Jump to content

Poverty, by America: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m →Reception: task, replaced: website=Vox (website) → website=Vox
Fernmyne (talk | contribs)
397 edits
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


== Overview ==
== Overview ==
''Poverty, by America'' is a sociological analysis of [[poverty]] and its causes [[Poverty in the United States|in the United States]]. Desmond's central thesis is that wealthy Americans, even those who would otherwise consider themselves progressive, tacitly benefit from government policies that keep people in poverty. Desmond also presents systemic solutions to the issue of poverty in the United States, arguing that tax reform and increasing investment in public services would reduce poverty.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Davies |first=Dave |date=2023-03-21 |title=Private opulence, public squalor: How the U.S. helps the rich and hurts the poor |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/03/21/1164275807/poverty-by-america-matthew-desmond-inequality |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=NPR}}</ref>
''Poverty, by America'' is a sociological analysis of [[poverty]] and its causes [[Poverty in the United States|in the United States]]. Desmond's central thesis is that wealthy Americans, even those who would otherwise consider themselves progressive, tacitly benefit from government policies that keep people in poverty. Desmond also presents systemic solutions to the issue of poverty in the United States, arguing that tax reform and increasing investment in public services would reduce poverty.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Davies |first=Dave |date=2023-03-21 |title=Private opulence, public squalor: How the U.S. helps the rich and hurts the poor |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/03/21/1164275807/poverty-by-america-matthew-desmond-inequality |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=NPR}}</ref> He also recommends that individual consumers become "poverty abolitionists" by withdrawing support "from corporations that exploit their workers" and patronize businesses that have a unionized workforce.<ref>{{cite book |last=Desmond|first=Matthew |author-link=Matthew Desmond|date=2023 |title=[[Poverty, by America]]|url= |location= |publisher=Crown Publishing Group|page=191|isbn=9780593239919}}</ref>


== Development history ==
== Development history ==
Line 24: Line 24:
''Poverty, by America'' received critical acclaim upon release.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Poverty, by America |url=https://bookmarks.reviews/reviews/poverty-by-america/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=BookMarks}}</ref> ''[[Kirkus Reviews]]'' wrote positively about Desmond's policy proposals, describing the book as a "clearly delineated guide to finally eradicate poverty in America."<ref name=":0" /> ''[[Booklist]]'' and ''BookPage'' similarly praised the book, singling out Desmond's solutions as a highlight.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mondor |first=Colleen |date=2023-01-01 |title=Poverty, by America |url=https://www.booklistonline.com/Poverty-By-America/pid=9771842 |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=Booklist}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Harvieux |first=Annie |title=Poverty, by America |url=https://www.bookpage.com/reviews/poverty-by-america-matthew-desmond-book-review/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=BookPage}}</ref> While positive overall, [[Eyal Press]] negatively compared ''Poverty, by America'' to Desmond's earlier book [[Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City|''Evicted'']], criticizing ''Poverty, by America'' for being drier and containing little original research.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Press |first=Eyal |date=2023-03-21 |title=The One Cause of Poverty That's Never Considered |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/books/archive/2023/03/poverty-by-america-book-matthew-desmond/673453/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=The Atlantic}}</ref>
''Poverty, by America'' received critical acclaim upon release.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Poverty, by America |url=https://bookmarks.reviews/reviews/poverty-by-america/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=BookMarks}}</ref> ''[[Kirkus Reviews]]'' wrote positively about Desmond's policy proposals, describing the book as a "clearly delineated guide to finally eradicate poverty in America."<ref name=":0" /> ''[[Booklist]]'' and ''BookPage'' similarly praised the book, singling out Desmond's solutions as a highlight.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mondor |first=Colleen |date=2023-01-01 |title=Poverty, by America |url=https://www.booklistonline.com/Poverty-By-America/pid=9771842 |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=Booklist}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Harvieux |first=Annie |title=Poverty, by America |url=https://www.bookpage.com/reviews/poverty-by-america-matthew-desmond-book-review/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=BookPage}}</ref> While positive overall, [[Eyal Press]] negatively compared ''Poverty, by America'' to Desmond's earlier book [[Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City|''Evicted'']], criticizing ''Poverty, by America'' for being drier and containing little original research.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Press |first=Eyal |date=2023-03-21 |title=The One Cause of Poverty That's Never Considered |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/books/archive/2023/03/poverty-by-america-book-matthew-desmond/673453/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=The Atlantic}}</ref>


[[The Washington Post|''The Washington Post'']]'s [[Timothy Noah]] wrote positively about the book, describing it as "a darker view" than other books about poverty.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Noah |first=Timothy |date=2023-03-16 |title=Why are so many Americans poor? Because we allow it, two books argue. |work=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2023/03/16/poverty-desmond-paradox-rank-essay/ |access-date=2023-04-10}}</ref> Paul Gleason wrote a positive review in the [[Los Angeles Review of Books|''Los Angeles Review of Books'']], noting that Desmond criticized politicians on all sides of the political spectrum, writing that "he reserves a lot of blame for his peers, the kind of people who are likely to buy his book."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gleason |first=Paul W. |date=2023-03-21 |title=How to Be a Poverty Abolitionist: On Matthew Desmond's 'Poverty, by America' |url=https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/how-to-be-a-poverty-abolitionist-on-matthew-desmonds-poverty-by-america/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=Los Angeles Review of Books}}</ref> Historian [[Samuel Moyn]] wrote positively about the book in [[The Guardian|''The Guardian'']], praising Desmond for his scope, but criticized his proposed solutions for lacking a concrete plan to implement them.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Moyn |first=Samuel |date=2023-03-22 |title=Poverty, By America by Matthew Desmond review - how the rich keep the poor down |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/mar/22/poverty-by-america-by-matthew-desmond-review-how-the-rich-keep-the-poor-down |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=The Guardian}}</ref>
''[[The Washington Post]]'''s [[Timothy Noah]] wrote positively about the book, describing it as "a darker view" than other books about poverty.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Noah |first=Timothy |date=2023-03-16 |title=Why are so many Americans poor? Because we allow it, two books argue. |work=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2023/03/16/poverty-desmond-paradox-rank-essay/ |access-date=2023-04-10}}</ref> Paul Gleason wrote a positive review in the ''[[Los Angeles Review of Books]]'', noting that Desmond criticized politicians on all sides of the political spectrum, writing that "he reserves a lot of blame for his peers, the kind of people who are likely to buy his book."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gleason |first=Paul W. |date=2023-03-21 |title=How to Be a Poverty Abolitionist: On Matthew Desmond's 'Poverty, by America' |url=https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/how-to-be-a-poverty-abolitionist-on-matthew-desmonds-poverty-by-america/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=Los Angeles Review of Books}}</ref> Historian [[Samuel Moyn]] wrote positively about the book in ''[[The Guardian]]'', praising Desmond for his scope, but criticized his proposed solutions for lacking a concrete plan to implement them. Moyn adds that "Desmond shows that the American economy has increasingly allowed business to enjoy power to coerce people into earning less for doing more. He insists he’s not a [[Marxist]] – though he writes that raising the spectre of exploitation always makes him sound like he is."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Moyn |first=Samuel |date=2023-03-22 |title=Poverty, By America by Matthew Desmond review - how the rich keep the poor down |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/mar/22/poverty-by-america-by-matthew-desmond-review-how-the-rich-keep-the-poor-down |access-date=2023-04-10 |website=The Guardian}}</ref> Writing in ''[[The New Yorker]]'', [[Margaret Talbot]] said the book is "urgent and accessible," and that its "moral force is a gut punch" which should be widely read and "deserves to be one of those books you see people reading on the subway, or handing around at organizing meetings, or citing in congressional hearings."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/20/matthew-desmond-poverty-by-america-book-review|title=How America Manufactures Poverty |last=Talbot|first=Margaret|date=March 13, 2023 |website=[[The New Yorker]] |publisher= |access-date=September 3, 2023 |quote=}}</ref>


In a mixed review of the book for ''[[Jacobin (magazine)|Jacobin]]'', Clark Randall writes that while its content "is not entirely lacking in truth, the way it is conceived reflects rather than challenges [[Neoliberalism|neoliberal]] ideas of subjective choice". Randall argues that Desmond retains what he sees as a pro-capitalist vision of combatting poverty, as any analysis or critique of the nature of [[capitalism]] and its contradictions is omitted, and insists that "to create a system whose primary goal is mass poverty eradication would necessitate the overthrow of the capitalist state."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Randall |first=Clark |date=July 1, 2023 |title=No, We’re Not All to Blame for Poverty |url=https://jacobin.com/2023/07/matthew-desmond-poverty-by-america-book-review-capitalism-poverty-solidarity-moralism |access-date=2023-07-04 |website=[[Jacobin (magazine)|Jacobin]] |language=en-US}}</ref>
In a mixed review of the book for ''[[Jacobin (magazine)|Jacobin]]'', Clark Randall writes that while its content "is not entirely lacking in truth, the way it is conceived reflects rather than challenges [[Neoliberalism|neoliberal]] ideas of subjective choice". Randall argues that Desmond retains what he sees as a pro-capitalist vision of combatting poverty, as any analysis or critique of the nature of [[capitalism]] and its contradictions is omitted, and insists that "to create a system whose primary goal is mass poverty eradication would necessitate the overthrow of the capitalist state."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Randall |first=Clark |date=July 1, 2023 |title=No, We’re Not All to Blame for Poverty |url=https://jacobin.com/2023/07/matthew-desmond-poverty-by-america-book-review-capitalism-poverty-solidarity-moralism |access-date=2023-07-04 |website=[[Jacobin (magazine)|Jacobin]] |language=en-US}}</ref>


In a positive review for ''[[The Nation]]'', [[Marcia Chatelain]] writes that the book makes a strong case why we should come together "to put an end to poverty in the United States once and for all," but this can only happen (according to Desmond's argument) when we reckon with the fact that too many high and middle income Americans "enjoy financial stability as a result of the suffering of the poor," including [[landlord]]s, [[Payday loans in the United States|payday lenders]], employers in the [[service industry]], and consumers themselves who "want low prices, an abundance of market options, and a plethora of gig workers to drive them to airports or clean their homes." She suggests that Desmond does not zero in on capitalism itself as the target as his objective with the book is to "bring people with disparate viewpoints and perspectives to a common place on poverty."<ref>{{cite news |last=Chatelain|first=Marcia|date=August 21, 2023 |title=Tens of Millions: The persistence of American poverty|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/society/poverty-by-america-matthew-desmond/|work=The Nation |location= |access-date=August 22, 2023}}</ref>
In a positive review for ''[[The Nation]]'', [[Marcia Chatelain]] writes that the book makes a strong case why we should come together "to put an end to poverty in the United States once and for all," but this can only happen (according to Desmond's argument) when we reckon with the fact that too many high and middle income Americans "enjoy financial stability as a result of the suffering of the poor," including [[landlord]]s, [[Payday loans in the United States|payday lenders]], employers in the [[service industry]], and consumers themselves who "want low prices, an abundance of market options, and a plethora of gig workers to drive them to airports or clean their homes." She suggests that Desmond does not zero in on capitalism itself as the target as his objective with the book is to "bring people with disparate viewpoints and perspectives to a common place on poverty."<ref>{{cite news |last=Chatelain|first=Marcia|date=August 21, 2023 |title=Tens of Millions: The persistence of American poverty|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/society/poverty-by-america-matthew-desmond/|work=The Nation |location= |access-date=August 22, 2023}}</ref>


