Jump to content

Karl Dönitz: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m mdash to ndash (snd). Probalby more changes needed, but I guess ndases in book titles to colons?
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|German admiral (1891–1980)}}
{{multiple issues|
{{redirect|Donitz|people with the surname "Dönitz"|Dönitz (surname)}}
{{refimprove|date=June 2016}}
{{more footnotes|date=September 2015}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}}
{{Use British English|date=May 2021}}
}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2012}}
{{Use shortened footnotes|date=October 2022}}
{{More footnotes needed|date=November 2022}}<!--has uncited paragraphs and attribution template Tucker 1957 with no pointing links-->
{{Infobox president
{{Infobox officeholder
|name=Karl Dönitz
| name = Karl Dönitz
|image=Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1976-127-06A, Karl Dönitz - crop.jpg
| image = Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1976-127-06A, Karl Dönitz (cropped)(3) (cropped).jpg
|caption=1943 portrait
| image_upright =
|order=[[President of Germany (1919–1945)| President of Germany]]
| alt =
|term_start=30 April 1945
| caption = Dönitz as Grand Admiral in 1943
|term_end=23 May 1945
| office = [[President of Germany (1919–1945)|President of Germany]]
|chancellor={{plainlist|
| term_start = 30 April 1945
*[[Joseph Goebbels]]
| term_end = 23 May 1945
*[[Lutz Graf Schwerin von Krosigk]]{{ref label|ch|1|}}}}
| 1blankname = {{nowrap|Chancellor}}
|predecessor1=[[Adolf Hitler]]
| 1namedata = {{ubl|[[Joseph Goebbels]]|[[Lutz von Krosigk]] ''(de facto)''}}
|successor1=[[Theodor Heuss]] <br />([[President of Germany |1949 as President of the Federal Republic]])<br/>[[Wilhelm Pieck]]<br/>(1949 as President of the [[German Democratic Republic]])
| predecessor = {{ubl|[[Paul von Hindenburg]] ({{lang|de|as President}})|[[Adolf Hitler]] ({{lang|de|as [[Führer]]}})}}
|successor2=
| successor = ''Office abolished''
|order2=''[[Oberbefehlshaber der Marine]]''
| office1 = [[List of German defence ministers|Minister of War]]
|term_start2=30 January 1943
|term_end2=1 May 1945
| term_start1 = 30 April 1945
| term_end1 = 23 May 1945
|deputy3=[[Eberhard Godt]]
| 1blankname1 = {{nowrap|Chancellor}}
|predecessor3=[[Erich Raeder]]
| 1namedata1 = Joseph Goebbels
|successor3=[[Hans-Georg von Friedeburg]]
| 2blankname1 = {{nowrap|Leading Minister}}
|birth_date={{Birth date|1891|09|16|df=y}}
| 2namedata1 = Lutz von Krosigk
|birth_place=[[Grünau (Berlin)|Grünau]], [[Berlin]], [[Kingdom of Prussia]], [[German Empire]]
| predecessor1 = [[Wilhelm Keitel]]<br />(Chief of the [[OKW]])
|death_date={{nowrap|{{Death date and age|df=yes|1980|12|24|1891|09|16}}}}
| office2 = [[Oberbefehlshaber der Marine|Chief of the German Navy High Command]]
|death_place=[[Aumühle]], [[Schleswig-Holstein]], [[West Germany]]
| term_start2 = 30 January 1943
|nationality=German
| term_end2 = 1 May 1945
|party=[[National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (honorary member, 1944–45){{sfn|Grier|2007|p=256|loc=Footnote 8, Chapter 10}}<ref group=Note name="Avalon Project group=Note">"On 30 January 1944, Dönitz received from the Führer, as a decoration, the [[Golden Party Badge]]; Dönitz would later assume that he "thereby became an honorary member of the Party". [http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/05-09-46.htm The Avalon Project at Yale Law School] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150612141039/http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/05-09-46.htm |date=12 June 2015 }}</ref>
| deputy2 = [[Eberhard Godt]]
|spouse=Ingeborg Weber
| predecessor2 = [[Erich Raeder]]
|children=3
| successor2 = [[Hans-Georg von Friedeburg]]
|religion=[[Evangelical Church in Germany|Lutheranism]]
| birth_name =
|signature= Dönitz Unterschrift.jpg
| birth_date = {{Birth date|1891|09|16|df=y}}
|allegiance={{plainlist|
| birth_place = [[Grünau (Berlin)|Grünau]], [[Province of Brandenburg]], [[Kingdom of Prussia|Prussia]], [[German Empire]]
*[[German Empire]] (1910–18)
| death_date = {{Death date and age|df=yes|1980|12|24|1891|09|16}}
*[[Weimar Republic]] (1920–33)
| death_place = [[Aumühle]], [[Schleswig-Holstein]], [[West Germany]]
*[[Nazi Germany]] (1933–45)}}
| death_cause =
|nickname=''Der Löwe'' (The Lion)
| resting_place = [[Waldfriedhof Cemetery]], Aumühle
|branch={{plainlist|
| resting_place_coordinates =
*''[[Imperial German Navy|Kaiserliche Marine]]''
| party = [[Nazi Party]]{{sfn|Grier|2007|p=256|loc=Footnote 8, Chapter 10}}
*''[[Reichsmarine]]''
| spouse = {{marriage|Ingeborg Weber|1916|1962|end=died}}
*''[[Kriegsmarine]]''}}
| children = 3
|serviceyears={{plainlist|
| cabinet = {{ubl|[[Goebbels cabinet]]|[[Flensburg government]]}}
*1910–18
| signature = Karl Doenitz signature.svg
*1920–45}}
| signature_alt =
|rank=[[Grand admiral|Großadmiral]]
| website =
|commands={{plainlist|
| nickname = {{lang|de|Der Löwe}} (The Lion){{sfn|Haarr|2012|p=493}}<br />{{lang|de|Onkel Karl}} (Uncle Karl){{sfn|Haarr|2012|p=493}}
*{{SMU|UC-25}} (1918)
| allegiance = {{ubl|[[German Empire]]|[[Weimar Republic]]|[[Nazi Germany]]}}
*{{SMU|UB-68}} (1918
| branch = {{Tree list}}
*[[Torpedo boats]] (1920s)
* [[Imperial German Navy]]
*{{Ship|German cruiser|Emden||2}} (1934–35)
*''[[1st U-boat Flotilla]]'' (1935–36)
* ''[[Reichsmarine]]''
* ''[[Kriegsmarine]]''
*[[Führer der Unterseeboote]] (1936–39)
{{Tree list/end}}
*[[Befehlshaber der U-Boote]] (1939–43)
| serviceyears = {{plainlist|
*[[Oberkommando der Marine]] (1943–45)
* 1910–1918
*[[Wehrmacht|Supreme Commander of the ''Wehrmacht'']] (1945)}}
* 1920–1945}}
|battles={{plainlist|
| rank = ''[[Großadmiral]]''
| unit =
| commands = {{Plainlist|
* {{SMU|UC-25}} (1917–1918)
* {{SMU|UB-68}} (1918)
* {{ship|German cruiser|Emden||2}} (1934–1935)
* [[1st U-boat Flotilla]] (1935–1936)
* [[Führer der Unterseeboote]] (1936–1939)
* [[Befehlshaber der U-Boote]] (1939–1943)
* [[Oberkommando der Marine]] (1943–1945)
* Supreme Commander of the ''[[Wehrmacht]]'' (1945)
}}
| battles = {{tree list}}
*[[World War I]]
*[[World War I]]
** [[Naval warfare of World War I#Black Sea|Black Sea Campaign]]
** [[Mediterranean U-boat Campaign (World War I)|Mediterranean U-boat Campaign]]
*[[World War II]]
*[[World War II]]
** [[Battle of the Atlantic]]
** [[Battle of the Atlantic]]
** [[Convoy SC 7]]
***[[Convoy Battles of World War II]]
{{tree list/end}}
** [[Second Happy Time|Operation ''Paukenschlag'']]}}
| mawards = [[Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves]]
|mawards={{plainlist|
| footnotes = {{note|ch|a}} Formally titled "Leading Minister" or "Chief Minister" ({{lang|de|Leitender Minister}})
*[[Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves]]
| module = '''Criminal conviction'''{{Infobox criminal
*[[Iron Cross]] 1st Class
|child = yes
*[[U-boat War Badge|U-boat War Badge with Diamonds]]}}
|conviction = [[Crimes of aggression]]<br>[[War crimes]]
|footnotes = {{note|ch|1}} Formally titled "Leading Minister" or "Chief Minister" (''Leitender Minister'').
| trial = Nuremberg trials
| conviction_penalty = 10 years imprisonment
| conviction_status = [[Imprisonment#Release|Released]]
| imprisoned = [[Spandau Prison]]
}}
}}
}}
'''Karl Dönitz''' (sometimes spelled '''Doenitz'''; {{IPA|de|ˈdøːnɪts|lang|De-Karl_Dönitz.ogg}}; 16 September 1891 – 24 December 1980) was a German navy officer who, following [[Adolf Hitler]]'s [[Death of Adolf Hitler|suicide]], succeeded him as [[head of state]] of [[Nazi Germany]] in May 1945, holding the position until the dissolution of the [[Flensburg Government]] following [[German Instrument of Surrender|Germany's unconditional surrender]] to the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]] days later. As [[Oberkommando der Marine|Supreme Commander of the Navy]] beginning in 1943, he played a major role in the [[naval history of World War II]].


He began his career in the [[Imperial German Navy]] before [[World War I]]. In 1918, he was commanding {{SMU|UB-68|3=2}}, and was taken [[prisoner of war]] by British forces. As commander of ''UB-68'', he attacked a convoy in the Mediterranean while on patrol near Malta. Sinking one ship before the rest of the convoy outran his U-boat, Dönitz began to formulate the concept of U-boats operating in attack groups [[Wolfpack (naval tactic)|''Rudeltaktik'']] (German for "pack tactic", commonly called a "wolfpack") for greater efficiency, rather than operating independently.<ref>Thames Television (9 January 1974), 10. "Wolf Pack: U-Boats in the Atlantic (1939–1944)", retrieved 16 September 2023</ref>
'''Karl Dönitz''' (sometimes spelled '''Doenitz''') ({{IPA-de|ˈkaɐ̯l ˈdøːnɪts|lang|De-Karl_Dönitz.ogg}}; 16 September 1891{{snd}} 24 December 1980) was a German admiral who played a major role in the [[naval history of World War II]]. Dönitz briefly succeeded [[Adolf Hitler]] as the head of state of Germany.


By the start of the Second World War, Dönitz was supreme commander of the ''[[Kriegsmarine]]''{{'s}} U-boat arm ({{lang|de|[[Befehlshaber der Unterseeboote]]}} (BdU)). In January 1943, Dönitz achieved the rank of {{lang|de|[[Großadmiral]]}} (grand admiral) and replaced Grand Admiral [[Erich Raeder]] as Commander-in-Chief of the Navy. Dönitz was the main enemy of Allied naval forces in the [[Battle of the Atlantic]]. From 1939 to 1943 the U-boats fought effectively but lost the initiative from [[Black May (1943)|May 1943]]. Dönitz ordered his submarines into battle until 1945 to relieve the pressure on other branches of the {{lang|de|[[Wehrmacht]]}} (armed forces).{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=614–615}} 648 U-boats were lost—429 with no survivors. Furthermore, of these, 215 were lost on their first patrol.{{sfn|Niestlé|1998|p=4}} Around 30,000 of the 40,000 men who served in U-boats perished.{{sfn|Niestlé|1998|p=4}}
He began his career in the [[Imperial German Navy]] before [[World War I]]. In 1918, while he was in command of {{SMU|UB-68|3=2}}, the [[submarine]] was sunk by British forces and Dönitz was taken prisoner. While in a [[prisoner of war]] camp, he formulated what he later called [[Wolfpack (naval tactic)|''Rudeltaktik'']]<ref>Dönitz, Karl. ''Memoirs''.</ref> ("pack tactic", commonly called "wolfpack"). At the start of World War II, he was the senior submarine officer <!--''BdU''-->in the ''[[Kriegsmarine]]''. In January 1943, Dönitz achieved the rank of [[Grand admiral|Großadmiral'']] (grand admiral) and replaced Grand Admiral [[Erich Raeder]] as Commander-in-Chief of the Navy.


On 30 April 1945, after the death of Adolf Hitler and in accordance with [[Last will and testament of Adolf Hitler|Hitler's last will and testament]], Dönitz was named Hitler's successor as head of state, with the title of [[President of Germany (1919–1945)|President of Germany]] and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. On 7 May 1945, he ordered [[Alfred Jodl]], Chief of Operations Staff of the [[OKW]], to sign the [[German instruments of surrender]] in [[Reims]], France.{{sfn|Hamilton|1996|pp=285, 286}} Dönitz remained as head of the [[Flensburg Government]], as it became known, until it was dissolved by the Allied powers on 23 May. At the [[Nuremberg trials]], he was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment; after his release, he lived quietly in a village near [[Hamburg]] until his death in 1980.
On 30 April 1945, following the suicide of [[Adolf Hitler]] and in accordance with [[Last will and testament of Adolf Hitler|his last will and testament]], Dönitz was named Hitler's successor as head of state in what became known as the [[Goebbels cabinet]] after his second-in-command, [[Joseph Goebbels]], until Goebbels' suicide led to Dönitz's cabinet being reformed into the [[Flensburg Government]] instead. On 7 May 1945, he ordered [[Alfred Jodl]], Chief of Operations Staff of the {{lang|de|[[Oberkommando der Wehrmacht]]}} (OKW), to sign the [[German instruments of surrender]] in [[Reims]], France, [[Victory in Europe Day|formally ending]] the [[European theatre of World War II|War in Europe]].{{sfn|Hamilton|1996|pp=285, 286}} Dönitz remained as head of state with the titles of [[President of Germany (1919–1945)|President of Germany]] and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces until his cabinet was dissolved by the Allied powers on 23 May ''de facto'' and on 5 June ''de jure''.


By his own admission, Dönitz was a dedicated Nazi and supporter of Hitler. Following the war, he was indicted as a major war criminal at the Nuremberg trials on three counts: conspiracy to commit [[crimes against peace]], [[war crime]]s, and [[crimes against humanity]]; planning, initiating, and waging [[wars of aggression]]; and [[War crime|crimes against the laws of war]]. He was found not guilty of committing crimes against humanity, but guilty of committing crimes against peace and war crimes against the laws of war. He was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment; following his release, he lived in a village near [[Hamburg]] until his death in 1980.
==Early life and career==
Dönitz was born in [[Grünau (Berlin)|Grünau]] near [[Berlin]], [[German Empire|Germany]], to Anna Beyer and Emil Dönitz, an engineer, in 1891. Karl had an older brother. In 1910, Dönitz enlisted in the ''Kaiserliche Marine'' ("Imperial Navy").{{sfn|Zabecki|2014|page=354}}


==Early career and personal life==
On 27 September 1913, Dönitz was [[Commissioned officer|commissioned]] as a ''[[Leutnant zur See]]'' (acting sub-lieutenant). When [[World War I]] began, he served on the [[light cruiser]] {{SMS|Breslau}} in the [[Mediterranean Sea]].{{sfn|Zabecki|2014|page=354}} In August 1914, the ''Breslau'' and the battlecruiser {{SMS|Goeben}} were sold to the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] navy; the ships were renamed the ''Midilli'' and the ''Yavuz Sultan Selim'', respectively. They began operating out of [[Constantinople]], under Rear Admiral [[Wilhelm Souchon]], engaging [[Russian Empire|Russian]] forces in the [[Black Sea]].<ref>Theodor Kraus, Karl Doenitz, Die Kreuzerfahrten der Goeben uns Breslau, Ullstein, Berlin, 1933</ref> On 22 March 1916, Dönitz was promoted to ''[[Oberleutnant zur See]]''. When the ''Midilli'' put into dock for repairs, he was temporarily assigned as airfield commander at the [[Dardanelles]]. From there, he requested a transfer to the submarine forces, which became effective in October 1916. He served as watch officer on {{SMU|U-39||2}}, and from February 1918 onward as commander of {{SMU|UC-25||2}}. On 5 September 1917, he became commander of {{SMU|UB-68||2}}, operating in the Mediterranean{{Citation needed|date=November 2017}}. On 4 October, after suffering technical difficulties, this boat was sunk by British forces and Dönitz was taken prisoner on the island of [[Malta]].
[[File:Oberleutnant zur See Karl Dönitz as Watch Officer of U-39.jpg|thumb|left|''[[Oberleutnant zur See]]'' Karl Dönitz as Watch Officer of ''U-39'' during World War I]]


Dönitz was born on 16 September 1891 in [[Grünau (Berlin)|Grünau]], near [[Berlin]], to Anna Beyer and Emil Dönitz, an engineer. Karl had an older brother. In 1910, Dönitz enlisted in the {{lang|de|Kaiserliche Marine}} ("Imperial Navy").{{sfn|Zabecki|2014|p=354}}
[[File:Oberleutnant zur See Karl Dönitz as Watch Officer of U-39.jpg|thumb|right|''[[Oberleutnant zur See]]'' Karl Dönitz as Watch Officer of ''U-39'']]


On 27 September 1913, Dönitz was [[Commissioned officer|commissioned]] as a {{lang|de|[[Leutnant zur See]]}} (acting sub-lieutenant). When [[World War I]] began, he served on the [[light cruiser]] {{SMS|Breslau}} in the [[Mediterranean Sea]].{{sfn|Zabecki|2014|p=354}} In August 1914, the ''Breslau'' and the battlecruiser {{SMS|Goeben}} were sold to the [[Ottoman Navy]]; the ships were renamed the ''Midilli'' and the ''Yavuz Sultan Selim'', respectively. They began operating out of [[Constantinople]], under Rear Admiral [[Wilhelm Souchon]], engaging [[Imperial Russian Navy|Russian]] forces in the [[Black Sea]].{{sfn|Kraus|Dönitz|1933}}{{page needed|date=December 2019}} On 22 March 1916, Dönitz was promoted to {{lang|de|[[Oberleutnant zur See]]}}. He requested a transfer to the submarine forces, which became effective on 1 October 1916. He attended the submariner's school at Flensburg-Mürwik and [[passing out (military)|passed out]] on 3 January 1917.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=162–164}} He served as watch officer on {{SMU|U-39||2}}, and from February 1918 onward as commander of {{SMU|UC-25||2}}. On 2 July 1918, he became commander of {{SMU|UB-68||2}}, operating in the Mediterranean.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=164–165}} On 4 October, after suffering technical difficulties, Dönitz was forced to surface and scuttled his boat. He was captured by the British and incarcerated in the [[Lodge Moor camp|Redmires camp]] near [[Sheffield]]. He remained a prisoner of war until 1919 and in 1920 he returned to Germany.{{sfn|Williamson|2007|p=10}}
==Interwar period==
The war ended in 1918, but Dönitz remained in a British camp near [[Sheffield]] as a [[prisoner of war]] until his release in July 1919. He returned to Germany in 1920.


[[File:Datei 2159 Kinder von Karl Dönitz.JPG|thumb|right| Karl Dönitz' sons both died in World War II: Lieutenant Peter Dönitz on May 19, 1943, as a watch officer on the ''U-954'', Oberleutnant Klaus Dönitz on May 13, 1944, on the [[E-boat]] ''S-141''.]]
During the [[interwar period]], he continued his naval career in the naval arm of the [[Weimar Republic]]'s armed forces. On 10 January 1921, he became a ''[[Kapitänleutnant]]'' (lieutenant) in the new German navy (''[[Vorläufige Reichsmarine]]''). Dönitz commanded [[torpedo boat]]s, becoming a ''[[Korvettenkapitän]]'' (lieutenant-commander) on 1 November 1928.


On 27 May 1916, Dönitz married a nurse named Ingeborg Weber (1893–1962), the daughter of German general [[Erich Weber]] (1860–1933). They had three children whom they raised as Protestant Christians: daughter Ursula (1917–1990) and sons Klaus (1920–1944) and Peter (1922–1943). Both of Dönitz's sons were killed during the Second World War.{{sfn|Miller|2000|p=145}} Peter was killed on 19 May 1943 when {{GS|U-954||2}} was sunk in the North Atlantic with all hands.{{sfn|Blair|1998|pp=283, 338, 569}}
On 1 September 1933, he became a ''[[Fregattenkapitän]]'' (commander) and, in 1934, was put in command of the cruiser [[German cruiser Emden|''Emden'']], the ship on which cadets and midshipmen took a year-long world cruise in preparation for a future officer's commission.


Hitler had issued a policy stating that if a senior officer such as Dönitz lost a son in battle and had other sons in the military, the latter could withdraw from combat and return to civilian life.{{sfn|Blair|1998|p=569}}
On 1 September 1935, he was promoted to ''[[Kapitän zur See]]'' (naval captain). He was placed in command of the first U-boat flotilla Weddigen, which included {{GS|U-7|1935|2}}, {{GS|U-8|1935|2}} and {{GS|U-9|1935|2}}.
After Peter's death, Klaus was forbidden to have any combat role and was allowed to leave the military to begin studying to become a naval doctor. He returned to sea and was killed on 13 May 1944; he had persuaded his friends to let him go on the [[E-boat]] ''S-141'' for a raid on [[Selsey]] on his 24th birthday. The boat was sunk by the {{ship|French destroyer|La Combattante|up=yes}}.{{sfn|Blair|1998|p=569}}


==Interwar period==
During 1935, the Weimar Republic's navy, the ''[[Reichsmarine]]'', was replaced by the Nazi German navy, the ''[[Kriegsmarine]]''.
He continued his naval career in the naval arm of the [[Weimar Republic]]'s armed forces. On 10 January 1921, he became a {{lang|de|[[Kapitänleutnant]]}} (lieutenant) in the new German navy ({{lang|de|[[Vorläufige Reichsmarine]]}}). Dönitz commanded [[torpedo boat]]s, becoming a {{lang|de|[[Korvettenkapitän]]}} (lieutenant-commander) on 1 November 1928. On 1 September 1933, he became a {{lang|de|[[Fregattenkapitän]]}} (commander) and, in 1934, was put in command of the cruiser [[German cruiser Emden|''Emden'']], the ship on which cadets and midshipmen took a year-long world cruise as training.{{sfn|Williamson|2007|p=10}}


In 1935, the {{lang|de|[[Reichsmarine]]}} was renamed {{lang|de|[[Kriegsmarine]]}}. Germany was prohibited by the [[Treaty of Versailles]] from possessing a submarine fleet. The [[Anglo-German Naval Agreement]] of 1935 allowed submarines and he was placed in command of the U-boat flotilla {{lang|de|Weddigen}}, which comprised three boats; {{GS|U-7|1935|2}}; {{GS|U-8|1935|2}} and; {{GS|U-9|1935|2}}. On 1 September 1935, he was promoted to {{lang|de|[[Kapitän zur See]]}} (naval captain).{{sfn|Williamson|2007|p=10}}
Throughout 1935 and 1936, Dönitz had misgivings regarding submarines due to German overestimation of the capabilities of British [[ASDIC]] intelligence. In reality, ASDIC could detect only one submarine in 10 during exercises. In the words of [[Alan Hotham]], British Director of [[Naval Intelligence Division|Naval Intelligence]], ASDIC was a "huge bluff".{{Citation needed|date=September 2007}}


Dönitz opposed Raeder's views that surface ships should be given priority in the {{lang|de|Kriegsmarine}} during the war,{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=345–348}} but in 1935 Dönitz doubted U-boat suitability in a naval trade war on account of their slow speed.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=186–188}} This phenomenal contrast with Dönitz's wartime policy is explained in the 1935 Anglo-German Naval Agreement. The accord was viewed by the navy with optimism, Dönitz included. He remarked, "Britain, in the circumstances, could not possibly be included in the number of potential enemies."{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=187}} The statement, made after June 1935, was uttered at a time when the naval staff were sure [[France]] and the [[Soviet Union]] were likely to be Germany's only enemies.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=187}} Dönitz's statement was partially correct. Britain was not foreseen as an immediate enemy, but the navy still held onto a cadre of imperial officers, which along with its Nazi-instigated intake, understood war would be certain in the distant future, perhaps not until the mid-1940s.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=187}}
German doctrine at the time, based on the work of American Admiral [[Alfred Mahan]] and shared by all major navies, called for submarines to be integrated with surface fleets and employed against enemy warships. By November 1937, Dönitz became convinced that a major campaign against merchant shipping was practicable and began pressing for the conversion of the German fleet almost entirely to U-boats.<ref name="Ten Years and Twenty Days">Dönitz, Karl, Grossadmiral, ''Zehn Jahre und Zwanzig Tage'', translated by R. H. Stevens as ''Memoirs: Ten Years and Twenty Days'' (Cleveland: World Publishing, 1959)</ref> He advocated a strategy of attacking only merchant ships, targets relatively safe to attack. He pointed out that destroying Britain's fleet of oil tankers would starve the [[Royal Navy]] of supplies needed to run its ships, which would be just as effective as sinking them. He thought a German fleet of 300 of the newer [[Type VII U-boat]]s could knock Britain out of the war.<ref name="Dönitz, Memoirs">Dönitz, ''Memoirs''.</ref>


Dönitz came to recognise the need for more of these vessels. Only 26 were in commission or under construction that summer. In the time before his command of submarines, he perfected the group tactics that first appealed to him in 1917. At this time Dönitz first expressed his procurement policies. His preference for the submarine fleet was in the production of large numbers of small craft. In contrast to other warships, the fighting power of the U-boat, in his opinion, was not dependent on its size as the torpedo, not the gun, was the machine's main weapon. Dönitz had a tendency to be critical of larger submarines and listed a number of disadvantages in their production, operation and tactical use.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=196–197}} Dönitz recommended the [[Type VII submarine]] as the ideal submarine. The boat was reliable and had a range of 6,200 miles. Modifications lengthened this to 8,700 miles.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=197–198}}
Dönitz revived the World War I idea of grouping several submarines together into a "[[wolfpack (naval tactic)|wolfpack]]" to overwhelm a merchant convoy's defensive escorts. Implementation of wolfpacks had been difficult in World War I owing to the limitations of available radios. In the interwar years, Germany had developed ultrahigh frequency transmitters which it was hoped would make their radio communication unjammable, while the [[Enigma machine|Enigma cipher machine]] was believed to have made communications secure. Dönitz also adopted and claimed credit for [[Wilhelm Marschall]]'s 1922 idea of attacking convoys using surface or very-near-the-surface night attacks. This tactic had the added advantage of making a submarine undetectable by sonar.<ref>[[Otto Kretschmer]] preferred to fight on the surface for exactly that reason. Robertson, Terrence. ''The Golden Horseshoes''. (London, Pan, 1957).</ref>


Dönitz revived [[Hermann Bauer]]'s idea of grouping several submarines together into a {{lang|de|Rudeltaktik}} ("pack tactic", commonly called "wolfpack") to overwhelm a merchant convoy's escorts. Implementation of wolfpacks had been difficult in World War I owing to the limitations of available radios. In the interwar years, Germany had developed ultra high frequency transmitters, (ukw) while the [[Enigma cipher machine]] was believed to have made communications secure.{{sfn|Rohwer|2015|pp=3–4, 257–262}} A 1922 paper written by {{lang|de|Kapitäinleutnant}} Wessner of the {{lang|de|Wehrabteilung}} (Defence Ministry) pointed to the success of surface attacks at night and the need to coordinate operations with multiple boats to defeat the escorts.{{sfn|Westwood|2005|pp=55–56}} Dönitz knew of the paper and improved the ideas suggested by Wessner.{{sfn|Haslop|2013|p=51}} This tactic had the added advantage that a submarine on the surface was undetectable by [[ASDIC]] (an early form of [[sonar]]). Dönitz claimed after the war he would not allow his service to be intimidated by British disclosures about ASDIC and the course of the war had proven him right.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=188}} In reality, Dönitz harboured fears stretching back to 1937 that the new technology would render the U-boat impotent.{{sfn|Westwood|2005|pp=53–54}} Dönitz published his ideas on night attacks in January 1939 in a booklet called {{lang|de|Die U-Bootwaffe}} which apparently went unnoticed by the British.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=17}} The Royal Navy's overconfidence in Asdic encouraged the Admiralty to suppose it could deal with submarines whatever strategy they adopted — in this they were proven wrong; submarines were difficult to locate and destroy under operational conditions.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=17}}
At the time, many{{snd}} including Admiral [[Erich Raeder]]{{snd}} felt such talk marked Dönitz as a weakling. Dönitz was alone among senior naval officers, including some former submariners, in believing in a new submarine war on trade. Dönitz and Raeder argued constantly over funding priorities within the Navy, while at the same time competing with Hitler's friends, such as [[Hermann Göring]], who received greater attention at this time.


In 1939 he expressed his belief that he could win the war with 300 vessels.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=215}} The Nazi leadership's rearmament priorities were fundamentally geared to land and aerial warfare. From 1933 to 1936, the navy was granted only 13 per cent of total armament expenditure.{{sfn|Overy|2002|p=182}} The production of U-boats, despite the existing [[Plan Z|Z Plan]], remained low. In 1935 shipyards produced 14 submarines, 21 in 1936, 1 in 1937. In 1938 nine were commissioned and in 1939 18 U-boats were built.{{sfn|Westwood|2005|pp=53–54}} Dönitz's vision may have been misguided. The British had planned for contingency construction programmes for the summer, 1939. At least 78 small escorts and a crash construction programme of "[[Whaler|Whale catchers]]" had been invoked. The British, according to one historian, had taken all the sensible steps necessary to deal with the U-boat menace as it existed in 1939 and were well placed to deal with large numbers of submarines, prior to events in 1940.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=16–17}}
Since the surface strength of the ''Kriegsmarine'' was much less than that of the [[British Royal Navy]], Raeder believed any war with Britain in the near future would doom it to uselessness, once remarking all the Germans could hope to do was to die valiantly. Raeder based his hopes on war's being delayed until the ''Kriegsmarine'''s extensive [[Plan Z|"Z Plan"]], which would have expanded Germany's surface fleet to where it could effectively contend with the Royal Navy, was implemented. The "Z Plan", however, was not scheduled to be completed until 1945.<ref>Dönitz, ''Ten Years and 20 Days''.</ref>


==World War II==
Dönitz, in contrast, was not constrained by such fatalism, but set about intensely training his crews in the new tactics. The marked inferiority of the German surface fleet left submarine warfare as Germany's primary naval option once war broke out.
{{Main|Battle of the Atlantic}}


On 1 September 1939, [[Germany invaded Poland]]. Britain and France soon declared war on Germany, and [[World War II]] began. On Sunday 3 September, Dönitz chaired a conference at [[Wilhelmshaven]]. At 11:15&nbsp;am the British Admiralty sent out a signal "Total Germany". [[B-Dienst]] intercepted the message and it was promptly reported to Dönitz. Dönitz paced around the room and his staff purportedly heard him repeatedly say, "My God! So it's war with England again!"{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=215}}
On 28 January 1939, Dönitz was promoted to [[commodore (rank)|commodore]] (''Kommodore'') and Commander of Submarines (''Führer der Unterseeboote'').


Dönitz abandoned the conference to return within the hour a far more composed man. He announced to his officers, "we know our enemy. We have today the weapon and a leadership that can face up to this enemy. The war will last a long time; but if each does his duty we will win."{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=215}} Dönitz had only 57 boats; of those, 27 were capable of reaching the [[Atlantic Ocean]] from their German bases. A small building program was already under way but the number of U-boats did not rise noticeably until the autumn of 1941.{{sfn|Tucker|2005|p=142}}
==World War II==
{{Main article|Battle of the Atlantic}}


Dönitz's first major action was the cover up of the sinking of the British passenger liner [[SS Athenia (1922)|''Athenia'']] later the same day. Acutely sensitive to international opinion and relations with the [[United States]], the death of more than a hundred civilians was damaging. Dönitz suppressed the truth that the ship was sunk by a German submarine. He accepted the commander's explanation that he genuinely believed the ship was armed. Dönitz ordered the engagement to be struck from the submarine's logbook. Dönitz did not admit the cover up until 1946.{{sfn|Paterson|2003|pp=10–14}}
In September 1939, [[Invasion of Poland (1939)|Germany invaded Poland]]. Britain and France declared war on Germany, and [[World War II]] began. The ''Kriegsmarine'' was caught unprepared for war, having expected that war would break out in 1945, instead of 1939. The Z Plan was tailored for this assumption, calling for a balanced fleet with a greatly increased number of surface capital ships, including several aircraft carriers. At the time the war began, Dönitz's force included only 57 U-boats, many of them short-range, and only 22 oceangoing [[German Type VII submarine|Type VIIs]]. He made do with what he had, while being harassed by Raeder and with Hitler calling on him to dedicate boats to military actions against the British fleet directly. These operations had mixed success; the [[aircraft carrier]] {{HMS|Courageous|50|6}} and [[battleship]] {{HMS|Royal Oak|08|2}} were sunk, battleships {{HMS|Nelson|28|6}} damaged and {{HMS|Barham|04|2}} sunk at a cost of some U-boats, diminishing the small quantity available even further. Together with surface raiders, merchant shipping lines were also attacked by U-boats.<ref name="Dönitz, Memoirs"/>

Hitler's original orders to wage war only in accordance with the [[Prize (law)|Prize Regulations]] were not issued in any altruistic spirit but in the belief hostilities with the Western Allies would be brief. On 23 September 1939, Hitler, on the recommendation of Admiral Raeder, approved that all merchant ships making use of their wireless on being stopped by U-boats should be sunk or captured. This German order marked a considerable step towards unrestricted warfare. Four days later enforcement of Prize Regulations in the North Sea was withdrawn; and on 2 October complete freedom was given to attack darkened ships encountered off the British and French coasts. Two days later the Prize Regulations were cancelled in waters extending as far as 15° West, and on 17 October the German Naval Staff gave U-boats permission to attack without warning all ships identified as hostile. The zone where darkened ships could be attacked with complete freedom was extended to 20° West on 19 October. Practically the only restrictions now placed on U-boats concerned attacks on passenger liners and, on 17 November, they too were allowed to be attacked without warning if clearly identifiable as hostile.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|pp=103–104}}

Although the phrase was not used, by November 1939 the BdU was practicing unrestricted submarine warfare. Neutral shipping was warned by the Germans against entering the zone which, by American neutrality legislation, was forbidden to American shipping, and against steaming without lights, zigzagging or taking any defensive precautions. The complete practice of unrestricted warfare was not enforced for fear of antagonising neutral powers, particularly the Americans. Admirals Raeder and Dönitz and the German Naval Staff had always wished and intended to introduce unrestricted warfare as rapidly as Hitler could be persuaded to accept the possible consequences.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|pp=103–104}}

Dönitz and Raeder accepted the death of the Z Plan upon the outbreak of war. The U-boat programme would be the only portion of it to survive 1939. Both men lobbied Hitler to increase the planned production of submarines to at least 29 per month.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=220–221}} The immediate obstacle to the proposals was [[Hermann Göring]], head of the [[Four Year Plan]], commander-in-chief of the ''[[Luftwaffe]]'' and future successor to Hitler. Göring would not acquiesce and in March 1940 Raeder was forced to drop the figure from 29 to 25, but even that plan proved illusory. In the first half of 1940, two boats were delivered, increased to six in the final half of the year. In 1941 the deliveries increased to 13 to June, and then 20 to December. It was not until late 1941 the number of vessels began to increase quickly.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=220–221}} From September 1939 through to March 1940, 15 U-boats were lost—nine to convoy escorts. The impressive tonnage sunk had little impact on the Allied war effort at that point.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=31}}


===Commander of the submarine fleet===
===Commander of the submarine fleet===
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101II-MW-3491-06, St. Nazaire, Uboot U 94, Karl Dönitz.jpg|thumb|left|Dönitz observing the arrival of [[German submarine U-94 (1940)|''U-94'']] at [[St Nazaire]] in France in June 1941]]
On 1 October 1939, Dönitz became a ''[[Konteradmiral]]'' (rear admiral) and "Commander of the Submarines" (''Befehlshaber der Unterseeboote'', ''BdU''); on 1 September the following year, he was made a ''[[Vizeadmiral]]'' (vice admiral).


On 1 October 1939, Dönitz became a {{lang|de|[[Konteradmiral]]}} (rear admiral) and "Commander of the Submarines" ({{lang|de|Befehlshaber der Unterseeboote}}, ''BdU''). For the first part of the war, despite disagreements with Raeder where best to deploy his men, Dönitz was given considerable [[Mission-type tactics|operational freedom]] for his junior rank.{{sfn|Gardner|1999|pp=58, 62}}
With the fall of France, Germany acquired U-boat bases at [[Lorient]], [[Brest, France|Brest]], [[St Nazaire]], and [[La Pallice]]/[[La Rochelle]]. A communication centre was established at the [[Château de Pignerolle]] at [[Saint-Barthélemy-d'Anjou]].<ref>{{cite web |url= http://docplayer.fr/9303523-Pignerolle-dans-la-seconde-guerre-mondiale.html |title=Pignerolle dans la Seconde Guerre mondiale}}</ref>


From September–December 1939 U-boats sank 221 ships for 755,237 gross tons, at the cost of nine U-boats.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=767}} Only 47 merchant ships were sunk in the [[North Atlantic]], a tonnage of 249,195.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=767}} Dönitz had difficulty in organising Wolfpack operations in 1939. A number of his submarines were lost en route to the Atlantic, through either the [[North Sea]] or the heavily defended [[English Channel]]. Torpedo failures plagued commanders during convoy attacks. Along with successes against single ships, Dönitz authorised the abandonment of pack attacks in the autumn.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=27–28}} The [[Norwegian Campaign]] amplified the defects. Dönitz wrote in May 1940, "I doubt whether men have ever had to rely on such a useless weapon."{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=35}} He ordered the removal of magnetic pistols in favour of contact fuses and their faulty depth control systems.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=35}} In no fewer than 40 attacks on Allied warships, not a single sinking was achieved.{{sfn|Morgan|Taylor|2011|p=61}} The statistics show that from the outbreak of war to approximately the spring, 1940, faulty German torpedoes saved 50–60 ships equating to {{GRT|300,000|link=off}}.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=29}}
By 1941, the delivery of new Type VIIs had improved to the point where operations were having a real effect on the British wartime economy. Although production of merchant ships shot up in response, improved torpedoes, better U-boats, and much better operational planning led to increasing numbers of "kills". On 11 December 1941, following Hitler's declaration of war on the United States, Dönitz immediately planned for implementation of [[Operation Drumbeat]] (''Unternehmen Paukenschlag'').<ref group="Note">Commonly known as Drumbeat, it has connotations of "tattoo" or "thunderbolt" in German.</ref> This targeted shipping along the [[East Coast of the United States]]. Carried out the next month with only nine U-boats (all the larger [[German Type IX submarine|Type IX]]), it had dramatic and far-reaching results. The [[United States Navy|U.S. Navy]] was entirely unprepared for [[antisubmarine warfare]] despite having had two years of British experience to draw from, and committed every imaginable mistake. Shipping losses, which had appeared to be coming under control as the Royal Navy and [[Royal Canadian Navy]] gradually adapted to the new challenge, skyrocketed.


Dönitz was encouraged in operations against warships by the sinking of the [[aircraft carrier]] [[HMS Courageous (50)|''Courageous'']]. On 28 September 1939 he said, "it is not true Britain possesses the means to eliminate the U-boat menace."{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=21–22}} The first specific operation—named "[[Special Operation P]]"—authorised by Dönitz was [[Günther Prien]]'s attack on [[Scapa Flow]], which sank the battleship [[HMS Royal Oak (08)|''Royal Oak'']].{{sfn|Roskill|1954|p=74}} The attack became a propaganda success though Prien purportedly was unenthusiastic about being used that way.{{sfn|Vause|1997|p=96}} [[Stephen Roskill]] wrote, "It is now known that this operation was planned with great care by Admiral Dönitz, who was correctly informed of the weak state of the defences of the eastern entrances. Full credit must also be given to Lieutenant Prien for the nerve and determination with which he put Dönitz's plan into execution."{{sfn|Roskill|1954|p=74}}
On at least two occasions, [[Allies of World War II|Allied]] success against U-boat operations led Dönitz to investigate. Among reasons considered were espionage and Allied interception and [[decoding methods|decoding]] of German naval communications (the naval version of the [[Enigma machine|Enigma cipher machine]]). Both investigations into communications security came to the conclusion espionage was more likely, or else the Allied successes had been accidental. Nevertheless, Dönitz ordered his U-boat fleet to use an improved version of the Enigma machine (one with four rotors, which was more secure than the three-rotor version it replaced), the [[Kriegsmarine M4|M4]], for communications within the fleet, on 1 February 1942. The ''Kriegsmarine'' was the only branch to use this improved version; the rest of the ''[[Wehrmacht]]'' (German armed forces) continued to use their then-current three-rotor versions of the Enigma machine. The new system was termed "Triton" ("Shark" to the Allies). For a time, this change in encryption between submarines caused considerable difficulty for Allied [[Cryptanalysis|codebreakers]]; it took 10 months before Shark traffic could be read (see also [[Ultra (World War II intelligence)|Ultra codebreaking]] and [[Cryptanalysis of the Enigma]]).


In May 1940, 101 ships were sunk—but only nine in the Atlantic—followed by 140 in June; 53 of them in the Atlantic for a total of {{GRT|585,496|link=off}} that month. The first six months in 1940 cost Dönitz 15 U-boats.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=767}} Until mid-1940 there remained a chronic problem with the reliability of the [[G7e torpedo]]. As the battles of Norway and Western Europe raged, the ''Luftwaffe'' sank more ships [[Operationsbefehl Hartmut|than the U-boats]]. In May 1940, German aircraft sank 48 ships ({{GRT|158|348|link=off}}), three times that of German submarines.{{clarify|date=August 2021}}{{citation needed|date=August 2021}} The Allied evacuations from western Europe and [[Scandinavia]] in June 1940 attracted Allied warships in large numbers, leaving many of the Atlantic convoys travelling through the [[Western Approaches]] unprotected. From June 1940, the German submarines began to exact a heavy toll. In the same month, the ''Luftwaffe'' sank just 22 ships ({{GRT|195,193|link=off}}) in a reversal of the previous months.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=261}}
By the end of 1942, the production of Type VII U-boats had increased to the point where Dönitz was finally able to conduct mass attacks by groups of submarines, a tactic he called ''Rudel'' (group or pack) and became known as "wolfpack" in English. Allied shipping losses shot up tremendously, and serious concern existed for a while about the state of British fuel supplies.


Germany's [[Norwegian Campaign|defeat of Norway]] gave the U-boats new bases much nearer to their main area of operations off the Western Approaches. The U-boats operated in groups or 'wolf packs' which were coordinated by radio from land.{{sfn|Tucker|2005|p=142}} With the [[fall of France]], Germany acquired U-boat bases at [[Lorient]], [[Brest, France|Brest]], [[St Nazaire]], and [[La Pallice]]/[[La Rochelle]] and [[Bordeaux]]. This extended the range of Type VIIs.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=770}} Regardless, the war with Britain continued. The admiral remained sceptical of [[Operation Sea Lion]], a planned invasion and expected a long war.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=260}} The destruction of seaborne trade became German strategy against Britain after the defeat of the ''[[Luftwaffe]]'' in the [[Battle of Britain]].{{sfn|National Archives|2001|p=104}} Hitler was content with [[The Blitz]] and cutting off Britain's imports. Dönitz gained importance as the prospect of a quick victory faded.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=265}} Dönitz concentrated groups of U-boats against the convoys and had them attack on the surface at night.{{sfn|Tucker|2005|p=142}} In addition the Germans were helped by Italian submarines which in early 1941 actually surpassed the number of German U-boats.{{sfn|Tucker|2005|p=143}} Having failed to persuade the Nazi leadership to prioritise U-boat construction, a task made more difficult by military victories in 1940 which convinced many people that Britain would give up the struggle, Dönitz welcomed the deployment of 26 Italian submarines to his force.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=39–40}} Dönitz complimented Italian bravery and daring, but was critical of their training and submarine designs. Dönitz remarked they lacked the necessary toughness and discipline and consequently were "of no great assistance to us in the Atlantic."{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=274}}
During 1943, the war in the [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]] turned against the Germans, but Dönitz continued to push for increased U-boat construction and entertained the notion that further technological developments would tip the war once more in Germany's favour, briefing the ''Führer'' to that effect.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/atlantic/bitterend.aspx |title=Military History Online |publisher=Military History Online |date=2002-12-15 |accessdate=2013-07-12}}</ref> At the end of the war, the German submarine fleet was by far the most advanced in the world, and late-war examples such as the [[Type XXI U-boat]] served as models for [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] and American construction after the war. The [[submarine snorkel|''Schnorchel'']] (snorkel) and [[German Type XXI submarine|Type XXI]] boats appeared late in the war because of Dönitz's personal indifference, at times even hostility, to new technology he perceived as disruptive to the production process.<ref>von der Porten, ''op. cit.''</ref> His opposition to the larger Type IX was not unique; Admiral [[Thomas C. Hart]], commander of the [[United States Asiatic Fleet]] in the [[Philippines]] at the outbreak of the [[Pacific War]], opposed fleet boats like the [[Gato-class submarine|''Gato'']] and [[Balao-class submarine|''Balao'']] classes as "too luxurious".<ref>Blair, ''Silent Victory''</ref>


The establishment of German bases on the French Atlantic coast allowed for the prospect of aerial support. Small numbers of German aircraft, such as the long-range [[Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor]], sank a large number of ships in the Atlantic in the last quarter of 1940. In the long term, Göring proved an insurmountable problem in effecting cooperation between the navy and the ''Luftwaffe''.{{sfn|National Archives|2001|pp=104–117}} In early 1941, while Göring was on leave, Dönitz approached Hitler and secured from him a [[Kampfgeschwader 40|single bomber/maritime patrol unit]] for the navy. Göring succeeded in overturning this decision and both Dönitz and Raeder were forced to settle for a specialist maritime air command under ''Luftwaffe'' control.{{sfn|Hooton|2010|p=111}} Poorly supplied, {{lang|de|[[Fliegerführer Atlantik]]}} achieved modest success in 1941, but thereafter failed to have an impact as British counter-measures evolved.{{sfn|National Archives|2001|pp=104–117}} Cooperation between the {{lang|de|Kriegsmarine}} and {{lang|de|Luftwaffe}} remained dysfunctional to the war's end.{{sfn|Neitzel|2003|pp=448–462}} Göring and his unassailable position at the {{lang|de|Reichsluftfahrtministerium}} ([[Ministry of Aviation (Nazi Germany)|Air Ministry]]) prevented all but limited collaboration.{{sfn|Neitzel|2003|p=450}}
Dönitz was deeply involved in the daily operations of his boats, often contacting them up to 70 times a day with questions such as their position, fuel supply. and other "minutiae". This incessant questioning hastened the compromise of his ciphers by giving the Allies more messages to work with. Furthermore, replies from the boats enabled the Allies to use [[direction finding]] (HF/DF, called "[[Huff-Duff]]") to locate a U-boat using its radio, track it and attack it (often with aircraft able to sink it with impunity).


The U-boat fleet's successes in 1940 and early 1941 were spearheaded by a small number of highly trained and experienced pre-war commanders. [[Otto Kretschmer]], [[Joachim Schepke]], and [[Günther Prien]] were the most famous, but others included [[Hans Jenisch]], [[Victor Oehrn]], [[Engelbert Endrass]], [[Herbert Schultze]] and [[Hans-Rudolf Rösing]]. Although skilled and with impeccable judgement, the shipping lanes they descended upon were poorly defended.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=261–262}} The U-boat force did not escape unscathed. Within the space of several days in March 1941, Prien and Schepke were dead and Kretschmer was a prisoner. All of them fell in battle with a convoy system.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=52–53}} The number of boats in the Atlantic remained low. Six fewer existed in May 1940 than in September 1939. In January 1941 there were just six on station in the Atlantic—the lowest during the war, while still suffering from unreliable torpedoes. Dönitz insisted that operations continue while "the smallest prospect of hits" remained.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=36}}
Dönitz wore on his uniform the special grade of the U-Boat War Badge with diamonds, his U-Boat War badge from World War I and his World War I Iron Cross 1st Class with World War II clasp.


For his part, Dönitz was involved in the daily operations of his boats and all the major [[operational level]] decisions. His assistant, [[Eberhard Godt]], was left to manage daily operations as the war continued.{{sfn|Stern|2003|p=137}} Dönitz was debriefed personally by his captains which helped establish a rapport between leader and led. Dönitz neglected nothing that would make the bond firmer. Often there would be a distribution of medals or awards. As an ex-submariner, Dönitz did not like to contemplate the thought of a man who had done well heading out to sea, perhaps never to return, without being rewarded or receiving recognition. Dönitz acknowledged where decorations were concerned there was no red tape and that awards were "psychologically important".{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=230–231}}
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-V00538-3, Karl Dönitz, Adolf Hitler.jpg|thumb|[[Hitler]] meets ''[[Großadmiral]]'' Dönitz in the ''[[Führerbunker]]'' (1945)]]

===Intelligence battle===
Intelligence played an important role in the Battle of the Atlantic.{{sfn|Gardner|1999|pp=1–218}} In general, BdU intelligence was poor.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=117}}{{sfn|Gardner|1999|p=58}} Counter-intelligence was not much better. At the height of the battle in mid-1943 some 2,000 signals were sent from the 110 U-boats at sea.{{sfn|Boog|Rahn|Stumpf|Wegner|2001|p=343}} Radio traffic compromised his ciphers by giving the Allies more messages to work with. Furthermore, replies from the boats enabled the Allies to use [[High-frequency direction finding]] (HF/DF, called "Huff-Duff") to locate a U-boat using its radio, track it and attack it.{{sfn|Stern|2003|p=171}}{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=264}} The over-centralised command structure of BdU and its insistence on micro-managing every aspect of U-boat operations with endless signals provided the Allied navies with ample intelligence.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=264}} The enormous "paper chase" [cross-referencing of materials] operations pursued by Allied intelligence agencies was not thought possible by BdU. The Germans did not suspect the Allies had identified the codes broken by B-Dienst.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=264}} Conversely, when Dönitz suspected the enemy had penetrated his own communications BdU's response was to suspect internal sabotage and reduce the number of the staff officers to the most reliable, exacerbating the problem of over-centralisation.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=264}} In contrast to the Allies, the {{lang|de|Wehrmacht}} was suspicious of civilian scientific advisors and generally distrusted outsiders. The Germans were never as open to new ideas or thinking of war in intelligence terms. According to one analyst BdU "lacked imagination and intellectual daring" in the naval war.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|pp=264–265}} These Allied advantages failed to avert heavy losses in the June 1940{{snd}} May 1941 period, known to U-boat crews as the "[[First Happy Time]]."{{sfn|Stern|2003|p=112}} In June 1941, 68 ships were sunk in the North Atlantic ({{GRT|318,740|link=off}}) at a cost of four U-boats, but the German submarines would not eclipse that number for the remainder of the year. Just 10 transports were sunk in November and December 1941.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=767}}

On 7 May 1941, the Royal Navy captured the German Arctic meteorological vessel {{lang|de|München}} and took its [[Enigma machine]] intact, which allowed the Royal Navy to decode U-boat radio communications in June 1941.{{sfn|Tucker|2005|p=143}} Two days later the capture of [[German submarine U-110 (1940)|''U-110'']] was an intelligence coup for the British. The settings for high-level "officer-only" signals, "short-signals" ({{lang|de|Kurzsignale}}) and codes standardising messages to defeat HF/DF fixes by sheer speed were found.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=326}} Only the ''Hydra'' settings for May were missing. The papers were the only stores destroyed by the crew.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=326}} The capture on 28 June of another weather ship, {{lang|de|Lauenburg}}, enabled British decryption operations to read radio traffic in July 1941. Beginning in August 1941, [[Bletchley Park]] operatives could decrypt signals between Dönitz and his U-boats at sea without any restriction.{{sfn|Tucker|2005|p=143}} The capture of the ''U-110'' allowed the [[British Admiralty|Admiralty]] to identify individual boats, their commanders, operational readiness, damage reports, location, type, speed, endurance from working up in the [[Baltic Sea|Baltic]] to Atlantic patrols.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=326}} On 1 February 1942, the Germans had introduced the [[Kriegsmarine M4|M4]] cipher machine, which secured communications until it was cracked in December 1942. Even so, the U-boats achieved their best success against the convoys in March 1943, due to an increase in U-boat numbers, and the protection of the shipping lanes was in jeopardy. Due to the cracked M4 and the use of radar, the Allies began to send air and surface reinforcements to convoys under threat. The shipping lanes were secured, which came as a great surprise to Dönitz.{{sfn|Tucker|2005|p=145}} The lack of intelligence and increased numbers of U-boats contributed enormously to Allied losses that year.{{sfn|Hinsley|1993|p=157}}

[[File:Angelo Parona and Karl Doenitz.jpg|thumb|upright|Dönitz and his Italian counterpart Admiral [[Angelo Parona]] in 1941]]
Signals security aroused Dönitz's suspicions during the war. On 12 January 1942 [[German submarine U-459|German supply submarine ''U-459'']] arrived 800 nautical miles west of [[Freetown]], well clear of convoy lanes. It was scheduled to rendezvous with an Italian submarine, until intercepted by a warship. The German captain's report coincided with reports of a decrease in sightings and a period of tension between Dönitz and Raeder.{{sfn|Macksey|2000|p=23}} The number of U-boats in the Atlantic, by logic, should have increased, not lowered the number of sightings and the reasons for this made Dönitz uneasy. Despite several investigations, the conclusion of the BdU staff was that ''Enigma'' was impenetrable. His signals officer responded to the ''U-459'' incident with answers ranging from coincidence, direction finding to Italian treachery.{{sfn|Macksey|2000|p=23}} General [[Erich Fellgiebel]], Chief Signal Officer of Army High Command and of Supreme Command of Armed Forces ({{lang|de|Chef des Heeresnachrichtenwesens}}), apparently concurred with Dönitz. He concluded that there was "convincing evidence" that, after an "exhaustive investigation" that the Allied codebreakers had been reading high level communications.{{sfn|Macksey|2000|p=53}} Other departments in the navy downplayed or dismissed these concerns. They vaguely implied "some components" of Enigma had been compromised, but there was "no real basis for acute anxiety as regards any compromise of operational security".{{sfn|Kohnen|1999|p=65}}

===American entry===
Following Hitler's declaration of war on the United States on 11 December 1941, Dönitz implemented [[Operation Drumbeat]] ({{lang|de|Unternehmen Paukenschlag}}).{{sfn|Gannon|1990|pp=308, 339}} The entry of the United States benefited German submarines in the short term. Dönitz intended to strike close to shore in American and Canadian waters and prevent the convoys—the most effective anti–U-boat system—from ever forming. Dönitz was determined to take advantage of Canadian and American unpreparedness before the situation changed.{{sfn|Hadley|1985|pp=52–54}}

The problem inhibiting Dönitz's plan was a lack of boats. On paper he had 259, but in January 1942, 99 were still undergoing [[sea trial]]s and 59 were assigned to training flotillas, leaving only 101 on war operations. 35 of these were under repair in port, leaving 66 operational, of which 18 were low on fuel and returning to base, 23 were en route to areas where fuel and torpedoes needed to be conserved, and one was heading to the [[Mediterranean]]. Therefore, on 1 January Dönitz had a fighting strength of 16–25 in the Atlantic (six near to [[Iceland]] on "Norwegian operations"), three in the [[Arctic Ocean]], three in the Mediterranean and three operating west of [[Gibraltar]].{{sfn|Hadley|1985|p=54}} Dönitz was severely limited to what he could accomplish in American waters in an initial offensive.{{sfn|Kohnen|1999|p=36}}

From 13 January 1942, Dönitz planned to begin a surprise offensive from the [[Gulf of Saint Lawrence]] to [[Cape Hatteras]]. Unknown to him, [[Ultra (cryptography)|Ultra]] had read his Enigma signals and knew the position, size, and intentions of his boats, down to the date the operation was scheduled to begin. The attacks, when they came, were not a surprise.{{sfn|Hadley|1985|p=55}} Of the 12 U-boats that began the offensive from the [[Grand Banks]] southward, just two survived the war.{{sfn|Hadley|1985|pp=55–56}} The operation began the [[Battle of the St. Lawrence]], a series of battles which lasted into 1944.{{sfn|Hadley|1985|pp=112–144}} It remained possible for a U-boat to operate in the Gulf into 1944, but countermeasures were strong.{{sfn|Milner|1994|pp=200–201}} In 1942, the global ratio of ships-to-U-boats sunk in Canadian waters was 112:1. The global average was 10.3:1. The solitary kill was achieved by the [[RCAF]]. Canadian operations, as with American efforts, were a failure during this year.{{sfn|Milner|1994|p=17}}

Along with conventional U-boat operations Dönitz authorised clandestine activities in Canadian waters, including spying, mine-laying, and recovery of German prisoners of war (as Dönitz wished to extract information from rescued submariners concerning Allied tactics). All of these things tied down Canadian military power and imposed industrial, fiscal, and psychological costs. The impunity with which U-boats carried out these operations in Canadian waters into 1944 provided a propaganda effect.{{sfn|Hadley|1985|pp=168–193}} One of these operations was the well-known [[Operation Kiebitz]] to rescue [[Otto Kretschmer]].{{sfn|Hadley|1985|pp=169, 176}}

Even with operational problems great success was achieved in American waters. From January to July 1942, Dönitz's submarines were able to attack unescorted ships off the United States' east coast and in the Caribbean Sea; U-boats sank more ships and tonnage than at any other time in the war. After a convoy system was introduced to protect the shipping, Dönitz shifted his U-boats back to the North Atlantic.{{sfn|Tucker|2005|p=145}} The period, known in the [[U-boat Arm]] as the "[[Second Happy Time]]", represented one of the greatest naval disasters of all time, and largest defeat suffered by American sea power.{{sfn|Gannon|1990|p=389}} The success was achieved with only five U-boats initially{{sfn|Gannon|1990|p=77}} which sank 397 ships in waters protected by the [[United States Navy]] with an additional 23 sunk at the [[Panama Sea Frontier]].{{sfn|Gannon|1990|p=389}} Dönitz put the successes down to the American failure to initialize a [[Blackout (wartime)|blackout]] along the [[East Coast of the United States]] and ship captains' insistence on following peace-time safety procedures.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=410}} The failure to implement a blackout stemmed from the American government's concern it would affect tourism trade.{{sfn|Wiggins|1995|p=21}} Dönitz wrote in his memoirs that the [[lighthouse]]s and [[buoy]]s "shone forth, though perhaps a little less brightly than usually".{{sfn|Wiggins|1995|p=21}}

By the time improved American air and naval defences had driven German submarines from American shores, 5,000 Allied sailors had been killed for negligible losses in U-boats.{{sfn|Gannon|1990|p=389}} Dönitz ordered simultaneous operations in the [[Caribbean Sea]]. The ensuing [[Battle of the Caribbean]] resulted in immediate dividends for U-boats. In a short time, at least 100 transports had been destroyed or sunk. The sinkings damaged inter-island trade substantially.{{sfn|Kelshall|1988|p=113}} [[Operation Neuland]] was among the most damaging naval campaigns in the region. [[Oil refinery]] production in region declined{{sfn|Kelshall|1988|pp=43, 45–67}} while the tanker fleet suffered losses of up to ten per cent within twenty-four hours.{{sfn|Blair|1998|pp=505–506}} However, ultimately Dönitz could not hope to sink more ships than American industry could build, so he targeted the tanker fleet in the Caribbean and [[Gulf of Mexico]] in the hope that depleting oil transports would paralyze shipyard output. 33 transports were sunk in July before Dönitz lost his first crew. The USN introduced effective convoy systems thereafter, ending the "carnage".{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=115}}

Dönitz maintained his demands for the concentration of all his crews in the Atlantic. As the military situation in [[North African Campaign|North Africa]] and on the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]] began to deteriorate Hitler diverted a number of submarines to the [[Battle of the Mediterranean]]{{sfn|Boog|Rahn|Stumpf|Wegner|2001|p=380}} upon the suggestions of Admiral [[Eberhard Weichold]].{{sfn|Vause|1997|pp=124–125}} Raeder and Dönitz resisted the deployment to the Mediterranean to no avail. Hitler felt compelled to act against Allied sea forces which were having an enormous impact on Axis supply lines to North Africa. The decision defied logic, for a victory in the Atlantic would end the war in the Mediterranean.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=359–361}} The [[Mediterranean U-boat Campaign (World War II)|U-boat war in the Mediterranean]] was a costly failure, despite successes against warships.{{sfn|Vause|1997|p=125}} Approximately 60 crews were lost and only one crew managed to withdraw through the [[Strait of Gibraltar]].{{sfn|Paterson|2007|pp=6, 19, 182–183, 187}} [[Albrecht Brandi]] was one of Dönitz's highest performers but his record is a matter of controversy; post-war records prove systematic over-claiming of sinkings.{{sfn|Morgan|Taylor|2011|p=xx}} He survived his boat's sinking and was smuggled to Germany through [[Spain]]. Dönitz had met his end as a submarine commander in the Mediterranean two decades earlier.{{sfn|Paterson|2007|pp=6, 19, 182–183, 187}}

In 1942 Dönitz summed up his philosophy in one simple paragraph; "The enemy's shipping constitutes one single, great entity. It is therefore immaterial where a ship is sunk. Once it has been destroyed it has to be replaced by a new ship; and that's that."{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=444}} The remark was the green light to unrestricted submarine warfare and began the [[tonnage war]] proper. BdU intelligence concluded the Americans could produce 15,300,000 tons of shipping in 1942 and 1943—two million tons under actual production figures. Dönitz always calculated the worst-case scenario using the highest figures of enemy production potential. Some 700,000 tons per month needed to be sunk to win the war. The "second happy time" reached a peak in June 1942, with 325,000 tons sunk, up from 311,000 in May, 255,000 in April and the highest since the 327,000 tons sunk in March 1942.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=444–445}} With support from the Royal Navy and [[Royal Canadian Navy]], the new convoy systems compelled Dönitz to withdraw his captains to the mid-Atlantic once again. Nevertheless, there was still cause for optimism. B-Dienst had cracked the convoy ciphers and by July 1942 Dönitz could call upon 311 boats, 140 operational, to conduct a renewed assault. By October 1942 he had 196 operational from 365. Dönitz's force finally reached the desired number both he and Raeder had hoped for in 1939.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=444–446}} Unaware of it, Dönitz and his men were aided by the [[Ultra (cryptography)|Ultra]] blackout. The addition of a fourth rotor to the Enigma left radio detection the only way to gather intelligence on dispositions and intentions of the German naval forces. [[German code breaking in World War II|German code breakers]] had their own success in the capture of the code book to Cipher Code Number 3 from a merchant ship. It was a treble success for the BdU.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=454}}

Dönitz was content that he now had the naval power to extend U-boat operations to other areas aside the North Atlantic. The Caribbean, [[Brazil]]ian waters with the coast of [[West Africa]] designated operational theatres. Waters in the southern hemisphere to [[South Africa]] could also be attacked with the new [[Type IX submarine]]. The strategy was sound and his tactical ideas were effective. The number of boats available allowed him to form Wolfpacks to comb convoy routes from east to west attacking one when found and pursuing it across the ocean. The pack then refuelled from a [[Type XIV submarine|U-boat tanker]] and worked from west to east. Raeder and the operations staff disputed the value in attacking convoys heading westward with empty cargo holds. The tactics were successful but placed great strain on crews who spent up to eight days in constant action.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=459–461}}

November 1942 was a new high in the Atlantic. 134 ships were sunk for 807,754 tons. 119 were destroyed by submarines, 83 (508,707 tons) in the Atlantic. The same month Dönitz suffered strategic defeat. His submarines failed to prevent [[Operation Torch]], even with 196 of them operating in the Atlantic. Dönitz considered it a major self-inflicted defeat. Allied morale radically improved after the victories of Torch, the [[Second Battle of El Alamein]] and the [[Battle of Stalingrad]]; all occurred within days of one another. The U-boat war was the only military success the Germans enjoyed at the end of the year.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=498–500}}


===Commander-in-chief and Grand Admiral===
===Commander-in-chief and Grand Admiral===
On 30 January 1943, Dönitz replaced Erich Raeder as Commander-in-Chief of the Navy (''Oberbefehlshaber der Kriegsmarine'') and ''[[Großadmiral]]'' (grand admiral) of the [[Oberkommando der Marine|Naval High Command]] (''[[Oberkommando der Marine]]'').<ref name="Speer">{{cite book|last1=Speer|first1=Albert|title=Inside the Third Reich|date=1995|publisher=Weidenfeld & Nicolson|location=London|isbn=9781842127353|pages=374-375}}</ref> His deputy, [[Eberhard Godt]], took over the operational command of the U-boat force.<ref>{{cite web
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H27590, Erich Raeder, Adolf Hitler retouched.jpg|thumb|[[Erich Raeder]] with [[Adolf Hitler]] shortly after he was replaced by Dönitz as Commander-in-chief and Grand Admiral (February 1943).]]On 30 January 1943, Dönitz replaced Erich Raeder as Commander-in-chief of the navy ({{lang|de|Oberbefehlshaber der Kriegsmarine}}) and {{lang|de|[[Großadmiral]]}} (grand admiral) of the [[Oberkommando der Marine|Naval High Command]] ({{lang|de|[[Oberkommando der Marine]]}}). In a communique to the navy he announced his intentions to retain practical control of the U-boats and his desire to fight to the end for Hitler.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=520, 522}} Dönitz's inability to delegate control of the U-boat service has been construed as a weakness in the U-boat arm, contributing to the perception that Dönitz was an "impatient warrior", preoccupied with fighting battles and tactics rather than a strategist or organiser.{{sfn|Haslop|2013|p=53}}
|url=http://uboat.net/men/godt.htm
|title=Eberhard Godt
|last=Helgason
|first=Guðmundur
|website=German U-boats of WWII - uboat.net
|accessdate=16 August 2009
}}</ref> Dönitz was able to convince Hitler not to scrap the remaining ships of the surface fleet. Despite hoping to continue to use them as a [[fleet in being]], the ''Kriegsmarine'' continued to lose what few capital ships it had. In September, the [[battleship]] [[German battleship Tirpitz|''Tirpitz'']] was [[Operation Source|put out of action for months]] by a British [[midget submarine]], and was sunk a year later by RAF bombers at anchor in Norway. In December, he ordered the battleship [[German battleship Scharnhorst|''Scharnhorst'']] (under ''[[Konteradmiral]]'' [[Erich Bey]]) to attack [[Arctic convoys of World War II|Soviet-bound convoys]], after reconsidering her success in the early years of the war with sister ship ''Gneisenau'', but she was sunk in the [[Battle of North Cape|resulting encounter]] with superior British forces led by the battleship {{HMS|Duke of York|17|6}}.


Dönitz's promotion earned Hitler his undying loyalty. For Dönitz, Hitler had given him a "true home-coming at last, to a country in which unemployment appeared to have been abolished, the class war no longer tore the nation apart, and the shame of defeat in 1918 was being expunged."{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=520–522}} When war came, Dönitz became more firmly wedded to his Nazi faith. Hitler recognised his patriotism, professionalism but above all, his loyalty. Dönitz remained so, long after the war was lost. In so doing, he wilfully ignored the genocidal nature of the regime and claimed ignorance of the [[Holocaust]].{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=520–522}}
===President of Germany===
[[File:Hitler will page 7.jpg|left|thumb|[]Last will and testament of Adolf Hitler|Hitler's last will and testament shows that Dönitz was chosen to succeed Hitler as Germany's president.]]


In the last quarter of 1942, 69 submarines had been commissioned taking the total number to 393, with 212 operational.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=523}} Dönitz was not satisfied and immediately began a naval construction programme which in contrast to Raeder's, laid all its emphasis on torpedo boats and submarines. Dönitz's proposed expansion ran into difficulties experienced by all of his predecessors; the lack of steel. The navy had no representation on [[Albert Speer]]'s armaments ministry, for naval production was the only sphere not under his control. Dönitz understood this worked against the navy because it lacked the elasticity to cope with breakdowns of production at any point, whereas the other services could make good production by compensating one sector at the expense of another. Without any representatives the battle of priorities was left to Speer and Göring. Dönitz had the sense to place U-boat production under Speer on the provision 40 per month were completed.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=652–654}} Dönitz persuaded Hitler not to scrap the surface fleet [[capital ship]]s, though they played no role in the Atlantic during his time in command.{{sfn|Rohwer|1996|p=86}} Dönitz reasoned the destruction of the surface fleet would provide the British with a victory and heap pressure on the U-boats, for these warships were tying down British air and naval forces that would otherwise be sent into the Atlantic.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=148}}
In the [[End of World War II in Europe|final days of the war]], after Hitler had taken refuge in the ''[[Führerbunker]]'' beneath the [[Reich Chancellery]] garden in Berlin, ''[[Reichsmarschall]]'' [[Hermann Göring]] was considered the obvious successor to Hitler, followed by ''[[Reichsführer-SS]]'' [[Heinrich Himmler]]. Göring, however, infuriated Hitler by radioing him in Berlin asking for permission to assume leadership of the Reich. Himmler also tried to seize power by entering into negotiations with [[Folke Bernadotte|Count Bernadotte]]. On 28 April 1945, the BBC reported Himmler had offered surrender to the western Allies and that the offer had been declined.{{sfn|Kershaw|2008|pp=943–946}}


[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-J09741, Trauerfeier für Generaloberst Hans Hube.jpg|thumb|left|From left to right: [[Günther von Kluge|Kluge]], [[Himmler]], Dönitz (with his grand admiral's baton) and [[Wilhelm Keitel|Keitel]] at [[Hans Hube]]'s funeral, 1944]]
From mid-April 1945, elements of the last Reich government and the Commander of the Navy, Admiral Karl Dönitz, moved into the buildings of the ''Stadtheide Barracks'' in [[Plön]]. In his [[last will and testament of Adolf Hitler|last will and testament]], dated 29 April 1945, Hitler named Dönitz his successor as ''Staatsoberhaupt'' ([[Head of State]]), with the titles of ''[[President of Germany (Weimar Republic)|Reichspräsident]]'' (President) and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. The same document named Propaganda Minister [[Joseph Goebbels]] as [[Head of Government]] with the title of ''[[Reichskanzler]]'' ([[Reich Chancellor|Chancellor]]). Furthermore, Hitler expelled both Göring and Himmler from the party.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|p=182}}


New construction procedures, dispensing with prototypes and the abandonment of modifications reduced construction times from 460,000-man hours to 260–300,000 to meet Speer's quota. In the spring 1944, the [[Type XXI submarine]] was scheduled to reach frontline units. In 1943 the [[Combined Bomber Offensive]] undid German plans. Dönitz and Speer were appalled by the destruction of [[Hamburg]], a major construction site.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=652–654}} The battles of 1943 and 1944 were fought with the existing Type VII and [[Type IX submarine]]s. The Type VII remained the backbone of the fleet in 1943.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=2}}
Rather than designate one person to succeed him as ''Führer'', Hitler reverted to the old arrangement in the [[Weimar Constitution]]. He believed the leaders of the air force (''[[Luftwaffe]]'') and SS (''[[Schutzstaffel]]'') had betrayed him. Since the ''Kriegsmarine'' had been too small to affect the war in a major way, its commander, Dönitz, became the only possible successor as far as Hitler was concerned more or less by default.{{sfn|Shirer|1983}}{{page needed|date=October 2012}}


At the end of 1942, Dönitz was faced with the appearance of [[escort carrier]]s, and long-range aircraft working with convoy escorts. To protect his boats against the latter, he ordered his boats to restrict their operations to the [[Mid-Atlantic Gap]], a stretch of ocean out of the range of land-based aircraft.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=15}} Allied air forces had few aircraft equipped with [[ASV Mark III radar|ASV radar]] for U-boat detection into April and May 1943, and such units would not exist in [[Newfoundland]] until June. Convoys relied on [[RAF Coastal Command]] aircraft operating from [[Northern Ireland]] and Iceland.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=15}} The aircraft imposed restraints on U-boat captains, who feared them for their ability to sink a submarine or alert surface warships to their position.{{sfn|Buckley|1995|pp=123–124}} In 1942 Coastal Command began forming units combined with ASV and [[Leigh Light]] to attack U-boats at night in transit to the Atlantic via the [[Bay of Biscay]], which continued into 1943. The Command was moderately successful after mid-1942.{{sfn|Buckley|1995|p=129}}
On 1 May, the day after Hitler's own suicide, Goebbels committed suicide.{{sfn|Beevor|2002|pp=380–381}} Dönitz thus became the sole representative of the crumbling [[German Reich]]. He appointed Finance Minister Count [[Ludwig Graf Schwerin von Krosigk|Ludwig Schwerin von Krosigk]] as "Leading Minister" (Krosigk had declined to accept the title of Chancellor), and they attempted to form a government.


1943 began with continued tactical success for Dönitz in battle. In January [[Convoy TM 1]] was nearly destroyed. The loss of 100,000 tons of fuel in one convoy represented the most devastating loss percentage of the war—only two of nine tankers reached port. The [[Eighth Army (United Kingdom)|Eighth Army]] were forced to ration their fuel for a time, earning Dönitz the gratitude of the ''[[Afrika Korps]]''.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=146–147}} The [[Casablanca Conference]], held that month, identified the Atlantic as the priority. It was agreed that until the defeat of Dönitz and his men, there could be no amphibious landings in continental Europe.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=146}} Unknown to Dönitz, Bletchley Park had broken the Shark cypher and restored the flow of Enigma information; the Admiralty was able to route convoys around wolfpacks. During January and February 1943 information was decrypted within 24 hours proving operationally useful, although this slipped at the end of the second month contributing to German interceptions.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=146, 155}} Even so, in appalling weather, the Germans sank only 44 ships during the month, even with 100 U-boats at sea, the majority stationed in the mid-Atlantic gap.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=146}}
On 1 May, Dönitz announced that Hitler had fallen and had appointed him as his successor. On 2 May, the new government of the Reich fled to [[Flensburg]]-[[Mürwik]] before the approaching British troops. That night, Dönitz made a nationwide radio address in which he announced Hitler's death and said the war would continue in the east "to save Germany from destruction by the advancing Bolshevik enemy". However, Dönitz knew Germany's position was untenable and the Wehrmacht was no longer capable of offering meaningful resistance. During his brief period in office, he devoted most of his effort to ensuring the loyalty of the German armed forces and trying to ensure German troops would surrender to the British or Americans and not the Soviets. He feared vengeful Soviet reprisals, and hoped to strike a deal with the western Allies.{{sfn|Shirer|1983}} In the end, Dönitz's tactics were moderately successful, enabling about 1.8 million German soldiers to escape Soviet capture.{{sfn|Kershaw|2008|p=962}}
{{clear left}}


In February 1943 the strength of Allied defences were ominous for Dönitz. The battle of convoy HX 224 was ended upon the intervention of air power from Iceland. Dönitz sent 20 boats to attack SC 118 and both sides suffered heavy losses—11 merchant ships for three U-boats plus four damaged. It was "what both sides considered one of the hardest fought battles of the Atlantic war".{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=146–147}} Despite sending 20 crews into action, Dönitz was concerned that most captains did not press home attacks. The majority of the ships sunk were by one crew, commanded by [[Siegfried von Forstner]]—he sank seven.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=149–150}}
===Flensburg government===
{{Main article|Flensburg government}}


In March, [[Convoy SC 121]] was attacked by 31 U-boats in two patrol lines.{{sfn|Rohwer|2015|p=75}} It was the most successful battle of the war for Dönitz.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=156}} The battle of [[Convoys HX 229/SC 122]] was the largest convoy battle, with 40 U-boats involved.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|p=365}} Each operation was successful but all were fought in the mid-Atlantic.{{sfn|Rohwer|2015|pp=95–191}} Allied losses reached a peak in March 1943. The Admiralty later issued a report on the matter; "The Germans never came so near [to] disrupting communications between the new world and the old as in the first twenty days of March 1943."{{sfn|Price|1980|p=132}} Dönitz later conceded the March battles were to be the U-boats' last victories. New Allied techniques, tactics and technology began to turn the tide. By April 1943 U-boat morale was reaching a crisis point.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=588, 593–594}} Ninety-eight new boats were sent into the Atlantic that month and although the training was thorough the crews were inexperienced and it showed. Fifteen U-boats were destroyed in March 1943 and another 15 in April.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=588, 593–594}} [[Werner Hartenstein]] and [[Johann Mohr]] were notable casualties over the course of these eight weeks; the former's decision to rescue survivors of a sunken ship led to Dönitz's [[Laconia Order]], which later formed part of the criminal case against Dönitz.{{sfn|Blair|1998|pp=62, 218, 778}}
Dönitz's headquarters were located in the [[Naval Academy Mürwik|Naval Academy]] in Mürwik, a suburb of [[Flensburg]] near the [[Denmark|Danish]] border. Accordingly, his administration was referred to as the [[Flensburg government]]. The following is Dönitz's description of his new government:


Ominous for BdU was the sudden growth of Allied air power. The Allied command accepted that air cover over the mid-Atlantic was inadequate and had drawn attention to the fact that not one VLR (Very Long Range) aircraft was to be found at any Allied air base west of Iceland. The Americans released 255 Liberators for the North Atlantic. At the end of March 1943 20 VLR aircraft were operational rising to 41 by mid-April, all of them flown by British crews. Twenty-eight anti-submarine and 11 anti-shipping squadrons were available to RAF Coastal Command, 619 aircraft in all—a striking change since September 1939.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|p=364}} The influx of radar equipped aircraft into mid-Atlantic was matched by air patrols over the Bay of Biscay. Dönitz detected a drop in morale among his captains, as did the British. Dönitz encouraged his commanders to show a "hunter's instinct" and "warrior spirit" in the face of the air–surface support group threat.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=157–158}}
{{quote|These considerations (the bare survival of the German people), which all pointed to the need for the creation of some sort of central government, took shape and form when I was joined by [[Ludwig Graf Schwerin von Krosigk|Graf Schwerin-Krosigk]]. In addition to discharging his duties as Foreign Minister and Minister of Finance, he formed the temporary government we needed and presided over the activities of its cabinet. Though restricted in his choice to men in [[northern Germany]], he nonetheless succeeded in forming a workmanlike cabinet of experts.


Along with air power, the BdU was forced to contend with a large increase in Allied convoy escorts which fuelled from tankers in the convoys allowing escort across the ocean.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|p=365}} The escort carrier support groups, protected by [[destroyer]]s, which, in the words of the official naval historian of the Second World War, proved decisive; "it was the advent of the Support Groups, the Escort Carriers and the Very Long Range Aircraft which turned the tables on the U-boats-and did so with astonishing rapidity".{{sfn|Roskill|1954|pp=366–368}}
The picture of the military situation as a whole showed clearly that the war was lost. As there was also no possibility of effecting any improvement in Germany's overall position by political means, the only conclusion to which I, as head of state, could come was that the war must be brought to an end as quickly as possible in order to prevent further bloodshed.|Karl Dönitz, ''Ten Years and Twenty Days''<ref name="Ten Years and Twenty Days" />}}


A hundred and eight ships were sunk in the first 20 days of March, and just 15 in the last 10. The official naval historian wrote, "The collapse of the enemy's offensive, when it came, was so sudden that it took him completely by surprise. We now know that, in fact, a downward trend in the U-boats' recent accomplishments could have forewarned him, but was concealed from him by the exaggerated claims made by their commanders."{{sfn|Roskill|1954|pp=367–368}} In April Dönitz lost five crews to the Coastal Command ASV Biscay offensive. Encouraged by the isolated successes of [[anti-aircraft artillery]] installed on submarines, he ordered crews to stay on the surface and fight it out with the aircraft.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|p=371}} The decision caused casualties—four boats were lost in the first week of May alone, and three more by the end.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=179}}
Late on 1 May, Himmler attempted to make a place for himself in the Flensburg government. The following is Dönitz's description of his showdown with Himmler:


For the month of April Allied losses fell to 56 ships of 327,943 tons.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|p=371}} In May 1943 the battle reached a climax with the battles of [[Convoy ONS 5]], [[Convoy SC 129]], [[Convoy SC 130]]. Throughout the battles only two ships were sunk in convoy in the Atlantic while an air anti-submarine escort was present.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|pp=373, 376}} Dönitz depended on the surface manoeuvrability of his U-boats to locate targets, assemble wolfpacks and the complicated business of positioning his forces ahead of a convoy for an attack. Allied air power determined where and when U-boats could move freely on the surface. It was the combination of convoy escorts and air power that made the Atlantic unsuitable for pack operations.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=94}} The US Navy introduced the [[K-class blimp]]. They forced a commander to dive to prevent the aircraft marking his position or attacking.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=96}} From 10 to 24 May 1943, ten convoys passed through the mid-Atlantic. Six of the 370 ships were sunk; three were stragglers. Thirteen U-boats were sunk; four by warships, seven by aircraft, and two shared.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=179–180}}
{{quote|At about midnight he arrived, accompanied by six armed SS officers, and was received by my aide-de-camp, Walter Luedde-Neurath. I offered Himmler a chair and sat down at my desk, on which lay, hidden by some papers, a pistol with the safety catch off. I had never done anything of this sort in my life before, but I did not know what the outcome of this meeting might be.


By 24 May, when Dönitz conceded defeat and withdrew the surviving crews from the field of battle, they had already lost 33 U-boats. At the end of May it had risen to 41. Dönitz tried to limit the damage to morale by declaring that the withdrawal was only temporary "to avoid unnecessary losses in a period when our weapons are shown to be at a disadvantage" and that "the battle in the north Atlantic—the decisive area—will be resumed". Dönitz did make a further attempt to regain the initiative, but the battle never reached the same pitch of intensity or hung in the balance, as during the spring of 1943. The Allied success won the Battle of the Atlantic.{{sfn|Roskill|1954|pp=377–378}} On 24 May Dönitz ordered the suspension of Atlantic operations, bringing an end to [[Black May (1943)|Black May]].{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=145}}
I handed Himmler the telegram containing my appointment. "Please read this," I said. I watched him closely. As he read, an expression of astonishment, indeed of consternation, spread over his face. All hope seemed to collapse within him. He went very pale. Finally he stood up and bowed. "Allow me," he said, "to become the second man in your state." I replied that was out of the question and that there was no way I could make any use of his services.


Defeat in the mid-Atlantic left Dönitz in a dilemma. The U-boats had proven unable to elude convoy escorts and attack convoys with success. He was concerned about crew morale suffering from idleness and a loss of experience with the latest Allied developments in anti-submarine warfare. Aside from problems of seaworthiness among machines and crew, there were not enough [[Submarine pen]]s to store idle boats and they were a target for aircraft in port. Dönitz would not withdraw his submarines from combat operations, for he felt the ships, men and aircraft engaged in suppressing the U-boats could then be turned on Germany directly; the U-boat war was to continue.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|p=146}}
Thus advised, he left me at about one o'clock in the morning. The showdown had taken place without force, and I felt relieved.|Karl Dönitz, as quoted in ''The Decline and Fall of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan''{{sfn|Dollinger|1997|p=242}}}}


===Hunter-killer era===
[[File:The Second World War 1939 - 1945- Germany- Personalities BU6711.jpg|thumb|325px|[[Karl Dönitz]] (centre, in long, dark coat) followed by [[Albert Speer]] (bareheaded) and [[Alfred Jodl]] (on Speer's right) during the arrest of the Flensburg government by British troops]]
From mid-June 1943 the technological and industrial superiority of the Allied navies allowed the Americans, Canadians, and British to form [[hunter-killer group]]s consisting of fast anti-submarine escorts and aircraft carriers. The purpose of naval operations changed from avoiding U-boats and safeguarding convoys to seeking them out and destroying them wherever they operated.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p={{page needed|date=January 2022}}}} USN hunter-killer groups operated throughout the Atlantic. [[Argentia]] had been an important base for the naval taskforces until superseded by the [[Royal Canadian Navy]] in early 1943.{{sfn|Milner|1994|pp=24, 28}} U-boat operations were "crushed" by these task forces: 14 were sunk and only two of seven crews operating in Brazilian waters returned to Germany.{{sfn|Milner|1994|p=47}}


Dönitz reacted by deploying his U-boats near the [[Azores]] where land-based aircraft still had difficulty reaching them. In this region he hoped to threaten the Gibraltar–Britain convoy route. Dönitz intended to concentrate his power in a rough arc from [[West Africa]] to [[South America]] and the Caribbean.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p={{page needed|date=January 2022}}}} He hoped to maintain a presence in the western and central Atlantic, reduce losses and await new weapons and anti-detection devices. In this, he failed to "stem the tide of U-boat losses."{{sfn|Milner|1994|p=47}} A large portion of the 39 U-boats deployed on these operations were intercepted.{{sfn|Milner|1994|p=47}} From May 1943, one historian wrote "U-boats rash enough to close with an Atlantic convoy...were simply inviting destruction."{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=178}}
On 4 May, Admiral [[Hans-Georg von Friedeburg]], representing Admiral Dönitz [[German surrender at Lüneburg Heath|surrendered]] all German forces in the [[Netherlands]], Denmark, and northwestern Germany under Dönitz's command to [[Field Marshal (United Kingdom)|Field Marshal]] [[Bernard Law Montgomery, 1st Viscount Montgomery of Alamein|Sir Bernard Law Montgomery]] at [[Lüneburg Heath]] just southeast of [[Hamburg]], signalling the end of World War II in northwestern Europe.


Dönitz's crews faced danger from the outset. The transit routes through the Bay of Biscay were heavily patrolled by aircraft. From May to December 1943, 25 U-boats were sunk by Coastal Command, more were sunk by the [[USAAF]] and Royal Navy—five and four respectively; with one shared by the navy and Coastal Command.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=189–190}} To counter radar aircraft, Dönitz ordered his submarines to group together and merge their powerful anti-aircraft armament together while surfaced and recharging their batteries, after initially ordering the groups to remain surfaced throughout the journey and fight off aerial attackers with gunfire. The decision was to cost BdU heavy casualties. A group of U-boats were more likely to attract a radar contact, and Allied pilots soon learned to swarm their targets.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=189, 191}} Dönitz ordered his captains to traverse the Bay under the lee of the neutral Spanish coast, with a sharply rising coast which shielded U-boats from radar. After 4 August 1943, the number of destroyed U-boats fell from one every four days, to one every 27 until June 1944.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=192–193}}
A day later, Dönitz sent Friedeburg to U.S. General [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]'s headquarters in [[Rheims]], France, to negotiate a surrender to the Allies. The [[Chief of Staff]] of OKW, ''[[Generaloberst]]'' (Colonel-General) [[Alfred Jodl]], arrived a day later. Dönitz had instructed them to draw out the negotiations for as long as possible so that German troops and refugees could surrender to the Western powers, but when Eisenhower let it be known he would not tolerate their stalling, Dönitz authorised Jodl to sign the instrument of unconditional surrender at 1:30 on the morning of 7 May. Just over an hour later, Jodl signed the documents. The surrender documents included the phrase, "All forces under German control to cease active operations at 23:01 hours Central European Time on 8 May 1945." At Stalin's insistence, on 8 May, shortly before midnight, (''[[Generalfeldmarschall]]'') [[Wilhelm Keitel]] repeated the signing in Berlin at [[Marshal of the Soviet Union|Marshal]] [[Georgiy Zhukov]]'s headquarters, with General [[Carl Spaatz]] of the [[USAAF]] present as Eisenhower's representative. At the time specified, [[end of World War II in Europe|World War II in Europe ended]].


US hunter–killer groups extended their patrols to the central Atlantic in the summer. They sank 15 U-boats from June through to August 1943. A number of supply submarines were destroyed crippling the Germans' ability to conduct long range operations. At the end of the summer, practically all supply U-boats had been destroyed.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=188–189}} In September 1943, Dönitz ordered his submarines back to the North Atlantic. U-boats were equipped with the [[G7es torpedo]], an acoustic torpedo, which the grand admiral hoped would wrest the technological initiative back. The torpedo was the centrepiece to Dönitz's plan. Great faith was also placed in the installation of {{lang|de|Wanze}} radar to detect aircraft. It was intended as a successor to the [[Metox radar detector]]. A number of his boats were later retrofitted with the [[submarine snorkel]], permitting the submarine to stay submerged.{{sfn|Milner|1994|pp=61–63}} Dönitz placed much faith in the [[Type XXI submarine]]. He accepted that the older submarines were obsolete now that Allied defences in the air were complete. He required a "true submarine", equipped with a snorkel to allow his crews to stay submerged, at least to snorkel-depth, and evade radar-equipped aircraft. Dönitz was pleased with the promised top speed of 18 [[Knot (unit)|knots]].{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=194}}
On 23 May, the [[Flensburg government|Dönitz government]] was dissolved when ''[[Großadmiral]]'' Dönitz was arrested by an [[RAF Regiment]] task force under the command of Squadron Leader Mark Hobden.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The RAF Regiment at War 1942–1946|last=Oliver|first=Kingsley M|publisher=Pen & Sword|year=|isbn=|location=Great Britain 2002|pages=118}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/military-obituaries/air-force-obituaries/10085223/Group-Captain-Mark-Hobden.html|title=Daily Telegraph|last=|first=|date=|work=|access-date=|via=}}</ref> The [[Großadmiral]]'s Kriegsmarine flag, which was removed from his headquarters can be seen at the RAF Regiment Heritage Centre at [[RAF Honington]]. ''Generaloberst'' Jodl, ''Reichsminister'' Speer and other members were also handed over to troops of the [[King's Shropshire Light Infantry]] at Flensburg. His ceremonial baton, awarded to him by Hitler, can be seen in the regimental museum of the KSLI in [[Shrewsbury Castle]].


[[File:U-Boot-Ehrenmal Möltenort 2.jpg|thumb|[[Möltenort U-Boat Memorial]] near [[Kiel]] in northern Germany. Approximately 30,000 men died under Dönitz's command.]]
==Dönitz's relationship to Jews and Nazism==
That month, 21 boats fought a battle with two formations; [[Convoys ONS 18/ON 202]]. The battle was a failure. In October an attack on [[Convoy SC 143]] failed, even with limited air support from the ''Luftwaffe''. The battle with [[Convoys ONS 20/ON 206]] in the same month was a comprehensive defeat. A fourth major battle, [[Convoy SL 138/MKS 28]], developed in the last days of October and ended in another failure for Dönitz. The November battle around [[Convoy SL 139/MKS 30]] ended in the repulse of 29 U-boats with the loss of only a single ship.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|pp=181–229}} Intelligence proved its worth. During the battles of convoys ONS 18/ON 202, Dönitz's admonitions to his commanders allowed the Allied intelligence services to uncover German tactical intentions.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=195–196}} Dönitz had tried and failed to push his forces through lethal convoy defences. The hunter-killer groups were called in to hunt the remaining members of the wolfpacks, with predictable results. In mid-December 1943, Dönitz finally conceded not only the Atlantic, but the Gibraltar routes as well.{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=204}}
Despite his postwar claims, Dönitz was seen as supportive of Nazism during the war.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} Several naval officers described him as "closely tied to Hitler and Nazi ideology".{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} On one occasion, he spoke of Hitler's humanity.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} Another event, in which he spoke to Hitler Youth in what was defined as an "inappropriate way", earned him the nickname of "Hitler Youth Dönitz".{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} He refused to help [[Albert Speer]] stop the [[scorched earth]] policy dictated by Hitler,{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} and is also noted to have declared, "In comparison to Hitler we are all pipsqueaks. Anyone who believes he can do better than the Führer is stupid."{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}}


The hunter-killer and convoy escorts brought the wolfpack era to an end at the close of 1943.{{sfn|Syrett|1994|pp=230–260}} Dönitz resorted to sending out single submarines to the far reaches of the oceans in a bid to escape Allied naval power. In November 1943 he sent the last U-boat into the Gulf of Mexico just after the blackout restrictions were lifted. [[German submarine U-193|''U-193'']] achieved one final success.{{sfn|Wiggins|1995|p=228}} The end of 1943 ended the attempt of the U-boat arm to achieve a strategic victory in the Atlantic. That left only the [[Arctic convoys]] to the [[Soviet Union]]. On Christmas Eve, this became the sole preserve of the U-boats after the dispatch of [[German battleship Scharnhorst|''Scharnhorst'']] at the [[Battle of the North Cape]].{{sfn|Milner|2011|p=204}}
Several antisemitic statements by Dönitz are known.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} When [[Sweden during World War II|Sweden]] closed its international waters to Germany, he blamed this action on their fear and dependence on "international Jewish capital".{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} In August 1944, he declared, "I would rather eat dirt than see my grandchildren grow up in the filthy, poisonous atmosphere of Jewry."{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}}


[[File:Admirał Karl Donitz i admirał Hellmuth Heye w otoczeniu marynarzy niemieckiej marynarki wojennej (2-2605).jpg|thumb|right|Karl Dönitz with students in July 1944.]]
On German Heroes' Day (12 March) of 1944, Dönitz declared that without Adolf Hitler, Germany would be beset by "the poison of Jewry", and the country destroyed for lack of [[Nazism|National Socialism]], which, as Dönitz declared, met an uncompromising ideology with defiance.<ref group=Note name="Avalon group=Note">"What would have become of our country today if the Fuehrer had not united us under National Socialism? Divided along party lines, beset with the spreading poison of Jewry and vulnerable to it, because we lacked the defense of our present uncompromising ideology, we would have long since succumbed under the burden of this war and delivered ourselves to the enemy who would have mercilessly destroyed us." [http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/05-10-46.htm The Avalon Project at Yale Law School] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071223041217/http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/05-10-46.htm |date=23 December 2007 }}</ref> At the [[Nuremberg trials]], Dönitz claimed the statement about the "poison of Jewry" was regarding "the endurance, the power to endure, of the people, as it was composed, could be better preserved than if there were Jewish elements in the nation". Initially he claimed, "I could imagine that it would be very difficult for the population in the towns to hold out under the strain of heavy bombing attacks if such an influence were allowed to work."


Dönitz's plan for 1944 was simply to survive and await the XXI and [[Type XXIII submarine]]s. New radars were on the horizon and a direction finding antenna for ''Naxos'' was scheduled for use. Dönitz established a naval operations scientific staff to focus on more powerful centimetric radars. Production of submarines was streamlined. Parts for eight major sections were fabricated across 60 plants in Europe and assembled at Hamburg, [[Danzig]] and [[Bremen]] to ease the pressure of bombing and congestion at shipyards. The first of the new generation boats were expected by April 1944. Dönitz hoped for 33 per month by September.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=205–207}} In early 1944, Dönitz opted to concentrate west of [[Ireland]], at 15 and 17° west, in the hope convoys would come to them. Single boats were still sent to the Mediterranean and [[Indian Ocean]]. With 66 vessels at sea at any one time, and with 200 boats operational, the BdU was still a viable threat and he believed the force could achieve modest success.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=205–207}} The U-boats were painfully slow, strategically, operationally and tactically. Crossing the Atlantic took up to a month compared to a week in 1942. Positioning west of Ireland could take several weeks submerged.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=205–207}} In the first quarter of 1944, U-boats sank only three of the 3,360 ships that passed south of Ireland. In return 29 crews were lost.{{sfn|Milner|2011|pp=216, 218}}
Author Eric Zillmer argues that, from an ideological standpoint, Dönitz was [[anti-Marxist]] and [[antisemitic]].{{sfn|Zillmer|1995|p=141}} Later, during the Nuremberg trials, Dönitz claimed to know nothing about the [[Final Solution|extermination of Jews]] and declared that nobody among "[his] men" thought about violence against Jews.<ref group="Note" name="Avalon group=Note" />


A major concern to Dönitz was [[Operation Overlord]], the long predicted landing in France, and what role the U-boat arm and surface forces could play in the defence. He was sensitive to a landing on the Bay of Biscay but retained boats there only for operational readiness. Dönitz ended reconnaissance operations in the region. In the BdU war diary he wrote of ending operations since "otherwise the strong enemy air activity will lead to high losses which would only be acceptable if an immediate landing on the Biscay coast were expected. As this is no longer considered an acute danger the boats will remain at readiness in the concrete shelters."{{sfn|Tarrant|1994|p=81}}
Dönitz told [[Leon Goldensohn]], an American psychiatrist at [[Nuremberg]], "I never had any idea of the goings-on as far as Jews were concerned. Hitler said each man should take care of his business, and mine was U-boats and the Navy."{{sfn|Goldensohn|2004}} Dönitz also told Dr. Goldensohn of his support for Admiral [[Bernhard Rogge]], who had one Jewish grandparent, when the Nazis began to persecute him.


