User talk:Koala15: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:26, 24 April 2015

Koala15, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Koala15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Koala15. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Koala15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey Koala15! I'm awarding you this Barnstar for your works in articles mostly related to animation and others. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 09:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Czarface, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Terrific article, a pleasure to read. Many thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for your contributions to bring Monsters, Inc. up to GA status! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article The Incredibles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles

The article The Incredibles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Incredibles for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! One of my favorites. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa

On 4 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the makeup for Johnny Knoxville's character in Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa took three hours to apply? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ratatouille (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ratatouille (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ratatouille (film)

The article Ratatouille (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ratatouille (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Half Million Award

		The Half Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Ratatouille (film) (estimated annual readership: 632,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Half Million Award for bringing Ratatouille to Good Article status.

Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Bug's Life

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Bug's Life you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 12:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Bug's Life

The article A Bug's Life you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Bug's Life for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 12:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Toy Story 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toy Story 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mediran -- Mediran (talk) 11:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Marshall Mathers LP 2

On 10 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Marshall Mathers LP 2, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Berzerk", produced by Rick Rubin, and "Survival", which appears in Call of Duty: Ghosts, are both songs from Eminem's eighth studio album, The Marshall Mathers LP 2? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Marshall Mathers LP 2. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Berzerk (song)

On 10 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Berzerk (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Berzerk", produced by Rick Rubin, and "Survival", which appears in Call of Duty: Ghosts, are both songs from Eminem's eighth studio album, The Marshall Mathers LP 2? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For making Toy Story 2 a GA. Keep it up! ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 11:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Finding Nemo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Finding Nemo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Finding Nemo

The article Finding Nemo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Finding Nemo for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shrek

The article Shrek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shrek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cars (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cars (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 3 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) @ 18:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has now passed. Rcsprinter (indicate) @ 23:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Half Million Award

		The Half Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Cars (film) (estimated annual readership: 964,012) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go get 'em, tiger! :D Bobnorwal (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pinocchio (1940 film)

The article Pinocchio (1940 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pinocchio (1940 film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Loeba -- Loeba (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koala - I was happy to do this GAN but wanted to mention that it's a wee bit disheartening not to get a word of thanks (reviewing does take time and effort). I'm sure you didn't mean to be rude but I wanted to give you a head's up for the future - it's always good to thank your reviewer. That's all, no hard feelings. Keep up the good editing --Loeba (talk) 08:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Good Article Barnstar
	For making Disney's Pinocchio a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasia

Well done for the quick work on another film GA. You will be happy to know that this article swiftly passed the review. I knew from the start this one would easily pass! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 19:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the help. Koala15 (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fantasia (film)

The article Fantasia (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fantasia (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Disney Barnstar
	This is for making Fantasia (1940) a GA! And also because you made a GA out of three consecutive Disney articles (Cars, Pinocchio and this). I wish you all the best for making more GA's out of Disney articles. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Koala15 (talk) 05:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Jungle Book (1967 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Jungle Book (1967 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished the review and put it on hold for seven days. It's a good article - only a few minor points need to addressing. Let me know when you're done with them. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For making Disney's Jungle Book a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Corpse Bride

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Corpse Bride you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Corpse Bride

The article Corpse Bride you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Corpse Bride for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quarter Million Award

		The Quarter Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Corpse Bride (estimated annual readership: 276,997) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Corpse Bride to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! And again, congratulations! –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Jungle Book (1967 film)

On 17 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Jungle Book (1967 film), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Walt Disney died during the production of his last film, The Jungle Book? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Jungle Book (1967 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disney and Pixar articles

Your work in this area is unparalleled, and as a lover of these grand animated films, I can't thank you enough for your tireless efforts to bring them up to scratch. Just thought I'd let you feast your eyes on some stats I've put together on the article quality of some of the categories. Its fascinating to see how low many of the articles are (or at least were, when I first created these stat articles in 2012 - before your improvements). Nevertheless there is much work to be done.

I was also wondering if, due to your expertise, you could look over some of the work I've been doing in the realm of animated films and perhaps build upon them through copyediting, research, or other helpful advice to make the articles even better?--Coin945 (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3

Thanks ill check them out. Koala15 (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Though I'm the first to admit that I'm not the greatest Wikipedia editor, I have a massive passion for this topic so have tried to improve the articles with great effort. I sincerely hope you and I can make some of these articles really good. :)--Coin945 (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prashant! -- Prashant! (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peanuts (film)

On 31 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peanuts (film), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the scheduled release of the Peanuts movie in 2015 would "commemorate the 65th anniversary of the comic strip and the 50th anniversary of the TV special A Charlie Brown Christmas"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peanuts (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Corpse Bride

I would like to create this post to prevent unnecessary future edits. Peter Lorre the actor that I am referencing originally called Laszlo Lowenstein was already in the wikipedia page before I edited it. Peter Lorre and Laszlo are the same people. He changed his name.

But do you have a reliable source to back up your claim? Koala15 (talk) 01:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Lorre was already cited as the source of inspiration before my edit I am not saying anything new. If you want to know about Peter Lorre as the inspiration of maggot you should talk to the previous user I am simply adding additional information. The source for Peter Lorre should not be my responsibility no offense to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.129.229.27 (talk) 02:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, it looks like you are correct i found a better source so i will add it in. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Koala15 (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.129.229.27 (talk) 03:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How copyright concerns are handled on Wikipedia

Hello, User:Koala15. I'm not the one who identified the copyvio - I am the administrator who tagged the dispute after the contents were removed and then twice restored and the problem was reported at WT:CP. The listing does not result in the deletion of whole articles when a specific section is problematic - as the template says, "Unless the copyright status of the text on this page is clarified, the problematic text or' the entire page may be deleted one week after the time of its listing." (emphasis added)

The listing should be addressed within several days time. In the meantime, as the template indicates, it should not be removed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The plot was removed, as I indicated, several times and put back. When disputes like this occur, the listing gives the contributor who disputes the finding time to argue his case and, if necessary, to rewrite the content. Frankly, I think plot removal would have been the better way to go, but when the removal is disputed the listing at WP:CP gives an opportunity for opposition to be aired and explored. Akin to an WP:AFD template, it lets people know how to voice their disagreement or reasons the content is okay or to aid in rewriting. It just takes a few days. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disney

Just now I noticed you managed to get The Jungle Book, of which I had done most of the hard work, into the Good Articles. Anyway, can you take a look at The Lion King, which I hope to finally restore the green shield on the corner? Thanks. igordebraga ≠ 05:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ill try to work on that one after i finish my next GA. Koala15 (talk) 15:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also left a review for Lion King. Feel free to edit accordingly with my input there. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty and the Beast

If you wanted the GA review for Beauty and the Beast to begin afresh, it would have been better to just call up someone else to take over as reviewer in the same GA review page instead of creating a new page. Maybe if I have time, I will serve as the new reviewer. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how that works. But yeah, whichever. Koala15 (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I've stepped in as GA reviewer! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Koala, I feel sorry for the failure of the GA review (I can't believe the article has failed its GA review three times in a row!) But I feel that after you fix all what the reviewer said, it will look GA worthy. So I wish you better luck for the next review. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite sorry myself. I'm sure everyone worked really hard on it and hate to have to let their hopes down again. I would like to remind you though that I'm willing to give a reassessment after it's been touched up. Spend at least a week or so improving the article, and then contact me when you feel ready to re-nominate. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 08:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article now is in much better shape. Just fix up the citations issues I mentioned and it will finally be GA! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

The article Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prashant! -- Prashant! (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

The article Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 18:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pinocchio, etc.

Thanks for understanding. I just posted a question on this (prior to your correction) on the Film Project page. In the future, I think I'm going to post both dates, when there is a difference between the premiere and the actual release. I think most folks use imdb.com, which goes by the earliest date. I've been using the AFI database, which is pretty thorough, although not infallible (as my research into the release of the other Disney film - Fantasia showed me).Onel5969 (talk) 00:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah its always best to use both dates. Koala15 (talk) 02:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

Hi. Would you care to comment at this RfC for the article Artpop? It originally started as a proposal to remove an unverifiable statement decided upon by editors in a previous consensus but has moved to a similar proposal titled "Agyle's proposal". If not, feel free to ignore message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 04:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For making Disney's Beauty and the Beast a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rio 2, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brazilian and Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasia

Hi. We had a discussion on the Film Project page regarding this. You can find the discussion here. I know it's a thin discussion, and am open to re-opening it. Please add your thoughts there.Onel5969 (talk) 02:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, since this movie had such a complicated release we can make an exception. Koala15 (talk) 02:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2

Re your reversion of my edits to the article:

You'll notice that I raised objections to the way in which the prose is structured in the "Development" section. I've already done some copy editing but it requires more work. I draw your attention to this specific paragraph: "On March 14, 2014 the Nevada Film Office announced that Sony Pictures had been awarded the first certificate of eligibility for the tax credit for the film Mall Cop 2.[10] Nevada Film Office Director, Eric Preiss, indicated that the production would get $4.3 million in tax credits based on the proposal in their application.[11] On March 25, 2014 Neal McDonough was added to the cast of the film to play the role of villain.[3] Daniella Alonso was also added to the cast on April 7, she would play Divina Martinez, the general manager of the Wynn Hotel, who is completely perplexed when Blart presumes that she's hitting on him.[4] On April 2, Sony set the film for an April 17, 2015 release date.[12] On April 25 D. B. Woodside joined the cast of the film.". This sequential order of events makes this section read quite clumsily. Why not name all the actors who were added to the cast, regardless of when they were added. My edit summary said the article read like a news release. The prose needs improvement so fix it if you wish the tag to be removed. EagerToddler39 (talk) 00:26, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah ill try to copy edit it. Koala15 (talk) 00:36, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Simpsons Brick Like Me.png

A tag has been placed on File:The Simpsons Brick Like Me.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Simpsons Brick Like Me.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Simpsons Brick Like Me.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disney film translations

The translation of songs and films etc. within the animated canon is a huge operation that is very well documented and very interesting. Sources for such an article would include The translation of songs in Disney's Beauty and the Beast: An example of manipulation. This article would follow the format of similar articles like Translations of The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter in translation. I would not even know where to begin so I offer it as a possibly pursuable project. If this sounds like something to interest you, I can obviously help out with gathering sources. (But the actual creating of articles TBH i can struggle with due to wanting to include every little tidbit and finding it hard to paraphrase without losing vital information, resulting in a quote-filled article).--Coin945 (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of other potential sources. (some great info about theme parks, which could be a supplementary angle than the films). Before even knowing what an article like this would include, I think an info dump to see all the possible angles is a good way to go:

[1]
'Frozen' Composer Robert Lopez on the Perils of Translating 'Let It Go'
'Let It Go': A Global Hit In Any Language
Disney’s Frozen – how to find a voice that fits
'Frozen': Finding a diva in 41 languages
Breaking Free of the Language Barrier in Music
A non-notable blog but a good compendium of keywords for further research etc.
Moraicity in Translated versus Native Japanese Text setting
An example of the multilangauge song vids put out by Disney (and a Telegraph article about it)
Disney View: The Studio Ghibli Fiasco
The Laziest Animated Movie Title Translations Ever
An article about an Arabic dubber of Disney films
The translation of linguistic stereotypes in animated films: a case study of DreamWorks’ Shrek and Shark Tale - tangential yet interesting analysis of Dreamworks films
Disney Localization for Chinese Viewers
Lion King & translation
Di Giovanni, E. (2003) 'Cultural Otherness and Global Communication in Walt Disney Films at the Turn of the Century', The Translator, Special Issue
Then there is also the issue of Disney's translation and adaptian of the original source material. But that is probably too much of a tangent.
The benefits of audio description for blind children.
Film Translation──a Field Of Growing Importance in Translation

Yeah maybe, that sounds interesting. Koala15 (talk) 17:24, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plácido Domingo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Minions

As far as the cast is concerned, I am going with the current listing of what IMDB is going with until otherwise. NoseNuggets (talk) 1:00 PM US EDT May 6 2014.

