Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bus routes in Thurrock
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Bus routes in Thurrock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable list of bus routes. WP:NOT an indiscriminate list of info. Delete Exxolon (talk) 09:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of bus routes in Essex. I believe there's been consensus in the past to keep county pages and those for major cities. I'm not wholly convinced Thurrock qualifies. JulesH (talk) 09:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Since bus deregulation, bus routes are much too changeable to warrant having WP articles. They are fundamentally unmaintainable. The operators will maintain their sites, but they will not keep WP up to date. This difficulty is demonstrated by the list above the table. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unmaintainable and unnotable. Gandalf61 (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT, WP:RS, and WP:CORP --Triadian (talk) 21:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.