[[Dylan Matthews]] of [[Vox (website)|Vox]] was critical of Desmond's core thesis, that poverty in the US has not improved in 50 years, which Matthews said is simply wrong.{{ r | Vox_2023-03-10 }} Matthews states that by any measure of poverty in the United States, absolute or relative, poverty has been reduced, and the only measure of poverty which does not demonstrate this is the [[Census Bureau]]'s Official Poverty Measure (OPM), a measure widely regarded as extremely flawed because it fails to include non-cash poverty reduction programs.{{ r | Vox_2023-03-10 }} Matthews stated that Desmond marvels at the 130 percent increase in federal anti-poverty spending but fails to understand where that money went and what it accomplished.<ref name=Vox_2023-03-10 >{{ Cite news |last=Matthews |first=Dylan |author-link=Dylan Matthews |date=2023-03-10 |title=Why even brilliant scholars misunderstand poverty in America - Housing expert Matthew Desmond argues poverty has stagnated in America, but misses something big. |url=https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2023/3/10/23632910/poverty-official-supplemental-relative-absolute-measure-desmond |website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]] |language=en | quote=That is, Desmond’s core premise, that expanding safety net programs haven’t slashed poverty, is wrong. They have. You just need to measure poverty carefully. ... Desmond, in his essay, spends some time marveling that “federal investments in means-tested programs increased by 130 percent from 1980 to 2018,” a fact he finds hard to square with the official poverty rate remaining flat. Surely that spending should have reduced poverty! The answer here is simple: It did reduce poverty. The escalation of government investment made a difference, no matter what reputable poverty data you look at, whether absolute or relative. The only data series where it doesn’t make a difference is the official poverty measure, which literally does not consider most of this spending and acts like it does not exist. ... That’s why there’s also near-unanimous consensus among poverty researchers that the official poverty measure (OPM) in the United States is a disaster. ... I was frankly a little shocked to see Desmond cite it without qualification in his article.}}</ref>
[[Dylan Matthews]] of [[Vox (website)|Vox]] was critical of Desmond's core thesis, that poverty in the US has not improved in 50 years, which Matthews said is simply wrong.{{ r | Vox_2023-03-10 }} Matthews states that by any measure of poverty in the United States, absolute or relative, poverty has been reduced, and the only measure of poverty which does not demonstrate this is the [[Census Bureau]]'s Official Poverty Measure (OPM), a measure widely regarded as extremely flawed because it fails to include non-cash poverty reduction programs.{{ r | Vox_2023-03-10 }} Matthews stated that Desmond marvels at the 130 percent increase in federal anti-poverty spending but fails to understand where that money went and what it accomplished.<ref name=Vox_2023-03-10 >{{ Cite news |last=Matthews |first=Dylan |author-link=Dylan Matthews |date=2023-03-10 |title=Why even brilliant scholars misunderstand poverty in America - Housing expert Matthew Desmond argues poverty has stagnated in America, but misses something big. |url=https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2023/3/10/23632910/poverty-official-supplemental-relative-absolute-measure-desmond |website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]] |language=en | quote=That is, Desmond’s core premise, that expanding safety net programs haven’t slashed poverty, is wrong. They have. You just need to measure poverty carefully. ... Desmond, in his essay, spends some time marveling that “federal investments in means-tested programs increased by 130 percent from 1980 to 2018,” a fact he finds hard to square with the official poverty rate remaining flat. Surely that spending should have reduced poverty! The answer here is simple: It did reduce poverty. The escalation of government investment made a difference, no matter what reputable poverty data you look at, whether absolute or relative. The only data series where it doesn’t make a difference is the official poverty measure, which literally does not consider most of this spending and acts like it does not exist. ... That’s why there’s also near-unanimous consensus among poverty researchers that the official poverty measure (OPM) in the United States is a disaster. ... I was frankly a little shocked to see Desmond cite it without qualification in his article.}}</ref>
Line 46: Line 46:
[[Category:Crown Publishing Group books]]
[[Category:Crown Publishing Group books]]
[[Category:Books about poverty]]
[[Category:Books about poverty]]
[[Category:Sociology books]]

Latest revision as of 15:24, 26 April 2024

Poverty, by America
AuthorMatthew Desmond
LanguageEnglish
SubjectPoverty in the United States
PublisherCrown Publishing Group
Publication date
March 21, 2023
Publication placeUnited States
ISBN9780593239919

Poverty, by America is a 2023 non-fiction book by Matthew Desmond, a sociology professor. Published by Crown Publishing Group, it was released on March 21, 2023.

Overview

[edit]

Poverty, by America is a sociological analysis of poverty and its causes in the United States. Desmond's central thesis is that wealthy Americans, even those who would otherwise consider themselves progressive, tacitly benefit from government policies that keep people in poverty. Desmond also presents systemic solutions to the issue of poverty in the United States, arguing that tax reform and increasing investment in public services would reduce poverty.[1] He also recommends that individual consumers become "poverty abolitionists" by withdrawing support "from corporations that exploit their workers" and patronize businesses that have a unionized workforce.[2]

Development history

[edit]

Publication history

[edit]

Poverty, by America was published by Crown Publishing Group and released on March 21, 2023.[3]

Reception

[edit]

Poverty, by America received critical acclaim upon release.[4] Kirkus Reviews wrote positively about Desmond's policy proposals, describing the book as a "clearly delineated guide to finally eradicate poverty in America."[3] Booklist and BookPage similarly praised the book, singling out Desmond's solutions as a highlight.[5][6] While positive overall, Eyal Press negatively compared Poverty, by America to Desmond's earlier book Evicted, criticizing Poverty, by America for being drier and containing little original research.[7]

The Washington Post's Timothy Noah wrote positively about the book, describing it as "a darker view" than other books about poverty.[8] Paul Gleason wrote a positive review in the Los Angeles Review of Books, noting that Desmond criticized politicians on all sides of the political spectrum, writing that "he reserves a lot of blame for his peers, the kind of people who are likely to buy his book."[9] Historian Samuel Moyn wrote positively about the book in The Guardian, praising Desmond for his scope, but criticized his proposed solutions for lacking a concrete plan to implement them. Moyn adds that "Desmond shows that the American economy has increasingly allowed business to enjoy power to coerce people into earning less for doing more. He insists he’s not a Marxist – though he writes that raising the spectre of exploitation always makes him sound like he is."[10] Writing in The New Yorker, Margaret Talbot said the book is "urgent and accessible," and that its "moral force is a gut punch" which should be widely read and "deserves to be one of those books you see people reading on the subway, or handing around at organizing meetings, or citing in congressional hearings."[11]