Mad Max

Village road is Australian, there are no American production companies involved.

Village Roadshow Pictures Atotalstranger (talk) 08:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros. is American and i believe they partially funded it. Koala15 (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Song genre reverts

What's with the reverts, according to various media sources and DJ Mustard himself, Ratchet (music genre) is considered a genre within hip hop.Backendgaming (talk) 04:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure there is no genre called "Ratchet" it is only a phrase to describe certain types of music, and even if it was you can't just change every song to the genre "Ratchet". You should probably read WP:GWAR. Koala15 (talk) 04:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Loiter Squad logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loiter Squad logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plots of Simpsons

I saw that you write a plots episodes of Family Guy...so I decided to ask you to help a bit and Simpsons. Do you want? There are some episodes to expand, like Specs and the City, Diggs, The Winter of His Content, You Don't Have to Live Like a Referee, What to Expect When Bart's Expecting and Pay Pal. Djole 555 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i will try but i might have to watch them again, lol. Koala15 (talk) 19:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for expand listed episodes. When you will to do for an episode The Yellow Badge of Cowardge? Greeting! Djole 555 — Preceding undated comment added 19:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, ill try to write a plot for The Yellow Badge of Cowardge right now. Koala15 (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote something for Days of Future Future, but I'm not sure that it is good written. Can you check plot and edit it if something is wrong. Thanks in advance. Djole 555

Looks good i added to it a bit. Koala15 (talk) 23:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robot Chicken (season 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malcolm X (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iggy Azalea The New Classic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iggy Azalea The New Classic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Boondocks (season 4)

Show me a current source and I'll back down. I might also note that sometimes shows are out on DVD before they air. The set costs 40 dollars which I doubt they'd sell for only 10 episodes. They might have also decided to break up the season into two broadcast runs of 10 episodes. Grapesoda22 (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Reunion sampling Bagpipes from Baghdad by Eminem

The Reunion contains a sample of the song "Bagpipes from Baghdad", as performed by Eminem. It needs to be redone on Hell: The Sequel EP. Don't believe me, find me a source for it. If you can't, then you don't have a choice but to believe me. I have the album, and it says so in the sample credits in the short booklet. User:Skylar3214 4:50, 19 May 2014

Oh, i only deleted your edits because that censorship section was ridiculous, but you can add the sample credit back. Koala15 (talk) 02:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frankenstein (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Executive production on Hell: The Sequel by Eminem and Mr. Porter

Mr. Porter was not the co-executive producer, just because Eminem was the executive producer. Mr. Porter was also the executive producer, like it's displayed in the short booklet that says so. That means that Eminem and Mr. Porter ARE the executive producers for the EP. User:Skylar3214 12:00, 20 May 2014

Hello?! Can you change it back? Mr. Porter are both the executive producers, as described in the EP booklet. That was for not responding back, like you did the last few times. Skylar3214 7:33, 27 July 2014

Yeah sure, add it back. Koala15 (talk) 02:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

G5s

By the way, I've never liked these types of deletions because sometimes they affect people who had nothing to do with the disruption that caused the deletion in the first place. But procedurally it's the deleting admin or someone familiar with the SPI that needs to make a call as to whether or not an article can be restored. That said, if you agree not to restore it to article space until you get a response from James, I'll userify the content for you. Deal? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I wanna improve it anyway. Koala15 (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Ambergris (Bob's Burgers)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ambergris (Bob's Burgers), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.ovguide.com/tv_episode/bobs-burgers-season-4-episode-18-ambergris-4707590), and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ambergris (Bob's Burgers) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Ambergris (Bob's Burgers), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ambergris (Bob's Burgers) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ambergris (Bob's Burgers). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ambergris (Bob's Burgers) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I accept that the content you re-added is not particularly substantial, but it is still obviously copied from the source. As you must well know, that is not acceptable here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't know how words can be copyrighted, I don't think I'll ever understand why we can't copy a plot that Fox gives in their press release. I also didn't even get this plot from ovguide. But I will remove it for now and write a better one when I have free time. Koala15 (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Your recent editing history at Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 20:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I did. So did AbramTerger but you didn't warm him so I guess you only warn people you disagree with. Keep up the good work! Koala15 (talk) 20:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You did have multiple editors reverting you, while you were the only one reverting him. In all fairness though, I apologize for not immediately warning him too, but see here. STATic message me! 22:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay and Craig

Why did you undo my edits to "Sanjay and Craig?" --SalmonCat (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cause you were adding trivial facts to the cast section. Koala15 (talk) 14:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pound of Flesh (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joshua James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Little Dragon Nabuma Rubberband.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Little Dragon Nabuma Rubberband.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

Stop changing the title of Shaun the Sheep the Movie back to just Shaun the Sheep. This is the official title of the movie.

This is what Aardman officially announced it as. ("Teaser Trailer Released for Shaun the Sheep the Movie!")
This is what it says on the official movie poster.
This is what it's called on the official Studio Canal UK YouTube channel. ("From Aardman, the creators of Wallace & Gromit and Chicken Run, Shaun the Sheep the Movie is coming to cinemas worldwide from Spring 2015!")

StopmotionEd (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but are they just calling it Shaun the Sheep the Movie for people to not confuse it with the show? Cause the majority of sources just call it Shaun the Sheep. Koala15 (talk) 19:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter why they did it, it's still the official name of the film. StopmotionEd (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Metacritic's "normalized" scores

Despite Metacritic's claims, their scores are not "normalized". Please see WT:Manual of Style/Film/Archive 6#Metacritic's so-called "normalized" scores. Thanks. 75.177.156.78 (talk) 23:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Little Mermaid (1989 film)

The article The Little Mermaid (1989 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Little Mermaid (1989 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on another Disney GA :) XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing at 2014 in hip hop music

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 in hip hop music, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. You have been told several times, and have never given a reason for the removals. From now on I'll be reverting any such edits. Wetdogmeat (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I only removed that album because it doesn't look like it was released today. I don't think that warrants a warning like that. Koala15 (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was released today. It was shipped with the Fait Accompli orders. It is a limited edition physical release that can only be bought directly from Canibus. I've told you multiple times about deleting entries from the article simply because you don't know anything about the albums or the artists. I've told you before to simply leave any entries like that alone; I check this article daily, I will take care of them. Saying that "it doesn't look like it was released today" might be an explanation for moving the entry to the 'unspecified' section, but you chose instead to delete it. You've done the same thing three or four times now, and that absolutely warrants a warning. Just stop doing it. Wetdogmeat (talk) 15:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well you know how hip hop albums go, they get pushed back so often so i can never tell if it was released or not if its not on a retail site. Koala15 (talk) 19:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but, again, that would explain you moving it to the 'unspecified' section, not deleting it entirely. Just leave it where it is in the future if you don't know what to do with it, and I'll sort it out. - Wetdogmeat (talk) 20:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Barnstar

	Good Article Barnstar
	For Disney's The Little Mermaid. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But why does the infobox have French as the second language? I don't remember the film having any French dialogue, after all it set in either Crotia or Denmark. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Le poissons, les poissons, he he he, haw haw haw". :P Best reference to genocide in a Disney movie ever.--Coin945 (talk) 07:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed "French" from the infobox. Undo it if I am wrong. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i think your right, thanks for the barn star. Koala15 (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Ambition Second Week Sales

So, wait until they post the chart standings on Billboard and the sales on HipHopDx or the site I pulled the info from? I think Thursday is when that information is released. Maybe, tomorrow, perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RodneyP43 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah HipHopDX usually posts the full sales on Wednesday, Hits Daily Double is sometimes way off with their estimates so its best not use them. Koala15 (talk) 23:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do. Unless someone beats me to the punch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RodneyP43 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maps (Maroon 5 song)

User:Mayast leave it these genres as "pop, pop rock" without citation. I saw E! (source from "Composition" section) says "uptempo track" but does not says "pop". So I found MTV News says "midtempo pop tune", and Fuse says "rock-pop track" (actually it's pop rock).

