Monas (heterokont): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
The genus was also included in other groups, as in [[Mastigophora]] or [[Flagellata]]. The current practice is the (questionable) synonymous use, based on morphological similarity, of the generic names ''Monas'' (mostly used in the east-Asian literature) and ''Spumella'' (synonymously used in the European and American literature) as unpigmented biflagellates in [[Chrysophyceae]]. However, there is a conflict between the morphological and molecular investigations. The present-day taxon ''Monas''/''Spumella'' is still [[polyphyletic]], comprising at least three to five lineages, and evidence about the identity of the [[type species]] of ''Monas'' is missing.<ref name=Boenigk2008/> |
The genus was also included in other groups, as in [[Mastigophora]] or [[Flagellata]]. The current practice is the (questionable) synonymous use, based on morphological similarity, of the generic names ''Monas'' (mostly used in the east-Asian literature) and ''Spumella'' (synonymously used in the European and American literature) as unpigmented biflagellates in [[Chrysophyceae]]. However, there is a conflict between the morphological and molecular investigations. The present-day taxon ''Monas''/''Spumella'' is still [[polyphyletic]], comprising at least three to five lineages, and evidence about the identity of the [[type species]] of ''Monas'' is missing.<ref name=Boenigk2008/> |
||
This problem in the circumscription of groups, using the practical [[Species#Other species concepts|morphological (or taxonomic) species concept]] or the [[biological species concept]] (based on the degree of molecular similarity), is also faced in the taxonomy of other microorganisms,<ref>Lahr, D. J., Laughinghouse, H. D., Oliverio, A. M., Gao, F., & Katz, L. A. (2014). [http://www.researchgate.net/publication/265013869_How_discordant_morphological_and_molecular_evolution_among_microorganisms_can_revise_our_notions_of_biodiversity_on_Earth_Introduction How discordant morphological and molecular evolution among microorganisms can revise our notions of biodiversity on Earth]. BioEssays, 36(10), 950-959.</ref> like other flagellates (e.g., ''[[Bodo]]'', ''[[Cercomonas]]'')<ref name=Boenigk2008/> and [[microalgae]] (e.g., [[Chlorococcales]]).<ref name=Krienitz&Bock2012>{{cite journal|last1=Krienitz|first1=Lothar|last2=Bock|first2=Christina|title=Present state of the systematics of planktonic coccoid green algae of inland waters|journal=Hydrobiologia|year=2012|volume=698|issue=1|pages=295–326|doi=10.1007/s10750-012-1079-z|url=http://reflora.jbrj.gov.br/downloads/ALGAS1.pdf}}</ref> |
This problem in the circumscription of groups, using the practical [[Species#Other species concepts|morphological (or taxonomic) species concept]] or the [[biological species concept]] (based on the degree of molecular similarity), is also faced in the taxonomy of other microorganisms,<ref>Lahr, D. J., Laughinghouse, H. D., Oliverio, A. M., Gao, F., & Katz, L. A. (2014). [http://www.researchgate.net/publication/265013869_How_discordant_morphological_and_molecular_evolution_among_microorganisms_can_revise_our_notions_of_biodiversity_on_Earth_Introduction How discordant morphological and molecular evolution among microorganisms can revise our notions of biodiversity on Earth]. ''BioEssays'', 36(10), 950-959.</ref> like other flagellates (e.g., ''[[Bodo]]'', ''[[Cercomonas]]'')<ref name=Boenigk2008/> and [[microalgae]] (e.g., [[Chlorococcales]]).<ref name=Krienitz&Bock2012>{{cite journal|last1=Krienitz|first1=Lothar|last2=Bock|first2=Christina|title=Present state of the systematics of planktonic coccoid green algae of inland waters|journal=Hydrobiologia|year=2012|volume=698|issue=1|pages=295–326|doi=10.1007/s10750-012-1079-z|url=http://reflora.jbrj.gov.br/downloads/ALGAS1.pdf}}</ref> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 00:35, 24 October 2014
| Monas | |
|---|---|
| Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | |
| (unranked): | |
| (unranked): | |
| Class: | |
| Order: | |
| Family: | |
| Genus: | Monas O. F. Müller, 1773[1]
|
Monas is a genus of flagellates, described by Otto Friedrich Müller in 1773 as a group of Infusoria. Throughout time, it represented an aggregate genus.
Taxonomic history
Many organisms were transferred to this genus, and most Monas spp. have later been synonymised with or integrated in other genera. The organisms once affiliated with Monas spp. truly belong to all major eukaryotic lineages (Opisthokonta, Amoebozoa, Rhizaria, Archaeplastida, Stramenopiles, Alveolata, Cryptophyta, Excavata), and even to prokaryotic lineages.[2]
The genus was also included in other groups, as in Mastigophora or Flagellata. The current practice is the (questionable) synonymous use, based on morphological similarity, of the generic names Monas (mostly used in the east-Asian literature) and Spumella (synonymously used in the European and American literature) as unpigmented biflagellates in Chrysophyceae. However, there is a conflict between the morphological and molecular investigations. The present-day taxon Monas/Spumella is still polyphyletic, comprising at least three to five lineages, and evidence about the identity of the type species of Monas is missing.[2]
This problem in the circumscription of groups, using the practical morphological (or taxonomic) species concept or the biological species concept (based on the degree of molecular similarity), is also faced in the taxonomy of other microorganisms,[3] like other flagellates (e.g., Bodo, Cercomonas)[2] and microalgae (e.g., Chlorococcales).[4]
References
- ^ Guiry, M.D. & Guiry, G.M. 2014. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org/search/genus/detail/?genus_id=44073; searched on 13 October 2014.
- ^ a b c Boenigk, Jens (2008). "The Past and Present Classification Problem with Nanoflagellates Exemplified by the Genus Monas". Protist. 159 (2): 319–337. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2008.01.001.
- ^ Lahr, D. J., Laughinghouse, H. D., Oliverio, A. M., Gao, F., & Katz, L. A. (2014). How discordant morphological and molecular evolution among microorganisms can revise our notions of biodiversity on Earth. BioEssays, 36(10), 950-959.
- ^ Krienitz, Lothar; Bock, Christina (2012). "Present state of the systematics of planktonic coccoid green algae of inland waters" (PDF). Hydrobiologia. 698 (1): 295–326. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1079-z.