Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Asia Institute
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy merge to Solbridge International School of Business. Mgm|(talk) 11:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Asia Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Subject of article does not appear notable. A Google search turned up mostly trivial mentions or non-third party materials, and the rest appears to be Wikipedia copies. Article appears to fail WP:ORG and WP:Notability. While not themselves reasons for deletion, the article is unsourced, and appears to have a conflict of interest issue. Due to the apparent notability issue I am recommending deletion. Jo7hs2 (talk) 21:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- merge/redirect to parent institution. Laudak (talk) 00:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD Nomination Withdrawn, Agree to Merge with Solbridge International School of Business and Redirect: A closer look at Solbridge International School of Business suggests that most of the relevant information in The Asia Institute is already in that article, so merging the remainder of the important information from The Asia Institute to parent article Solbridge International School of Business and placing a redirect on The Asia Institute to Solbridge International School of Business makes the most sense. Nomination withdrawn. Jo7hs2 (talk) 03:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 09:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.