P.S. Make sure if "References" section has the same link. 183.171.160.18 (talk) 06:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's because pop is mentioned in the second ref in this section (Radio.com: "more straightforward pop sheen"). I didn't want to put ref tags next to each word, but if you prefer it, I've added it now, together with the Fuse citation about pop rock. Mayast (talk) 08:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is this referring to? Koala15 (talk) 14:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wise Up Ghost.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Wise Up Ghost.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing at 2014 in hip hop music (again)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 in hip hop music, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. You have been told several times, and have never given a reason for the removals. You do not own the article, it's not up to you to decide what is or isn't hip hop. Stop trying to covertly delete entries. I check all of your edits now, so there's no point even trying. - Wetdogmeat (talk) 16:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Koala15, assuming good faith goes a long way, but we both know you did that on purpose. You are not slick at all. As Wetdogmeat said, do not act like you own the article, you most certainly do not. You do not get to decide what is or isn't hip hop. You are most certainly not an expert in the field. STATic message me! 17:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How did i act like i own the article? I just disagree with including that album since the article is not called 2014 in R&B music or 2014 in pop music. Koala15 (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You just answered your own question. Disagreeing with the inclusion of content is not grounds for your removing that content, because you do not own the article; the content of the article is determined by consensus based on sources, not the whims and opinions of Koala15. FYI, sources consistently label the artist hip hop, even if not primarily so. Google "ed sheeran hip hop" and see for yourself. - Wetdogmeat (talk) 19:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well this deed that says i own the article says different. ;) Koala15 (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again you repeat the R&B/pop comment when x is less pop then G I R L, which you were so ambient on including. Before you started editing the annual hip hop articles there was already consensus to include certain R&B releases as long as they do some rapping or are submerged into the hip hop scene (R. Kelly, The-Dream, Chris Brown, Ty Dolla Sign etc.). There is no 2014 in R&B music article and without the R&B/soul records of the 50-70s there would be no hip hop. Its not like we are talking about female pop R&B like Mariah Carey or J. Lo, Ed Sherran performs hip hop soul music, but as you admitted to me, you have no clue about his music outside of his radio songs. As Wetdogmeat said, do any bit of research on a subject before edit warring about it. STATic message me! 20:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar
	Gerald Shields, founder of the North Korean Fashion Watch, awards you the North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar for your continuing efforts to add reliable and poignant discussions about North Korean topics, such as the 2014 comedy movie The Interview. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paula (album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. –Chase (talk / contribs) 15:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Paula (album), you may be blocked from editing. "Opinions of the album" are exactly what a review is. You are removing evaluations of the album and its tracks from credible publications without proper reason. A review does not need a score to be considered a review. Please stop your disruptive editing or you may be blocked. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, even if those were not reviews (which they are), the appropriate action would be to move them from another section, not completely remove them for no reason. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Beast is a tabloid we don't include opinions from tabloids. There will be enough reviews to fill up the section come next week, no need to have those there now. And stop acting like i'm vandalizing the article. Koala15 (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of your opinion on The Daily Beast, which is a known and notable news organization (and I need to see discussions from other Wikipedia editors that have determined it is not acceptable to use as a source before we go just based off your opinion), Stereogum, Complex, and Vibe are all well-known music publications. Removing this sourced content was inappropriate, and while I have not called you a vandal, removing sourced content is most definitely considered disruptive editing.

And as I previously said, if you felt the content did not belong in the reviews section, the proper action would have been to move it to a different section, not delete it altogether. If something cannot be used in one section, it can usually be used elsewhere. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:32, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well then put it in another section, cause if it goes back in the reception section, it will be removed. Maybe a Themes section or something? Koala15 (talk) 23:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Beast - "Paula won’t be available to the public for another five days or so, but I’ve spent the last 24 hours listening to an advance copy of the album and trying to figure out whether Thicke’s new music is any good. My first impression? Not really. But that doesn’t mean the record isn’t interesting."
Daily Beast - "If you’d rather, however, see Paula as a cautionary tale about gender, narcissism, celebrity culture, and what not do when someone dumps you, there’s plenty of that here, too. Thicke seems to think Paula is all “about” Patton, but really, it’s all about him—his self-flagellation, his mea culpas, his pleas, his epiphanies."
Daily Beast - "Ultimately, the sense you get is of a guy who doesn’t know the difference between being a good pickup artist and being a good husband. That said, an album isn’t a gossip mag or a sociological treatise; it’s a collection of songs."
Daily Beast - "The problem is that it’s also a muddle. Thicke is too much of a pop artist—too concerned with hit-making—to fully follow his muse, and too heated, at least at the moment, to take his time and find the ideal form for his feelings."
Daily Beast - "As a whole, Paula is neither catchy enough for the charts nor inventive enough to justify its shortage of hooks."
Stereogum - "he would have been a lot better off bringing back Pharrell or, like, any top-notch writers and producers. Usher’s similarly minded Confessions worked because it was stacked with absolute jams, whereas Paula has maybe one or two songs I’d ever like to hear again. Thicke has always been a vanilla kind of guy, and his talents mainly lie with his effortlessly smoky vocals. As evidenced by songs like “Too Little, Too Late,” which I originally mistook for one of those obnoxious McDonald’s ads that runs on Spotify, he’s not nearly as good at creating the atmosphere in which those vocals thrive. Opener “You’re My Fantasy” proves it really does take two to tango, and the gospel piano ballad “Still Madly Crazy” feels way too sane. The background singers seem a lot more invested in the cutesy concept of “Lock The Door.” So much of the album implicitly communicates, “See? I can be boring for you!” Even the relatively flavorful blues-rocker “Black Tar Cloud,” which puts that all-female chorus to mighty fine use, is plagued by horrendous lyrics such as “Thought that everyone was gonna eat the chip/ Turns out I’m the only one who double-dipped.” I’m all for reconciliation if the guy is really cleaning up his act, and I’m all for Thicke remaining in the public eye if he keeps releasing songs as eminently likable as “Blurred Lines.” It’s just that these songs aren’t strong enough to save a marriage or a career."

This is what I've pulled from the sources you removed from the article. These are very clearly critical commentaries on the album. I'll give you the fact that the Vibe and Complex write-ups aren't usable for the reception section, but they can be used elsewhere. But please explain to me why the other two should not be included. –Chase (talk / contribs) 00:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on a post written before the album has come out isn't a review and doesn't belong in the review section. And like i said, The Daily Beast is tabloid and comments from them are probably not notable enough for us to use. Koala15 (talk) 00:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Little Boy (film)

Hello, thanks for contributing Wikipedia, specially in Films dept. Please add a source to confirm that movie's filming has done already. I'll also help with it. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 18:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was filmed like 3 years ago, the Facebook has pictures. Koala15 (talk) 18:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my! But we should find a better source for it's confirmation. I'll try to find it in the morning. It's midnight here, so Good Night and keep contributing :). --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 18:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ratchet and Clank (film) - ISA

Hi Koala15, Why do you keep on removing information related to the International Sales of the film Ratchet and Clank ? Cinema Management Group is the international sales agent - check their website: http://www.cinemamanagementgroup.com/ and worldwide distribution of this film is relevant information! Thanks for your reply

A company that sells movies to distributors, isn't notable. Koala15 (talk) 18:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's just your personal opinion, but in the Film Industry it is very notable. (Gingerhell (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Removing sourced content without reason

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Neon Icon. STATic message me! 03:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed that review because it basically gave the album a joke rating, if we want the encyclopedia to be taken seriously we probably shouldn't use ratings from sites like that. Koala15 (talk) 04:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The site is considered professional for music reviews from Metacritic and not in any of your disruptive edits have you gave any reasoning or proof to your opinion. This is not something new is it? It was not a joke review, the 0/10 to 10/10 was based on if Riff Raff is serious or not, or if it was meant to be taken seriously as a hip-hop album. Fine to remove it from the table, but to remove it from the prose repeatedly, especially when doing it again hidden in another edit. You have warned many times to stop edit warring to remove sourced content without a valid reason. You must abide by WP:BRD, if you make a bold edit, are reverted, you must take the dispute to the article talk page, not continue to edit war. STATic message me! 05:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Metacritic is the end all be all when it comes to reviews, and i don't think any random reader would understand a review that's 0/10 or 10/10. But i wasn't trying to edit war. Koala15 (talk) 14:13, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stan Knows Best, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Barker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trigga (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1403967991&sr=8-1&keywords=trey+songz+smartphones |title=SmartPhones [Explicit]: Trey Songz: MP3 Downloads |publisher=Amazon.com |date= |accessdate=2014-06-28}}</
ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1403968049&sr=8-1&keywords=trey+songz+foreign |title=Foreign [Explicit]: Trey Songz: MP3 Downloads |publisher=Amazon.com |date= |accessdate=2014-06-28}}</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Get On Up (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul0PlrmwScM |title=MASTERCLASS: AAKOMON "AJ" JONES INSTRUCTIONAL PT 2 [DS2DIO |publisher=YouTube |date=2012-10-26 |accessdate=2014-07-20}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Juicy J discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rise of the Planet of the Apes poster

Alright, it finally showed up. Until just now I was still not seeing the new poster with a billing block. However it still is an advance poster with an upcoming release date. I won't protest it as I prefer to have a billing block, but others may prefer having the image of the fully visible ape. - Gothicfilm (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remember how the posters were released when the movie came out, but this appears to be the United States theatrical poster. Cause the one we had up was a UK poster which doesn't make sense cause its a US film. Koala15 (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's My Birthday

Hey, can you please upload a single cover for this article, because it's too small :S — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.20.121 (talk) 21:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, i just did it. Koala15 (talk) 00:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thanks for new article, but please check links. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, i did not realize there were more. Koala15 (talk) 18:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) In ictu oculi (talk) 23:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not Alone

Hey it's again me, the one who *always* (not always thought) tells you to ulpoad a cover for music singles :D Maybe you don't even know that song but please can you upload a cover for this song. You can search it on Google, but this one is the official i think I really can't do it, thsi is why i'm always asking you :/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.5.162 (talk) 21:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i uploaded it. You can also upload them yourself if you register a Wikipedia account. Koala15 (talk) 23:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IPs

Please be more careful with your edit summaries, or someone may think you aren't being polite. Regarding the second half of this edit's edit summary: We do assume good faith for non-logged in editors just as much as for logged-in editors unless there is a reason not to. The 3-revert rule applies to you as well as to the non-logged-in editor.

Granted, sometimes sockpuppets of banned editors and totally-clueless non-logged in editors edit in a way that makes the assumption of good faith go away. Even when that happens, it's best to argue that the edit is wrong, not that there is something wrong with the editor unless it's obvious or egregious. When obvious abuse happens, it may be time to go to WP:SPI or WP:AN/I.

Now, as for this particular edit, I'm not familiar enough with the topic at hand to know if this is a case of an abusive editor or if it's the much more common case of two editors (you and him) with a difference of opinion about what should be in the article. If it's the latter, please discuss it on the talk page. If it's the former, consider going to WP:AN/I. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i didn't mean it literally, just kind of frustrated cause he keeps reverting me. Koala15 (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

22 Jump Street

added a link pointing to Variety

All About Steve (American Dad!)

added a link pointing to Chris McKenna

An Apocalypse to Remember

added a link pointing to Stalk

Irregarding Steve

added a link pointing to Chris McKenna

Joint Custody (American Dad!)

added a link pointing to Hotwire

Star Trek (American Dad!)

added a link pointing to Chris McKenna

Tears of a Clooney

added a link pointing to Chris McKenna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 12 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Bob's Burgers episodes page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juicy J's new album

Hello, as i see you're interested in hip hop music. I still don't understand why there's no page about American rapper Juicy J's upcoming album. It will release only in 2 months and i think it's time to write about the album since Juicy has already announced many details about the album during many interviews.--46.130.19.108 (talk) 19:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah probably because there's not a whole lot of info about it, but if it gets a release date I'm sure someone will create it. Koala15 (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Planes: Fire & Rescue page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bar Mitzvah Hustle

added a link pointing to Chris McKenna

Choosy Wives Choose Smith

added a link pointing to Practice

There Will Be Bad Blood

added a link pointing to Native-American

Widowmaker (American Dad!)

added a link pointing to National Geographic

Wife Insurance

added a link pointing to Patrick Wilson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robot Chicken episode summaries

On the Robot Chicken (season 7) page, you reverted my removal of summaries copied from tvguide.com and then altered only one of them. I have again removed the summaries that are in violation. Please do not revert this without correcting all of the offending summaries. Ryan8374 (talk) 21:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but i did re write them after. Koala15 (talk) 23:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You rewrote the one with Kim Possible. None of the others were touched. I verified them before I removed them. Ryan8374 (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding wiki-links and any other metadata not normally seen on the page does not count. All of these can be found verbatim on tvguide.com.

The still-offending summaries:

G.I. Jogurt - A puppet orgy; why God hates bees; a drunken visitor from Narnia; a rock song from the Dino-Riders; and Cobra Commander joins SAG.

Link's Sausages - What's really behind Punky Brewster's Punky Power; Clarice Starling runs into Multiple Miggs; Skeletor tries to blow up Snake Mountain.

Secret of the Booze - An alien's identity is questioned; Bert gets a new roommate; the Terminator becomes a step-father; Papa Smurf goes undercover.

Rebel Appliance - An uncomfortable talk between a father and daughter; the origin of the bagpipes; Alex Mack goes to prom; and a trip into Game of Thrones.

Legion of Super-gyros - Gerry gets infected in World War Z; Benjamin Franklin's latest invention is revealed; Hannah from "Girls" has a new boyfriend; and the prequel to "The Parent Trap" is revealed.

El Skeletorito - The Cryptkeeper brings terror; Iron Sheik appears; the crew brainstorms a Candy Crush movie; and Woody Woodpecker receives a phone call.

Up, Up, & Buffet - Scrooge McDuck appears on Shark Tank; Fred Flintstone gets a colonoscopy; Shrek has a moment of clarity; Doc from Mike Tyson's Punchout passes on.Ryan8374 (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i did it. Your welcome. Koala15 (talk) 04:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content

Please do not remove content from the Run the Jewels album page, even if it is trivia, You will be blocked if you remove it again/Jusgtr (talk) 05:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jusgtr:: Please read WP:TRIVIA, which explains that trivia sections should be avoided and may only be used in appropriate sections. You were wrong for re-adding the content and your personal attacks/threats, which aren't allowed here.

@Koala15:: Don't be alarmed, Jusgtr's warning to you was not needed at all. You and User:STATicVapor were correct about this obvious trivia.

IPadPerson (talk) 15:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i really don't why he keeps adding it. Koala15 (talk) 16:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Koala15:: It is likely that he is the one that would be blocked, not you and STATic. IPadPerson (talk) 17:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Koala15 (talk) 17:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting other user's edits

Hi. The next time you want to revert other user's edits, like you did to mine for Ratchet & Clank (film) and Animal Ambition in the past, always leave an explanation in the revision history right away, please. It's only a suggestion. Skylar3214 12:56, 23 July 2014

I usually always do, unless its blatant vandalism. Koala15 (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, start putting explanations when you revert other users' edits from now on. If there's no explanation for a revert, then it will be put back to the way it was. Skylar3214 6:00, 23 July 2014

Unnecessary reverting

Please read the guideline I've cited in my edit summary to Trigga (album). Template:Rating is quite clear about using digits in place of the star-ratings template when the source did not use stars to illustrate their rating:

Please only use this template if the rating was originally expressed with the images used. For example, if a reviewer awards something a rating of "4" (expressed in digits not stars) on a scale of 5, you should simply write it as "4" or "4/5" in your article, depending on how it is presented by the source. Do not use where the source does not use stars, because it is inaccurate and misleading.

This is an MOS issue, not an issue of whether dots mean the same thing as stars. The template page is clear enough not to warrant any further reverting. Otherwise, take it to the talk page if you have anything more to add. Dan56 (talk) 20:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I gotta say its been a pleasure not running into the most stubborn editor on Wikipedia for a while, until now. I don't see why there is a problem with this, Now uses red dots and its the same thing as stars. You don't have problem with the HipHopDX rating even though they use X's. I remember i saw a red dot album rating template on a few album pages. Do you know the name of that? Koala15 (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Worst Stan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steve Smith and Roger Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bandz a Make Her Dance

Hey. Why don't you write about Juicy J's "Bandz a Make Her Dance"? Seriously i really would like to have more info about that song on the English Wiki, but unfortunately idk where to find the background or the other details :$ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.4.71 (talk) 21:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did create the article a while back, but i will have to look around to see if i can find any info to expand it. Koala15 (talk) 01:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thnx! I fouind some links but they are vidoes :S ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.45.142 (talk) 07:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Banco (Sir Michael Rocks album)

Hello Koala15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Banco (Sir Michael Rocks album) for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheMagikCow (talk) 18:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Testimony (August Alsina album), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. STATic message me! 18:32, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell? I moved a damn section to a spot you don't prefer and you have the nerve to give me a warning like that? The fact that you even care that i moved a section to a spot it's supposed be is quite odd in its own right. Koala15 (talk) 18:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No you removed the template that I had to add back for the billionth time. You do not even pay attention to the edits you make. STATic message me! 23:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to My Own Lane may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

king-los-bizzy-crook/ |title=Kid Ink Announces My Own Lane Tour With King Los & Bizzy Crook [PHOTO |publisher=Hip-Hop Wired |date=2014-02-13 |accessdate=2014-08-01}}</ref> The tour is

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lip Lock may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|Eve]]. The album, her first in eleven years, was released on May 14, 2013, by From The Rib and [[RED Distribution]. The album features [[guest appearance]]s from [[Gabe Saporta]], [[Dawn Richard (
ref=sr_1_album_2_rd?ie=UTF8&child=B00B6I0C8K&qid=1365197736&sr=1-2 |title=She Bad Bad [Remix] (feat. Pusha T and Juicy J): Eve: MP3 Downloads |publisher=Amazon.com |date= |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American Dad! editing dispute

I have turned the discussion at Talk:American Dad!#Season 11 & season 12 dispute over to the Dispute Resolution NoticeBoard as User:Wattlebird doesn't seem to think consensus and opposition against him is satisfactory, resulting in his continued reversions and edit warring. Dispute Resolution Noticeboard rules indicate that I'm to inform all editors involved in the discussion of my submission in case they would like to provide input. If you you would like to provide your input regarding the edit under dispute, that be much appreciated. The Dispute Noticeboard Discussion is here Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:American Dad!#Season 11 & season 12 dispute. Cheers! AmericanDad86 (talk) 00:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American Dad

It's easy to say that you're going to improve the articles, but in my experience, people often don't follow through with what they say. You can use a sandbox to edit them in the mean time, but I don't agree with leaving episode pages that contain next to no information just because some day somebody might improve them. However for now, I'll stop redirecting the pages if you stop recreating the pages already redirected. JDDJS (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 00:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 00:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 00:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 00:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 02:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 02:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go to Talk:List_of_American_Dad!_episodes#Redirect_of_episodes

I already said multiple times that the discussion on whether or not to redirect the articles will take place at Talk:List_of_American_Dad!_episodes#Redirect_of_episodes. I chose this place instead of the episodes articles or my talk page because it should be consistent and public. If you don't participate in the discussion there, then don't complain when I redirect the articles. JDDJS (talk) 04:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Hi, please note that common terms are not linked] without a pretty good reason. Tony (talk) 03:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All About Steve (American Dad!), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Barker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Wow that was awful"

Could you explain why? 23W 22:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I may have been a little dramatic with that statement, i just didn't like what you did with the cast list. But overall very good improvements on the article, it looks good. Koala15 (talk) 04:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm planning on promoting it to GA after the season ends. The character list was bordering on being indiscriminate with all the secondary characters listed, so I condensed it to just the main characters (maybe I shouldn't have split it into columns). I'll try to clean it up, but what do you think? 23W 04:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Slim Shady LP

File:The_Slim_Shady_LP_CD_tracklisting.jpeg;

Here is a scan of my copy of Eminem's 1999 major label debut album "The Slim Shady LP" track listing; I have had it since I was a kid; got it for my 6th birthday (the year it was released) and have nigh on memorised every little detail of the album cover; artwork; booklet etc and it does not have on the back of it any of the featured artists names (IE Dr. Dre, Dina Rae, Royce da 5'9") on the back. Just thought I'd let you know Bling$Bling$Blang$Blang$ (talk) 19:50, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. Koala15 (talk) 01:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tha Carter V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 23:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 23:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 23:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 23:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 23:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 23:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 02:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Honeymoon

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paris Honeymoon, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.primewiremovies.org/movie/247958/paris-honeymoon-1939.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 21:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 21:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Thicke

Hey can you please upload a photo of Robin Thicke from the 2013 MTV VMA performance? I can't really do it because i have no idea about copyrights. Please if you upload it then let it be a free picture.. i mean i would like it to be available for every wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.39.202 (talk) 21:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if their are any free ones available. Koala15 (talk) 01:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at JDDJS's talk page.
Message added 02:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JDDJS (talk) 02:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Mermaid (1989 film)

Hi, I just reverted your revert of my edit. The reason for my deletion is on the talk page, please discuss it there if you disagree. AD (talk) 22:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

East Side of Heaven

added a link pointing to Jane Jones

Thieves (1977 film)

added a link pointing to Ian Martin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

psst Koala

when accuse someone of advertising "their site" and you are clueless whether it is their site, is that what your team does at wiki? you didnt get this month's allowance from the industry? not enough funds coming through? There are a dozen instances dating from 2008 where wiki editors have posted excerpts from this publication in a dozen stubs where the subject matter fails the "notable" criteria and yet Wiki's editors have allowed the excerpt since it was convenient and helpful to the stub and the donation from the company that commissioned the sub. Well I did a little research before posting the comment from the mag and noted it was already featured in wikipedia on several pieces. Your argument is typical of the problem mentioned in the press, if the excerpt is convenient for wiki the notable critieria is overlooked, if the comment is inconvenient the notable criteria is used as a crutch to remove something that could have relevance but is either inappropriate or not suited to the decorative taste of the page editor. As I asked before are you PMSing right now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.86.88 (talk) 02:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it is your site but usually when people post reviews from amateur sites, it means they are advertising their own. And just because you saw it on a few articles, that does not make it notable. Koala15 (talk) 02:29, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Your recent editing history at Sin City: A Dame to Kill For shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You should know better than to engage an IP editor troll in a war. Oosh (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course i realized i could be in violation of this rule, but i felt i shouldn't leave this advertising content on the page. I tried everything with this editor but he just kept edit warring. I don't think i should receive a warning like this for keeping the page clean. Koala15 (talk) 02:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Take a long-term view of these things, the world won't end if some rubbish sits there for a little while until an Admin can resource, it's always best to remain calm and don't feed the trolls. -Oosh (talk) 05:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Needless reversions

Hi Koala, I've noticed you've twice changed gross totals at Planes: Fire & Rescue per your personal preference, for example here, where I can't find a constructive counterargument in your summary, "keep it as a full number" or here where you don't add an edit summary at all. As I previously tried to explain in this edit, WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT isn't a valid reason to revert, nor is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, should you attempt to make that argument. Contrarily, MOS:LARGENUM says: "Precise values (often given in sources for formal or matter-of-record reasons) should appear in articles only where stable and appropriate to the context, or significant in themselves for some special reason." The precise values you are submitting for a movie still out are not stable, and there is no real context that makes them appropriate for inclusion, and they are not significant in themselves for some special reason. See also this discussion where a consensus is established on the use of these long digits in film (which I admittedly learned about recently.) I also added an embedded note at Planes to explain that the Gross infobox parameter now indicates rounded numbers, but it appears you deliberately ignored that note in this edit. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:59, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This whole not using the full gross thing is just a preference of a small number of editors, the full gross has been used on here for years. I haven't seen enough concrete rules that we can't use them. As for that date template, it is just pointless. Koala15 (talk) 04:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that you don't get to decide that the existing consensus at WT:FILM is too "small" for it to be a consensus, and (predictably) you are arguing WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Consensus has been established, consensus can change over the years, and the guidelines for expanded numbers are in the MOS, which is a Wikipedia-wide consensus. If you have a problem with these existing guidelines, then you need to argue for local consensus on all the articles you edit. Until then, you are editing against consensus established by the relevant WikiProject. Nothing in your response so far constitutes a coherent counterargument for any of these points. You have every right to participate in the various WikiProject discussions that come up, and if you don't, don't complain. But attempting to take ownership of content as you appear to be doing in this case isn't constructive, and isn't consistent with community editing. (Addendum:) Per the instructions at Template:As of: "The template {{as of}} is used to mark potentially dated statements, and will add an article to the appropriate hidden sub-category of Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements. This allows editors to catalogue statements that may become dated over time." Since we are using ephemeral dates that may get updated until such a time as they are no longer updated, the template will alert other editors of this fact, so they can update the content appropriately. That you say it is pointless (without any explanation) doesn't mean that it is pointless. It's just another thing you don't like, but can't explain why. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you think i'm trying to take "ownership" of the content lessens your argument. I just don't think that their has been a definitive enough guideline set against the full gross. Since the majority of film articles still use it. Koala15 (talk) 04:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've said already that the definitive guideline is MOS:LARGENUM, and Template:Infobox film now reflects the specific consensus established through discussion at WT:FILM. So far you've only asserted that your perspective is correct because the other "majority" of articles haven't been changed yet. The new consensus was established in May. And I'm sorry, where did you find that the "majority" of articles list the long-form gross totals? Or is that just hyperbole? If you're going to dig in your heels on this, I think I have the stronger argument since I'm citing both general MOS numerical guidelines as well as a discussion that you could have been a part of. Your argument is that you don't like it, and that all the other articles haven't been changed yet. Unless you have something more substantial than WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, I think you're out of gas. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Talk:Planes: Fire & Rescue.
Message added 05:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Since we obviously disagree, I'm opening the discussion to comments. You are encouraged to adequately state your position. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koala, consensus is established through discussion and I notice that you haven't participated in this discussion yet. It's up to you whether you will or won't, but if you choose to abstain, then I think it's reasonable of me to expect that you won't be reverting future edits that reduce long form box office gross values ($123,456,789) to condensed, rounded values ($123.5 million). I can tell that you care about movie and TV articles, and although I personally find your lack of constructive edit summaries frustrating, and your recent reversions of my edits seem arbitrary, and emotionally inspired to me, I believe that you are a good editor. You really should be participating in the various WikiProject discussions so that you can help shape the guidelines that we all use to write articles. No pressure. Just a thought. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updating Bio Pages

Hello.

When altering an article to reflect the cause of death for an individual or celebrity, please ensure that the language immediately above your edit reflects the passing (i.e, "was," rather than "is"). This is in reference to your alteration of the Jimi Jamison page. It's a somewhat common error, but it really shouldn't happen — especially not when the article is no more than 6 paragraphs in length.

Please be more careful, so that we can keep Wikipedia relevant.

Thank you.

Jonpaulusa (talk) 01:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, it was a brief accident, someone else had it fixed right away. Koala15 (talk) 02:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Renegades of the West) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Renegades of the West, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor Upjav just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your page creation! Keep it up!

To reply, leave a comment on Upjav's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Scarlet River) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Scarlet River, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor SantiLak just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article, don't forget to add a plot if you can

To reply, leave a comment on SantiLak's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Yeah, i haven't seen it so i can't add a plot, but hopefully someone will. Koala15 (talk) 04:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vote on to KEEP or CHANGE American Dad's episode guide.

Hey there, us over at the American Dad! talk page are considering are deciding if we should KEEP the longer-season number (in which Season 11 would be the "three episodes" and TBS's season would be Season 12) or CHANGING to the fewer-season method (in which Season 10 is the three episodes and Season 11 is the TBS season). On September 12, 2014, we will be changing or keeping the episode guide and are asking you to vote on to KEEP or CHANGE the episode guide. Thanks. Spongey253 (talk) 15:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question About Talib Kweli & NIKO IS

Hey There,

I saw you undid my edit adding NIKO IS as a related artist. Not sure why this happened as he is signed to Talib's label (http://www.javottimedia.com/artists/niko-is/), and he is tweeting about NIKO regularly?

https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509371432594575360 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509319598827528192 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509161357355536384 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509034254215684096 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509024951794663424 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/509001538921324545 https://twitter.com/TalibKweli/status/508858989300711424

Thanks M8, Nik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikwilliamson (talk • contribs) 20:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Him being signed to his label does not make him an associated act. They would have to have collaborated a number of times to be considered that. Koala15 (talk) 20:11, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American films

Hi, can you add new entries to the lists like this? I'm trying to make the lists as comprehensive as possible though so I'd much appreciate you adding missing films into the lists so readers can browse and access as full a lists as possible by year!♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure, i could give it a shot. Koala15 (talk) 23:44, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Series overview and potential copyright violation

With regard to your reversion here, the guidelines for the Series Overview table have been changed recently. See (MOS:TV#Series overview) The argument "no page has it this small" is not sufficient justification to restore it as it constitutes a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. Additionally, the synopses you submitted look an awful lot like content found [2] for example. We cannot copy/paste or even closely paraphrase these synopses--you can get blocked for this. Synopses must be written from scratch, preferably by someone who has seen the episode. (They should also be between 100-200 words and do more to describe the episode than provide a logline.) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So your trying get me blocked for this? Rewrite the summary's then, i still don't get how a sentence can be copyrighted. I tried to rewrite as much as i can without it going into WP:OR territory, cause i haven't seen these episodes. Koala15 (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no interest in you being blocked because I think you are generally a good editor and your contributions are useful. I do, however, have an interest in you not submitting copyrighted content, adamantly claiming that the content is original, and sparking a mini-edit war of the matter. Since my attempts to explain matters to you were unfruitful, it seems that rather than warring with you, admins should weigh in. Your other POV edits are problematic as well, since you seem to be demonstrating more often (see Needless reversions section above) that consensus is not something you care to adhere to. This is a community editing project, not the Koala15 show. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to act snippy about it, we could have solved this on our own. I just wanna know where we cross the line between paraphrasing summary's and original research. Koala15 (talk) 20:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing to suggest that we could have solved it on our own, since you keep making reverts in spite of clear references to existing guidelines, and ignoring what I felt were rational arguments, both recently and in the past. Since I am neither interested in edit warring, nor feuding, ANI seemed the quickest way to resolve the matter. As for the snippiness, please note also that I've attempted to balance my snippiness with compliments in my note above, and in some of my other notes on your page. You are allowed to watch a TV episode and write a summary of what you see. "SpongeBob does this, which results in XYZ, so the guys have to do ABC to get everything back to normal." That's not OR, as long as it doesn't contain personal interpretation, suppositions, or attempts to derive meaning, like "SpongeBob rescues Sandy Cheeks, which means he has a crush on her." For whatever reason, some contributors think that we are limited to one-sentence loglines. That is not the case. Summaries should be 100-200 words. It is probably easier to write a 100 word summary than to write a logline that isn't going to look like plagiarism. As for the Series Overview boxes, you can still participate in the shaping of that guideline if you object to the width limit. There is a lengthy discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I get your point, but it is hard for me to paraphrase a summary for an episode i haven't seen. I also find it hard to substitute the words. And about the series overview template, i just think it looks stupid so small, and with all that white space. I don't know what the people at MOS are thinking. Koala15 (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you haven't seen the episode, and are trying to write summaries based on the loglines, you will have an impossible time. We can't just tweak one or two words and move a clause around and call it original content. I would strongly recommend not writing anything, and waiting until you either see the episode, or until someone else submits a thorough summary. Wikipedia has no deadline. Re Series overview: Though a 100% wide table looks fine on a mobile phone and probably on a tablet, I have a 27 inch (68.5cm) monitor. A 100% table with four columns on it, takes up 19 inches (48.2cm) of horizontal space on my screen. That's more than two pages wide for four bits of data. Not efficient. And many people have screens even larger than that. Whitespace is not our enemy. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

~~There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.~~ Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Season 18

The Tattletale Frog/D.W. and Bud's Higher Purpose is going to be the first episode of Season 18. --24.170.75.206 (talk) 15:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Birdman