When the [[D-day landings]] took place on 6 June 1944, the U-boats were ordered into action with the awareness that the western flank of the invasion would be well protected at sea.{{sfn|Tarrant|1994|pp=76, 80–81}} Operational experience with the snorkel was too scant to devise instructions for its use. The narrow, shallow, waters of the [[English Channel]] provided few opportunities for charging the batteries. Dönitz feared the task was impossible.{{sfn|Tarrant|1994|pp=76, 80–81}} The {{lang|de|Holzbein}} group based at Brest, sent 15 submarines into action against the [[Cherbourg]] peninsula landings part of a 36-strong flotilla.{{sfn|Paterson|2001|pp=237–240}} Only eight had snorkels. The seven non-snorkel boats were ordered to attack on the surface.{{sfn|Paterson|2001|pp=237–240}} The BdU war diary entry on 6 June 1944 states that "for those boats without schnorchel this means the last operation".{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=645}} Of the 15, only five got near to the invasion fleet.{{sfn|Paterson|2001|pp=237–240}} Five of the snorkel boats survived. In exchange for 10 U-boats with the survivors damaged, two [[frigate]]s, four freighters, and one tank landing ship were sunk.{{sfn|Tarrant|1994|pp=80–81}} 22 U-boats were sunk from 6 to 30 June 1944.{{sfn|Hendrie|2006|pp=121–122}} On 5 July 1944, the Allied Operation ''Dredger'' permitted hunter-killer groups to roam the Western Approaches and Biscay making it a "no-go area" for U-boats.{{sfn|Paterson|2001|p=245}} U-boat operations against Normandy landings were a fiasco. Dönitz and the high command had been ignorant of the true scale of the naval D-day effort.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=645–647}} Dönitz claimed his men sank five escorts, 12 merchant ships and four landing craft for 20 submarines and 1,000 men, of whom 238 were rescued. Dönitz's claims underplayed German losses, which were, in fact, 41 submarines from 82 in France, a 50 per cent loss rate.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=650}}
==Nuremberg war crimes trials==
Following the war, Dönitz was held as a prisoner of war by the Allies. He was indicted as a major war criminal at the [[Nuremberg Trials]] on three counts: (1) conspiracy to commit [[Crime against peace|crimes against peace]], [[war crime]]s, and [[crimes against humanity]]; (2) planning, initiating, and waging [[War of aggression|wars of aggression]]; and (3) [[War crime|crimes against the laws of war]]. Dönitz was found not guilty on count (1) of the indictment, but guilty on counts (2) and (3).<ref name="NTrials">[http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/juddoeni.asp Judgement: Dönitz] the [[Avalon Project]] at the [[Yale Law School]].</ref>


The collapse of the [[Battle of Normandy|German front in Normandy]] left only the bases in [[German-occupied Norway]] nearest to the Atlantic. The newer boats were not forthcoming either. Ninety Type XXI and 31 Type XIII boats were built by the end of 1944. Sixty of the former and 23 of the latter were in service but none were operational. Dönitz was left with the old VIIs to carry the war into 1945. A large number had snorkels, which enabled them to surface only upon reaching port. Submerged, this meant no radio or Enigma communications and far fewer sightings for the Allied intelligence network to exploit. Dönitz ordered his submarines to British coastal waters with some success in November and December 1944, achieving 85,639 tons. Admiral [[Andrew Cunningham, 1st Viscount Cunningham of Hyndhope|Andrew Cunningham]] remarked of the strategy, "We are having a difficult time with the U-boats....the air are about 90 percent out of business and Asdic is failing us." The inshore waters impeded the use of Asdic, which became confused with wrecks, rocks, and tidal swirls. The new types could conceivably have capitalised on these developments but the war was nearly over. On 1 January 1945, Dönitz had 425 submarines; 144 operational. On 1 April 1945, it was 166 from 429. He threw into battle every available weapon as the German Reich collapsed. Dönitz supported the use of [[Human torpedo]]es; the [[Neger (torpedo)|Neger]], [[Marder (submarine)|Marder]], [[Seehund]] and [[Biber (submarine)|Biber]] were all used in [[suicide mission]]s on his orders, perhaps inspired by the Japanese [[Kamikaze]].{{sfn|Terraine|1989|pp=658–659}}
[[File:DönitzDetentionReport.png|thumb|left|350px|Dönitz detention report and [[mugshot]] from 1945]]


On 30 April 1945 [[Death of Adolf Hitler|Adolf Hitler committed suicide]]. Dönitz succeeded him as head of state. Admiral [[Hans-Georg von Friedeburg]] succeeded Dönitz as commander-in-chief of the {{lang|de|Kriegsmarine}}.{{sfn|Thomas|1990|pp=253, 255}} On 4 May 1945 the [[German surrender at Lüneburg Heath]] took place. Dönitz issued an order to all U-boats to cease combat operations and return to port or surrender to Allied naval vessels. The order was obeyed with a handful of notable exceptions—the [[Actions of 5–6 May 1945]], and [[Actions of 7–8 May 1945]] occurred after the surrender. The surrendered U-boats numbered into the hundreds and were destroyed in the postwar [[Operation Deadlight]]. The U-boat war finally came to an end on 9 May 1945, the date of the [[German Instrument of Surrender]].{{sfn|Rohwer|Hümmelchen|2005|pp=406–407, 418}}
Dönitz was, for nearly seven decades, the only head of state to be convicted by an international tribunal until the conviction of Liberia's [[Charles Taylor (Liberian politician)|Charles Taylor]] in April 2012.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/international-court-to-deliver-verdicts-in-trial-of-former-liberain-president-charles-taylor/2012/04/26/gIQAJ7gGiT_story.html|title=Sorry, we can’t seem to find the page you’re looking for.|date=26 April 2012|publisher=|via=washingtonpost.com}}</ref>


===President of Germany===
During the trial, [[Gustave Gilbert]], an American Army psychologist, was allowed to examine the Nazi leaders who were tried at Nuremberg for war crimes. Among other tests, a German version of the [[Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale|Wechsler-Bellevue]] [[IQ test]] was administered. Dönitz and Hermann Göring scored 138 which made them equally the third-highest<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.quora.com/How-accurate-were-the-IQ-scores-of-the-high-ranking-Third-Reich-officials-tried-at-Nuremberg|title=How accurate were the IQ scores of the high-ranking Third Reich officials tried at Nuremberg? - Quora|publisher=}}</ref> among the Nazi leaders tested.{{sfn|Mosley|1974}}
{{Main|Death of Adolf Hitler}}


Dönitz admired Hitler and was vocal about the qualities he perceived in Hitler's leadership. In August 1943, he praised his foresightedness and confidence; "anyone who thinks he can do better than the ''Führer'' is stupid."{{sfn|Frieser|Schmider|Schönherr|Schreiber|2007|p=227}} Dönitz's relationship with Hitler strengthened through to the end of the war, particularly after the [[20 July plot]], for the naval staff officers were not involved; when news of it came there was indignation in the OKM.{{sfn|Thomas|1990|p=241}} Even after the war, Dönitz said he could never have joined the conspirators.{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=521}} Dönitz tried to imbue Nazi ideas among his officers, though the indoctrination of the naval officer corps was not the brainchild of Dönitz, but rather a continuation of the Nazification of the navy begun under his predecessor Raeder.{{sfn|Thomas|1990|p=211}} Naval officers were required to attend a five-day education course in [[Nazi ideology]].{{sfn|Thomas|1990|p=249}} Dönitz's loyalty to him and the cause was rewarded by Hitler, who, owing to Dönitz's leadership, never felt abandoned by the navy. In gratitude, Hitler appointed the navy's commander as his successor before he committed suicide.{{sfn|Thomas|1990|pp=xxi, 253}}
Dönitz disputed the propriety of his [[Nuremberg Trials#Criticism|trial at Nuremberg]], commenting on count (2) "One of the 'accusations' that made me guilty during this trial was that I met and planned the course of the war with Hitler; now I ask them in heaven’s name, how could an admiral do otherwise with his country's head of state in a time of war?"<ref>Dönitz, Karl. ''Memoirs: Ten years and Twenty days''</ref> Over 100 senior Allied officers also sent letters to Dönitz conveying their disappointment over the fairness and verdict of his trial.{{sfn|Blair|1998|pp=704–705}}


Dönitz's influence on military matters was also evident. Hitler acted on Dönitz's advice in September 1944 to block the [[Gulf of Finland]] after [[Finland]] abandoned the [[Axis powers]]. [[Operation Tanne Ost]] was a poorly executed disaster.{{sfn|Frieser|Schmider|Schönherr|Schreiber|2007|p=635}} Dönitz shared Hitler's senseless strategic judgement—with the [[Courland Pocket]] on the verge of collapse, and the air and army forces requesting a withdrawal, the two men were preoccupied in planning an attack on an isolated island in the far north.{{sfn|Frieser|Schmider|Schönherr|Schreiber|2007|p=635}} Hitler's willingness to listen to the naval commander was based on his high opinion of the navy's usefulness at this time. It reinforced isolated coastal garrisons along the [[Baltic region|Baltic]] and evacuated thousands of German soldiers and civilians in order that they might continue to participate in the war effort into the spring of 1945.{{sfn|Thomas|1990|p=250}}
At the trial, Dönitz was charged with:<ref name="NTrials"/>


Through 1944 and 1945, the Dönitz-initiated [[Operation Hannibal]] had the distinction of being the largest naval evacuation in history.{{sfn|Vego|2003|p=280}} The [[Baltic Fleet]] was presented with a mass of targets, the subsequent [[Soviet submarine Baltic Sea campaign in 1944]] and [[Soviet naval Baltic Sea campaign in 1945]] inflicted grievous losses during ''Hannibal''. The most notable was the sinking of the ''[[MV Wilhelm Gustloff]]'' by a Soviet submarine.{{sfn|Tarrant|1994|pp=225–226}} The liner had nearly 10,000 people on board.{{sfn|Rohwer|Hümmelchen|2005|pp=389–390}} The evacuations continued after the surrender. From 3 to 9 May 1945, 81,000 of the 150,000 persons waiting on the [[Hel Peninsula]] were evacuated without loss.{{sfn|Rohwer|1996|p=162}} [[Albrecht Brandi]], commander of the eastern Baltic,{{sfn|Morgan|Taylor|2011|pp=322–323}} initiated a counter operation, the [[Gulf of Finland campaign]], but failed to have an impact.
* Waging [[unrestricted submarine warfare]] against neutral shipping
* Permitting Hitler's [[Commando Order]] of 18 October 1942 to remain in full force when he became commander-in-chief of the Navy, and to that extent responsibility for that crime (his defence was that the order excluded men captured in naval warfare, and that the order had not been acted upon by any men under his command).
* Knowing that 12,000 involuntary foreign workers were working in the shipyards, and doing nothing to stop it.
* Advice in 1945 when Hitler asked Dönitz whether the [[Geneva Convention (1929)|Geneva Convention]] should be denounced. Hitler's motives were twofold. The first was that reprisals could be taken against Western Allied prisoners of war; second, it would deter German forces from surrendering to the Western Allies (as was happening on the Eastern Front where the Geneva Convention was in abeyance). Instead of arguing the conventions should never be denounced, Dönitz suggested it was not expedient to do so, so the court found against him on this issue; but as the Convention was not denounced by Germany, and British prisoners in camps under Dönitz's jurisdiction were treated strictly according to the Convention, the Court considered these mitigating circumstances.


[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-V00538-3, Karl Dönitz, Adolf Hitler.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Adolf Hitler]] meets with Dönitz in the {{lang|de|[[Führerbunker]]}} (1945).]]
[[File:1946-10-08 21 Nazi Chiefs Guilty.ogv|thumb|A 17 October 1946 newsreel of [[Nuremberg Trials]] sentencing]]
In the [[End of World War II in Europe|final days of the war]], after Hitler had taken refuge in the {{lang|de|[[Führerbunker]]}} beneath the [[Reich Chancellery]] garden in Berlin, {{lang|de|[[Reichsmarschall]]}} [[Hermann Göring]] was considered the obvious successor to Hitler, followed by {{lang|de|[[Reichsführer-SS]]}} [[Heinrich Himmler]]. Göring, however, infuriated Hitler by radioing him in Berlin to ask for permission to assume leadership of the Reich. Himmler also tried to seize power by entering into negotiations with [[Folke Bernadotte|Count Bernadotte]]. On 28 April 1945, the BBC reported Himmler had offered surrender to the western Allies and that the offer had been declined.{{sfn|Kershaw|2008|pp=943–946}}


From mid-April 1945, Dönitz and elements of what remained of the Reich government moved into the buildings of the ''Stadtheide Barracks'' in [[Plön]]. In [[last will and testament of Adolf Hitler|his last will and testament]], dated 29 April 1945, Hitler named Dönitz his successor as {{lang|de|Staatsoberhaupt}} ([[Head of State]]), with the titles of ''[[Reichspräsident]]'' (President) and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. The same document named Propaganda Minister [[Joseph Goebbels]] as [[Head of Government]] with the title of {{lang|de|[[Reichskanzler]]}} ([[Reich Chancellor|Chancellor]]). Hitler would not name any successors to hold his titles of Führer or leader of the Nazi Party.{{sfn|Kershaw|2008|pp=949, 950}} Furthermore, Hitler declared both Göring and Himmler traitors and expelled them from the party. He committed suicide on 30 April.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|p=182}}
Among the war-crimes charges, Dönitz was accused of waging unrestricted submarine warfare for issuing [[War Order No. 154]] in 1939, and another similar order after the [[Laconia incident|''Laconia'' incident]] in 1942, not to rescue survivors from ships attacked by submarine. By issuing these two orders, he was found guilty of causing Germany to be in breach of the [[Second London Naval Treaty]] of 1936.<ref name="NTrials"/> However, as evidence of similar conduct by the Allies was presented at his trial, and with the help of his lawyer [[Otto Kranzbühler]], his sentence was not assessed on the grounds of this breach of international law.<ref name="NTrials" />


On 1 May, the day after Hitler's own suicide, Goebbels committed suicide.{{sfn|Beevor|2002|pp=380–381}} Dönitz thus became the sole representative of the collapsing [[German Reich]]. On 2 May, the new government of the Reich fled to [[Flensburg]]-[[Mürwik]]. That night, 2 May, Dönitz made a nationwide radio address in which he announced Hitler's death and said the war would continue in the East "to save Germany from destruction by the advancing [[Bolshevik]] enemy." Dönitz remained in Flensburg–Mürwik until his arrest on 23 May 1945.{{sfn|Kershaw|2008|p=962}}<ref>{{Citation |title=Karl Dönitz Speech to the German People – 1 May 1945 | date=22 September 2022 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOvqkC24mkA |access-date=2023-08-16 |language=en}}</ref>
On the specific war crimes charge of ordering unrestricted submarine warfare, Dönitz was found "[not] guilty for his conduct of submarine warfare against British armed merchant ships", because they were often armed and equipped with radios which they used to notify the admiralty of attack<ref name="NTrials"/><ref group="Note">Dönitz in ''Ten Years & Twenty Days'' and Edward P. von der Porten in ''The German Navy in World War Two'' argued, by being armed and reporting the position of submarines to Royal Navy forces, British merchantmen placed themselves beyond the protection of international law;</ref> but the judges found, "Dönitz is charged with waging unrestricted submarine warfare contrary to the Naval Protocol of 1936 to which Germany acceded, and which reaffirmed the rules of submarine warfare laid down in the London Naval Agreement of 1930... The order of Dönitz to sink neutral ships without warning when found within these zones was, therefore, in the opinion of the Tribunal, violation of the Protocol... The orders, then, prove Dönitz is guilty of a violation of the Protocol.... The sentence of Dönitz is not assessed on the ground of his breaches of the international law of submarine warfare."<ref name="NTrials"/>{{sfn|Ronzitti|1988|p=359}}


Dönitz knew that Germany's position was untenable and the ''Wehrmacht'' was no longer capable of offering meaningful resistance. During his brief period in office, he devoted most of his effort to ensuring the loyalty of the German armed forces and trying to ensure German personnel would surrender to the British or Americans and not the Soviets. He feared vengeful Soviet reprisals, and hoped to strike a deal with the [[Western Allies]]. In the end, Dönitz's tactics were moderately successful, enabling about 1.8&nbsp;million German soldiers to escape Soviet capture.{{sfn|Kershaw|2008|p=962}} As many as 2.2&nbsp;million may have been evacuated.{{sfn|Vego|2003|p=280}}
His sentence on unrestricted submarine warfare was not assessed, because of similar actions by the Allies: in particular, the [[Admiralty|British Admiralty]] on 8 May 1940 had ordered all vessels in the [[Skagerrak]] sunk on sight; and [[Fleet Admiral (United States)|Admiral]] [[Chester Nimitz]], wartime commander-in-chief of the [[United States Pacific Fleet|U.S. Pacific Fleet]], stated the U.S. Navy had waged unrestricted submarine warfare in the Pacific from the day the U.S. entered the war. Thus, although Dönitz was found guilty of waging unrestricted submarine warfare against unarmed neutral shipping by ordering all ships in [[unrestricted submarine warfare#Post-World War II concept|designated areas in international waters]] to be sunk without warning, no additional prison time was added to his sentence for this crime.<ref name="NTrials"/>


===Flensburg Government===
Dönitz was imprisoned for 10 years in [[Spandau Prison]] in what was then [[West Berlin]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tercer-reich.com/kriegsmarine/los-argumentso-de-la-defensa-del-almirante-karl-donitz-durante-los-juicios-de-nurenberg/ |title=Dönitz case for the defence at Nuremberg trials |publisher=Tercer-reich.com |date=2011-02-27 |accessdate=2013-07-12}}</ref>
{{Main|Flensburg Government}}
[[File:The Second World War 1939 - 1945- Germany- Personalities BU6711.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|left|Karl Dönitz (centre, in long, dark coat) followed by [[Albert Speer]] (bareheaded) and [[Alfred Jodl]] (on Speer's right) during the arrest of the Flensburg Government by British troops]]


On 4 May, Admiral Hans-Georg von Friedeburg, representing Dönitz, [[German surrender at Lüneburg Heath|surrendered all German forces]] in the [[Netherlands]], [[Denmark]], and northwestern Germany to [[Field marshal (United Kingdom)|Field Marshal]] [[Bernard Montgomery]] at [[Lüneburg Heath]] southeast of [[Hamburg]], signaling the end of World War II in northwestern Europe.
==Later years==
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[File:Karl donitz.jpg|thumb|Cover of the first edition of Dönitz's [[memoirs]] in English, ''Ten Years and Twenty Days'' (1958).]] -->


A day later, Dönitz sent Friedeburg to [[General of the Army (United States)|US General]] [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]'s headquarters in [[Rheims]], France, to negotiate a surrender to the Allies. The [[Chief of Staff]] of OKW, {{lang|de|[[Generaloberst]]}} (Colonel-General) [[Alfred Jodl]], arrived a day later. Dönitz had instructed them to draw out the negotiations for as long as possible so that German troops and refugees could surrender to the Western powers, but when Eisenhower let it be known he would not tolerate their stalling, Dönitz authorized Jodl to sign the instrument of unconditional surrender at 1:30 on the morning of 7 May. Just over an hour later, Jodl signed the documents. The surrender documents included the phrase, "All forces under German control to cease active operations at 23:01 hours Central European Time on 8 May 1945." At Stalin's insistence, on 8 May, shortly before midnight, ({{lang|de|[[Generalfeldmarschall]]}}) [[Wilhelm Keitel]] repeated the signing in Berlin at [[Marshal of the Soviet Union|Marshal]] [[Georgy Zhukov]]'s headquarters, with General [[Carl Spaatz]] of the [[USAAF]] present as Eisenhower's representative. At the time specified, [[end of World War II in Europe|World War II in Europe ended]].<ref>{{Citation |title=Karl Dönitz Announcement of German Capitulation- 8 May 1945 | date=12 December 2022 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8tXt0buPbA |access-date=2023-08-16 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |title=Last Wehrmacht Report – 9 May 1945 | date=22 September 2022 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kS4PZlF_BM |access-date=2023-08-16 |language=en}}</ref>
Dönitz was released on 1 October 1956 and retired to the small village of [[Aumühle]] in Schleswig-Holstein in northern [[West Germany]]. There, he worked on two books. His [[memoirs]], ''Zehn Jahre, Zwanzig Tage'' (''Memoirs: Ten Years and Twenty Days''), appeared in Germany in 1958 and became available in an English translation the following year. This book recounted Dönitz's experiences as U-boat commander (10 years) and President of Germany (20 days). In it, Dönitz explains the Nazi regime as a product of its time, but argues he was not a politician and thus not morally responsible for much of the regime's crimes. He likewise criticizes dictatorship as a fundamentally flawed form of government and blames it for much of the Nazi era's failings.<ref>Dönitz p. 477</ref>


On 23 May, the [[Flensburg Government|Dönitz government]] was dissolved when Dönitz was arrested by an [[RAF Regiment]] task force.{{sfn|Oliver|2002|p=118}} The ''[[Großadmiral]]''{{'s}} ''Kriegsmarine'' flag, which was removed from his headquarters, can be seen at the RAF Regiment Heritage Centre at [[RAF Honington]]. {{lang|de|Generaloberst}} Jodl, {{lang|de|Reichsminister}} Speer and other members were also handed over to troops of the Herefordshire Regiment at Flensburg. His ceremonial baton, awarded to him by Hitler, can be seen in the regimental museum of the [[Kings Shropshire Light Infantry]] in [[Shrewsbury Castle]] and his car pennant in the regimental museum of the [[Herefordshire Light Infantry]].
In 1973, he appeared in the [[Thames Television]] production ''[[The World at War]]'', in one of his few television appearances.


==Nazism and antisemitism==
Dönitz's second book, ''Mein wechselvolles Leben'' (''My Ever-Changing Life'') is less known, perhaps because it deals with the events of his life before 1934. This book was first published in 1968, and a new edition was released in 1998 with the revised title ''Mein soldatisches Leben'' (''My Martial Life'').<ref>Meinolf Reitz, ''Grossadmiral Karl Dönitz und die deutsche Kriegsmarine'' (2006), p. 37</ref>
Dönitz was a dedicated Nazi and a passionate supporter of Hitler,{{sfn|Terraine|1989|p=519}} something he attempted to obscure after the war.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} Raeder described him as "a picture-book Nazi and confirmed anti-Semite".{{sfn|Wette|2007|p=154}} Several naval officers described him as "closely tied to Hitler and Nazi ideology."{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} On occasion, he spoke of Hitler's humanity.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} His fervent pro-Hitler attitude led to him being known ironically as "[[Hitler Youth Quex]]", after the fictionalised hero of a Nazi novel and feature film.{{sfn|Beevor|2011}} He refused to help [[Albert Speer]] stop the [[scorched earth]] policy dictated by Hitler{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} and is also noted to have declared, "In comparison to Hitler we are all pipsqueaks. Anyone who believes he can do better than the Führer is stupid."{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}}


[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101II-MW-4012-04, Frankreich, Dönitz bei Offizieren.jpg|thumb|alt=Black and white photograph of men wearing military uniforms giving the nazi salute|Dönitz and other officers performing the [[Nazi salute]] in 1941]]
Late in his life, Dönitz made every attempt to answer correspondence and autograph postcards for others. Dönitz was unrepentant regarding his role in World War II,{{sfn|Cowley|Parker|2005|p=139}}<ref>{{cite web|author=iPad iPhone Android TIME TV Populist The Page |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,867109,00.html |title=The Lion Is Out – TIME |publisher=Time.com |date=1956-09-24 |accessdate=2013-07-12}}</ref> as he firmly believed that he had acted at all times out of duty to his nation. He also maintained the belief that to betray military secrets, even when working with the enemy, is a despicable act of treachery; he was firmly convinced that nobody should or would respect an individual who did not share such a conviction.{{citation needed|date=March 2016}} The West German government argued he should receive only the pension pay of a [[captain (naval)|captain]] because all of his advances in rank after that had been because of Hitler, but he won a court case demanding the pension for his final rank.{{citation needed|date=March 2017}}


Dönitz contributed to the spread of Nazism within the {{lang|de|Kriegsmarine}}. He insisted that officers share his political views and, as head of the {{lang|de|Kriegsmarine}}, formally joined the Nazi Party on 1 February 1944, as member 9,664,999.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|p=185}} He was awarded the [[Golden Party Badge]] for his loyalty to the party later that year. Dönitz's influence over naval officers contributed to none joining the [[List of assassination attempts on Adolf Hitler|attempts to kill Hitler]].{{sfn|Rems|2015}}
Dönitz lived out the rest of his life in relative obscurity in Aumühle, occasionally corresponding with collectors of German naval history, and died there of a heart attack on 24 December 1980. As the last German officer with the rank of ''Großadmiral'' (grand admiral), he was honoured by many former servicemen and foreign naval officers who came to pay their respects at his funeral on 6 January 1981. He was buried in Waldfriedhof Cemetery in Aumühle without military honours, and soldiers were not allowed to wear uniforms to the funeral.<ref name="nyt-obit">{{Cite news|work=New York Times|title= Doenitz Dies; Gave Up for Nazis :Admiral Doenitz Is Dead; Surrendered for the Nazis.|author=DAMON STETSON|date=26 December 1980}}</ref> However, a number of German naval officers disobeyed this order and were joined by members of the Royal Navy, such as the senior chaplain, the Rev. Dr. John Cameron, in full dress uniform.{{citation needed|date=March 2016}}<!-- This sentence was inserted with revision as of 13:20, January 1, 2011--> Also in attendance were over 100 holders of the [[Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/07/world/war-veterans-come-to-bury-and-to-praise-doenitz.html|title=WAR VETERANS COME TO BURY, AND TO PRAISE, DOENITZ|first=John Vinocur, Special To The New York|last=Times|date=7 January 1981|publisher=|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref>


From an ideological standpoint, Dönitz was [[anti-Marxist]] and [[antisemitic]]{{sfn|Zillmer|1995|p=141}} and believed that Germany needed to fight the "poison of Jewry".{{sfn|Harris|1999|p=289}} Several anti-Semitic statements by Dönitz are known.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} When [[Sweden during World War II|Sweden]] closed its international waters to Germany, he blamed this action on their fear and dependence on "international Jewish capital."{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}} In August 1944, he declared, "I would rather eat dirt than see my grandchildren grow up in the filthy, poisonous atmosphere of Jewry."{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|pp=186–188}}
===Wife and children===
On 27 May 1916, Dönitz married a nurse named Ingeborg Weber (1894–1962), the daughter of a German general [[:de:Erich Weber (General)|Erich Paul Weber]] (1860–1933). They had three children whom they raised as Protestant Christians: daughter Ursula (1917–1990) and sons Klaus (1920–1944) and Peter (1922–1943).


His fellow officers noted he was under Hitler's influence, and closely wedded to Nazi ideology.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|p=187}} On German Heroes' Day (12 March) of 1944, Dönitz declared that, without Adolf Hitler, Germany would be beset by "the poison of Jewry," and the country destroyed for lack of the "uncompromising ideology" of [[National Socialism]]:
In 1937, Karl Dönitz's daughter Ursula married U-boat commander [[Günther Hessler]].
{{blockquote|What would have become of our country today, if the Führer had not united us under National Socialism? Divided along party lines, beset with the spreading poison of Jewry and vulnerable to it, because we lacked the defense of our present uncompromising ideology, we would have long since succumbed under the burden of this war and delivered ourselves to the enemy who would have mercilessly destroyed us.{{sfn|Harris|1999|p=289}}}}


At the [[Nuremberg trials]], Dönitz claimed the statement about the "poison of Jewry" was regarding "the endurance, the power to endure, of the people, as it was composed, could be better preserved than if there were Jewish elements in the nation."{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|p=187}} Later, during the Nuremberg trials, Dönitz claimed to know nothing about the [[Final Solution|extermination of Jews]] and declared that nobody among "my men thought about violence against Jews."{{sfn|Sprecher|1999|p=994}} Dönitz told [[Leon Goldensohn]], an American psychiatrist at [[Nuremberg]], "I never had any idea of the goings-on as far as Jews were concerned. Hitler said each man should take care of his business and mine was U-boats and the Navy."{{sfn|Goldensohn|2004|p=9}} After the war, Dönitz tried to hide his knowledge of the [[Holocaust]]. He was present at the October 1943 [[Posen Conference]] where Himmler described the mass murder of Jews with the intent of making the audience complicit in this crime.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|p=187}} It cannot be proven beyond doubt that he was present during Himmler's segment of the conference, which openly discussed the mass murder of European Jews.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|p=187}}
Both of Dönitz's sons were killed during the Second World War.{{sfn|Miller|2000|p=145}} The younger, Peter, was killed on 19 [[Black May (1943)|May 1943]], when {{GS|U-954||2}} was sunk in the North Atlantic with all hands. After this loss, the elder son, [[Klaus Dönitz|Klaus]], was allowed to leave combat duty and began studying to be a naval doctor. Klaus was killed on 13 May 1944 while taking part in an action contrary to standing orders prohibiting his involvement in any combat role. He persuaded his friends to let him go on the [[torpedo boat]] ''S-141'' for a raid on [[Selsey]] on his 24th birthday. The boat was sunk by the French [[destroyer]] [[French destroyer La Combattante|''La Combattante'']] and Klaus died, though six others were rescued.


Even after the Nuremberg Trials, with the crimes of the Nazi state well-known, Dönitz remained an antisemite. In April 1953, he told [[Albert Speer|Speer]] that if it was the choice of the Americans and not the Jews, he would have been released.{{sfn|Steinweis|Rogers|Grier|2003|p=187}}
==In popular culture==
Karl Dönitz has been portrayed in film, television, theatre productions and other media:<ref name="imdb">{{cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0048225/|title=Karl Dönitz (Character)|accessdate=20 May 2008|publisher=[[IMDb.com]]|quote=}}</ref>{{Better source|reason=WP:CITEIMDB|date=June 2017}}


==Nuremberg war crimes trials==
* [[David Mitchell (comedian)|David Mitchell]] in the 2006 British TV sketch comedy ''[[That Mitchell and Webb Look]]''
[[File:DönitzDetentionReport.png|thumb|upright=1.6|Dönitz's detention report, 1945]]
* Gert Hänsch in the 1976 Czechoslovak film ''Osvobození Prahy''
* Peter Rühring in the 2005 German TV miniseries ''[[Speer und Er]]''
* Philip Rham in the 2013 U.S. TV PBS production ''Nazi Mega Weapons'' episode 2
* Raymond Cloutier in the 2000 Canadian/U.S. TV production ''[[Nuremberg (2000 film)|Nuremberg]]''
* [[Richard Bebb]] in the 1973 British television production ''[[The Death of Adolf Hitler]]''<ref name="imdb3">{{cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0283307/|title=The Death of Adolf Hitler (1973) (TV)|accessdate=8 May 2008|publisher=[[IMDb.com]]|quote=}}</ref>
* Simeon Victorov in the 2006 British television docudrama ''[[Nuremberg: Nazis on Trial]]''
* [[Thomas Kretschmann]] in the 2011 Anglo-German TV production, ''[[The Sinking of the Laconia]]''


Following the war, Dönitz was held as a prisoner of war by the Allies. He was indicted as a major war criminal at the [[Nuremberg Trials]] on three counts. One: conspiracy to commit [[crimes against peace]], [[war crime]]s, and [[crimes against humanity]]. Two: planning, initiating, and waging [[wars of aggression]]. Three: crimes against the laws of war. Dönitz was found not guilty on count one of the indictment, but guilty on counts two and three.{{sfn|Zabecki|2007|pp=14–17, 95–96}}
He is additionally a figure in [[Neal Stephenson]]'s ''[[Cryptonomicon]]''.


During the trial, army psychologist [[Gustave Gilbert]] was allowed to examine Nazi leaders on trial for war crimes. Among other tests, a German version of the [[Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale|Wechsler–Bellevue]] IQ test was administered. Dönitz and Hermann Göring scored 138, which made them equally the third-highest among the Nazi leaders tested.{{sfn|Zabecki|2007|pp=99–100}}
==Summary of career==


At the trial, Dönitz was charged with waging [[unrestricted submarine warfare]] against neutral shipping, permitting Hitler's [[Commando Order]] of 18 October 1942 to remain in full force when he became commander-in-chief of the Navy, and to that extent responsibility for that crime. His defence was that the order excluded men captured in naval warfare, and that the order had not been acted upon by any men under his command. Added to that was his knowledge of 12,000 involuntary foreign workers working in the shipyards, and doing nothing to stop it.{{sfn|Walker|2006|pp=100–102}}{{sfn|Zabecki|2007|pp=56–63}} Dönitz was unable to defend himself on this charge convincingly when cross-examined by prosecutor Sir [[David Maxwell Fyfe]].{{sfn|Madsen|1998|p=188}}

On 25 February 1945, Hitler asked Dönitz whether the [[Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War (1929)|Geneva Convention]] should be denounced. Hitler's motives were twofold. The first was that reprisals could be taken against Western Allied prisoners of war; second, it would deter German forces from surrendering to the Western Allies, as was happening on the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]] where the convention was in abeyance. Instead of arguing the conventions should never be denounced, Dönitz suggested it was not expedient to do so, so the court found against him on this issue; but as the convention was not denounced by Germany, and British prisoners in camps under Dönitz's jurisdiction were treated strictly according to the Convention, the Court considered these mitigating circumstances.{{sfn|McDonald|2000|pp=729–730}}

[[File:Nazi Personalities BU6713.jpg|thumb|[[Albert Speer]], Dönitz, and [[Alfred Jodl]]]]

Among the war-crimes charges, Dönitz was accused of waging unrestricted submarine warfare for issuing [[War Order No. 154]] in 1939, and [[Laconia Order|another similar order]] after the [[Laconia incident|''Laconia'' incident]] in 1942, not to rescue survivors from ships attacked by submarine. By issuing these two orders, he was found guilty of causing Germany to be in breach of the [[Second London Naval Treaty]] of 1936. However, as evidence of similar conduct by the Allies was presented at his trial, his sentence was not assessed on the grounds of this breach of international law.{{sfn|Moore|Turner|1995|p=54}}{{sfn|Zabecki|2007|pp=52–54}}

On the specific war crimes charge of ordering unrestricted submarine warfare, Dönitz was found "[not] guilty for his conduct of submarine warfare against British armed merchant ships", because they were often armed and equipped with radios which they used to notify the admiralty of attack. As stated by the judges:
{{blockquote|Dönitz is charged with waging unrestricted submarine warfare contrary to the Naval Protocol of 1936 to which Germany acceded, and which reaffirmed the rules of submarine warfare laid down in the London Naval Agreement of 1930&nbsp;... The order of Dönitz to sink neutral ships without warning when found within these zones was, therefore, in the opinion of the Tribunal, violation of the Protocol&nbsp;... The orders, then, prove Dönitz is guilty of a violation of the Protocol&nbsp;... The sentence of Dönitz is not assessed on the ground of his breaches of the international law of submarine warfare.{{sfn|Ronzitti|1988|p=359}}}}

His sentence on unrestricted submarine warfare was not assessed because of similar actions by the Allies. In particular, the [[British Admiralty]], on 8 May 1940, had ordered all vessels in the [[Skagerrak]] sunk on sight, and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], wartime commander-in-chief of the [[US Pacific Fleet]], stated the US Navy had [[Allied submarines in the Pacific War|waged unrestricted submarine warfare]] against [[Empire of Japan|Japan]] in the Pacific from the day the US officially entered the war. Thus, Dönitz was not charged of waging unrestricted submarine warfare against unarmed neutral shipping by ordering all ships in [[unrestricted submarine warfare#Post-World War II concept|designated areas in international waters]] to be sunk without warning.

