Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting

(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:WSS)
Latest comment: 9 days ago by Pegship in topic How many stubs to merit an upmerged template?


Formatting error?

edit

Hello all, I just proposed this new stub category but I think I've made an error somewhere that I can't see as the nomination doesn't appear on the main proposals page - help! Lajmmoore (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

All stubs list

edit

Is there an list of all stubs (not stub articles, that is articles with stub tags)? That is, a WP:STUBLONG (as opposed to WP:STUBSHORT)? Tule-hog (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I believe its supposed to be WP:STUBTAGS but that got lost in the "See the separate ___ page" format - before I go haywire embedding the full list there, were the categories intentionally un-embedded due to length or were they simply awaiting someone to do it justice? Tule-hog (talk) 02:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also given there is other useful information at WP:SST, perhaps WP:STUBTAGS should be moved to its own page due to length? Tule-hog (talk) 02:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yacht racing (not sailing) stub templates and category tree

edit

You may be interested to join the discussion: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports#Yacht racing (not sailing) stub templates and category tree. Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Zemgale

edit

I think Category:Zemgale geography stubs and Template:Zemgale-geo-stub should simultaneously renamed from Zemgale to Semigallia, per article title Semigallia and Category:Semigallia. What is the right process for that? Marcocapelle (talk) 03:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

CfD, I think. Her Pegship (?) 23:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Zoological stub templates

edit

Does anyone have an opinion about the proposals for upmerged templates currently on the proposals page? Most of them have fewer than 30 possible uses. Her Pegship (?) 23:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

How many stubs to merit an upmerged template?

edit

I don't know whether this has been discussed anywhere; in light of a few of the current proposals, I've been wondering what the threshold should be for creation of an upmerged template. One such proposal shows that there are only 3 articles that would qualify for {{Rheiformes-stub}}, for example, and Grey Clownfish proposes that it be created and upmerged to Category:Bird stubs. To me, this begs the question as to whether every stub category needs an upmerged template for every possible sub-cat, regardless of the quantity of articles it might apply to. I'm not sure I'm expressing myself very well, but wouldn't this sort of action prompt an enormous number of barely-used templates, and wouldn't it be a lot of work to organize/track/list all of them? Her Pegship (?) 23:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply