Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Foundation (Iran)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" !votes boil down to WP:ILIKEIT without providing any evidence. Randykitty (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ehsan Foundation (Iran)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising without reputational criteria and independent sources Persia ☘ 07:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: a poorly written article about a community service organisation in Iran. The article needs a rewrite and/or copy-editing. The references indicate this is a substantial community relief organisation providing many services in Iran. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is not the case. The organization was set up by the government for media propaganda. The resources in question are all government resources that are operating in a directional rather than independent manner.--Persia ☘ 09:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Whiteguru; The wide range of activities and reputation of this foundation has the necessary criteria to have an independent page. Whiteguru also mentioned a true point that: The references indicate this is a substantial community relief organisation providing many services in Iran. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 11:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Service or Demagogue/Populism?--Persia ☘ 15:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:40, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't see a reliable source supporting any form of notability. Agree with the OP's assessment that this looks like some kind of advertiser. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 12:37, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional article, nothing found that convince me it passes the GNG Mardetanha (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - horrendous article, bordering on propaganda, about an otherwise ordinary NGO. Bearian (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.