Jump to content

Minimum funding requirement: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Date of introduction
Clarifying MFR still in effect (for now...)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Minimum Funding Requirement''' (MFR) was a part of [[United Kingdom]] [[legislation]] in the [[Pensions Act 1995]], and was introduced on 6 April 1997.
The '''Minimum Funding Requirement''' (MFR) was a part of [[United Kingdom]] [[legislation]] in the [[Pensions Act 1995]], and was introduced on 6 April 1997. The [[Pensions Act 2004]] abolishes the MFR replaces it with new "scheme funding" requirements; these are expected to come into effect in December 2005.


The aim of the Minimum Funding Requirement was to set a minimum amount of assets that a [[Pension|Pension scheme]] should hold in order to fund its promised benefits. If a scheme did not hold sufficient assets the pension scheme was required to achieve the minimum level within a given time scale.
The aim of the Minimum Funding Requirement was to set a minimum amount of assets that a [[Pension|Pension scheme]] should hold in order to fund its promised benefits. If a scheme did not hold sufficient assets the pension scheme was required to achieve the minimum level within a given time scale.
Line 7: Line 7:
Although legislation set out the broad requirements of the Minimum Funding Requirement the details of the methods and assumptions to use were specified in Guidance Note 27 issued by the [[Institute of Actuaries]] and the [[Faculty of Actuaries]].
Although legislation set out the broad requirements of the Minimum Funding Requirement the details of the methods and assumptions to use were specified in Guidance Note 27 issued by the [[Institute of Actuaries]] and the [[Faculty of Actuaries]].


After the introduction of the Minimum Funding Requirement there were a number of modifications to the assumptions to cope with perceived weaknesses in the original basis. However, the level of assets required by the MFR never proved sufficient to provide the benefits promised by the scheme which the MFR was suppose to fund. The [[Pensions Act 2004]] abolished the MFR and introduced a new scheme specific funding basis which it is hoped will prove the flexibility that pensions schemes require whilst at the same time protecting members' benefits.
After the introduction of the Minimum Funding Requirement there were a number of modifications to the assumptions to cope with perceived weaknesses in the original basis. However, the level of assets required by the MFR never proved sufficient to provide the benefits promised by the scheme which the MFR was suppose to fund. The [[Pensions Act 2004]] abolishes the MFR and introduced a new scheme funding basis which it is hoped will prove the flexibility that pensions schemes require whilst at the same time protecting members' benefits.


==External links==
==External links==


* [[http://www.actuaries.org.uk/files/pdf/map/GN27V2-1.pdf Guidance Note 27]] (pdf)
* [http://www.actuaries.org.uk/files/pdf/map/GN27V2-1.pdf Actuarial Guidance Note 27] (pdf)

Revision as of 01:24, 9 October 2005

The Minimum Funding Requirement (MFR) was a part of United Kingdom legislation in the Pensions Act 1995, and was introduced on 6 April 1997. The Pensions Act 2004 abolishes the MFR replaces it with new "scheme funding" requirements; these are expected to come into effect in December 2005.

The aim of the Minimum Funding Requirement was to set a minimum amount of assets that a Pension scheme should hold in order to fund its promised benefits. If a scheme did not hold sufficient assets the pension scheme was required to achieve the minimum level within a given time scale.

For a scheme which had less than 90% of the assets required the scheme had to pay the shortfall below 90% within three years. Where the scheme was between 90% and 100% the shortfall had to be paid off over a period not to exceed 10 years.

Although legislation set out the broad requirements of the Minimum Funding Requirement the details of the methods and assumptions to use were specified in Guidance Note 27 issued by the Institute of Actuaries and the Faculty of Actuaries.

After the introduction of the Minimum Funding Requirement there were a number of modifications to the assumptions to cope with perceived weaknesses in the original basis. However, the level of assets required by the MFR never proved sufficient to provide the benefits promised by the scheme which the MFR was suppose to fund. The Pensions Act 2004 abolishes the MFR and introduced a new scheme funding basis which it is hoped will prove the flexibility that pensions schemes require whilst at the same time protecting members' benefits.