In a mixed review of the book for Jacobin, Clark Randall writes that while its content "is not entirely lacking in truth, the way it is conceived reflects rather than challenges neoliberal ideas of subjective choice". Randall argues that Desmond retains what he sees as a pro-capitalist vision of combatting poverty, as any analysis or critique of the nature of capitalism and its contradictions is omitted, and insists that "to create a system whose primary goal is mass poverty eradication would necessitate the overthrow of the capitalist state."[12]

In a positive review for The Nation, Marcia Chatelain writes that the book makes a strong case why we should come together "to put an end to poverty in the United States once and for all," but this can only happen (according to Desmond's argument) when we reckon with the fact that too many high and middle income Americans "enjoy financial stability as a result of the suffering of the poor," including landlords, payday lenders, employers in the service industry, and consumers themselves who "want low prices, an abundance of market options, and a plethora of gig workers to drive them to airports or clean their homes." She suggests that Desmond does not zero in on capitalism itself as the target as his objective with the book is to "bring people with disparate viewpoints and perspectives to a common place on poverty."[13]

Dylan Matthews of Vox was critical of Desmond's core thesis, that poverty in the US has not improved in 50 years, which Matthews said is simply wrong.[14] Matthews states that by any measure of poverty in the United States, absolute or relative, poverty has been reduced, and the only measure of poverty which does not demonstrate this is the Census Bureau's Official Poverty Measure (OPM), a measure widely regarded as extremely flawed because it fails to include non-cash poverty reduction programs.[14] Matthews stated that Desmond marvels at the 130 percent increase in federal anti-poverty spending but fails to understand where that money went and what it accomplished.[14]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Davies, Dave (2023-03-21). "Private opulence, public squalor: How the U.S. helps the rich and hurts the poor". NPR. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  2. ^ Desmond, Matthew (2023). Poverty, by America. Crown Publishing Group. p. 191. ISBN 9780593239919.
  3. ^ a b "Poverty, by America". Kirkus Reviews. 2022-12-01. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  4. ^ "Poverty, by America". BookMarks. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  5. ^ Mondor, Colleen (2023-01-01). "Poverty, by America". Booklist. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  6. ^ Harvieux, Annie. "Poverty, by America". BookPage. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  7. ^ Press, Eyal (2023-03-21). "The One Cause of Poverty That's Never Considered". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  8. ^ Noah, Timothy (2023-03-16). "Why are so many Americans poor? Because we allow it, two books argue". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  9. ^ Gleason, Paul W. (2023-03-21). "How to Be a Poverty Abolitionist: On Matthew Desmond's 'Poverty, by America'". Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  10. ^ Moyn, Samuel (2023-03-22). "Poverty, By America by Matthew Desmond review - how the rich keep the poor down". The Guardian. Retrieved 2023-04-10.
  11. ^ Talbot, Margaret (March 13, 2023). "How America Manufactures Poverty". The New Yorker. Retrieved September 3, 2023.
  12. ^ Randall, Clark (July 1, 2023). "No, We're Not All to Blame for Poverty". Jacobin. Retrieved 2023-07-04.
  13. ^ Chatelain, Marcia (August 21, 2023). "Tens of Millions: The persistence of American poverty". The Nation. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
  14. ^ a b c Matthews, Dylan (2023-03-10). "Why even brilliant scholars misunderstand poverty in America - Housing expert Matthew Desmond argues poverty has stagnated in America, but misses something big". Vox. That is, Desmond's core premise, that expanding safety net programs haven't slashed poverty, is wrong. They have. You just need to measure poverty carefully. ... Desmond, in his essay, spends some time marveling that "federal investments in means-tested programs increased by 130 percent from 1980 to 2018," a fact he finds hard to square with the official poverty rate remaining flat. Surely that spending should have reduced poverty! The answer here is simple: It did reduce poverty. The escalation of government investment made a difference, no matter what reputable poverty data you look at, whether absolute or relative. The only data series where it doesn't make a difference is the official poverty measure, which literally does not consider most of this spending and acts like it does not exist. ... That's why there's also near-unanimous consensus among poverty researchers that the official poverty measure (OPM) in the United States is a disaster. ... I was frankly a little shocked to see Desmond cite it without qualification in his article.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Poverty,_by_America&oldid=1220892464"