Birdman poster Someone changed the Birdman poster to another image. As the film is not yet in theatres I'm not convinced the image that replaced the one you added is actually the "Theatrical release poster" (and replacement JPEG was too heavily compressed and looks terrible). I reverted the edits but the new image is still there. I'm hoping you might know how to properly revert the actual image and not just the text on the page as I have done. (Maybe I should download your version of the image and reupload it?) -- 109.78.172.77 (talk) 13:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like that is the theatrical poster, since it has the full billing block with the rating. Koala15 (talk) 14:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

T.I. article move

So I see you nominated Paperwork to be moved so that "the motion picture" can be dropped from the title. How long does it usually take for a move nomination to be done with? BlaccCrab (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It could take a day or a few hours, in this case almost 3 days. I will try to ask an admin. Koala15 (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 21:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yelawolf

We hit the revert vandalism button at the same time. Weird stuff. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dangerous Venture) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dangerous Venture, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor Titodutta just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for starting the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Titodutta's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Copyrights

Hi Koala15, you've been asked numerous times (since at least since May 2014) to stop submitting copyrighted content, yet you still periodically submit copy/pasted loglines for example the episode synopses you submitted here can be found here and here. On your talk page you've twice said things like, "Well I don't know how words can be copyrighted" or "i still don't get how a sentence can be copyrighted". I hope you quickly do research to resolve this confusion. Books contain words. Words can be copyrighted. Television shows and songs and films contain words, and those words are copyrighted. Anything you write is automatically protected by copyright in the United States, and that includes episode loglines. This isn't a Cyphoidbomb vs. Koala15 issue, this is a basic academic issue: we do not copy/paste content from one site to this one without appropriate attribution, and even if we properly attribute, we cannot base large portions of a page's content (i.e. all the summaries) on content lifted from somewhere else. Episode synopses must be written from scratch, preferably by someone who has watched the episode, and who isn't trying to paraphrase a one-sentence logline. Wikipedia takes this seriously. Editors get indeffed for copy/pasting words,[3]. In the real world, people get kicked out of school for copy/pasting words.[4] People lose their jobs for copy/pasting words.[5][6][7][8] It is not trivial. Your contributions are valuable to the project, and it would be a real shame if you wound up indeffed for something so avoidable. I beg you to please stop with the copy/pasting. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to? Koala15 (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding? I posted links in my introductory sentence. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, that was an error. It won't happen again. Koala15 (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Koala. I have faith in you, whether you believe that or not. You are a good editor. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Marshal's Daughter) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Marshal's Daughter, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor Aytea just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Simple and well done. It will be of much greater value with an expansion of the plot section.

To reply, leave a comment on Aytea's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Alice

Dear Koala, It seems clear you work for the Disney corporation. Your entry is factually incorrect. The original sequel to Alice in Wonderland is called 'Through the Looking-Glass and what Alice found there'. Please can you correct this in your link. Alice Through The Looking Glass is not the name of the original sequel. Therefore please correct your link or I can send you the link to the Alice Through the Looking Glass website if this is what you feel people will be confused with. Wikipedia is supposed to be factually correct and impartial. I look forward to you updating accordingly. Jo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Booneystar (talk • contribs) 19:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i couldn't understand your edit, but i think i fixed it. Koala15 (talk) 20:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bob's Burgers

And the reason you keep undoing the Bob's Burgers Burger of the Day isss....? (And this better be good.) --RThompson82 (talk) 02:53, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hi RThompson82, although I really wish Koala would have used clear edit summaries, your attempts to wedge this content into Ambergris (Bob's Burgers), for example, doesn't seem to me like noteworthy content. Your edit summary, "Nope. If the Simpsons' chalkboard/couch crap is going to be in their articles, Burger of the Day will be in these. Period." attempts to assert some questionable authority over the article, which you do not have. And, your argument is basically a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. The Simpsons is a significant cultural landmark, and while Bob's Burgers is a fantastic show, it hasn't yet achieved the same status that would warrant mention of every minor gag, such as the oft-subtle Burger of the Day gags. And if you think the content is crap, why would you argue for the inclusion of more crap in an international encyclopedia? Rhetorical question. It's a pointless argument. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb, I couldn't have said it better myself. Koala15 (talk) 04:19, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its less than 2KB or text. Why is this a big fucking problem? And if my additions have to go, why then do a number of earlier episodes get to keep their Burger of the Day listings? Its not crap -- I was being sarcastic. Also, Koala, I'm looking at this page and you don't have room to talk. --RThompson82 (talk) 18:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RThompson82, nobody said it's a "big fucking problem". The size of the problem, however is not relevant. Content that isn't noteworthy, should not be included. When kids add crufty nonsense about which cartoon character is crushing on another cartoon character, we don't remove it because it's a "big fucking problem", we remove it because it's trivial. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. And I only provided one example, because only one example was needed. The other trivia probably should be removed as well, unless they are notable on their own. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tonight's episode ("Father of the Bob") revolved around the burgers of the day. Are we still pretending this isn't relevant? Really? --RThompson82 (talk) 05:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb Well since this Koala ass won't respond maybe you will. Did you see that episode? ^ --RThompson82 (talk) 05:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tha Carter V

Please do not delete accurate information from the page Tha Carter V. Simply typing "hoax" isn't sufficient reasoning to delete content. Not only is your claim that it's a hoax incorrect, the track list was confirmed by Lil Wayne himself (But I'm sure you know more about his album than he does). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkatastic (talk • contribs) 16:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where is your source then? Koala15 (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

Hello Koala15:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Talk:Jesus Piece (jewelry)

You are invited to discuss page move proposal. --George Ho (talk) 05:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why the revert to my edit of Mr. Peabody & Sherman?

Gidday Koala15!

I wonder why the revert to my edit of Mr. Peabody & Sherman? If no valid reason is given, I have no choice but to imitate a raw prawn and revert your revert of my edit such as in User_talk:Koala15#The_Little_Mermaid_.281989_film.29. DadaNeem (talk) 02:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You linked "financial failure" with "box office bomb". This film was not a "box office bomb". Koala15 (talk) 05:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Thanks for your contribution on VII – Teyana Taylor album. Karlhard (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsorama

Can you write a plot for Simpsorama? Thanks in advance! Djole 555 (talk)

Get a Job (2014 film)

I suggest you ask politely, and then I will be more than happy to restore the article. The PROD was not challenged, so the article was deleted properly. Giant Snowman 13:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well i wasn't trying to be mean, sorry if you took it that way. Koala15 (talk) 15:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Free Birds

Free Birds was Distributed by Entertainment One in the UK. To prove it, It shown it in the UK Trailer posted by Entertainment One.

"Party Central" short film

Hi. I noticed the edit you made to the Party Central note on the Monsters University article. I realize that the short was shown with Muppets Most Wanted in March 2014, but the short first premiered on August 9, 2013 at the D23 Expo. (I was there and saw it, and the first source supports that date.) That's why I wrote Fall 2013. Is it more appropriate to note the premiere date in the MU article, or when it was first shown to the general public? If the latter, then I think it should be noted that it was shown "March 2014 with Muppets Most Wanted." I'd like to know your thoughts. Thanks. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 08:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh i didn't realize it premiered in August 2013, so i guess its's fair to write that. Koala15 (talk) 15:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Thanks for the response. It turns out that Carniolus already fixed it. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 23:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Hey, thanks for going through all the Children's BAFTA additions I made and fixing the citations! Luthien22 (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bridal Suite) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bridal Suite, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor Johnsmith2116 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nicely done.

To reply, leave a comment on Johnsmith2116's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Paramount Animation

In your latest edits in this page, you decreed the following...

Its fake, where's your source that its real?

Here is the source, direct from the company itself.

Art show flyer from CTN Animation Expo 2014

Be more considerate to your fellow Wikipedians and ask before you go declaring something is fake without proper research. We don't need any skeptics here. Thank you. Kresblain (talk) 21:08, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A flyer for an art show is not really convincing, but i guess we shall see if its real when the studios first film comes out. Koala15 (talk) 00:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kresblain, firstly, "skeptic" is not a slur, and Wikipedia absolutely needs more skeptics. What it needs fewer of, are editors who add previously unseen content without any edit summaries, who revert without any explanations, and who post condescending edit summaries on other users' talk pages when they, in fact, were not editing with a community in mind. The onus is on you to adequately explain and source your edits, not on other users to perform "proper research" to disprove you. Secondly, the content you are adding isn't reliably sourced. A random Dropbox link does not suggest a reliable source, nor does it suggest the logo is an officially sanctioned logo. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I really can't protest, Cyphoidbomb. You're absolutely right. We all try hard to make sure things are accurate and sound. Skepticism wasn't meant as a slur, and I apologize if it came out that way. The edit summary in question was added to the file directly, which had replaced a previous upload that was a clear placeholder logo. No mention was made in the accompanying article as a result of that update. As for the reliable source, the print material linked here is all that we have at the moment. The only thing I would suggest at this stage is to contact the company personally and have them verify whether or not it is an official logo mark. Good luck. Kresblain (talk) 10:02, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lil Wayne The Carter V.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lil Wayne The Carter V.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 04:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Terminator Genisys

Why did you upload a separate file of Terminator Genisys, when you could have clicked "Upload a new version of this file"? Kailash29792 (talk) 02:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i guess i could have done that. Error on my part. Koala15 (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jurassic World

I saw your removal of the criticism section. Saying "Nice try Dinosaur fanboys" in your edit summary isn't a valid reason for removal - and the content appears to be adequately sourced to multiple reliable sources - and while the criticism has been brought up on the article talk page, there appears to not be any argument there for its removal. But, before restoring, I wanted to see if there's more history or reasoning for the removal of which I'm not aware. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a criticism section before the film's even out, really? There is always that one editor that takes things to literally and wants to add a "criticism" section or a "historical accuracy" section because they refuse to decipher fact from fiction. Two sources aren't sufficient either, The Guardian will posts criticism from me. Koala15 (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As discussion of the criticism is already on the talk page, arguments against the section should be added there as well. I can actually see both sides on this one, and view it as a content dispute - which means talk page consensus - which Talk:Jurassic World#Criticism of the film seems to be no consensus at the moment, but leaning towards omitting at least for now. I encourage you to join that discussion, even if with just a brief comment.

