Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotions Education

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emotions Education

More unencyclopaedic self-promotion from the editor who brought us Crime Education(AfD) and Spiritual Education‎(AfD). Only non-self-source doesn't even mention the term. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 14:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not encyclopaedic. This editor is just spamming his own website. Teapotgeorge^Talk 19:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As a world leader in this field and other "educations" I have only my own sources to refer to. If the people complaining about this have other sources they should add them instead of accusing me of spamming. Emotions education is refered to loosely in talks and papers without beiung defined. Read Goleman again and he does refer to it. Bill robb (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = A Google search suggests that this will not be verifiable. The fact that the only references are to Robb's website (the book is marked as not having the reference that's expected) also suggests that this is self-promotion, although that's not a good reason to delete - it's just gravy on top of the nonverifiability. --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.