User talk:PEANUTBUTTERCOOOKIE!

Hi

Hello Welcome To My User Talk Page I am So exited to spread Info and The Truth

An article about Matt Mowers?

I would suggest creating any new article here Draft:Matt Mowers then you can work on it in peace and submit for review when ready. Theroadislong (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

There was an artical and What i wrote is better then a redirect PEANUTBUTTERCOOKIE!

Yes, do start by working in the draft space. The text you added to Matt Mowers would not be acceptable as a Wikipedia article: it had no sources, it included almost no information, and it did not say anything about how Mowers is notable according to Wikipedia's definition. The language had several problems, with almost every word capitalised, and some unintelligible phrasing ("NH GOP" is jargon that most readers won't understand).

Please do not restore your text again. This is extra important since you have already reverted other editors on that page three times today, and Wikipedia has a strict policy against edit warring. Reverting more than three times can lead to your account being temporarily blocked from editing. Instead, use the draft suggested by Theroadislong above, and work on the article there. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 18:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Your recent editing history at Matt Mowers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. bonadea contributions talk 18:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)