Copyvio notice has been removed twice (in good faith, but against policy). – Kacie Jane (talk) 01:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Y Thanks much for identifying it, keeping an eye on it and making sure that the copyvio remained blank during processing. The temporary version has been merged into place. While I typically prefer to delete infringement from history, in this case I could not because the temporary version included creative text supplied by others. As Wikipedia:Copyright violations and Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Advice for admins note, we don't always delete infringement from history. I have put the {{cclean}} notice at the article's talk page. I've also watchlisted the article. If in spite of that template the material is restored, the article should probably be deleted and completely rewritten. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]