse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Naveenchandra.JPG

The file File:Naveenchandra.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Westfort Hospital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Westfort Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mother Hospital

The article Mother Hospital has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just promotional and mundane data, no secondary sources. No notable events.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darcyisverycute (talk) 13:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC)