Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earthmover (band)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 07:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Earthmover (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
originally nominated for A7 speedy, author claims notability through having released an album with a notable label. No vote. ugen64 05:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:MUSIC says at least two albums on a notable label. They seem to be one short.
(If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll change my vote).Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 12:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply] - Delete per TPH. Darrenhusted 12:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per TenPoundHammer. Iknowyourider (t c) 13:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per TenPoundHammer. *drew 14:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless it can be proven that they released two albums on notable labels. Bart133 (t) (c) 16:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Google searches for the other labels turn up nothing of importance. Genet Records gets the most hits, but still I can't find any reliable sources on it. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - do you think the other labels should be put up for deletion then? ugen64 05:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.