Dönitz was imprisoned for 10 years in [[Spandau Prison]] in what was then [[West Berlin]].{{sfn|Walker|2006|p=145}} During his period in prison he was unrepentant, and maintained that he had done nothing wrong. He also rejected Speer's attempts to persuade him to end his devotion to Hitler and accept responsibility for the wrongs the German Government had committed. Conversely, over 100 senior Allied officers sent letters to Dönitz conveying their disappointment over the unfairness and verdict of his trial.{{sfn|Blair|1998|pp=704–705}}

==Later years and death==
Dönitz was released on 1 October 1956 and retired to the small village of [[Aumühle]] in Schleswig-Holstein in northern [[West Germany]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=GERMANY: GRAND-ADMIRAL KARL DOENITZ RELEASED FROM SPANDAU PRISON AFTER TEN YEARS |url=https://reuters.screenocean.com/record/545527 |access-date=2023-09-24 |website=Reuters Archive Licensing |language=en}}</ref> There, he worked on two books. His [[memoirs]], ''Zehn Jahre, Zwanzig Tage'' (''Memoirs: Ten Years and Twenty Days''), were released in Germany in 1958 and became available in an English translation the following year. This book recounted Dönitz's experiences as U-boat commander (10 years) and President of Germany (20 days). In it, Dönitz explains the Nazi regime as a product of its time, but argues he was not a politician and thus not morally responsible for many of the regime's crimes. He likewise criticizes dictatorship as a fundamentally flawed form of government and blames it for many of the Nazi era's failings.{{sfn|Dönitz|1997|p=477}} Historian Alan P. Rems has written that Dönitz's memoirs are unconvincing and that "unimpeded by a meaningful Nuremberg verdict, Dönitz fashioned a legend that could be embraced by the most unregenerate Nazis as well as credulous Allied officers who accepted his sanitized version of history and showered Dönitz with letters of support as a wronged brother-in-arms".{{sfn|Rems|2015}}

[[File:2158 Karl Dönitz.JPG|thumb|right|Grave in [[Aumühle]], east of [[Hamburg]]]]
Dönitz's second book, {{lang|de|Mein wechselvolles Leben}} (''My Ever-Changing Life'') is less known, perhaps because it deals with the events of his life before 1934. This book was first published in 1968, and a new edition was released in 1998 with the revised title {{lang|de|Mein soldatisches Leben}} (''My Martial Life''). In 1973, he appeared in the [[Thames Television]] production ''[[The World at War]]'', in one of his few television appearances.<ref>{{Citation |last=Thames Television - Jeremy Isaacs |title=The World at War (1973) - Thames Television |date=1973-10-31 |url=http://archive.org/details/the-world-at-war-1973-thames-television-world-war-two |access-date=2024-08-02 |publisher=Thames Television}}</ref>

Dönitz was unrepentant regarding his role in World War II, saying that he had acted at all times out of duty to his nation.{{sfn|Cowley|Parker|2005|p=139}} In 1976, Dönitz appeared in ''[[The Memory of Justice]]''. In the documentary, Dönitz explains about the [[Nuremberg Trials]] and his experience during the trials in 1946 along with [[Albert Speer]].{{CN|date=July 2024}} He lived out the rest of his life in relative obscurity in Aumühle, occasionally corresponding with collectors of German naval history.<ref name="Damon">{{Cite news |last=Stetson |first=Damon |date=1980-12-26 |title=Doenitz Dies; Gave Up for Nazis; Admiral Doenitz Is Dead; Surrendered for the Nazis |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1980/12/26/archives/doenitz-dies-gave-up-for-nazis-admiral-doenitz-is-dead-surrendered.html |access-date=2023-09-16 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Around 1974, Dönitz was contacted by [[Neo-Nazi]] [[conspiracy theorist]] and early ''[[Reichsbürger]]'' [[Manfred Roeder]] who tried to prove that the German Reich still existed. Roeder assumed that Dönitz remained the legal head of state, but the former admiral considered the idea ridiculous and firmly stated that he no longer considered himself President of Germany. Regarding this as a resignation declaration, Roeder subsequently declared himself the new leader of Germany and eventually became active as a terrorist.{{sfn|Ginsburg|2022|p=67}}

Dönitz died in Aumühle of a [[heart attack]] on Christmas Eve 1980 at the age of 89.<ref name="Damon" /> As the last German officer with the rank of {{lang|de|Großadmiral}} (grand admiral), he was honoured by many former servicemen and foreign naval officers who came to pay their respects at his funeral on 6 January 1981.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> He was buried in Waldfriedhof Cemetery in [[Aumühle]] without military honours, and service members were not allowed to wear uniforms to the funeral. Also in attendance were over 100 holders of the [[Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last1=Vinocur |first1=John |date=1981-01-07 |title=WAR VETERANS COME TO BURY, AND TO PRAISE, DOENITZ |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/07/world/war-veterans-come-to-bury-and-to-praise-doenitz.html |access-date=2023-09-16 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=Thousands at funeral for Hitler's successor – UPI Archives |url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1981/01/06/Thousands-at-funeral-for-Hitlers-successor/4486347605200/ |access-date=2023-09-16 |website=UPI}}</ref>

==Summary of career==
===Promotions===
===Promotions===
{| style="background: transparent;"
{| style="background: transparent;"
! Kaiserliche Marine
! Kaiserliche Marine
|-
|-
| 1 April 1910: || ''[[Seekadett]]'' (Officer Cadet){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
| 1 April 1910: || {{lang|de|[[Seekadett]]}} (Officer Cadet){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
|-
|-
| 15 April 1911: || ''[[Fähnrich zur See]]'' (Midshipman){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
| 15 April 1911: || {{lang|de|[[Fähnrich zur See]]}} (Midshipman){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
|-
|-
| 27 September 1913: || ''[[Leutnant zur See]]'' (Acting Sub-Lieutenant){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
| 27 September 1913: || {{lang|de|[[Leutnant zur See]]}} (Acting Sub-Lieutenant){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
|-
|-
| 22 March 1916: || ''[[Oberleutnant zur See]]'' (Sub-Lieutenant){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
| 22 March 1916: || {{lang|de|[[Oberleutnant zur See]]}} (Sub-Lieutenant){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
|-
|-
! Reichsmarine
! Reichsmarine
|-
|-
| 10 January 1921: || ''[[Kapitänleutnant]]'' (Lieutenant), with date of rank on 1 January 1921{{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=27}}
| 10 January 1921: || {{lang|de|[[Kapitänleutnant]]}} (Lieutenant), with date of rank on 1 January 1921{{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=27}}
|-
|-
| 1 November 1928: || ''[[Korvettenkapitän]]'' (Corvette Captain – Lieutenant Commander){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=27}}
| 1 November 1928: || {{lang|de|[[Korvettenkapitän]]}} (Corvette Captain – Lieutenant Commander){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=27}}
|-
|-
| 1 October 1933: || ''[[Fregattenkapitän]]'' (Frigate Captain – Commander){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
| 1 October 1933: || {{lang|de|[[Fregattenkapitän]]}} (Frigate Captain – Commander){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
|-
|-
! Kriegsmarine
! Kriegsmarine
|-
|-
| 1 October 1935: || ''[[Kapitän zur See]]'' (Captain at Sea – Captain){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
| 1 October 1935: || {{lang|de|[[Kapitän zur See]]}} (Captain at Sea – Captain){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
|-
|-
| 28 January 1939: || ''[[Kommodore]]'' (Commodore){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
| 28 January 1939: || {{lang|de|[[Kommodore]]}} (Commodore){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
|-
|-
| 1 October 1939: || ''[[Konteradmiral]]'' (Rear Admiral){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
| 1 October 1939: || {{lang|de|[[Konteradmiral]]}} (Rear Admiral){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
|-
|-
| 1 September 1940: || ''[[Vizeadmiral]]'' (Vice Admiral){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
| 1 September 1940: || {{lang|de|[[Vizeadmiral]]}} (Vice Admiral){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
|-
|-
| 14 March 1942: || ''[[Admiral]]'' (Admiral){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
| 14 March 1942: || {{lang|de|[[Admiral]]}} (Admiral){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
|-
|-
| 30 January 1943: || ''[[Großadmiral]]'' (Grand Admiral){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
| 30 January 1943: || {{lang|de|[[Großadmiral]]}} (Grand Admiral){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
|}
|}


==Decorations and awards==
===Decorations and awards===
; German:
:''This article incorporates information from the equivalent articles on the [[:it:Karl Dönitz|Italian Wikipedia]] and the [[:de:Karl Dönitz|German Wikipedia]].''
* [[General Honor Decoration (Prussia)|General Honor Decoration]] ({{lang|de|Allgemeines Ehrenzeichen}}) (7 June 1913){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}

* [[Iron Cross]] (1914)
* 223rd Oak Leaves on 6 April 1943 as ''[[Großadmiral]]'' and ''[[Oberkommando der Marine|Oberbefehlshaber der Kriegsmarine]]'' and ''Befehlshaber der U-Boote''{{sfn|Scherzer|2007|p=275}}{{sfn|Fellgiebel|2000|p=68}}
* [[Clasp to the Iron Cross]] (1939) 2nd class (18 September 1939) & 1st class (20 December 1939){{sfn|Thomas|1997|p=123}}
** 2nd class (7 September 1914){{sfn|Thomas|1997|p=123}}
* [[Friedrich Cross]], 1st class (Duchy of Anhalt, 17 January 1916){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
** 1st class (5 May 1916){{sfn|Thomas|1997|p=123}}
* [[General Honor Decoration (Prussia)|General Honor Decoration]] (''Allgemeines Ehrenzeichen'') (7 June 1913){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
* [[Friedrich Cross]] of the Duchy of Anhalt, 1st class (17 January 1916){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
* [[The Honour Cross of the World War 1914/1918|Honour Cross of the World War 1914/1918]] (30 January 1935){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* [[Iron Cross]] (1914) 2nd class (7 September 1914) & 1st class (5 May 1916){{sfn|Thomas|1997|p=123}}
* Knight of the Royal [[House Order of Hohenzollern]] with Swords (10 June 1918){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=27}}
* Knight of the Royal [[House Order of Hohenzollern]] with Swords (10 June 1918){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=27}}
* [[Honour Cross of the World War 1914/1918]] (30 January 1935){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* [[U-boat War Badge]] 1918 Version
* Special [[U-boat War Badge]] with diamonds (1939)
* [[Sudetenland Medal]] (20 December 1939){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* [[Clasp to the Iron Cross]] (1939)
** 2nd class (18 September 1939){{sfn|Thomas|1997|p=123}}
** 1st class (20 December 1939){{sfn|Thomas|1997|p=123}}
* [[Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves]]
* [[Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves]]
** Knight's Cross on 21 April 1940 as ''[[Konteradmiral]]'' and ''[[Befehlshaber der U-Boote]]'' (B.d.U.){{sfn|Scherzer|2007|p=275}}{{sfn|Fellgiebel|2000|p=162}}
** Knight's Cross on 21 April 1940 as {{lang|de|[[Konteradmiral]]}} and {{lang|de|[[Befehlshaber der U-Boote]]}} (B.d.U.){{sfn|Scherzer|2007|p=275}}{{sfn|Fellgiebel|2000|p=162}}
** 223rd Oak Leaves on 6 April 1943 as {{lang|de|[[Großadmiral]]}} and {{lang|de|[[Oberkommando der Marine|Oberbefehlshaber der Kriegsmarine]]}} and {{lang|de|Befehlshaber der U-Boote}}{{sfn|Scherzer|2007|p=275}}{{sfn|Fellgiebel|2000|p=68}}
<!--- * [[Golden Party Badge]] of the National Socialist German Workers Party
* [[Golden Party Badge]] of the National Socialist German Workers Party (1943)
* [[Military Order of Savoy]] Knight (20 April 1940); Commander's Cross (7 November 1941){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}

* [[Order of Medjidié]], 1st class (Ottoman Empire)---->
; Foreign:
* [[Order of Michael the Brave]], 1st class (Romania)
* [[Order of Michael the Brave]], 2nd and 3rd class (Romania, 7 April 1943){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* [[Ottoman War Medal]] (7 November 1916){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}} (Ottoman Empire)
* [[Order of Naval Merit (Spain)|Order of Naval Merit]] in white (Spain, 10 June 1940){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* [[Order of the Medjidie]], 4th class (13 March 1917){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=27}} (Ottoman Empire)
* [[Order of the Medjidie]], 4th class (13 March 1917){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=27}}
** [[Order of the Medjidie]], 1st class (Ottoman Empire)
* [[Military Order of Savoy]] Knight Cross (20 April 1940) (Kingdom of Italy)
* [[Order of the Rising Sun]], First Class (Japan, 11 September 1943){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* [[Ottoman War Medal]] (7 November 1916){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=26}}
** [[Military Order of Savoy]] Commander's Cross (7 November 1941){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}} (Kingdom of Italy)
* [[Order of Naval Merit (Spain)|Order of Naval Merit]] in white (10 June 1940) ([[Spanish State]]){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* Special [[U-boat War Badge]] with Swastika and laurel branches with diamonds
* [[Sudetenland Medal]] (20 December 1939){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* [[Order of Michael the Brave]], 2nd and 3rd class (7 April 1943) (Kingdom of Romania){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
** [[Order of Michael the Brave]], 1st class (Kingdom of Romania)
* [[Order of the Rising Sun]], First Class (11 September 1943) (Empire of Japan){{sfn|Busch|Röll|2003|p=28}}
* [[Order of the Cross of Liberty]] Grand Cross with Swords (11 April 1944) (Finland){{sfn|Matikkala|2017|p=511}}


==See also==
==See also==
{{Portal|Biography|Germany|Politics}}
* [[B-Dienst]]
* [[B-Dienst]]
* [[Glossary of German military terms|Glossary of German World War II military terms]]
* [[Glossary of German military terms]]
* [[Glossary of Nazi Germany]]
* [[Glossary of Nazi Germany]]
* [[Last will and testament of Adolf Hitler]]
* [[List of Nazi Party leaders and officials]]
* [[List of Nazi Party leaders and officials]]

==Notes==
{{Reflist|group="Note"}}


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}


===Citations===
==Sources==
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{Refbegin}}
* {{cite book| title = Berlin – The Downfall 1945

| title-link = Berlin: The Downfall 1945
===Bibliography===
| last = Beevor | first = Antony | year = 2002
{{Refbegin|30em}}
| author-link = Antony Beevor
* {{cite book
| publisher = Viking-Penguin Books
|last=Beevor
| isbn = 978-0-670-03041-5
|first=Antony
|authorlink=Antony Beevor
|year=2002
|title=[[Berlin: The Downfall 1945|Berlin – The Downfall 1945]]
|publisher=Viking-Penguin Books
|isbn=978-0-670-03041-5
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{cite book
* {{Cite book| title = Berlino 1945
| last = Beevor | first = Antony
|last=Blair
| publisher = Bur
|first=Clay
| language = it
|year=1998
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=4oZMpeQ9mfoC&dq=quex+doenitz&pg=PT181
|title=Hitler's U-boat War: Vol. II, The Hunted, 1942–1945
| year = 2011
|publisher=Random House
|isbn=978-0-679-45742-8
| isbn = 978-88-586-1832-5
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{cite book| title = Hitler's U-boat War: Vol. II, The Hunted, 1942–1945
* {{Cite book
| last = Blair | first = Clay | year = 1998
|last1=Busch
| publisher = Random House
|first1=Rainer
| isbn = 978-0-679-45742-8
|last2=Röll
|first2=Hans-Joachim
|year=2003
|title=Der U-Boot-Krieg 1939–1945 — Die Ritterkreuzträger der U-Boot-Waffe von September 1939 bis Mai 1945
|trans-title=The U-Boat War 1939–1945 — The Knight's Cross Bearers of the U-Boat Force from September 1939 to May 1945
|language=German
|location=Hamburg, Berlin, Bonn Germany
|publisher=Verlag E.S. Mittler & Sohn
|isbn=978-3-8132-0515-2
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{cite book| title = Germany and the Second World War: Volume 6: The Global War
* {{Cite book
| last1 = Boog | first1 = Horst
|last1=Cowley
| last2 = Rahn | first2 = Werner
|first1=Robert
| last3 = Stumpf | first3 = Reinhard
|last2=Parker
| last4 = Wegner | first4 = Bernd
|first2=Geoffrey
| author1-link = Horst Boog
|year=2005
| author2-link = Werner Rahn
|title=The Reader's Companion to Military History
| author3-link = Reinhard Stumpf
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qOEu4ALwR-IC&pg=PA139
| author4-link = Bernd Wegner
|publisher=Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
| year = 2001
|isbn=978-0-547-56146-2
| publisher = [[Oxford University Press]]
|ref=harv
| isbn = 978-0-1982-2888-2
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The RAF and Trade Defence, 1919–1945: Constant Endeavour
* Dönitz, Karl, ''Grossadmiral''. ''Memoirs: Ten Years and Twenty Days''. Da Capo Press, USA, 1997. {{ISBN|0-306-80764-5}}. (reprints 1958 German-language Athenäum-Verlag edition).
| last = Buckley | first = John | year = 1995
* {{Cite book
| author-link = John Buckley (historian)
|last=Dollinger
| publisher = Ryburn Publishing
|first=Hans
| isbn = 1-85331-069-7
|year=1997
|title=The Decline and Fall of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, Library of Congress Catalogue Card # 67-27047
|location=London
|publisher=Bounty Books
|isbn=978-0-7537-0009-9
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Der U-Boot-Krieg 1939–1945 – Die Ritterkreuzträger der U-Boot-Waffe von September 1939 bis Mai 1945
* {{Cite book
| trans-title = The U-Boat War 1939–1945 – The Knight's Cross Bearers of the U-Boat Force from September 1939 to May 1945
|last=Fellgiebel
| last1 = Busch | first1 = Rainer
|first=Walther-Peer
| last2 = Röll | first2 = Hans-Joachim
|authorlink=Walther-Peer Fellgiebel
|year=2000
| year = 2003
| publisher = Verlag E.S. Mittler & Sohn | location = Hamburg, Berlin, Bonn Germany
|origyear=1986
| language = de
|title=Die Träger des Ritterkreuzes des Eisernen Kreuzes 1939–1945 — Die Inhaber der höchsten Auszeichnung des Zweiten Weltkrieges aller Wehrmachtteile
| isbn = 978-3-8132-0515-2
|trans-title=The Bearers of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross 1939–1945 — The Owners of the Highest Award of the Second World War of all Wehrmacht Branches
|language=German
|location=Friedberg, Germany
|publisher=Podzun-Pallas
|isbn=978-3-7909-0284-6
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Reader's Companion to Military History
* {{Cite book
| last1 = Cowley | first1 = Robert
|last=Goldensohn
| last2 = Parker | first2 = Geoffrey
|first=Leon
| year = 2005
|authorlink=Leon Goldensohn
| publisher = Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
|year=2004
| isbn = 978-0-547-56146-2
|title=The Nuremberg Interviews
|location=New York
|isbn=1-4000-3043-9
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Memoirs: Ten Years and Twenty Days Mass Market | edition = First Da Capo Press, 1997
* {{Cite book
| last = Doenitz | first = Karl | year = 1959
|last=Grier
| translator-last = Stevens | translator-first = R.H.
|first=Howard D.
| others = In collaboration with David Woodward
|year=2007
| publisher = [[Da Capo Press]] | location = Boston
|title=Hitler, Dönitz, and the Baltic Sea. The Third Reich's last hope.
| isbn = 0-306-80764-5
|publisher=Naval Institute Press
}}<!-- Retained the same spellings (Doenitz/Dönitz) used in the two sources; easier to distinguish.-->
|isbn=1-59114-345-4
** {{Cite book| title = Zehn Jahre und zwanzig Tage: Erinnerungen 1935–1945 | edition = 11th |year= 1997
|ref=harv
| trans-title = Ten Years and Twenty Days: Memoirs 1935 – 1945
| last = Dönitz | first = Karl | orig-date = 1958
| publisher = Bernard und Graefe
| language = de
| isbn = 978-376375186-0
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Decline and Fall of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan
* {{cite web
| last = Dollinger | first = Hans | year = 1997
|url=http://uboat.net/men/doenitz.htm
| publisher = Bounty Books | location = London
|title=Befehlshaber der Unterseeboote (BdU) Karl Dönitz.
| isbn = 978-0-7537-0009-9 | lccn = 67-27047
|last=Helgason
|first=Guðmundur
|website=German U-boats of WWII - uboat.net
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Die Träger des Ritterkreuzes des Eisernen Kreuzes 1939–1945 – Die Inhaber der höchsten Auszeichnung des Zweiten Weltkrieges aller Wehrmachtteile
* {{Cite book
| trans-title = The Bearers of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross 1939–1945 – The Owners of the Highest Award of the Second World War of all Wehrmacht Branches
|last=Hamilton
| last = Fellgiebel | first = Walther-Peer | year = 2000
|first=Charles
|year=1996
| orig-year = 1986
| publisher = Podzun-Pallas | location = Friedberg, Germany
|title=Leaders & Personalities of the Third Reich, Vol. 2
| language = de
|location=San José, CA
| isbn = 978-3-7909-0284-6
|publisher=R. James Bender Publishing
|isbn=978-0-912138-66-4
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{cite book| title = Die Ostfront 1943/44 – Der Krieg im Osten und an den Nebenfronten
* {{Cite book
| trans-title = The Eastern Front 1943–1944: The War in the East and on the Neighbouring Fronts
|last=Kershaw
| last1 = Frieser | first1 = Karl-Heinz
|first=Ian
| last2 = Schmider | first2 = Klaus
|author-link=Ian Kershaw
| last3 = Schönherr | first3 = Klaus
|year=2008
| last4 = Schreiber | first4 = Gerhard
|title=Hitler: A Biography
| last5 = Ungváry | first5 = Kristián
|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company
| last6 = Wegner | first6 = Bernd
|location=New York
| author1-link = Karl-Heinz Frieser
|isbn=978-0-393-06757-6
| author5-link = Krisztián Ungváry
|ref=harv
| author6-link = Bernd Wegner
| year = 2007
| publisher = Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt | location = München
| volume = VIII
| language = de
| series = [[Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg]] [Germany and the Second World War]
| isbn = 978-3-421-06235-2
}}
}}
* {{cite book| title = Operation Drumbeat: The Dramatic True Story of Germany's First U-boat Attacks Along the American Coast in World War II
* {{Cite book
| last = Gannon | first = Michael | year = 1990
|last=Mosley
| author-link = Michael Gannon (historian)
|first=Leonard
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]] | location = Washington
|authorlink=Leonard Mosley
| isbn = 978-1-59114-302-4
|year=1974
|title=The Reich Marshal: A Biography of Hermann Goering
|publisher=Doubleday
|location=Garden City
|isbn=978-0-385-04961-0
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{cite book| title = Decoding History: The Battle of the Atlantic and Ultra
* {{Cite book
| last = Gardner | first = W. J. R | year = 1999
|last=Miller
| publisher = Palgrave, McMillan
|first=David
| isbn = 978-0-230-51014-2
|year=2000
|title=U-Boats: The Illustrated History of the Raiders of the Deep
|location=Washington, D.C.
|publisher=Brassey's
|isbn=978-1-57488-246-9
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{cite book| title = Die Reise ins Reich: Unter Rechtsextremisten, Reichsbürgern und anderen Verschwörungstheoretikern
* [[Peter Padfield|Padfield, Peter]], ''Dönitz: The Last Führer''. Cassell & Co, UK, 2001
| trans-title = Journey into the Reich: Among far-right extremists, Reich Citizens and other conspiracy theorists
* {{Cite book
| last = Ginsburg | first = Tobias | year = 2022
|last=Ronzitti
| edition = 2nd | orig-year = 1st pub. 2019
|first=Natalino
| publisher = Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag | location = Hamburg
|year=1988
| isbn =978-3-499-00456-8
|title=The Law of Naval Warfare: A Collection of Agreements and Documents with Commentaries
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pE4D7cnZp9oC&pg=PA359&lpg=PA359&dq=doenitz+guilty+of+unrestricted+submarine+warfare&source=web&ots=N3ElduPAsi&sig=KAvCj8aJXdO6X0Lry1mIGqRLV28&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=7&ct=result
|publisher=Martinus Nijhoff
|isbn=90-247-3652-8
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{Cite book
* {{Cite book| title = The Nuremberg Interviews
| last = Goldensohn | first = Leon | year = 2004
|last=Scherzer
| author-link = Leon Goldensohn
|first=Veit
| location = New York
|year=2007
| isbn = 978-1-4000-3043-9
|title=Die Ritterkreuzträger 1939–1945 Die Inhaber des Ritterkreuzes des Eisernen Kreuzes 1939 von Heer, Luftwaffe, Kriegsmarine, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm sowie mit Deutschland verbündeter Streitkräfte nach den Unterlagen des Bundesarchives
|trans-title=The Knight's Cross Bearers 1939–1945 The Holders of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross 1939 by Army, Air Force, Navy, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm and Allied Forces with Germany According to the Documents of the Federal Archives
|language=German
|location=Jena, Germany
|publisher=Scherzers Militaer-Verlag
|isbn=978-3-938845-17-2
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Hitler, Dönitz, and the Baltic Sea. The Third Reich's last hope
* {{Cite book
| last = Grier | first = Howard D. | year = 2007
|last=Shirer
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]]
|first=William
| isbn = 978-1-59114-345-1
|authorlink=William Shirer
| url = https://archive.org/details/hitlerdonitzbalt0000grie
|year=1983
|title=[[The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich]]
|location=New York
|publisher=Fawcett Crest
|isbn=0-449-21977-1
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{cite book| title = The Gathering Storm: The Naval War in Northern Europe September 1939 – April 1940
* {{Cite book
| last = Haarr | first = Geirr H. | year = 2012
|last1=Steinweis
| publisher = Seaforth Publishing
|first1=Alan E.
| isbn = 978-1-84832-140-3
|last2=Rogers
|first2=Daniel E.
|last3=Grier
|first3=David
|year=2003
|title=The Impact of Nazism: New Perspectives on the Third Reich and its Legacy
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ks2IpI9zccsC&pg=PP1&dq=The+impact+of+Nazism:+new+perspectives+on+the+Third+Reich+and+its+legacy&cd=1#v=onepage&q&f=false
|publisher=Harris Center for Judaic Studies
|isbn=0-8032-4299-9
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = U-Boats Against Canada: German Submarines in Canadian Waters
* {{Cite book
| last = Hadley | first = Michael | year = 1985
|last=Thomas
| publisher = [[McGill–Queen's University Press]] | location = Montreal
|first=Franz
| isbn = 978-0-7735-0811-8
|year=1997
|title=Die Eichenlaubträger 1939–1945 Band 1: A–K
|trans-title=The Oak Leaves Bearers 1939–1945 Volume 1: A–K
|language=German
|location=Osnabrück, Germany
|publisher=Biblio-Verlag
|isbn=978-3-7648-2299-6
|ref=harv
}}
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Leaders & Personalities of the Third Reich|volume= 2
* {{cite book|last1=Zabecki|first1=David T.|title=Germany at War: 400 Years of Military History [4 volumes]: 400 Years of Military History|date=2014|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1598849813|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rCWMBQAAQBAJ&dq=Karl+D%C3%B6nitz&hl=nl&source=gbs_navlinks_s|ref=harv}}
| last = Hamilton | first = Charles | year = 1996
* {{Cite book
| publisher = R. James Bender Publishing | location = San José, CA
|last=Zillmer
| isbn = 978-0-912138-66-4
|first=Eric A.
}}
|year=1995
|title=The Quest for the Nazi Personality: a Psychological Investigation of Nazi War Criminals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
* {{cite book| title = Tyranny on Trial: The Trial of the Major German War Criminals at the End of World War II at Nuremberg, Germany, 1945–1946
| last = Harris | first = Whitney | year = 1999
|location=Hillsdale NJ
|publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
| publisher = Southern Methodist University Press
|isbn=978-0-8058-1898-7
| isbn = 978-0-8707-4436-5
}}
|ref=harv
* {{cite book| title = Britain, Germany and the Battle of the Atlantic: A Comparative Study
| last = Haslop | first = Dennis | year = 2013
| publisher = Bloomsbury Academic
| isbn = 978-1-4725-1163-8
}}
* {{cite book| title = The Cinderella Service: RAF Coastal Command 1939–1945
| last = Hendrie | first = Andrew | year = 2006
| publisher = Pen & Sword Aviation
| isbn = 978-1-84415-346-6
}}
* {{cite book| title = British Intelligence in the Second World War: Volume 3, Part 2: Its Influence on Strategy and Operations [Abridged]
| last = Hinsley | first = Francis | year = 1993
| author-link = Harry Hinsley
| publisher = [[Her Majesty's Stationery Office]]
| isbn = 978-0-670-03041-5
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Luftwaffe: A Study in Air Power, 1933–1945
| last = Hooton | first = E.R. | year = 2010
| publisher = Classic Publications
| isbn = 978-1-906537-18-0
}}
* {{cite book| title = The U-Boat War in the Caribbean
| last = Kelshall | first = Gaylord | year = 1988
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]] | location = Washington
| isbn = 978-1-55750-452-4
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Hitler: A Biography
| last = Kershaw | first = Ian | year = 2008
| author-link = Ian Kershaw
| publisher = W.W. Norton & Company | location = New York
| isbn = 978-0-393-06757-6
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Commanders Winn and Knowles: winning the U-boat war with intelligence, 1939–1943
| last = Kohnen | first = David | year = 1999
| publisher = Enigma Press
| isbn = 978-8-3861-1034-6
}}
* {{cite book| title = Die Kreuzerfahrten der Goeben und Breslau
| trans-title = The Cruises of Goeben and Breslau
| last1 = Kraus | first1 = Theodor
| last2 = Dönitz | first2 = Karl
| year = 1933
| publisher = Ullstein | location = Berlin
| language = de
| oclc = 251295583
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Without Enigma: The Ultra and Fellgiebel Riddles
| last = Macksey | first = Kenneth | year = 2000
| author-link = Kenneth Macksey
| publisher = Ian Allan | location = London
| isbn = 978-0-7110-2766-4
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Royal Navy and German naval disarmament, 1942–1947
| last = Madsen | first = Chris | year = 1998
| publisher = Taylor & Francis
| isbn = 978-0-7146-4373-1
}}
* {{cite book | title = Kunnian ruletti: Korkeimmat ulkomaalaisille 1941-1944 annetut suomalaiset kunniamerkit
| last = Matikkala | first = Antti | year = 2017
| publisher = Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura | location = Helsinki
| language = fi
| isbn = 978-952-222-847-5
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law: The Experience of International and National Courts: Materials: 002
| last = McDonald | first = Gabrielle | year = 2000
| publisher = Kluwer Law International | location = The Hague
| isbn = 978-90-411-1135-7
}}
* {{Cite book| title = U-Boats: The Illustrated History of the Raiders of the Deep
| last = Miller | first = David | year = 2000
| publisher = Brassey's | location = Washington, D.C.
| isbn = 978-1-57488-246-9
}}
* {{cite book| title = The U-boat Hunters: The Royal Canadian Navy and the Offensive Against Germany's Submarines, 1943–1945
| last = Milner | first = Marc | year = 1994
| author-link = Marc Milner
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]]
| isbn = 978-1-5575-0854-6
}}
* {{cite book| title = Battle of the Atlantic
| last = Milner | first = Marc | year = 2011
| author-link = Marc Milner
| publisher = [[The History Press]]
| isbn = 978-0-7524-6187-8
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Readings on International Law from the Naval War College Review, 1978–1994
| last1 = Moore | first1 = John Norton
| last2 = Turner | first2 = Robert F.
| year = 1995
| publisher = Naval War College
| volume = 65
| url = https://archive.org/details/reichmarshalbiog0000mosl | url-access = registration | via = [[Internet Archive]]
| isbn = 978-0-385-04961-0
}}
* {{cite book| title = U-Boat Attack Logs: A Complete Record of Warship Sinkings from Original Sources, 1939–1945
| last1 = Morgan | first1 = Daniel
| last2 = Taylor | first2 = Bruce
| year = 2011
| publisher = Seaforth Publishing
| isbn = 978-1-84832-118-2
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Reich Marshal: A Biography of Hermann Goering
| last = Mosley | first = Leonard | year = 1974
| author-link = Leonard Mosley
| publisher = Doubleday | location = Garden City, NJ
| url = https://archive.org/details/reichmarshalbiog0000mosl | url-access = registration | via = [[Internet Archive]]
| isbn = 978-0-385-04961-0
}}
* {{cite book| title = The Rise and Fall of the German Air Force: 1933–1945
| author = National Archives | year = 2001
| author-link = The National Archives (United Kingdom)
| publisher = [[Public Record Office]] | location = London
| isbn = 978-1-905615-30-8
}}
* {{cite journal | title = Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe Co-operation in the War against Britain, 1939-1945
| last = Neitzel | first = Sönke
| author-link = Sönke Neitzel
| journal = War in History
| year = 2003 | volume = 10 | issue = 4 | pages = 448–463
| doi = 10.1191/0968344503wh285oa | issn = 0968-3445 | oclc = 437806787 | s2cid = 159960697
}}
* {{cite book| title = German U-boat Losses During World War II: Details of Destruction
| last = Niestlé | first = Axel | year = 1998
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]]
| isbn = 978-1-5575-0641-2
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The RAF Regiment at War 1942–1946
| last = Oliver | first = Kingsley | year = 2002
| publisher = Pen and Sword | location = Havertown
| isbn = 978-1-78337-981-1
}}
* {{cite book| title = War and Economy in the Third Reich
| last = Overy | first = Richard J. | year = 2002
| author-link = Richard Overy
| publisher = Oxford University Press | location = New York
| isbn = 978-0-198-20599-9
}}
* {{cite book| title = First U-boat Flotilla
| last = Paterson | first = Lawrence | year = 2001
| publisher = Leo Cooper
| isbn = 978-0-8505-2917-3
}}
* {{cite book| title = Second U-boat Flotilla
| last = Paterson | first = Lawrence | year = 2003
| publisher = Leo Cooper
| isbn = 978-1-78337-967-5
}}
* {{cite book| title = U-boats in the Mediterranean 1941–1944
| last = Paterson | first = Lawrence | year = 2007
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]]
| isbn = 978-0-8117-1655-0
}}
* {{cite book| title = Aircraft Versus Submarine: The Evolution of the Anti-submarine Aircraft, 1912 to 1980
| last = Price | first = Alfred | year = 1980
| author-link = Alfred Price (author)
| publisher = Jane
| isbn = 978-0-7106-0008-0
}}
* {{cite magazine| title = Götterdämmerung German Admirals on Trial
| last = Rems | first = Alan P.
| magazine = Naval History Magazine
| date = December 2015 | volume = 26 | issue = 6
| url = https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2015/december/gotterdammerung-german-admirals-trial | url-status = live
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190818021813/https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2015/december/gotterdammerung-german-admirals-trial
| access-date = 18 August 2019 | archive-date = 18 August 2019
}}
* {{Cite book| title = War at Sea, 1939–1945
| last = Rohwer | first = Jürgen | year = 1996
| author-link = Jürgen Rohwer
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]]
| isbn = 978-1-5575-0915-4
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Critical Convoy Battles of WWII: Crisis in the North Atlantic, March 1943
| last = Rohwer | first = Jürgen | year = 2015
| publisher = Stackpole Books | author-link = Jürgen Rohwer
| isbn = 978-0-8117-1655-0
}}
* {{cite book| title = Chronology of the War at Sea, 1939–1945: The Naval History of World War Two
| last1 = Rohwer | first1 = Jürgen
| last2 = Hümmelchen | first2 = Gerhard
| author1-link = Jürgen Rohwer
| year = 2005
| publisher = US Naval Institute Press | location = Annapolis, MD
| isbn = 978-1-59114-119-8
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Law of Naval Warfare: A Collection of Agreements and Documents with Commentaries
| last = Ronzitti | first = Natalino | year = 1988
| publisher = Martinus Nijhoff
| isbn = 978-90-247-3652-2
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The War at Sea, 1939–1945: The defensive
| last = Roskill | first = Stephen | year = 1954
| author-link = Stephen Roskill
| publisher = [[Her Majesty's Stationery Office]]
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Die Ritterkreuzträger 1939–1945 Die Inhaber des Ritterkreuzes des Eisernen Kreuzes 1939 von Heer, Luftwaffe, Kriegsmarine, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm sowie mit Deutschland verbündeter Streitkräfte nach den Unterlagen des Bundesarchives
| trans-title = The Knight's Cross Bearers 1939–1945 The Holders of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross 1939 by Army, Air Force, Navy, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm and Allied Forces with Germany According to the Documents of the Federal Archives
| last = Scherzer | first = Veit | year = 2007
| publisher = Scherzers Militaer-Verlag | location = Jena, Germany
| language = de
| isbn = 978-3-938845-17-2
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich
| title-link = The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich
| last = Shirer | first = William | year = 1983
| author-link = William Shirer
| publisher = Fawcett Crest | location = New York
| isbn = 978-0-449-21977-5
}}
* {{cite book| title = Inside the Nuremberg Trial: A Prosecutor's Comprehensive Account
| last = Sprecher | first = Drexel | year = 1999
| publisher = [[University Press of America]]
| volume = 2
| isbn = 978-0-7618-1284-5
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Impact of Nazism: New Perspectives on the Third Reich and its Legacy
| last1 = Steinweis | first1 = Alan E.
| last2 = Rogers | first2 = Daniel E.
| last3 = Grier | first3 = David
| year = 2003
| publisher = Harris Center for Judaic Studies
| isbn = 978-0-8032-4299-9
}}
* {{cite book| title = Battle Beneath the Waves: U-boats at War
| last = Stern | first = Robert | year = 2003
| publisher = Castle Books
| isbn = 978-0-7858-1682-9
}}
* {{cite book| title = The Defeat of the German U-boats: The Battle of the Atlantic
| last = Syrett | first = David | year = 1994
| author-link = David Syrett
| publisher = [[University of South Carolina Press]] | location = Columbia
| url = https://archive.org/details/defeatofgermanub00syre | url-access = registration | via = [[Internet Archive]]
| isbn = 978-1-41022-139-1
}}
* {{cite book| title = The Last Year of the Kriegsmarine: May 1944 to May 1945
| last = Tarrant | first = E.V | year = 1994
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]] | location = Maryland, MD
| isbn = 978-1-5575-0510-1
}}
* {{cite book| title = British and Commonwealth Merchant Ship Losses to Axis Submarines, 1939–1945
| last = Tennent | first = Alan J. | year = 2001
| publisher = Sutton | location = Stoud
| isbn = 978-0-7509-2760-4
}}
* {{cite book| title = Business in Great Waters: The U-Boat Wars, 1916–1945
| last = Terraine | first = John | year = 1989
| author-link = John Terraine
| publisher = Leo Cooper | location = London
| isbn = 978-0-85052-760-5
}}
* {{cite book| title = The Germany Navy in the Nazi Era
| last = Thomas | first = Charles | year = 1990
| publisher = Routledge | location = London
| isbn = 978-0-0444-5493-9
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Die Eichenlaubträger 1939–1945 Band 1: A–K
| trans-title = The Oak Leaves Bearers 1939–1945 Volume 1: A–K
| last = Thomas | first = Franz | year = 1997
| publisher = Biblio-Verlag | location = Osnabrück, Germany
| language = de
| isbn = 978-3-7648-2299-6
}}
* {{cite book| title = World War II: A Student Encyclopedia
| last = Tucker | first = Spencer | year = 2005
| publisher = ABC Clio
| isbn = 978-1-85109-857-6
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Wolf: U-boat Commanders in World War II
| last = Vause | first = Jordan | year = 1997
| publisher = [[Naval Institute Press]] | location = Washington, D.C.
| isbn = 978-1-55750-874-4
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Naval Strategy and Operations in Narrow Seas
| last = Vego | first = Milan | year = 2003
| publisher = Frank Cass | location = London
| isbn = 0-7146-5389-6
}}
* {{cite book| title = The Nazi War Trials
| last = Walker | first = Andrew | year = 2006
| publisher = CPD
| isbn = 978-1-903047-50-7
}}
* {{cite book| title = The U-Boat War: The German Submarine Service and the Battle of the Atlantic 1935–1945
| last = Westwood | first = David | year = 2005
| publisher = Conway Maritime Press
| isbn = 978-1-84486-001-2
}}
* {{cite book| title = The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality
| last = Wette | first = Wolfram | year = 2007
| author-link = Wolfram Wette
| publisher = [[Harvard University Press]] | location = Cambridge, MA
| isbn = 978-0-674-02577-6
}}
* {{Cite book| title = Torpedoes in the Gulf: Galveston and the U-Boats, 1942–1943
| last = Wiggins | first = Melanie | year = 1995
| publisher = [[Texas A&M University Press]] | location = Texas
| isbn = 978-0-8909-6627-3
}}
* {{Cite book| title = U-Boats vs Destroyer Escorts
| last = Williamson | first = Gordon | year = 2007
| publisher = Osprey Publishing | location = U.K.
| isbn = 978-1-84603-133-5
}}
* {{cite book| title = Dönitz: A Defense
| last = Zabecki | first = David T. | year = 2007
| author-link = David T. Zabecki
| publisher = Merriam Press Military Monograph Series
| isbn = 978-1-57638-042-0
}}
* {{cite book| title = Germany at War: 400 Years of Military History [4 volumes]: 400 Years of Military History
| last = Zabecki | first = David T. | year = 2014
| author-link = David T. Zabecki
| publisher = ABC-CLIO
| isbn = 978-1-59884-981-3
}}
* {{Cite book| title = The Quest for the Nazi Personality: a Psychological Investigation of Nazi War Criminals
| last = Zillmer | first = Eric A. | year = 1995
| publisher = Lawrence Erlbaum Associates | location = Hillsdale NJ
| url = https://archive.org/details/questfornazipers0000unse | url-access = registration | via = [[Internet Archive]]
| isbn = 978-0-8058-1898-7
}}
}}
{{Refend}}