And, in all fairness to the "Dinosaur fanboys", the criticism has been covered by dozens of news outlets at this point (the Guardian is kinda' late in their coverage, and appear to be copying some of their text from multiple other news sources). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blacc Hollywood

Hi Koala, I was trying to add David Versis as a credited producer on the Blacc Hollywood page. I have this source to confirm: http://www.allmusic.com/album/blacc-hollywood-mw0002673160/credits

I work directly with David and was a part of the deal for this album. The record he did production for was titled 'The Sleaze'

MerchantsofVenice (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If his name was listed in the booklet he would already be there. Koala15 (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey koala, I just checked the booklet and his name is there multiple times as David DaRosa (legal name) I'm also waiting for approval of his own Wikipedia page. Sorry the page link was wrong, the album is Wiz Khalifa - Blacc Hollywood

MerchantsofVenice (talk) 20:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He would need a producer credit not a writers credit to be listed as a producer. Koala15 (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the booklet, under 'The Sleaze,' it has David DaRosa for a writing credit and immediately after says "Produced by Arthur McArthur for Canadian Jew Music, Inc. Additional Production by David Versis for Ring-leader Music Group, Ltd." That's why I listed him with as David Versis (co.)

MerchantsofVenice (talk) 21:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK, then you can add it in. Koala15 (talk) 21:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick replies Koala, this also brings to light that David DaRosa should be listed next to Tomaz and Jeremy McArthur under the writers because that is how it appears in the booklet. MerchantsofVenice (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MerchantsofVenice (talk • contribs) 21:58, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hey man I just wanted to know that How Can I edit a locked page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leftbrainnation (talk • contribs) 08:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you are new, within a week you should be able to. Koala15 (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Southpaw

Hey Koala I'm curious as to why you took down my sourced cast addition ON southpaw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaviermaine (talk • contribs) 17:28, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cause you used IMDB as a source. Koala15 (talk) 19:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I Won't Be Home for Christmas (The Simpsons)

Please, expand a plot of this episode... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.223.159.190 (talk) 22:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Paramount Pictures films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happy Go Lucky (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:When the Game Stands Tall poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:When the Game Stands Tall poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your edit warring and get a ref for The Jungle Book (2015 film)

Have and Instragram post that says a director is on the set is in no way saying filming has commenced. ...so that no original research is needed to extract the content. One needs to infer or one is doing original research to obtain the meaning that filming has commenced. No film is 100% on a green screen... even Sin City, 300 and Avatar. Practice does also take place before filming. You have reverted two people multiple times. Travis Wong's ref is not a good ref either because he has been there since JUNE. Oh wait, you mean practicing on set!!!!!

Get a #(%$*&# ref that is able to be in the article that says filming has commenced!!! Bgwhite (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two days ago The Philadelphia Inquirer said: "His The Jungle Book, starring Idris Elba, Scarlett Johansson, Sir Ben Kingsley, Christopher Walken and Lupita Nyong'o, is currently filming and is due for release next year." Is that enough for you? Koala15 (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Why in the world you didn't use this in the first place is baffling? You are also supposed to add it to the article to say filming has commenced and not in the edit summary after you have been challenged. So, please add the philly ref to the article now. Captain Assassain was blocked several times for doing exactly what you did (who you reverted), as has many others. Next time, add a reliable ref that actually says filming has commenced or you can be blocked. Bgwhite (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well i didn't feel like it was necessary to add, since the source doesn't exactly say when it began filming. Koala15 (talk) 06:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Filming is actually underway Bgwhite, Koala is right about mentioning when filming began. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 16:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Terminator Genisys

What's wrong with adding this cast member? This nationally syndicated newspaper columnist considered her important enough to interview.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:38, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to? Koala15 (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I should always do this.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Birds (film)

Hello Koala15, I think we should move the Draft:Angry Birds (film) to the mainspace now. What do you say? --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 16:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i would say its in production by now. Koala15 (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 06:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article for deletion

Hey, can you suggest this article for deletion? This rapper isn't notable person to have an article on Wikipedia. Has released just one mixtape which had no commercial success. All the videos on his official Youtube channel shows how much unofficial can his videos and songs be. For example in this video the titles says that it's a collaboration with rapper 2 Chainz but in the video you can clearly see that 2 Chainz's parts are from his "I'm Different", "No Lie" and etc videos. Thanks in advance

Alright, will do. Koala15 (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

IPadPerson (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Arthur season 18 episodes are announced on KET, so why did you revert it?

Hi there! Why did you revert my edit on Arthur season 18 episodes? They were announced on KET.

My bad, i misunderstood your edit. Koala15 (talk) 03:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Save the Children (film)

added links pointing to Nancy Wilson and Cuba Gooding

Elf: Buddy's Musical Christmas

added a link pointing to Musical

The Jungle Book (2015 film)

added a link pointing to Akela

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help regarding User:Zhaofeng Li/Reflinks

Hi Koala, I need your help in using User:Zhaofeng Li/Reflinks tool for fillling Wikipedia:Bare URLs. But i am not able to understand how to use this tool. Please guide me.( !dea4u 07:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Just click through, and put the article name of your choice in the page name box. Koala15 (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Wild Olive) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Wild Olive, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor SparrowHK just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work, but please remember to add content to the Plot section. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment on SparrowHK's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ty Dolla $ign

Hey Koala15. Can you cut this picture with Ty Dolla $ign and upload it as a new file? [9] I would like to have that picture of him on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.76.28 (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plz do it

I am not very good at that, but i can try. Koala15 (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. I will wait. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.41.31 (talk) 10:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Films

Hi, can you add films to the lists like List of American films of 1916 so people can find them? Cheers!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, after i create them. Koala15 (talk) 20:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was going to mention As Men Love adding to the 1917 but realised I'd already asked you! Have a good one!♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Koala15! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Koala15!

Happy New Year!

Koala15,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Reason for removing the religion of kanye west

I wonder why you removed the religion of kanye west, read the cite source it's in the title.

Reason for removing the religion of kanye west

I wonder why you removed the religion of kanye west, read the cite source it's in the title.Jason foren daniel (talk) 12:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://rapzilla.com/rz/features/story/6889-kanye-west-says-im-a-christian I'm reverting the editJason foren daniel (talk) 12:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Pyramid (film) dispute

let's see if we can resolve this ourselves. tell me where we disagree...

the film was originally called site 146. you can verify this at imdb.

it's found footage, right?

it was "released on December 5, 2014, by 20th Century Fox to extremely negative reviews," wasn't it? it got a 6% on rotten tomatoes.

many critics felt it was one of the ten worst films of the year. follow the citations. is the phrase 'many critics' a problem? because we can change it to 'several critics'. that's fine.

if you follow the hollywood stock exchange link, you'll see that the film was originally trading above twenty million dollars. there should be a graph directly accessible via the link.

thanks. 172.249.59.137 (talk) 04:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First off, the "alt" parameter is not for alternative titles. And i don't think adding "extremely" to a sentence adds anything. Also, i don't think the "many critics" thing makes sense. Why not just add which publications called it one of the worst films of the year? Koala15 (talk) 04:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for clarification re: the alt parameter. i'll remove it.

i'm fine with nixing the 'extremely'.

seems like a good compromise would to be change 'many critics' to 'several critics.' this way we retain readability and if people want to know exactly which critics they can follow the citations.

appreciate it. 172.249.59.137 (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Neon Icon. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Koala15 reported by User:Mlpearc (Result: ). Thank you. —Mlpearc (open channel) 04:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Silent film task force

Hello! Thank you for all the work you've done, in adding articles about silent films to Wikipedia. I invite you to consider joining the Silent films task force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of silent films. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kingsman The Secret Service poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kingsman The Secret Service poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In-Universe Style

Hello, I'm Gamebuster19901. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Shrek because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Also please be sure that your edits are not in an in-universe style. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gamebuster19901 (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Heart of Youth

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Heart of Youth, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://silenthollywood.com/theheartofyouth1919.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Hey! I know I'm a year late, but I just wanted to say nice job @ Finding Nemo! Bananasoldier (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

An Adventure in Hearts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elmer Harris

It Pays to Advertise (1919 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elmer Harris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regular Show

Please don't change the edit i did to the Regular Show episode "Sugar Rush". I watched the episode and the Doughnut shop Clerk said they were called "Apple Fritters". If you don't believe me then watch that episode yourself and you'll see that my edit was 100% accurate. Any and all edits i make to wikipedia are 100% true and accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roverzero1983 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's your proof that my edit was correct. http://regularshow.wikia.com/wiki/Sugar_Rush#Plot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roverzero1983 (talk • contribs) 16:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right, i remember that episode. May bad. Koala15 (talk) 19:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Funk Flex Full Throttle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diddy

Strange Magic (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Trouble

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boondocks edit

Hey, just letting you know my Boondocks edit is correct. Check the article I just added as a reference. Also, I was at The Hitlist when we first brought on Aaron so I know the dates intimately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajarchibald (talk • contribs) 16:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation

Hi, there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television#Amending the MOS centered around whether or not we want to deprecate the Broadcast section in articles, and if not, how we want that content to be presented. In the past it has been stuffed full of unsourced nation cruft, which we no longer support, but there's still some question as to what qualifies as an "English-speaking nation" and we need to work out the language details. If this is something that interests you, please participate! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ill check it out. Koala15 (talk) 19:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you google, Hitist.com and boondocks you can see several references that mention the boondocks debuting on The Hitlist, mostly from student publications as Aaron was doing a college tour at the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajarchibald (talk • contribs) 20:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Duff poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Duff poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

re your reversal of properly sourced info on Sony Pictures Animation

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Sony Pictures Animation. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. --Wuerzele (talk) 05:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes its sourced, but the lawsuit is probably not notable enough to be mentioned in the article. If we mentioned every time a company was sued it would be ridiculous. Try to discuss it on the talk page sine it is a controversial edit. Koala15 (talk) 05:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you to discuss your removal on the talk page.--Wuerzele (talk) 06:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

editwarring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Wuerzele (talk) 03:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Silent film articles

Hi Koala15, thanks for your great work in creating articles on many a Paramount, Realart and Artcraft stars. In creating the articles can you link the cast & crew (as many as who have wiki articles)? In addition to the 'cookies-in-the-search' bar, it lets us know the article has been created and that the individual has been linked to it. An example is my linking the cast & crew to your recently created article The Top of New York(1922). Thanks much. Happy editing.Koplimek (talk) 16:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting without explanations

Hi Koala, I don't understand why are you still reverting other users without so much as extending the courtesy of an explanation as you did here? SchroCat has 46,000 edits under his belt with a slew of contributions to GA articles that he doesn't deserve to be reverted without a quick note about whatever guideline you think he has failed to grasp. And even if he were a fresh-off-the-block n00b, you could at least extend a courtesy of dropping an note to enlighten the user. Even in matters of clear vandalism there is no real benefit to avoiding some sort of summary like Rvv. There are other editors working here, in case you weren't aware. I'm reverting your reversion, and if you intend to resubmit it, I hope you can provide a better explanation than "I didn't like it." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think it made sense to paraphrase the Rotten Tomatoes consensus, since the quote is already short. But yes i should have left a summary. Koala15 (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 31st Annie Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Peterson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Winnie the Pooh film article

