- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 22:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gnu/communism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)– (View log)
Non-notable insult. Page has no references and only one external link, which is broken. Written in unencyclopediac style. Topic isn't big enough for an article. Search engines turn up little relavant content. Contains nonsense. etc. Gronky 17:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC) UPDATE: I've notified each of the five non-bot non-anon contributors to this article.[reply]
- Delete per nom Gronky 17:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete little-used term Lurker 17:23, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Doesnt even sound like a term but more like WP:OR. Plm209(talk • contribs) 17:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clear Neologism. If it wasn't the purely opinion based tone of the article and uneventful history of the term would make it not only non encyclopedic content but possibly viable for NPOV. -- Jimmi Hugh 18:02, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everything said above. — Wenli (contribs) 20:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism. Pavel Vozenilek 15:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.