'''Attribution:'''
===Background information===
* {{source-attribution| {{cite book| title = The Law of War and Neutrality at Sea
{{Refbegin}}
| last = Tucker | first = Robert W. | year = 1957
* [[Peter-Erich Cremer|Cremer, Peter]]. ''U-Boat Commander: A Periscope View of the Battle of the Atlantic''. 1984. {{ISBN|0-87021-969-3}}.
| publisher = U.S. Government Printing Office
* Davidson, Eugene. ''The Trial of the Germans: Account of the Twenty-two Defendants Before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg''. 1997. {{ISBN|0-8262-1139-9}}
| url = https://archive.org/details/lawofwarneutrali0000tuck | url-access = registration | via = [[Internet Archive]]
* Hadley, Michael L. ''U-Boats Against Canada: German Submarines in Canadian Waters''. McGill-Queen's University Press: 1985. {{ISBN|0-7735-0801-5}}.
}}}}
* Macintyre, Donald. ''U-boat Killer''. 1999. {{ISBN|0-304-35235-7}}
* Thompson, H.K. & Henry Strutz. ''Doenitz at Nuremberg, a reappraisal: War crimes and the military professional''. Amber Pub. Corp. 1976.
* Herwig, Holger H. ''Innovation ignored: The Submarine problem'' in Murray, Williamson and Millet Allan R. ed. "Military Innovation in the Interwar Period". Cambridge University Press 1998
* ''Failure to Learn: American Anti-submarine Warfare in 1942'' in Cohen, Eliot A. and Gooch, John. ''Military Misfortunes'' Vintage Books 1991
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}

==Further reading==
* [http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/atlantic/uboat.aspx Re-birth of the U-boat]
* O'Keefe, David "One Day In August{{snd}} The Untold Story Behind Canada's Tragedy At Dieppe", Alfred A. Knopf Canada, 2013, {{ISBN|978-0-345-80769-4}}, 471 pgs
* {{cite book|last=Turner|first=Barry|title=Karl Doenitz and the Last Days of the Third Reich|year=2016|publisher=Icon Books|location=London|isbn=978-1-7857-805-47}}


==External links==
==External links==
{{Spoken Wikipedia|En-KarlDoenitz-article.ogg|date= 2017-12-16}}
* {{Internet Archive author |sname=Karl Dönitz}}
* {{Find a Grave|4363|name=Karl Dönitz}}
* {{Internet Archive author|sname=Karl Dönitz}}
* [http://www.enigma.hoerenberg.com Historical Enigma message] Grand Admiral Dönitz announcing his appointment as Hitler’s successor.
* [http://www.enigma.hoerenberg.com Historical Enigma message] Grand Admiral Dönitz announcing his appointment as Hitler's successor.
* {{PM20|FID=pe/004104}}

{{Major defendants at the Nuremberg trials}}
{{S-start}}
{{German presidents}}
{{S-mil}}
{{s-bef|before = [[Erich Raeder]]}}
{{s-ttl|title = ''[[Oberbefehlshaber der Marine]]''|years = 1943–1945}}
{{s-aft|after = [[Hans-Georg von Friedeburg]]}}
{{S-off}}
{{s-bef|before = [[Adolf Hitler]] | as = [[Führer]]}}
{{s-ttl|title = [[President of Germany (1919–1945)|President of Germany]]|years = 1945}}
{{s-non | reason = Position abolished}}
{{S-ach}}
{{S-bef|before=[[Hein ter Poorten]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[Time (magazine)|Cover of Time Magazine]]
| years = 2 February 1942}}
{{S-aft|after=[[Robert A. Lovett]]}}
{{S-bef|before=[[Kenneth Arthur Noel Anderson]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[Time (magazine)|Cover of Time Magazine]]
| years = 10 May 1943}}
{{S-aft|after=[[Harold L. George]]}}
{{S-end}}

{{Navboxes
|title=Articles and topics related to Karl Dönitz
|state=collapsed
|list1=
{{GFMofWWII}}
{{GFMofWWII}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Uboat}}
{{German Presidents (1919–1945)}}
{{Cabinet Schwerin von Krosigk}}
{{Main Nuremberg defendants}}
}}
{{Subject bar
{{Subject bar
| portal1=Biography
| portal1=Biography
| commons=y
| portal2=Military of Germany
| commons-search=Category:Karl Dönitz
| portal3=Submarine
| q=y
| portal4=World War I
| portal5=World War II
| commons=y
| q=y
}}
}}

{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Donitz, Karl}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dönitz, Karl}}
[[Category:Karl Dönitz| ]]
[[Category:1891 births]]
[[Category:1891 births]]
[[Category:1980 deaths]]
[[Category:1980 deaths]]
[[Category:Naval history of World War II]]
[[Category:20th-century presidents of Germany]]
[[Category:20th-century German memoirists]]
[[Category:20th-century German non-fiction writers]]
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]
[[Category:Politicians from Berlin]]
[[Category:Commanders of the Military Order of Savoy]]
[[Category:Commanders of the Military Order of Savoy]]
[[Category:Crosses of Naval Merit]]
[[Category:Crosses of Naval Merit]]
[[Category:German prisoners and detainees]]
[[Category:German prisoners of war in World War I]]
[[Category:World War I prisoners of war held by the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:German people convicted of war crimes]]
[[Category:Grand admirals of the Kriegsmarine]]
[[Category:Grand Cordons of the Order of the Rising Sun]]
[[Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of the Cross of Liberty]]
[[Category:Heads of government who were later imprisoned]]
[[Category:Heads of state convicted of war crimes]]
[[Category:Heads of state convicted of war crimes]]
[[Category:Knights of the House Order of Hohenzollern]]
[[Category:Imperial German Navy personnel of World War I]]
[[Category:Grand admirals of the Kriegsmarine]]
[[Category:Military personnel from Berlin]]
[[Category:Nazi leaders]]
[[Category:Military personnel from the Province of Brandenburg]]
[[Category:Nazis who served in World War I]]
[[Category:Naval history of World War II]]
[[Category:Officials of Nazi Germany]]
[[Category:People convicted by the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg]]
[[Category:People convicted by the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg]]
[[Category:People from the Province of Brandenburg]]
[[Category:People from Treptow-Köpenick]]
[[Category:Presidents of Germany]]
[[Category:Politicians from Berlin]]
[[Category:Recipients of the clasp to the Iron Cross, 1st class]]
[[Category:Recipients of the clasp to the Iron Cross, 1st class]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Friedrich Cross]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of Michael the Brave, 1st class]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of Michael the Brave, 1st class]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of the Medjidie, 1st class]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of the Medjidie, 1st class]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of the Rising Sun, 1st class]]
[[Category:Reichsmarine personnel]]
[[Category:Reichsmarine personnel]]
[[Category:U-boat commanders (Imperial Navy)]]
[[Category:U-boat commanders (Imperial German Navy)]]

Latest revision as of 00:23, 6 October 2024

Karl Dönitz
Dönitz as Grand Admiral in 1943
President of Germany
In office
30 April 1945 – 23 May 1945
Chancellor
Preceded by
Succeeded byOffice abolished
Minister of War
In office
30 April 1945 – 23 May 1945
ChancellorJoseph Goebbels
Leading MinisterLutz von Krosigk
Preceded byWilhelm Keitel
(Chief of the OKW)
Chief of the German Navy High Command
In office
30 January 1943 – 1 May 1945
DeputyEberhard Godt
Preceded byErich Raeder
Succeeded byHans-Georg von Friedeburg
Personal details
Born(1891-09-16)16 September 1891
Grünau, Province of Brandenburg, Prussia, German Empire
Died24 December 1980(1980-12-24) (aged 89)
Aumühle, Schleswig-Holstein, West Germany
Resting placeWaldfriedhof Cemetery, Aumühle
Political partyNazi Party[1]
Spouse
Ingeborg Weber
(m. 1916; died 1962)
Children3
Cabinet
Signature
Nickname(s)Der Löwe (The Lion)[2]
Onkel Karl (Uncle Karl)[2]
Military service
Allegiance
Branch/service
Years of service
  • 1910–1918
  • 1920–1945
RankGroßadmiral
Commands
Battles/wars
AwardsKnight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves
Criminal conviction
Criminal statusReleased
Conviction(s)Crimes of aggression
War crimes
TrialNuremberg trials
Criminal penalty10 years imprisonment
Imprisoned atSpandau Prison
^a Formally titled "Leading Minister" or "Chief Minister" (Leitender Minister)

Karl Dönitz (sometimes spelled Doenitz; German: [ˈdøːnɪts] ; 16 September 1891 – 24 December 1980) was a German navy officer who, following Adolf Hitler's suicide, succeeded him as head of state of Nazi Germany in May 1945, holding the position until the dissolution of the Flensburg Government following Germany's unconditional surrender to the Allies days later. As Supreme Commander of the Navy beginning in 1943, he played a major role in the naval history of World War II.

He began his career in the Imperial German Navy before World War I. In 1918, he was commanding UB-68, and was taken prisoner of war by British forces. As commander of UB-68, he attacked a convoy in the Mediterranean while on patrol near Malta. Sinking one ship before the rest of the convoy outran his U-boat, Dönitz began to formulate the concept of U-boats operating in attack groups Rudeltaktik (German for "pack tactic", commonly called a "wolfpack") for greater efficiency, rather than operating independently.[3]

By the start of the Second World War, Dönitz was supreme commander of the Kriegsmarine's U-boat arm (Befehlshaber der Unterseeboote (BdU)). In January 1943, Dönitz achieved the rank of Großadmiral (grand admiral) and replaced Grand Admiral Erich Raeder as Commander-in-Chief of the Navy. Dönitz was the main enemy of Allied naval forces in the Battle of the Atlantic. From 1939 to 1943 the U-boats fought effectively but lost the initiative from May 1943. Dönitz ordered his submarines into battle until 1945 to relieve the pressure on other branches of the Wehrmacht (armed forces).[4] 648 U-boats were lost—429 with no survivors. Furthermore, of these, 215 were lost on their first patrol.[5] Around 30,000 of the 40,000 men who served in U-boats perished.[5]

On 30 April 1945, following the suicide of Adolf Hitler and in accordance with his last will and testament, Dönitz was named Hitler's successor as head of state in what became known as the Goebbels cabinet after his second-in-command, Joseph Goebbels, until Goebbels' suicide led to Dönitz's cabinet being reformed into the Flensburg Government instead. On 7 May 1945, he ordered Alfred Jodl, Chief of Operations Staff of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (OKW), to sign the German instruments of surrender in Reims, France, formally ending the War in Europe.[6] Dönitz remained as head of state with the titles of President of Germany and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces until his cabinet was dissolved by the Allied powers on 23 May de facto and on 5 June de jure.

By his own admission, Dönitz was a dedicated Nazi and supporter of Hitler. Following the war, he was indicted as a major war criminal at the Nuremberg trials on three counts: conspiracy to commit crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity; planning, initiating, and waging wars of aggression; and crimes against the laws of war. He was found not guilty of committing crimes against humanity, but guilty of committing crimes against peace and war crimes against the laws of war. He was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment; following his release, he lived in a village near Hamburg until his death in 1980.

Early career and personal life

[edit]
Oberleutnant zur See Karl Dönitz as Watch Officer of U-39 during World War I

Dönitz was born on 16 September 1891 in Grünau, near Berlin, to Anna Beyer and Emil Dönitz, an engineer. Karl had an older brother. In 1910, Dönitz enlisted in the Kaiserliche Marine ("Imperial Navy").[7]

On 27 September 1913, Dönitz was commissioned as a Leutnant zur See (acting sub-lieutenant). When World War I began, he served on the light cruiser SMS Breslau in the Mediterranean Sea.[7] In August 1914, the Breslau and the battlecruiser SMS Goeben were sold to the Ottoman Navy; the ships were renamed the Midilli and the Yavuz Sultan Selim, respectively. They began operating out of Constantinople, under Rear Admiral Wilhelm Souchon, engaging Russian forces in the Black Sea.[8][page needed] On 22 March 1916, Dönitz was promoted to Oberleutnant zur See. He requested a transfer to the submarine forces, which became effective on 1 October 1916. He attended the submariner's school at Flensburg-Mürwik and passed out on 3 January 1917.[9] He served as watch officer on U-39, and from February 1918 onward as commander of UC-25. On 2 July 1918, he became commander of UB-68, operating in the Mediterranean.[10] On 4 October, after suffering technical difficulties, Dönitz was forced to surface and scuttled his boat. He was captured by the British and incarcerated in the Redmires camp near Sheffield. He remained a prisoner of war until 1919 and in 1920 he returned to Germany.[11]

Karl Dönitz' sons both died in World War II: Lieutenant Peter Dönitz on May 19, 1943, as a watch officer on the U-954, Oberleutnant Klaus Dönitz on May 13, 1944, on the E-boat S-141.

On 27 May 1916, Dönitz married a nurse named Ingeborg Weber (1893–1962), the daughter of German general Erich Weber (1860–1933). They had three children whom they raised as Protestant Christians: daughter Ursula (1917–1990) and sons Klaus (1920–1944) and Peter (1922–1943). Both of Dönitz's sons were killed during the Second World War.[12] Peter was killed on 19 May 1943 when U-954 was sunk in the North Atlantic with all hands.[13]

Hitler had issued a policy stating that if a senior officer such as Dönitz lost a son in battle and had other sons in the military, the latter could withdraw from combat and return to civilian life.[14] After Peter's death, Klaus was forbidden to have any combat role and was allowed to leave the military to begin studying to become a naval doctor. He returned to sea and was killed on 13 May 1944; he had persuaded his friends to let him go on the E-boat S-141 for a raid on Selsey on his 24th birthday. The boat was sunk by the French destroyer La Combattante.[14]

Interwar period

[edit]

He continued his naval career in the naval arm of the Weimar Republic's armed forces. On 10 January 1921, he became a Kapitänleutnant (lieutenant) in the new German navy (Vorläufige Reichsmarine). Dönitz commanded torpedo boats, becoming a Korvettenkapitän (lieutenant-commander) on 1 November 1928. On 1 September 1933, he became a Fregattenkapitän (commander) and, in 1934, was put in command of the cruiser Emden, the ship on which cadets and midshipmen took a year-long world cruise as training.[11]

In 1935, the Reichsmarine was renamed Kriegsmarine. Germany was prohibited by the Treaty of Versailles from possessing a submarine fleet. The Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 1935 allowed submarines and he was placed in command of the U-boat flotilla Weddigen, which comprised three boats; U-7; U-8 and; U-9. On 1 September 1935, he was promoted to Kapitän zur See (naval captain).[11]

Dönitz opposed Raeder's views that surface ships should be given priority in the Kriegsmarine during the war,[15] but in 1935 Dönitz doubted U-boat suitability in a naval trade war on account of their slow speed.[16] This phenomenal contrast with Dönitz's wartime policy is explained in the 1935 Anglo-German Naval Agreement. The accord was viewed by the navy with optimism, Dönitz included. He remarked, "Britain, in the circumstances, could not possibly be included in the number of potential enemies."[17] The statement, made after June 1935, was uttered at a time when the naval staff were sure France and the Soviet Union were likely to be Germany's only enemies.[17] Dönitz's statement was partially correct. Britain was not foreseen as an immediate enemy, but the navy still held onto a cadre of imperial officers, which along with its Nazi-instigated intake, understood war would be certain in the distant future, perhaps not until the mid-1940s.[17]

Dönitz came to recognise the need for more of these vessels. Only 26 were in commission or under construction that summer. In the time before his command of submarines, he perfected the group tactics that first appealed to him in 1917. At this time Dönitz first expressed his procurement policies. His preference for the submarine fleet was in the production of large numbers of small craft. In contrast to other warships, the fighting power of the U-boat, in his opinion, was not dependent on its size as the torpedo, not the gun, was the machine's main weapon. Dönitz had a tendency to be critical of larger submarines and listed a number of disadvantages in their production, operation and tactical use.[18] Dönitz recommended the Type VII submarine as the ideal submarine. The boat was reliable and had a range of 6,200 miles. Modifications lengthened this to 8,700 miles.[19]

Dönitz revived Hermann Bauer's idea of grouping several submarines together into a Rudeltaktik ("pack tactic", commonly called "wolfpack") to overwhelm a merchant convoy's escorts. Implementation of wolfpacks had been difficult in World War I owing to the limitations of available radios. In the interwar years, Germany had developed ultra high frequency transmitters, (ukw) while the Enigma cipher machine was believed to have made communications secure.[20] A 1922 paper written by Kapitäinleutnant Wessner of the Wehrabteilung (Defence Ministry) pointed to the success of surface attacks at night and the need to coordinate operations with multiple boats to defeat the escorts.[21] Dönitz knew of the paper and improved the ideas suggested by Wessner.[22] This tactic had the added advantage that a submarine on the surface was undetectable by ASDIC (an early form of sonar). Dönitz claimed after the war he would not allow his service to be intimidated by British disclosures about ASDIC and the course of the war had proven him right.[23] In reality, Dönitz harboured fears stretching back to 1937 that the new technology would render the U-boat impotent.[24] Dönitz published his ideas on night attacks in January 1939 in a booklet called Die U-Bootwaffe which apparently went unnoticed by the British.[25] The Royal Navy's overconfidence in Asdic encouraged the Admiralty to suppose it could deal with submarines whatever strategy they adopted — in this they were proven wrong; submarines were difficult to locate and destroy under operational conditions.[25]

In 1939 he expressed his belief that he could win the war with 300 vessels.[26] The Nazi leadership's rearmament priorities were fundamentally geared to land and aerial warfare. From 1933 to 1936, the navy was granted only 13 per cent of total armament expenditure.[27] The production of U-boats, despite the existing Z Plan, remained low. In 1935 shipyards produced 14 submarines, 21 in 1936, 1 in 1937. In 1938 nine were commissioned and in 1939 18 U-boats were built.[24] Dönitz's vision may have been misguided. The British had planned for contingency construction programmes for the summer, 1939. At least 78 small escorts and a crash construction programme of "Whale catchers" had been invoked. The British, according to one historian, had taken all the sensible steps necessary to deal with the U-boat menace as it existed in 1939 and were well placed to deal with large numbers of submarines, prior to events in 1940.[28]

World War II

[edit]

On 1 September 1939, Germany invaded Poland. Britain and France soon declared war on Germany, and World War II began. On Sunday 3 September, Dönitz chaired a conference at Wilhelmshaven. At 11:15 am the British Admiralty sent out a signal "Total Germany". B-Dienst intercepted the message and it was promptly reported to Dönitz. Dönitz paced around the room and his staff purportedly heard him repeatedly say, "My God! So it's war with England again!"[26]

Dönitz abandoned the conference to return within the hour a far more composed man. He announced to his officers, "we know our enemy. We have today the weapon and a leadership that can face up to this enemy. The war will last a long time; but if each does his duty we will win."[26] Dönitz had only 57 boats; of those, 27 were capable of reaching the Atlantic Ocean from their German bases. A small building program was already under way but the number of U-boats did not rise noticeably until the autumn of 1941.[29]

Dönitz's first major action was the cover up of the sinking of the British passenger liner Athenia later the same day. Acutely sensitive to international opinion and relations with the United States, the death of more than a hundred civilians was damaging. Dönitz suppressed the truth that the ship was sunk by a German submarine. He accepted the commander's explanation that he genuinely believed the ship was armed. Dönitz ordered the engagement to be struck from the submarine's logbook. Dönitz did not admit the cover up until 1946.[30]

Hitler's original orders to wage war only in accordance with the Prize Regulations were not issued in any altruistic spirit but in the belief hostilities with the Western Allies would be brief. On 23 September 1939, Hitler, on the recommendation of Admiral Raeder, approved that all merchant ships making use of their wireless on being stopped by U-boats should be sunk or captured. This German order marked a considerable step towards unrestricted warfare. Four days later enforcement of Prize Regulations in the North Sea was withdrawn; and on 2 October complete freedom was given to attack darkened ships encountered off the British and French coasts. Two days later the Prize Regulations were cancelled in waters extending as far as 15° West, and on 17 October the German Naval Staff gave U-boats permission to attack without warning all ships identified as hostile. The zone where darkened ships could be attacked with complete freedom was extended to 20° West on 19 October. Practically the only restrictions now placed on U-boats concerned attacks on passenger liners and, on 17 November, they too were allowed to be attacked without warning if clearly identifiable as hostile.[31]

Although the phrase was not used, by November 1939 the BdU was practicing unrestricted submarine warfare. Neutral shipping was warned by the Germans against entering the zone which, by American neutrality legislation, was forbidden to American shipping, and against steaming without lights, zigzagging or taking any defensive precautions. The complete practice of unrestricted warfare was not enforced for fear of antagonising neutral powers, particularly the Americans. Admirals Raeder and Dönitz and the German Naval Staff had always wished and intended to introduce unrestricted warfare as rapidly as Hitler could be persuaded to accept the possible consequences.[31]

Dönitz and Raeder accepted the death of the Z Plan upon the outbreak of war. The U-boat programme would be the only portion of it to survive 1939. Both men lobbied Hitler to increase the planned production of submarines to at least 29 per month.[32] The immediate obstacle to the proposals was Hermann Göring, head of the Four Year Plan, commander-in-chief of the Luftwaffe and future successor to Hitler. Göring would not acquiesce and in March 1940 Raeder was forced to drop the figure from 29 to 25, but even that plan proved illusory. In the first half of 1940, two boats were delivered, increased to six in the final half of the year. In 1941 the deliveries increased to 13 to June, and then 20 to December. It was not until late 1941 the number of vessels began to increase quickly.[32] From September 1939 through to March 1940, 15 U-boats were lost—nine to convoy escorts. The impressive tonnage sunk had little impact on the Allied war effort at that point.[33]

Commander of the submarine fleet

[edit]
Dönitz observing the arrival of U-94 at St Nazaire in France in June 1941

On 1 October 1939, Dönitz became a Konteradmiral (rear admiral) and "Commander of the Submarines" (Befehlshaber der Unterseeboote, BdU). For the first part of the war, despite disagreements with Raeder where best to deploy his men, Dönitz was given considerable operational freedom for his junior rank.[34]

From September–December 1939 U-boats sank 221 ships for 755,237 gross tons, at the cost of nine U-boats.[35] Only 47 merchant ships were sunk in the North Atlantic, a tonnage of 249,195.[35] Dönitz had difficulty in organising Wolfpack operations in 1939. A number of his submarines were lost en route to the Atlantic, through either the North Sea or the heavily defended English Channel. Torpedo failures plagued commanders during convoy attacks. Along with successes against single ships, Dönitz authorised the abandonment of pack attacks in the autumn.[36] The Norwegian Campaign amplified the defects. Dönitz wrote in May 1940, "I doubt whether men have ever had to rely on such a useless weapon."[37] He ordered the removal of magnetic pistols in favour of contact fuses and their faulty depth control systems.[37] In no fewer than 40 attacks on Allied warships, not a single sinking was achieved.[38] The statistics show that from the outbreak of war to approximately the spring, 1940, faulty German torpedoes saved 50–60 ships equating to 300,000 GRT.[39]

Dönitz was encouraged in operations against warships by the sinking of the aircraft carrier Courageous. On 28 September 1939 he said, "it is not true Britain possesses the means to eliminate the U-boat menace."[40] The first specific operation—named "Special Operation P"—authorised by Dönitz was Günther Prien's attack on Scapa Flow, which sank the battleship Royal Oak.[41] The attack became a propaganda success though Prien purportedly was unenthusiastic about being used that way.[42] Stephen Roskill wrote, "It is now known that this operation was planned with great care by Admiral Dönitz, who was correctly informed of the weak state of the defences of the eastern entrances. Full credit must also be given to Lieutenant Prien for the nerve and determination with which he put Dönitz's plan into execution."[41]

In May 1940, 101 ships were sunk—but only nine in the Atlantic—followed by 140 in June; 53 of them in the Atlantic for a total of 585,496 GRT that month. The first six months in 1940 cost Dönitz 15 U-boats.[35] Until mid-1940 there remained a chronic problem with the reliability of the G7e torpedo. As the battles of Norway and Western Europe raged, the Luftwaffe sank more ships than the U-boats. In May 1940, German aircraft sank 48 ships (158 GRT), three times that of German submarines.[clarification needed][citation needed] The Allied evacuations from western Europe and Scandinavia in June 1940 attracted Allied warships in large numbers, leaving many of the Atlantic convoys travelling through the Western Approaches unprotected. From June 1940, the German submarines began to exact a heavy toll. In the same month, the Luftwaffe sank just 22 ships (195,193 GRT) in a reversal of the previous months.[43]

Germany's defeat of Norway gave the U-boats new bases much nearer to their main area of operations off the Western Approaches. The U-boats operated in groups or 'wolf packs' which were coordinated by radio from land.[29] With the fall of France, Germany acquired U-boat bases at Lorient, Brest, St Nazaire, and La Pallice/La Rochelle and Bordeaux. This extended the range of Type VIIs.[44] Regardless, the war with Britain continued. The admiral remained sceptical of Operation Sea Lion, a planned invasion and expected a long war.[45] The destruction of seaborne trade became German strategy against Britain after the defeat of the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain.[46] Hitler was content with The Blitz and cutting off Britain's imports. Dönitz gained importance as the prospect of a quick victory faded.[47] Dönitz concentrated groups of U-boats against the convoys and had them attack on the surface at night.[29] In addition the Germans were helped by Italian submarines which in early 1941 actually surpassed the number of German U-boats.[48] Having failed to persuade the Nazi leadership to prioritise U-boat construction, a task made more difficult by military victories in 1940 which convinced many people that Britain would give up the struggle, Dönitz welcomed the deployment of 26 Italian submarines to his force.[49] Dönitz complimented Italian bravery and daring, but was critical of their training and submarine designs. Dönitz remarked they lacked the necessary toughness and discipline and consequently were "of no great assistance to us in the Atlantic."[50]

The establishment of German bases on the French Atlantic coast allowed for the prospect of aerial support. Small numbers of German aircraft, such as the long-range Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor, sank a large number of ships in the Atlantic in the last quarter of 1940. In the long term, Göring proved an insurmountable problem in effecting cooperation between the navy and the Luftwaffe.[51] In early 1941, while Göring was on leave, Dönitz approached Hitler and secured from him a single bomber/maritime patrol unit for the navy. Göring succeeded in overturning this decision and both Dönitz and Raeder were forced to settle for a specialist maritime air command under Luftwaffe control.[52] Poorly supplied, Fliegerführer Atlantik achieved modest success in 1941, but thereafter failed to have an impact as British counter-measures evolved.[51] Cooperation between the Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe remained dysfunctional to the war's end.[53] Göring and his unassailable position at the Reichsluftfahrtministerium (Air Ministry) prevented all but limited collaboration.[54]

The U-boat fleet's successes in 1940 and early 1941 were spearheaded by a small number of highly trained and experienced pre-war commanders. Otto Kretschmer, Joachim Schepke, and Günther Prien were the most famous, but others included Hans Jenisch, Victor Oehrn, Engelbert Endrass, Herbert Schultze and Hans-Rudolf Rösing. Although skilled and with impeccable judgement, the shipping lanes they descended upon were poorly defended.[55] The U-boat force did not escape unscathed. Within the space of several days in March 1941, Prien and Schepke were dead and Kretschmer was a prisoner. All of them fell in battle with a convoy system.[56] The number of boats in the Atlantic remained low. Six fewer existed in May 1940 than in September 1939. In January 1941 there were just six on station in the Atlantic—the lowest during the war, while still suffering from unreliable torpedoes. Dönitz insisted that operations continue while "the smallest prospect of hits" remained.[57]

For his part, Dönitz was involved in the daily operations of his boats and all the major operational level decisions. His assistant, Eberhard Godt, was left to manage daily operations as the war continued.[58] Dönitz was debriefed personally by his captains which helped establish a rapport between leader and led. Dönitz neglected nothing that would make the bond firmer. Often there would be a distribution of medals or awards. As an ex-submariner, Dönitz did not like to contemplate the thought of a man who had done well heading out to sea, perhaps never to return, without being rewarded or receiving recognition. Dönitz acknowledged where decorations were concerned there was no red tape and that awards were "psychologically important".[59]

Intelligence battle

[edit]

Intelligence played an important role in the Battle of the Atlantic.[60] In general, BdU intelligence was poor.[61][62] Counter-intelligence was not much better. At the height of the battle in mid-1943 some 2,000 signals were sent from the 110 U-boats at sea.[63] Radio traffic compromised his ciphers by giving the Allies more messages to work with. Furthermore, replies from the boats enabled the Allies to use High-frequency direction finding (HF/DF, called "Huff-Duff") to locate a U-boat using its radio, track it and attack it.[64][65] The over-centralised command structure of BdU and its insistence on micro-managing every aspect of U-boat operations with endless signals provided the Allied navies with ample intelligence.[65] The enormous "paper chase" [cross-referencing of materials] operations pursued by Allied intelligence agencies was not thought possible by BdU. The Germans did not suspect the Allies had identified the codes broken by B-Dienst.[65] Conversely, when Dönitz suspected the enemy had penetrated his own communications BdU's response was to suspect internal sabotage and reduce the number of the staff officers to the most reliable, exacerbating the problem of over-centralisation.[65] In contrast to the Allies, the Wehrmacht was suspicious of civilian scientific advisors and generally distrusted outsiders. The Germans were never as open to new ideas or thinking of war in intelligence terms. According to one analyst BdU "lacked imagination and intellectual daring" in the naval war.[66] These Allied advantages failed to avert heavy losses in the June 1940 – May 1941 period, known to U-boat crews as the "First Happy Time."[67] In June 1941, 68 ships were sunk in the North Atlantic (318,740 GRT) at a cost of four U-boats, but the German submarines would not eclipse that number for the remainder of the year. Just 10 transports were sunk in November and December 1941.[35]

On 7 May 1941, the Royal Navy captured the German Arctic meteorological vessel München and took its Enigma machine intact, which allowed the Royal Navy to decode U-boat radio communications in June 1941.[48] Two days later the capture of U-110 was an intelligence coup for the British. The settings for high-level "officer-only" signals, "short-signals" (Kurzsignale) and codes standardising messages to defeat HF/DF fixes by sheer speed were found.[68] Only the Hydra settings for May were missing. The papers were the only stores destroyed by the crew.[68] The capture on 28 June of another weather ship, Lauenburg, enabled British decryption operations to read radio traffic in July 1941. Beginning in August 1941, Bletchley Park operatives could decrypt signals between Dönitz and his U-boats at sea without any restriction.[48] The capture of the U-110 allowed the Admiralty to identify individual boats, their commanders, operational readiness, damage reports, location, type, speed, endurance from working up in the Baltic to Atlantic patrols.[68] On 1 February 1942, the Germans had introduced the M4 cipher machine, which secured communications until it was cracked in December 1942. Even so, the U-boats achieved their best success against the convoys in March 1943, due to an increase in U-boat numbers, and the protection of the shipping lanes was in jeopardy. Due to the cracked M4 and the use of radar, the Allies began to send air and surface reinforcements to convoys under threat. The shipping lanes were secured, which came as a great surprise to Dönitz.[69] The lack of intelligence and increased numbers of U-boats contributed enormously to Allied losses that year.[70]

Dönitz and his Italian counterpart Admiral Angelo Parona in 1941

Signals security aroused Dönitz's suspicions during the war. On 12 January 1942 German supply submarine U-459 arrived 800 nautical miles west of Freetown, well clear of convoy lanes. It was scheduled to rendezvous with an Italian submarine, until intercepted by a warship. The German captain's report coincided with reports of a decrease in sightings and a period of tension between Dönitz and Raeder.[71] The number of U-boats in the Atlantic, by logic, should have increased, not lowered the number of sightings and the reasons for this made Dönitz uneasy. Despite several investigations, the conclusion of the BdU staff was that Enigma was impenetrable. His signals officer responded to the U-459 incident with answers ranging from coincidence, direction finding to Italian treachery.[71] General Erich Fellgiebel, Chief Signal Officer of Army High Command and of Supreme Command of Armed Forces (Chef des Heeresnachrichtenwesens), apparently concurred with Dönitz. He concluded that there was "convincing evidence" that, after an "exhaustive investigation" that the Allied codebreakers had been reading high level communications.[72] Other departments in the navy downplayed or dismissed these concerns. They vaguely implied "some components" of Enigma had been compromised, but there was "no real basis for acute anxiety as regards any compromise of operational security".[73]

American entry

[edit]

Following Hitler's declaration of war on the United States on 11 December 1941, Dönitz implemented Operation Drumbeat (Unternehmen Paukenschlag).[74] The entry of the United States benefited German submarines in the short term. Dönitz intended to strike close to shore in American and Canadian waters and prevent the convoys—the most effective anti–U-boat system—from ever forming. Dönitz was determined to take advantage of Canadian and American unpreparedness before the situation changed.[75]

The problem inhibiting Dönitz's plan was a lack of boats. On paper he had 259, but in January 1942, 99 were still undergoing sea trials and 59 were assigned to training flotillas, leaving only 101 on war operations. 35 of these were under repair in port, leaving 66 operational, of which 18 were low on fuel and returning to base, 23 were en route to areas where fuel and torpedoes needed to be conserved, and one was heading to the Mediterranean. Therefore, on 1 January Dönitz had a fighting strength of 16–25 in the Atlantic (six near to Iceland on "Norwegian operations"), three in the Arctic Ocean, three in the Mediterranean and three operating west of Gibraltar.[76] Dönitz was severely limited to what he could accomplish in American waters in an initial offensive.[77]

From 13 January 1942, Dönitz planned to begin a surprise offensive from the Gulf of Saint Lawrence to Cape Hatteras. Unknown to him, Ultra had read his Enigma signals and knew the position, size, and intentions of his boats, down to the date the operation was scheduled to begin. The attacks, when they came, were not a surprise.[78] Of the 12 U-boats that began the offensive from the Grand Banks southward, just two survived the war.[79] The operation began the Battle of the St. Lawrence, a series of battles which lasted into 1944.[80] It remained possible for a U-boat to operate in the Gulf into 1944, but countermeasures were strong.[81] In 1942, the global ratio of ships-to-U-boats sunk in Canadian waters was 112:1. The global average was 10.3:1. The solitary kill was achieved by the RCAF. Canadian operations, as with American efforts, were a failure during this year.[82]

Along with conventional U-boat operations Dönitz authorised clandestine activities in Canadian waters, including spying, mine-laying, and recovery of German prisoners of war (as Dönitz wished to extract information from rescued submariners concerning Allied tactics). All of these things tied down Canadian military power and imposed industrial, fiscal, and psychological costs. The impunity with which U-boats carried out these operations in Canadian waters into 1944 provided a propaganda effect.[83] One of these operations was the well-known Operation Kiebitz to rescue Otto Kretschmer.[84]

Even with operational problems great success was achieved in American waters. From January to July 1942, Dönitz's submarines were able to attack unescorted ships off the United States' east coast and in the Caribbean Sea; U-boats sank more ships and tonnage than at any other time in the war. After a convoy system was introduced to protect the shipping, Dönitz shifted his U-boats back to the North Atlantic.[69] The period, known in the U-boat Arm as the "Second Happy Time", represented one of the greatest naval disasters of all time, and largest defeat suffered by American sea power.[85] The success was achieved with only five U-boats initially[86] which sank 397 ships in waters protected by the United States Navy with an additional 23 sunk at the Panama Sea Frontier.[85] Dönitz put the successes down to the American failure to initialize a blackout along the East Coast of the United States and ship captains' insistence on following peace-time safety procedures.[87] The failure to implement a blackout stemmed from the American government's concern it would affect tourism trade.[88] Dönitz wrote in his memoirs that the lighthouses and buoys "shone forth, though perhaps a little less brightly than usually".[88]

By the time improved American air and naval defences had driven German submarines from American shores, 5,000 Allied sailors had been killed for negligible losses in U-boats.[85] Dönitz ordered simultaneous operations in the Caribbean Sea. The ensuing Battle of the Caribbean resulted in immediate dividends for U-boats. In a short time, at least 100 transports had been destroyed or sunk. The sinkings damaged inter-island trade substantially.[89] Operation Neuland was among the most damaging naval campaigns in the region. Oil refinery production in region declined[90] while the tanker fleet suffered losses of up to ten per cent within twenty-four hours.[91] However, ultimately Dönitz could not hope to sink more ships than American industry could build, so he targeted the tanker fleet in the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico in the hope that depleting oil transports would paralyze shipyard output. 33 transports were sunk in July before Dönitz lost his first crew. The USN introduced effective convoy systems thereafter, ending the "carnage".[92]

Dönitz maintained his demands for the concentration of all his crews in the Atlantic. As the military situation in North Africa and on the Eastern Front began to deteriorate Hitler diverted a number of submarines to the Battle of the Mediterranean[93] upon the suggestions of Admiral Eberhard Weichold.[94] Raeder and Dönitz resisted the deployment to the Mediterranean to no avail. Hitler felt compelled to act against Allied sea forces which were having an enormous impact on Axis supply lines to North Africa. The decision defied logic, for a victory in the Atlantic would end the war in the Mediterranean.[95] The U-boat war in the Mediterranean was a costly failure, despite successes against warships.[96] Approximately 60 crews were lost and only one crew managed to withdraw through the Strait of Gibraltar.[97] Albrecht Brandi was one of Dönitz's highest performers but his record is a matter of controversy; post-war records prove systematic over-claiming of sinkings.[98] He survived his boat's sinking and was smuggled to Germany through Spain. Dönitz had met his end as a submarine commander in the Mediterranean two decades earlier.[97]

In 1942 Dönitz summed up his philosophy in one simple paragraph; "The enemy's shipping constitutes one single, great entity. It is therefore immaterial where a ship is sunk. Once it has been destroyed it has to be replaced by a new ship; and that's that."[99] The remark was the green light to unrestricted submarine warfare and began the tonnage war proper. BdU intelligence concluded the Americans could produce 15,300,000 tons of shipping in 1942 and 1943—two million tons under actual production figures. Dönitz always calculated the worst-case scenario using the highest figures of enemy production potential. Some 700,000 tons per month needed to be sunk to win the war. The "second happy time" reached a peak in June 1942, with 325,000 tons sunk, up from 311,000 in May, 255,000 in April and the highest since the 327,000 tons sunk in March 1942.[100] With support from the Royal Navy and Royal Canadian Navy, the new convoy systems compelled Dönitz to withdraw his captains to the mid-Atlantic once again. Nevertheless, there was still cause for optimism. B-Dienst had cracked the convoy ciphers and by July 1942 Dönitz could call upon 311 boats, 140 operational, to conduct a renewed assault. By October 1942 he had 196 operational from 365. Dönitz's force finally reached the desired number both he and Raeder had hoped for in 1939.[101] Unaware of it, Dönitz and his men were aided by the Ultra blackout. The addition of a fourth rotor to the Enigma left radio detection the only way to gather intelligence on dispositions and intentions of the German naval forces. German code breakers had their own success in the capture of the code book to Cipher Code Number 3 from a merchant ship. It was a treble success for the BdU.[102]

Dönitz was content that he now had the naval power to extend U-boat operations to other areas aside the North Atlantic. The Caribbean, Brazilian waters with the coast of West Africa designated operational theatres. Waters in the southern hemisphere to South Africa could also be attacked with the new Type IX submarine. The strategy was sound and his tactical ideas were effective. The number of boats available allowed him to form Wolfpacks to comb convoy routes from east to west attacking one when found and pursuing it across the ocean. The pack then refuelled from a U-boat tanker and worked from west to east. Raeder and the operations staff disputed the value in attacking convoys heading westward with empty cargo holds. The tactics were successful but placed great strain on crews who spent up to eight days in constant action.[103]

November 1942 was a new high in the Atlantic. 134 ships were sunk for 807,754 tons. 119 were destroyed by submarines, 83 (508,707 tons) in the Atlantic. The same month Dönitz suffered strategic defeat. His submarines failed to prevent Operation Torch, even with 196 of them operating in the Atlantic. Dönitz considered it a major self-inflicted defeat. Allied morale radically improved after the victories of Torch, the Second Battle of El Alamein and the Battle of Stalingrad; all occurred within days of one another. The U-boat war was the only military success the Germans enjoyed at the end of the year.[104]

Commander-in-chief and Grand Admiral

[edit]
Erich Raeder with Adolf Hitler shortly after he was replaced by Dönitz as Commander-in-chief and Grand Admiral (February 1943).

On 30 January 1943, Dönitz replaced Erich Raeder as Commander-in-chief of the navy (Oberbefehlshaber der Kriegsmarine) and Großadmiral (grand admiral) of the Naval High Command (Oberkommando der Marine). In a communique to the navy he announced his intentions to retain practical control of the U-boats and his desire to fight to the end for Hitler.[105] Dönitz's inability to delegate control of the U-boat service has been construed as a weakness in the U-boat arm, contributing to the perception that Dönitz was an "impatient warrior", preoccupied with fighting battles and tactics rather than a strategist or organiser.[106]

Dönitz's promotion earned Hitler his undying loyalty. For Dönitz, Hitler had given him a "true home-coming at last, to a country in which unemployment appeared to have been abolished, the class war no longer tore the nation apart, and the shame of defeat in 1918 was being expunged."[107] When war came, Dönitz became more firmly wedded to his Nazi faith. Hitler recognised his patriotism, professionalism but above all, his loyalty. Dönitz remained so, long after the war was lost. In so doing, he wilfully ignored the genocidal nature of the regime and claimed ignorance of the Holocaust.[107]

In the last quarter of 1942, 69 submarines had been commissioned taking the total number to 393, with 212 operational.[108] Dönitz was not satisfied and immediately began a naval construction programme which in contrast to Raeder's, laid all its emphasis on torpedo boats and submarines. Dönitz's proposed expansion ran into difficulties experienced by all of his predecessors; the lack of steel. The navy had no representation on Albert Speer's armaments ministry, for naval production was the only sphere not under his control. Dönitz understood this worked against the navy because it lacked the elasticity to cope with breakdowns of production at any point, whereas the other services could make good production by compensating one sector at the expense of another. Without any representatives the battle of priorities was left to Speer and Göring. Dönitz had the sense to place U-boat production under Speer on the provision 40 per month were completed.[109] Dönitz persuaded Hitler not to scrap the surface fleet capital ships, though they played no role in the Atlantic during his time in command.[110] Dönitz reasoned the destruction of the surface fleet would provide the British with a victory and heap pressure on the U-boats, for these warships were tying down British air and naval forces that would otherwise be sent into the Atlantic.[111]

From left to right: Kluge, Himmler, Dönitz (with his grand admiral's baton) and Keitel at Hans Hube's funeral, 1944

New construction procedures, dispensing with prototypes and the abandonment of modifications reduced construction times from 460,000-man hours to 260–300,000 to meet Speer's quota. In the spring 1944, the Type XXI submarine was scheduled to reach frontline units. In 1943 the Combined Bomber Offensive undid German plans. Dönitz and Speer were appalled by the destruction of Hamburg, a major construction site.[109] The battles of 1943 and 1944 were fought with the existing Type VII and Type IX submarines. The Type VII remained the backbone of the fleet in 1943.[112]

At the end of 1942, Dönitz was faced with the appearance of escort carriers, and long-range aircraft working with convoy escorts. To protect his boats against the latter, he ordered his boats to restrict their operations to the Mid-Atlantic Gap, a stretch of ocean out of the range of land-based aircraft.[113] Allied air forces had few aircraft equipped with ASV radar for U-boat detection into April and May 1943, and such units would not exist in Newfoundland until June. Convoys relied on RAF Coastal Command aircraft operating from Northern Ireland and Iceland.[113] The aircraft imposed restraints on U-boat captains, who feared them for their ability to sink a submarine or alert surface warships to their position.[114] In 1942 Coastal Command began forming units combined with ASV and Leigh Light to attack U-boats at night in transit to the Atlantic via the Bay of Biscay, which continued into 1943. The Command was moderately successful after mid-1942.[115]

1943 began with continued tactical success for Dönitz in battle. In January Convoy TM 1 was nearly destroyed. The loss of 100,000 tons of fuel in one convoy represented the most devastating loss percentage of the war—only two of nine tankers reached port. The Eighth Army were forced to ration their fuel for a time, earning Dönitz the gratitude of the Afrika Korps.[116] The Casablanca Conference, held that month, identified the Atlantic as the priority. It was agreed that until the defeat of Dönitz and his men, there could be no amphibious landings in continental Europe.[117] Unknown to Dönitz, Bletchley Park had broken the Shark cypher and restored the flow of Enigma information; the Admiralty was able to route convoys around wolfpacks. During January and February 1943 information was decrypted within 24 hours proving operationally useful, although this slipped at the end of the second month contributing to German interceptions.[118] Even so, in appalling weather, the Germans sank only 44 ships during the month, even with 100 U-boats at sea, the majority stationed in the mid-Atlantic gap.[117]

In February 1943 the strength of Allied defences were ominous for Dönitz. The battle of convoy HX 224 was ended upon the intervention of air power from Iceland. Dönitz sent 20 boats to attack SC 118 and both sides suffered heavy losses—11 merchant ships for three U-boats plus four damaged. It was "what both sides considered one of the hardest fought battles of the Atlantic war".[116] Despite sending 20 crews into action, Dönitz was concerned that most captains did not press home attacks. The majority of the ships sunk were by one crew, commanded by Siegfried von Forstner—he sank seven.[119]

In March, Convoy SC 121 was attacked by 31 U-boats in two patrol lines.[120] It was the most successful battle of the war for Dönitz.[121] The battle of Convoys HX 229/SC 122 was the largest convoy battle, with 40 U-boats involved.[122] Each operation was successful but all were fought in the mid-Atlantic.[123] Allied losses reached a peak in March 1943. The Admiralty later issued a report on the matter; "The Germans never came so near [to] disrupting communications between the new world and the old as in the first twenty days of March 1943."[124] Dönitz later conceded the March battles were to be the U-boats' last victories. New Allied techniques, tactics and technology began to turn the tide. By April 1943 U-boat morale was reaching a crisis point.[125] Ninety-eight new boats were sent into the Atlantic that month and although the training was thorough the crews were inexperienced and it showed. Fifteen U-boats were destroyed in March 1943 and another 15 in April.[125] Werner Hartenstein and Johann Mohr were notable casualties over the course of these eight weeks; the former's decision to rescue survivors of a sunken ship led to Dönitz's Laconia Order, which later formed part of the criminal case against Dönitz.[126]

Ominous for BdU was the sudden growth of Allied air power. The Allied command accepted that air cover over the mid-Atlantic was inadequate and had drawn attention to the fact that not one VLR (Very Long Range) aircraft was to be found at any Allied air base west of Iceland. The Americans released 255 Liberators for the North Atlantic. At the end of March 1943 20 VLR aircraft were operational rising to 41 by mid-April, all of them flown by British crews. Twenty-eight anti-submarine and 11 anti-shipping squadrons were available to RAF Coastal Command, 619 aircraft in all—a striking change since September 1939.[127] The influx of radar equipped aircraft into mid-Atlantic was matched by air patrols over the Bay of Biscay. Dönitz detected a drop in morale among his captains, as did the British. Dönitz encouraged his commanders to show a "hunter's instinct" and "warrior spirit" in the face of the air–surface support group threat.[128]

Along with air power, the BdU was forced to contend with a large increase in Allied convoy escorts which fuelled from tankers in the convoys allowing escort across the ocean.[122] The escort carrier support groups, protected by destroyers, which, in the words of the official naval historian of the Second World War, proved decisive; "it was the advent of the Support Groups, the Escort Carriers and the Very Long Range Aircraft which turned the tables on the U-boats-and did so with astonishing rapidity".[129]

A hundred and eight ships were sunk in the first 20 days of March, and just 15 in the last 10. The official naval historian wrote, "The collapse of the enemy's offensive, when it came, was so sudden that it took him completely by surprise. We now know that, in fact, a downward trend in the U-boats' recent accomplishments could have forewarned him, but was concealed from him by the exaggerated claims made by their commanders."[130] In April Dönitz lost five crews to the Coastal Command ASV Biscay offensive. Encouraged by the isolated successes of anti-aircraft artillery installed on submarines, he ordered crews to stay on the surface and fight it out with the aircraft.[131] The decision caused casualties—four boats were lost in the first week of May alone, and three more by the end.[132]

For the month of April Allied losses fell to 56 ships of 327,943 tons.[131] In May 1943 the battle reached a climax with the battles of Convoy ONS 5, Convoy SC 129, Convoy SC 130. Throughout the battles only two ships were sunk in convoy in the Atlantic while an air anti-submarine escort was present.[133] Dönitz depended on the surface manoeuvrability of his U-boats to locate targets, assemble wolfpacks and the complicated business of positioning his forces ahead of a convoy for an attack. Allied air power determined where and when U-boats could move freely on the surface. It was the combination of convoy escorts and air power that made the Atlantic unsuitable for pack operations.[134] The US Navy introduced the K-class blimp. They forced a commander to dive to prevent the aircraft marking his position or attacking.[135] From 10 to 24 May 1943, ten convoys passed through the mid-Atlantic. Six of the 370 ships were sunk; three were stragglers. Thirteen U-boats were sunk; four by warships, seven by aircraft, and two shared.[136]

By 24 May, when Dönitz conceded defeat and withdrew the surviving crews from the field of battle, they had already lost 33 U-boats. At the end of May it had risen to 41. Dönitz tried to limit the damage to morale by declaring that the withdrawal was only temporary "to avoid unnecessary losses in a period when our weapons are shown to be at a disadvantage" and that "the battle in the north Atlantic—the decisive area—will be resumed". Dönitz did make a further attempt to regain the initiative, but the battle never reached the same pitch of intensity or hung in the balance, as during the spring of 1943. The Allied success won the Battle of the Atlantic.[137] On 24 May Dönitz ordered the suspension of Atlantic operations, bringing an end to Black May.[138]

Defeat in the mid-Atlantic left Dönitz in a dilemma. The U-boats had proven unable to elude convoy escorts and attack convoys with success. He was concerned about crew morale suffering from idleness and a loss of experience with the latest Allied developments in anti-submarine warfare. Aside from problems of seaworthiness among machines and crew, there were not enough Submarine pens to store idle boats and they were a target for aircraft in port. Dönitz would not withdraw his submarines from combat operations, for he felt the ships, men and aircraft engaged in suppressing the U-boats could then be turned on Germany directly; the U-boat war was to continue.[139]

Hunter-killer era

[edit]

From mid-June 1943 the technological and industrial superiority of the Allied navies allowed the Americans, Canadians, and British to form hunter-killer groups consisting of fast anti-submarine escorts and aircraft carriers. The purpose of naval operations changed from avoiding U-boats and safeguarding convoys to seeking them out and destroying them wherever they operated.[140] USN hunter-killer groups operated throughout the Atlantic. Argentia had been an important base for the naval taskforces until superseded by the Royal Canadian Navy in early 1943.[141] U-boat operations were "crushed" by these task forces: 14 were sunk and only two of seven crews operating in Brazilian waters returned to Germany.[142]

Dönitz reacted by deploying his U-boats near the Azores where land-based aircraft still had difficulty reaching them. In this region he hoped to threaten the Gibraltar–Britain convoy route. Dönitz intended to concentrate his power in a rough arc from West Africa to South America and the Caribbean.[140] He hoped to maintain a presence in the western and central Atlantic, reduce losses and await new weapons and anti-detection devices. In this, he failed to "stem the tide of U-boat losses."[142] A large portion of the 39 U-boats deployed on these operations were intercepted.[142] From May 1943, one historian wrote "U-boats rash enough to close with an Atlantic convoy...were simply inviting destruction."[143]

Dönitz's crews faced danger from the outset. The transit routes through the Bay of Biscay were heavily patrolled by aircraft. From May to December 1943, 25 U-boats were sunk by Coastal Command, more were sunk by the USAAF and Royal Navy—five and four respectively; with one shared by the navy and Coastal Command.[144] To counter radar aircraft, Dönitz ordered his submarines to group together and merge their powerful anti-aircraft armament together while surfaced and recharging their batteries, after initially ordering the groups to remain surfaced throughout the journey and fight off aerial attackers with gunfire. The decision was to cost BdU heavy casualties. A group of U-boats were more likely to attract a radar contact, and Allied pilots soon learned to swarm their targets.[145] Dönitz ordered his captains to traverse the Bay under the lee of the neutral Spanish coast, with a sharply rising coast which shielded U-boats from radar. After 4 August 1943, the number of destroyed U-boats fell from one every four days, to one every 27 until June 1944.[146]

US hunter–killer groups extended their patrols to the central Atlantic in the summer. They sank 15 U-boats from June through to August 1943. A number of supply submarines were destroyed crippling the Germans' ability to conduct long range operations. At the end of the summer, practically all supply U-boats had been destroyed.[147] In September 1943, Dönitz ordered his submarines back to the North Atlantic. U-boats were equipped with the G7es torpedo, an acoustic torpedo, which the grand admiral hoped would wrest the technological initiative back. The torpedo was the centrepiece to Dönitz's plan. Great faith was also placed in the installation of Wanze radar to detect aircraft. It was intended as a successor to the Metox radar detector. A number of his boats were later retrofitted with the submarine snorkel, permitting the submarine to stay submerged.[148] Dönitz placed much faith in the Type XXI submarine. He accepted that the older submarines were obsolete now that Allied defences in the air were complete. He required a "true submarine", equipped with a snorkel to allow his crews to stay submerged, at least to snorkel-depth, and evade radar-equipped aircraft. Dönitz was pleased with the promised top speed of 18 knots.[149]

Möltenort U-Boat Memorial near Kiel in northern Germany. Approximately 30,000 men died under Dönitz's command.

That month, 21 boats fought a battle with two formations; Convoys ONS 18/ON 202. The battle was a failure. In October an attack on Convoy SC 143 failed, even with limited air support from the Luftwaffe. The battle with Convoys ONS 20/ON 206 in the same month was a comprehensive defeat. A fourth major battle, Convoy SL 138/MKS 28, developed in the last days of October and ended in another failure for Dönitz. The November battle around Convoy SL 139/MKS 30 ended in the repulse of 29 U-boats with the loss of only a single ship.[150] Intelligence proved its worth. During the battles of convoys ONS 18/ON 202, Dönitz's admonitions to his commanders allowed the Allied intelligence services to uncover German tactical intentions.[151] Dönitz had tried and failed to push his forces through lethal convoy defences. The hunter-killer groups were called in to hunt the remaining members of the wolfpacks, with predictable results. In mid-December 1943, Dönitz finally conceded not only the Atlantic, but the Gibraltar routes as well.[152]

The hunter-killer and convoy escorts brought the wolfpack era to an end at the close of 1943.[153] Dönitz resorted to sending out single submarines to the far reaches of the oceans in a bid to escape Allied naval power. In November 1943 he sent the last U-boat into the Gulf of Mexico just after the blackout restrictions were lifted. U-193 achieved one final success.[154] The end of 1943 ended the attempt of the U-boat arm to achieve a strategic victory in the Atlantic. That left only the Arctic convoys to the Soviet Union. On Christmas Eve, this became the sole preserve of the U-boats after the dispatch of Scharnhorst at the Battle of the North Cape.[152]

Karl Dönitz with students in July 1944.

Dönitz's plan for 1944 was simply to survive and await the XXI and Type XXIII submarines. New radars were on the horizon and a direction finding antenna for Naxos was scheduled for use. Dönitz established a naval operations scientific staff to focus on more powerful centimetric radars. Production of submarines was streamlined. Parts for eight major sections were fabricated across 60 plants in Europe and assembled at Hamburg, Danzig and Bremen to ease the pressure of bombing and congestion at shipyards. The first of the new generation boats were expected by April 1944. Dönitz hoped for 33 per month by September.[155] In early 1944, Dönitz opted to concentrate west of Ireland, at 15 and 17° west, in the hope convoys would come to them. Single boats were still sent to the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean. With 66 vessels at sea at any one time, and with 200 boats operational, the BdU was still a viable threat and he believed the force could achieve modest success.[155] The U-boats were painfully slow, strategically, operationally and tactically. Crossing the Atlantic took up to a month compared to a week in 1942. Positioning west of Ireland could take several weeks submerged.[155] In the first quarter of 1944, U-boats sank only three of the 3,360 ships that passed south of Ireland. In return 29 crews were lost.[156]

A major concern to Dönitz was Operation Overlord, the long predicted landing in France, and what role the U-boat arm and surface forces could play in the defence. He was sensitive to a landing on the Bay of Biscay but retained boats there only for operational readiness. Dönitz ended reconnaissance operations in the region. In the BdU war diary he wrote of ending operations since "otherwise the strong enemy air activity will lead to high losses which would only be acceptable if an immediate landing on the Biscay coast were expected. As this is no longer considered an acute danger the boats will remain at readiness in the concrete shelters."[157]

When the D-day landings took place on 6 June 1944, the U-boats were ordered into action with the awareness that the western flank of the invasion would be well protected at sea.[158] Operational experience with the snorkel was too scant to devise instructions for its use. The narrow, shallow, waters of the English Channel provided few opportunities for charging the batteries. Dönitz feared the task was impossible.[158] The Holzbein group based at Brest, sent 15 submarines into action against the Cherbourg peninsula landings part of a 36-strong flotilla.[159] Only eight had snorkels. The seven non-snorkel boats were ordered to attack on the surface.[159] The BdU war diary entry on 6 June 1944 states that "for those boats without schnorchel this means the last operation".[160] Of the 15, only five got near to the invasion fleet.[159] Five of the snorkel boats survived. In exchange for 10 U-boats with the survivors damaged, two frigates, four freighters, and one tank landing ship were sunk.[161] 22 U-boats were sunk from 6 to 30 June 1944.[162] On 5 July 1944, the Allied Operation Dredger permitted hunter-killer groups to roam the Western Approaches and Biscay making it a "no-go area" for U-boats.[163] U-boat operations against Normandy landings were a fiasco. Dönitz and the high command had been ignorant of the true scale of the naval D-day effort.[164] Dönitz claimed his men sank five escorts, 12 merchant ships and four landing craft for 20 submarines and 1,000 men, of whom 238 were rescued. Dönitz's claims underplayed German losses, which were, in fact, 41 submarines from 82 in France, a 50 per cent loss rate.[165]

The collapse of the German front in Normandy left only the bases in German-occupied Norway nearest to the Atlantic. The newer boats were not forthcoming either. Ninety Type XXI and 31 Type XIII boats were built by the end of 1944. Sixty of the former and 23 of the latter were in service but none were operational. Dönitz was left with the old VIIs to carry the war into 1945. A large number had snorkels, which enabled them to surface only upon reaching port. Submerged, this meant no radio or Enigma communications and far fewer sightings for the Allied intelligence network to exploit. Dönitz ordered his submarines to British coastal waters with some success in November and December 1944, achieving 85,639 tons. Admiral Andrew Cunningham remarked of the strategy, "We are having a difficult time with the U-boats....the air are about 90 percent out of business and Asdic is failing us." The inshore waters impeded the use of Asdic, which became confused with wrecks, rocks, and tidal swirls. The new types could conceivably have capitalised on these developments but the war was nearly over. On 1 January 1945, Dönitz had 425 submarines; 144 operational. On 1 April 1945, it was 166 from 429. He threw into battle every available weapon as the German Reich collapsed. Dönitz supported the use of Human torpedoes; the Neger, Marder, Seehund and Biber were all used in suicide missions on his orders, perhaps inspired by the Japanese Kamikaze.[166]

On 30 April 1945 Adolf Hitler committed suicide. Dönitz succeeded him as head of state. Admiral Hans-Georg von Friedeburg succeeded Dönitz as commander-in-chief of the Kriegsmarine.[167] On 4 May 1945 the German surrender at Lüneburg Heath took place. Dönitz issued an order to all U-boats to cease combat operations and return to port or surrender to Allied naval vessels. The order was obeyed with a handful of notable exceptions—the Actions of 5–6 May 1945, and Actions of 7–8 May 1945 occurred after the surrender. The surrendered U-boats numbered into the hundreds and were destroyed in the postwar Operation Deadlight. The U-boat war finally came to an end on 9 May 1945, the date of the German Instrument of Surrender.[168]

President of Germany

[edit]

Dönitz admired Hitler and was vocal about the qualities he perceived in Hitler's leadership. In August 1943, he praised his foresightedness and confidence; "anyone who thinks he can do better than the Führer is stupid."[169] Dönitz's relationship with Hitler strengthened through to the end of the war, particularly after the 20 July plot, for the naval staff officers were not involved; when news of it came there was indignation in the OKM.[170] Even after the war, Dönitz said he could never have joined the conspirators.[171] Dönitz tried to imbue Nazi ideas among his officers, though the indoctrination of the naval officer corps was not the brainchild of Dönitz, but rather a continuation of the Nazification of the navy begun under his predecessor Raeder.[172] Naval officers were required to attend a five-day education course in Nazi ideology.[173] Dönitz's loyalty to him and the cause was rewarded by Hitler, who, owing to Dönitz's leadership, never felt abandoned by the navy. In gratitude, Hitler appointed the navy's commander as his successor before he committed suicide.[174]

Dönitz's influence on military matters was also evident. Hitler acted on Dönitz's advice in September 1944 to block the Gulf of Finland after Finland abandoned the Axis powers. Operation Tanne Ost was a poorly executed disaster.[175] Dönitz shared Hitler's senseless strategic judgement—with the Courland Pocket on the verge of collapse, and the air and army forces requesting a withdrawal, the two men were preoccupied in planning an attack on an isolated island in the far north.[175] Hitler's willingness to listen to the naval commander was based on his high opinion of the navy's usefulness at this time. It reinforced isolated coastal garrisons along the Baltic and evacuated thousands of German soldiers and civilians in order that they might continue to participate in the war effort into the spring of 1945.[176]

Through 1944 and 1945, the Dönitz-initiated Operation Hannibal had the distinction of being the largest naval evacuation in history.[177] The Baltic Fleet was presented with a mass of targets, the subsequent Soviet submarine Baltic Sea campaign in 1944 and Soviet naval Baltic Sea campaign in 1945 inflicted grievous losses during Hannibal. The most notable was the sinking of the MV Wilhelm Gustloff by a Soviet submarine.[178] The liner had nearly 10,000 people on board.[179] The evacuations continued after the surrender. From 3 to 9 May 1945, 81,000 of the 150,000 persons waiting on the Hel Peninsula were evacuated without loss.[180] Albrecht Brandi, commander of the eastern Baltic,[181] initiated a counter operation, the Gulf of Finland campaign, but failed to have an impact.

Adolf Hitler meets with Dönitz in the Führerbunker (1945).

In the final days of the war, after Hitler had taken refuge in the Führerbunker beneath the Reich Chancellery garden in Berlin, Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring was considered the obvious successor to Hitler, followed by Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler. Göring, however, infuriated Hitler by radioing him in Berlin to ask for permission to assume leadership of the Reich. Himmler also tried to seize power by entering into negotiations with Count Bernadotte. On 28 April 1945, the BBC reported Himmler had offered surrender to the western Allies and that the offer had been declined.[182]

From mid-April 1945, Dönitz and elements of what remained of the Reich government moved into the buildings of the Stadtheide Barracks in Plön. In his last will and testament, dated 29 April 1945, Hitler named Dönitz his successor as Staatsoberhaupt (Head of State), with the titles of Reichspräsident (President) and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. The same document named Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels as Head of Government with the title of Reichskanzler (Chancellor). Hitler would not name any successors to hold his titles of Führer or leader of the Nazi Party.[183] Furthermore, Hitler declared both Göring and Himmler traitors and expelled them from the party. He committed suicide on 30 April.[184]

On 1 May, the day after Hitler's own suicide, Goebbels committed suicide.[185] Dönitz thus became the sole representative of the collapsing German Reich. On 2 May, the new government of the Reich fled to Flensburg-Mürwik. That night, 2 May, Dönitz made a nationwide radio address in which he announced Hitler's death and said the war would continue in the East "to save Germany from destruction by the advancing Bolshevik enemy." Dönitz remained in Flensburg–Mürwik until his arrest on 23 May 1945.[186][187]

Dönitz knew that Germany's position was untenable and the Wehrmacht was no longer capable of offering meaningful resistance. During his brief period in office, he devoted most of his effort to ensuring the loyalty of the German armed forces and trying to ensure German personnel would surrender to the British or Americans and not the Soviets. He feared vengeful Soviet reprisals, and hoped to strike a deal with the Western Allies. In the end, Dönitz's tactics were moderately successful, enabling about 1.8 million German soldiers to escape Soviet capture.[186] As many as 2.2 million may have been evacuated.[177]

Flensburg Government

[edit]
Karl Dönitz (centre, in long, dark coat) followed by Albert Speer (bareheaded) and Alfred Jodl (on Speer's right) during the arrest of the Flensburg Government by British troops

On 4 May, Admiral Hans-Georg von Friedeburg, representing Dönitz, surrendered all German forces in the Netherlands, Denmark, and northwestern Germany to Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery at Lüneburg Heath southeast of Hamburg, signaling the end of World War II in northwestern Europe.

A day later, Dönitz sent Friedeburg to US General Dwight D. Eisenhower's headquarters in Rheims, France, to negotiate a surrender to the Allies. The Chief of Staff of OKW, Generaloberst (Colonel-General) Alfred Jodl, arrived a day later. Dönitz had instructed them to draw out the negotiations for as long as possible so that German troops and refugees could surrender to the Western powers, but when Eisenhower let it be known he would not tolerate their stalling, Dönitz authorized Jodl to sign the instrument of unconditional surrender at 1:30 on the morning of 7 May. Just over an hour later, Jodl signed the documents. The surrender documents included the phrase, "All forces under German control to cease active operations at 23:01 hours Central European Time on 8 May 1945." At Stalin's insistence, on 8 May, shortly before midnight, (Generalfeldmarschall) Wilhelm Keitel repeated the signing in Berlin at Marshal Georgy Zhukov's headquarters, with General Carl Spaatz of the USAAF present as Eisenhower's representative. At the time specified, World War II in Europe ended.[188][189]

On 23 May, the Dönitz government was dissolved when Dönitz was arrested by an RAF Regiment task force.[190] The Großadmiral's Kriegsmarine flag, which was removed from his headquarters, can be seen at the RAF Regiment Heritage Centre at RAF Honington. Generaloberst Jodl, Reichsminister Speer and other members were also handed over to troops of the Herefordshire Regiment at Flensburg. His ceremonial baton, awarded to him by Hitler, can be seen in the regimental museum of the Kings Shropshire Light Infantry in Shrewsbury Castle and his car pennant in the regimental museum of the Herefordshire Light Infantry.

Nazism and antisemitism

[edit]

Dönitz was a dedicated Nazi and a passionate supporter of Hitler,[191] something he attempted to obscure after the war.[192] Raeder described him as "a picture-book Nazi and confirmed anti-Semite".[193] Several naval officers described him as "closely tied to Hitler and Nazi ideology."[192] On occasion, he spoke of Hitler's humanity.[192] His fervent pro-Hitler attitude led to him being known ironically as "Hitler Youth Quex", after the fictionalised hero of a Nazi novel and feature film.[194] He refused to help Albert Speer stop the scorched earth policy dictated by Hitler[192] and is also noted to have declared, "In comparison to Hitler we are all pipsqueaks. Anyone who believes he can do better than the Führer is stupid."[192]

Black and white photograph of men wearing military uniforms giving the nazi salute
Dönitz and other officers performing the Nazi salute in 1941

Dönitz contributed to the spread of Nazism within the Kriegsmarine. He insisted that officers share his political views and, as head of the Kriegsmarine, formally joined the Nazi Party on 1 February 1944, as member 9,664,999.[195] He was awarded the Golden Party Badge for his loyalty to the party later that year. Dönitz's influence over naval officers contributed to none joining the attempts to kill Hitler.[196]

From an ideological standpoint, Dönitz was anti-Marxist and antisemitic[197] and believed that Germany needed to fight the "poison of Jewry".[198] Several anti-Semitic statements by Dönitz are known.[192] When Sweden closed its international waters to Germany, he blamed this action on their fear and dependence on "international Jewish capital."[192] In August 1944, he declared, "I would rather eat dirt than see my grandchildren grow up in the filthy, poisonous atmosphere of Jewry."[192]

His fellow officers noted he was under Hitler's influence, and closely wedded to Nazi ideology.[199] On German Heroes' Day (12 March) of 1944, Dönitz declared that, without Adolf Hitler, Germany would be beset by "the poison of Jewry," and the country destroyed for lack of the "uncompromising ideology" of National Socialism:

What would have become of our country today, if the Führer had not united us under National Socialism? Divided along party lines, beset with the spreading poison of Jewry and vulnerable to it, because we lacked the defense of our present uncompromising ideology, we would have long since succumbed under the burden of this war and delivered ourselves to the enemy who would have mercilessly destroyed us.[198]

At the Nuremberg trials, Dönitz claimed the statement about the "poison of Jewry" was regarding "the endurance, the power to endure, of the people, as it was composed, could be better preserved than if there were Jewish elements in the nation."[199] Later, during the Nuremberg trials, Dönitz claimed to know nothing about the extermination of Jews and declared that nobody among "my men thought about violence against Jews."[200] Dönitz told Leon Goldensohn, an American psychiatrist at Nuremberg, "I never had any idea of the goings-on as far as Jews were concerned. Hitler said each man should take care of his business and mine was U-boats and the Navy."[201] After the war, Dönitz tried to hide his knowledge of the Holocaust. He was present at the October 1943 Posen Conference where Himmler described the mass murder of Jews with the intent of making the audience complicit in this crime.[199] It cannot be proven beyond doubt that he was present during Himmler's segment of the conference, which openly discussed the mass murder of European Jews.[199]

Even after the Nuremberg Trials, with the crimes of the Nazi state well-known, Dönitz remained an antisemite. In April 1953, he told Speer that if it was the choice of the Americans and not the Jews, he would have been released.[199]

Nuremberg war crimes trials

[edit]
Dönitz's detention report, 1945

Following the war, Dönitz was held as a prisoner of war by the Allies. He was indicted as a major war criminal at the Nuremberg Trials on three counts. One: conspiracy to commit crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Two: planning, initiating, and waging wars of aggression. Three: crimes against the laws of war. Dönitz was found not guilty on count one of the indictment, but guilty on counts two and three.[202]

During the trial, army psychologist Gustave Gilbert was allowed to examine Nazi leaders on trial for war crimes. Among other tests, a German version of the Wechsler–Bellevue IQ test was administered. Dönitz and Hermann Göring scored 138, which made them equally the third-highest among the Nazi leaders tested.[203]

At the trial, Dönitz was charged with waging unrestricted submarine warfare against neutral shipping, permitting Hitler's Commando Order of 18 October 1942 to remain in full force when he became commander-in-chief of the Navy, and to that extent responsibility for that crime. His defence was that the order excluded men captured in naval warfare, and that the order had not been acted upon by any men under his command. Added to that was his knowledge of 12,000 involuntary foreign workers working in the shipyards, and doing nothing to stop it.[204][205] Dönitz was unable to defend himself on this charge convincingly when cross-examined by prosecutor Sir David Maxwell Fyfe.[206]

On 25 February 1945, Hitler asked Dönitz whether the Geneva Convention should be denounced. Hitler's motives were twofold. The first was that reprisals could be taken against Western Allied prisoners of war; second, it would deter German forces from surrendering to the Western Allies, as was happening on the Eastern Front where the convention was in abeyance. Instead of arguing the conventions should never be denounced, Dönitz suggested it was not expedient to do so, so the court found against him on this issue; but as the convention was not denounced by Germany, and British prisoners in camps under Dönitz's jurisdiction were treated strictly according to the Convention, the Court considered these mitigating circumstances.[207]

Albert Speer, Dönitz, and Alfred Jodl

Among the war-crimes charges, Dönitz was accused of waging unrestricted submarine warfare for issuing War Order No. 154 in 1939, and another similar order after the Laconia incident in 1942, not to rescue survivors from ships attacked by submarine. By issuing these two orders, he was found guilty of causing Germany to be in breach of the Second London Naval Treaty of 1936. However, as evidence of similar conduct by the Allies was presented at his trial, his sentence was not assessed on the grounds of this breach of international law.[208][209]

On the specific war crimes charge of ordering unrestricted submarine warfare, Dönitz was found "[not] guilty for his conduct of submarine warfare against British armed merchant ships", because they were often armed and equipped with radios which they used to notify the admiralty of attack. As stated by the judges:

Dönitz is charged with waging unrestricted submarine warfare contrary to the Naval Protocol of 1936 to which Germany acceded, and which reaffirmed the rules of submarine warfare laid down in the London Naval Agreement of 1930 ... The order of Dönitz to sink neutral ships without warning when found within these zones was, therefore, in the opinion of the Tribunal, violation of the Protocol ... The orders, then, prove Dönitz is guilty of a violation of the Protocol ... The sentence of Dönitz is not assessed on the ground of his breaches of the international law of submarine warfare.[210]

His sentence on unrestricted submarine warfare was not assessed because of similar actions by the Allies. In particular, the British Admiralty, on 8 May 1940, had ordered all vessels in the Skagerrak sunk on sight, and Admiral Chester Nimitz, wartime commander-in-chief of the US Pacific Fleet, stated the US Navy had waged unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan in the Pacific from the day the US officially entered the war. Thus, Dönitz was not charged of waging unrestricted submarine warfare against unarmed neutral shipping by ordering all ships in designated areas in international waters to be sunk without warning.

Dönitz was imprisoned for 10 years in Spandau Prison in what was then West Berlin.[211] During his period in prison he was unrepentant, and maintained that he had done nothing wrong. He also rejected Speer's attempts to persuade him to end his devotion to Hitler and accept responsibility for the wrongs the German Government had committed. Conversely, over 100 senior Allied officers sent letters to Dönitz conveying their disappointment over the unfairness and verdict of his trial.[212]

Later years and death

[edit]

Dönitz was released on 1 October 1956 and retired to the small village of Aumühle in Schleswig-Holstein in northern West Germany.[213] There, he worked on two books. His memoirs, Zehn Jahre, Zwanzig Tage (Memoirs: Ten Years and Twenty Days), were released in Germany in 1958 and became available in an English translation the following year. This book recounted Dönitz's experiences as U-boat commander (10 years) and President of Germany (20 days). In it, Dönitz explains the Nazi regime as a product of its time, but argues he was not a politician and thus not morally responsible for many of the regime's crimes. He likewise criticizes dictatorship as a fundamentally flawed form of government and blames it for many of the Nazi era's failings.[214] Historian Alan P. Rems has written that Dönitz's memoirs are unconvincing and that "unimpeded by a meaningful Nuremberg verdict, Dönitz fashioned a legend that could be embraced by the most unregenerate Nazis as well as credulous Allied officers who accepted his sanitized version of history and showered Dönitz with letters of support as a wronged brother-in-arms".[196]

Grave in Aumühle, east of Hamburg

Dönitz's second book, Mein wechselvolles Leben (My Ever-Changing Life) is less known, perhaps because it deals with the events of his life before 1934. This book was first published in 1968, and a new edition was released in 1998 with the revised title Mein soldatisches Leben (My Martial Life). In 1973, he appeared in the Thames Television production The World at War, in one of his few television appearances.[215]

Dönitz was unrepentant regarding his role in World War II, saying that he had acted at all times out of duty to his nation.[216] In 1976, Dönitz appeared in The Memory of Justice. In the documentary, Dönitz explains about the Nuremberg Trials and his experience during the trials in 1946 along with Albert Speer.[citation needed] He lived out the rest of his life in relative obscurity in Aumühle, occasionally corresponding with collectors of German naval history.[217] Around 1974, Dönitz was contacted by Neo-Nazi conspiracy theorist and early Reichsbürger Manfred Roeder who tried to prove that the German Reich still existed. Roeder assumed that Dönitz remained the legal head of state, but the former admiral considered the idea ridiculous and firmly stated that he no longer considered himself President of Germany. Regarding this as a resignation declaration, Roeder subsequently declared himself the new leader of Germany and eventually became active as a terrorist.[218]

Dönitz died in Aumühle of a heart attack on Christmas Eve 1980 at the age of 89.[217] As the last German officer with the rank of Großadmiral (grand admiral), he was honoured by many former servicemen and foreign naval officers who came to pay their respects at his funeral on 6 January 1981.[219][220] He was buried in Waldfriedhof Cemetery in Aumühle without military honours, and service members were not allowed to wear uniforms to the funeral. Also in attendance were over 100 holders of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross.[219][220]

Summary of career

[edit]

Promotions

[edit]
Kaiserliche Marine
1 April 1910: Seekadett (Officer Cadet)[221]
15 April 1911: Fähnrich zur See (Midshipman)[221]
27 September 1913: Leutnant zur See (Acting Sub-Lieutenant)[221]
22 March 1916: Oberleutnant zur See (Sub-Lieutenant)[221]
Reichsmarine
10 January 1921: Kapitänleutnant (Lieutenant), with date of rank on 1 January 1921[222]
1 November 1928: Korvettenkapitän (Corvette Captain – Lieutenant Commander)[222]
1 October 1933: Fregattenkapitän (Frigate Captain – Commander)[223]
Kriegsmarine
1 October 1935: Kapitän zur See (Captain at Sea – Captain)[223]
28 January 1939: Kommodore (Commodore)[223]
1 October 1939: Konteradmiral (Rear Admiral)[223]
1 September 1940: Vizeadmiral (Vice Admiral)[223]
14 March 1942: Admiral (Admiral)[223]
30 January 1943: Großadmiral (Grand Admiral)[223]

Decorations and awards

[edit]
German
Foreign

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Grier 2007, p. 256, Footnote 8, Chapter 10.
  2. ^ a b Haarr 2012, p. 493.
  3. ^ Thames Television (9 January 1974), 10. "Wolf Pack: U-Boats in the Atlantic (1939–1944)", retrieved 16 September 2023
  4. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 614–615.
  5. ^ a b Niestlé 1998, p. 4.
  6. ^ Hamilton 1996, pp. 285, 286.
  7. ^ a b Zabecki 2014, p. 354.
  8. ^ Kraus & Dönitz 1933.
  9. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 162–164.
  10. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 164–165.
  11. ^ a b c Williamson 2007, p. 10.
  12. ^ Miller 2000, p. 145.
  13. ^ Blair 1998, pp. 283, 338, 569.
  14. ^ a b Blair 1998, p. 569.
  15. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 345–348.
  16. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 186–188.
  17. ^ a b c Terraine 1989, p. 187.
  18. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 196–197.
  19. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 197–198.
  20. ^ Rohwer 2015, pp. 3–4, 257–262.
  21. ^ Westwood 2005, pp. 55–56.
  22. ^ Haslop 2013, p. 51.
  23. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 188.
  24. ^ a b Westwood 2005, pp. 53–54.
  25. ^ a b Milner 2011, p. 17.
  26. ^ a b c Terraine 1989, p. 215.
  27. ^ Overy 2002, p. 182.
  28. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 16–17.
  29. ^ a b c Tucker 2005, p. 142.
  30. ^ Paterson 2003, pp. 10–14.
  31. ^ a b Roskill 1954, pp. 103–104.
  32. ^ a b Terraine 1989, pp. 220–221.
  33. ^ Milner 2011, p. 31.
  34. ^ Gardner 1999, pp. 58, 62.
  35. ^ a b c d Terraine 1989, p. 767.
  36. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 27–28.
  37. ^ a b Milner 2011, p. 35.
  38. ^ Morgan & Taylor 2011, p. 61.
  39. ^ Milner 2011, p. 29.
  40. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 21–22.
  41. ^ a b Roskill 1954, p. 74.
  42. ^ Vause 1997, p. 96.
  43. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 261.
  44. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 770.
  45. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 260.
  46. ^ National Archives 2001, p. 104.
  47. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 265.
  48. ^ a b c Tucker 2005, p. 143.
  49. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 39–40.
  50. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 274.
  51. ^ a b National Archives 2001, pp. 104–117.
  52. ^ Hooton 2010, p. 111.
  53. ^ Neitzel 2003, pp. 448–462.
  54. ^ Neitzel 2003, p. 450.
  55. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 261–262.
  56. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 52–53.
  57. ^ Milner 2011, p. 36.
  58. ^ Stern 2003, p. 137.
  59. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 230–231.
  60. ^ Gardner 1999, pp. 1–218.
  61. ^ Syrett 1994, p. 117.
  62. ^ Gardner 1999, p. 58.
  63. ^ Boog et al. 2001, p. 343.
  64. ^ Stern 2003, p. 171.
  65. ^ a b c d Syrett 1994, p. 264.
  66. ^ Syrett 1994, pp. 264–265.
  67. ^ Stern 2003, p. 112.
  68. ^ a b c Terraine 1989, p. 326.
  69. ^ a b Tucker 2005, p. 145.
  70. ^ Hinsley 1993, p. 157.
  71. ^ a b Macksey 2000, p. 23.
  72. ^ Macksey 2000, p. 53.
  73. ^ Kohnen 1999, p. 65.
  74. ^ Gannon 1990, pp. 308, 339.
  75. ^ Hadley 1985, pp. 52–54.
  76. ^ Hadley 1985, p. 54.
  77. ^ Kohnen 1999, p. 36.
  78. ^ Hadley 1985, p. 55.
  79. ^ Hadley 1985, pp. 55–56.
  80. ^ Hadley 1985, pp. 112–144.
  81. ^ Milner 1994, pp. 200–201.
  82. ^ Milner 1994, p. 17.
  83. ^ Hadley 1985, pp. 168–193.
  84. ^ Hadley 1985, pp. 169, 176.
  85. ^ a b c Gannon 1990, p. 389.
  86. ^ Gannon 1990, p. 77.
  87. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 410.
  88. ^ a b Wiggins 1995, p. 21.
  89. ^ Kelshall 1988, p. 113.
  90. ^ Kelshall 1988, pp. 43, 45–67.
  91. ^ Blair 1998, pp. 505–506.
  92. ^ Milner 2011, p. 115.
  93. ^ Boog et al. 2001, p. 380.
  94. ^ Vause 1997, pp. 124–125.
  95. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 359–361.
  96. ^ Vause 1997, p. 125.
  97. ^ a b Paterson 2007, pp. 6, 19, 182–183, 187.
  98. ^ Morgan & Taylor 2011, p. xx.
  99. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 444.
  100. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 444–445.
  101. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 444–446.
  102. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 454.
  103. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 459–461.
  104. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 498–500.
  105. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 520, 522.
  106. ^ Haslop 2013, p. 53.
  107. ^ a b Terraine 1989, pp. 520–522.
  108. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 523.
  109. ^ a b Terraine 1989, pp. 652–654.
  110. ^ Rohwer 1996, p. 86.
  111. ^ Milner 2011, p. 148.
  112. ^ Syrett 1994, p. 2.
  113. ^ a b Syrett 1994, p. 15.
  114. ^ Buckley 1995, pp. 123–124.
  115. ^ Buckley 1995, p. 129.
  116. ^ a b Milner 2011, pp. 146–147.
  117. ^ a b Milner 2011, p. 146.
  118. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 146, 155.
  119. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 149–150.
  120. ^ Rohwer 2015, p. 75.
  121. ^ Milner 2011, p. 156.
  122. ^ a b Roskill 1954, p. 365.
  123. ^ Rohwer 2015, pp. 95–191.
  124. ^ Price 1980, p. 132.
  125. ^ a b Terraine 1989, pp. 588, 593–594.
  126. ^ Blair 1998, pp. 62, 218, 778.
  127. ^ Roskill 1954, p. 364.
  128. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 157–158.
  129. ^ Roskill 1954, pp. 366–368.
  130. ^ Roskill 1954, pp. 367–368.
  131. ^ a b Roskill 1954, p. 371.
  132. ^ Milner 2011, p. 179.
  133. ^ Roskill 1954, pp. 373, 376.
  134. ^ Milner 2011, p. 94.
  135. ^ Milner 2011, p. 96.
  136. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 179–180.
  137. ^ Roskill 1954, pp. 377–378.
  138. ^ Syrett 1994, p. 145.
  139. ^ Syrett 1994, p. 146.
  140. ^ a b Milner 2011, p. [page needed].
  141. ^ Milner 1994, pp. 24, 28.
  142. ^ a b c Milner 1994, p. 47.
  143. ^ Milner 2011, p. 178.
  144. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 189–190.
  145. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 189, 191.
  146. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 192–193.
  147. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 188–189.
  148. ^ Milner 1994, pp. 61–63.
  149. ^ Milner 2011, p. 194.
  150. ^ Syrett 1994, pp. 181–229.
  151. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 195–196.
  152. ^ a b Milner 2011, p. 204.
  153. ^ Syrett 1994, pp. 230–260.
  154. ^ Wiggins 1995, p. 228.
  155. ^ a b c Milner 2011, pp. 205–207.
  156. ^ Milner 2011, pp. 216, 218.
  157. ^ Tarrant 1994, p. 81.
  158. ^ a b Tarrant 1994, pp. 76, 80–81.
  159. ^ a b c Paterson 2001, pp. 237–240.
  160. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 645.
  161. ^ Tarrant 1994, pp. 80–81.
  162. ^ Hendrie 2006, pp. 121–122.
  163. ^ Paterson 2001, p. 245.
  164. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 645–647.
  165. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 650.
  166. ^ Terraine 1989, pp. 658–659.
  167. ^ Thomas 1990, pp. 253, 255.
  168. ^ Rohwer & Hümmelchen 2005, pp. 406–407, 418.
  169. ^ Frieser et al. 2007, p. 227.
  170. ^ Thomas 1990, p. 241.
  171. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 521.
  172. ^ Thomas 1990, p. 211.
  173. ^ Thomas 1990, p. 249.
  174. ^ Thomas 1990, pp. xxi, 253.
  175. ^ a b Frieser et al. 2007, p. 635.
  176. ^ Thomas 1990, p. 250.
  177. ^ a b Vego 2003, p. 280.
  178. ^ Tarrant 1994, pp. 225–226.
  179. ^ Rohwer & Hümmelchen 2005, pp. 389–390.
  180. ^ Rohwer 1996, p. 162.
  181. ^ Morgan & Taylor 2011, pp. 322–323.
  182. ^ Kershaw 2008, pp. 943–946.
  183. ^ Kershaw 2008, pp. 949, 950.
  184. ^ Steinweis, Rogers & Grier 2003, p. 182.
  185. ^ Beevor 2002, pp. 380–381.
  186. ^ a b Kershaw 2008, p. 962.
  187. ^ Karl Dönitz Speech to the German People – 1 May 1945, 22 September 2022, retrieved 16 August 2023
  188. ^ Karl Dönitz Announcement of German Capitulation- 8 May 1945, 12 December 2022, retrieved 16 August 2023
  189. ^ Last Wehrmacht Report – 9 May 1945, 22 September 2022, retrieved 16 August 2023
  190. ^ Oliver 2002, p. 118.
  191. ^ Terraine 1989, p. 519.
  192. ^ a b c d e f g h Steinweis, Rogers & Grier 2003, pp. 186–188.
  193. ^ Wette 2007, p. 154.
  194. ^ Beevor 2011.
  195. ^ Steinweis, Rogers & Grier 2003, p. 185.
  196. ^ a b Rems 2015.
  197. ^ Zillmer 1995, p. 141.
  198. ^ a b Harris 1999, p. 289.
  199. ^ a b c d e Steinweis, Rogers & Grier 2003, p. 187.
  200. ^ Sprecher 1999, p. 994.
  201. ^ Goldensohn 2004, p. 9.
  202. ^ Zabecki 2007, pp. 14–17, 95–96.
  203. ^ Zabecki 2007, pp. 99–100.
  204. ^ Walker 2006, pp. 100–102.
  205. ^ Zabecki 2007, pp. 56–63.
  206. ^ Madsen 1998, p. 188.
  207. ^ McDonald 2000, pp. 729–730.
  208. ^ Moore & Turner 1995, p. 54.
  209. ^ Zabecki 2007, pp. 52–54.
  210. ^ Ronzitti 1988, p. 359.
  211. ^ Walker 2006, p. 145.
  212. ^ Blair 1998, pp. 704–705.
  213. ^ "GERMANY: GRAND-ADMIRAL KARL DOENITZ RELEASED FROM SPANDAU PRISON AFTER TEN YEARS". Reuters Archive Licensing. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
  214. ^ Dönitz 1997, p. 477.
  215. ^ Thames Television - Jeremy Isaacs (31 October 1973), The World at War (1973) - Thames Television, Thames Television, retrieved 2 August 2024
  216. ^ Cowley & Parker 2005, p. 139.
  217. ^ a b Stetson, Damon (26 December 1980). "Doenitz Dies; Gave Up for Nazis; Admiral Doenitz Is Dead; Surrendered for the Nazis". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  218. ^ Ginsburg 2022, p. 67.
  219. ^ a b Vinocur, John (7 January 1981). "WAR VETERANS COME TO BURY, AND TO PRAISE, DOENITZ". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  220. ^ a b "Thousands at funeral for Hitler's successor – UPI Archives". UPI. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  221. ^ a b c d e f g Busch & Röll 2003, p. 26.
  222. ^ a b c d Busch & Röll 2003, p. 27.
  223. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Busch & Röll 2003, p. 28.
  224. ^ a b c d Thomas 1997, p. 123.
  225. ^ a b Scherzer 2007, p. 275.
  226. ^ Fellgiebel 2000, p. 162.
  227. ^ Fellgiebel 2000, p. 68.
  228. ^ Matikkala 2017, p. 511.

Sources

[edit]

Attribution:

[edit]
Listen to this article (37 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 16 December 2017 (2017-12-16), and does not reflect subsequent edits.