What was the issue with my edit on the Winnie the Pooh article? (Stating that it was to date the most recent traditional animated film from Disney) Did it need a source? Is it because the short Get a Horse! includes traditional animation? Please clarify. Thanks.Wikicontributor12 (talk) 03:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know it seemed kind of trivial to me. Something like that could change. Koala15 (talk) 03:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. I was kind of inspired by the fact that the Home on the Range article has the sentence: "it was the last traditionally animated Disney film until The Princess and the Frog was released in 2009." So I thought that it might be worth putting that "most recent traditional animated film" note on Pooh and I figured that if it ever did change, the note could be updated. But, no biggie. Thanks for the response. I do appreciate it.Wikicontributor12 (talk) 08:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robin Thicke Get Her Back.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robin Thicke Get Her Back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sea Horses

Hi, I'm Irondome. Koala15, thanks for creating Sea Horses!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. looks ok so far, plot section is a priority for inclusion at this point. Notable director

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Irondome (talk) 17:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lists

If you create any more can you add them to List of American films of 1926? Cheers. It would be great if you could go back and add the ones already created to the lists. The lists are quite important I think for documenting the films by year!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least give me a list of articles you've created then? I'm not sure why it's so much of a tall order to simply paste the films you create from a given year at the top of the film lists and I'll format them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you add plot sections empty with tags? In my experience they're unlikely to make people add them and in the meantime they look unsightly. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can read my created articles from the link at the bottom of my contributions. I was gonna add them, but i have been pre occupied with creating these articles. And i don't know i just usually add the plot tags, someone will eventually write something there. Koala15 (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're working through the Paramount film list right? Can you just dump the film titles after completing a year at the top of the film list year pages and let me know and I'll format them. It's just I am keen to ensure that the lists are as comprehensive as possible and that we're not missing lots from each year. I'd like to put in more time on those lists but they're hard work and I've got a lot of other things to think about!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, its on my list of things to do. Koala15 (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 04:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Any Woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Straight Outta Compton/O'Shea Jackson Jr.

Hi, I notice you did a lot of edits on the Straight Outta Compton movie article. I created an article for O'Shea Jackson Jr. that was promptly deleted by admin Snuggims saying he "failed" notability. Then I noticed O'Shea already had an article under his rap name but it hasn't been updated in awhile... So I proposed for merger, and hope it will save the page. if you could contribute to the discussion about the merger/keeping the page I would appreciate it! Thanks! Discussion here! Wikimandia (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimandia, I am not an admin. Also, I mentioned on my talk page that I actually redirected the article. Redirecting is different from deleting. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Musk Who Fell To Earth

Hello Koala! Are you watched before last episode? I'm not! I can not find the plot for this episode anywhere. Can you write a plot if you have free time? Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.223.159.59 (talk) 19:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicki Minaj Lookin Ass Nigga.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicki Minaj Lookin Ass Nigga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heads Up (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McGowan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting the article

Please stop reverting the article for Monkey Kingdom. So far the film has yet to gain any actual coverage in reliable sources and a search only brings up brief mentions that the film will release. Right now it fails WP:NFF since the production of the film went largely uncovered by anyone other than Disney. It's expected that the film company itself will give their films coverage, but those sources are considered to be WP:PRIMARY and just being associated with Disney will not give the film notability. I have no problem with the article being created once the movie releases and gains coverage, but it should not be re-created until that point in time. The film just isn't notable at this point in time. Will it be notable? Probably- it is Disney after all, but we cannot guarantee that it's going to gain the necessary coverage to pass WP:NFILM and right now saying that it would violates WP:CRYSTAL. I've asked for a third opinion on this via WP:3O and I'd like it if for the time being you could discuss this on the article's talk page rather than continue to revert the redirect. This is beginning to turn into an edit war and I'd prefer to avoid that if possible. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a break, of course its notable. The fact that you think you can revert an article like this is ridiculous. It's obviously coming out in nearly a month, and already is notable. Koala15 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How does it pass notability guidelines? The issue isn't that the film won't release but that it has not yet recevied enough in-depth coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:NFILM or WP:NFF. (Although there is always the issue of film releases possibly getting pushed back, so saying that a release date exists isn't itself a reason to keep something. Even Disney has delayed films at the last minute, which is why notability can and should only be determined through coverage in reliable sources.) If I were to bring it to AfD right now it very likely would end up getting closed as a redirect due to the lack of coverage. If you can provide this coverage then I'm open to discussion but just unredirecting and saying that "eventual release equals notability" is not good enough. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Since it's clear that you are going to continue to revert this and you don't seem to be particularly open to discussing this on the article's talk page, I've escalated this to WP:AN3. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

February 2015

The result of the AN3 noticeboard is that you are warned foe edit-warring. WP:CONSENSUS states that encyclopedic content of the articles is determined by consensus. In Monkey Kingdom, you resorted to reverting and failed to discuss your changes at the talk page, as your opponent suggested. You even refused to discuss them here at your talk page, saying that the film is "of course notable". I am not involved, and I am not going to discuss the content, but I do not immediately see any proof of notability in the material you tried to restore, meaning it is at the very least debatable. Next revert may get your account blocked from editing. Please in the future follow WP:BLD and if someone reverts your edits go to the talk page and discuss rather then edit-war. Edit summaries and edit-warring are not an appropriate way of resolve content disputes, we have different avenues for that, see WP:Dispute resolution.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I just noticed that Sophie Hunter has notable relatives and this should be reflected in her infobox. All sources are in the family family section of the page. If you may be so kind to copy-paste this to the page, I would be very grateful and it would be a big improvement to her page. Thank you in advance! 62.46.161.223 (talk) 06:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

|family =

Michael Gow
(maternal grandfather)
J. E. B. Seely
(maternal great-grandfather)
Timothy Carlton
(father-in-law)
Wanda Ventham
(mother-in-law)

This IP is a sock of Fairyspit. Be careful as they spam editors to do their editing for them. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lone Cowboy (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Will James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Along Came Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gregory Stone

Coronado (1935 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brian Hooker

The Accusing Finger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chandler House

You Belong to Me (1934 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elizabeth Alexander

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kid Rock First Kiss.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kid Rock First Kiss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 5 Flights Up (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nobody's Baby (1937 film) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nobody's Baby (1937 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Prison Farm (film). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wildcat (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tropic Zone (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tropic Zone (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropic Zone (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 05:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The New Classic

Please explain this. — HĐ (talk) 05:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Genres should always be as general as possible. And i don't think her album is "dance pop". Koala15 (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Terminator Genisys poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Terminator Genisys poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Koala15, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Country Music Holiday. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 20:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Vanquished, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karl Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Party Crashers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eddie Fitzgerald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Earned It, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Home Plot

Hello, you were unclear with a bit of the plotline of the movie Home, so I fixed some edits. Just wanted you to know.

Pezminer12 (talk) 07:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: The Marvelous Missing Link: Lost

Hello Koala15. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Marvelous Missing Link: Lost, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article uses both terms interchangeably, or at least doesn't explain the differet titles, so it's not clear what the album is actually called, thus what the article should be called. So it can't be uncontroversial. I'd suggest updating the article with sources on the title, or at least an explanation why there's two names, before a move can be considered. . Thank you. Ged UK 12:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well iTunes lists it under that title. I think whoever created the article just made a mistake. Koala15 (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Straight Outta Compton (2015 film)

Hi, why did you undo this? --82.136.210.153 (talk) 21:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth noting if hes not being portrayed in the movie? Koala15 (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it should say "included" instead of "include", because all of them are past members and N.W.A is no longer active, and I also think it's strange to leave out one member when it's not clear that the listing is not exhaustive. It says "[...] rap group N.W.A, whose members include(d)" and then the article lists everyone except one member. That doesn't make any sense. A reader would not understand it lists all members but one. If one past member is not included, the text should be something like "some of whose members were" or "[...], among others" or something similar. Or: "[...], all of whom, with the exception of ..., are being portrayed in the movie." Also, you write "if hes not being portrayed in the movie", but maybe he is. Is there a reliable third party source that says Arabian Prince is not in the film? The full credits at IMDb - I know it's not a reliable source - lists Brandon Lafourche as "Arabian prince (uncredited)" which seems to indicate he is being portrayed in the movie. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 01:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, well then i guess it is worth noting. Koala15 (talk) 01:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Masterminds (2015 film) poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Masterminds (2015 film) poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gentle Giant (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fighting Father Dunne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Una O'Connor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

WHY THE HECK DO YOU KEEP UNDING MY EDITS!! STOP PLEASE!!! IT'S ANNOYING ME!! Thanks, The Hitmakers (Talk) 07:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of your edits are not factually correct. Koala15 (talk) 00:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"D'usse" is a single from Lil Wayne's Tha Carter V. Also, AJayones is the one who produced "Gotti" by Lil Wayne and that song is going to be on the album, so that means he's obviously one of the producers on the album. You can look those things up yourself if you want to! The Hitmakers (Talk) 22 April 2015 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)-@The Hitmakers: You have the burden of proof, you look it up before you make changes and include "your proof" with your changes. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I obviously looked up the information. I even included the references and he still undoes them. I'm just so angry and frustrated from what it.

Acid Rap (Chance the Rapper album) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Acid Rap (Chance the Rapper album). Since you had some involvement with the Acid Rap (Chance the Rapper album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ITfan1990 (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Acid Rap (Chance the Rapper album), you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you.

Edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ITfan1990 (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ITfan1990 (talk) 16:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Koala15. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 21:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Chloë Grace Moretz

Thank you for your addition to this article. Please don't forget that data added to the biography of a living person requires an accompanying, reliable source. I have gone ahead and made the change. Happy editing! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 01:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1,916: / Line 1,916: @@
 ==Talkback==
 {{talkback|Malik Shabazz|Page move|ts=21:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)}}
+==[[Chloë Grace Moretz]]==
+Thank you for your addition to this article. Please don't forget that data added to the [[WP:BLP|biography of a living person]] requires an accompanying, [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. I have gone ahead and made the change. Happy editing! &mdash;[[User:ATinySliver|<span style="font-family:times; font-size:15px; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px">ATinySliver</span>]]<b>&#47;</b>[[User talk:ATinySliver|<span style="font-family:times; color:#070; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px"><sup>ATalkPage</sup></span>]] 01:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC)