Jump to content

Road junction: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Cleaned up using AutoEd
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 8 templates: del empty params (1×); hyphenate params (4×);
Line 28: Line 28:
At [[Intersection (road)|intersections]], roads cross [[at-grade intersection|at-grade]]. They also can be further subdivided into those with and without signal controls.
At [[Intersection (road)|intersections]], roads cross [[at-grade intersection|at-grade]]. They also can be further subdivided into those with and without signal controls.


Signalized designs include [[advanced stop line]], [[Bowtie (road)|bowtie]], [[box junction]], [[continuous-flow intersection]],<ref name=Hummer>{{cite web|url=http://www.urbanstreet.info/1st_symp_proceedings/Ec019_e3.pdf |title=Unconventional Left-Turn Alternatives for Urban and Suburban Arterials |accessdate=13 June 2007 |author=Hummer, Joseph E. and Jonathan D. Reid |publisher=Transportation Research Board |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930055756/http://www.urbanstreet.info/1st_symp_proceedings/Ec019_e3.pdf |archivedate=30 September 2007 }}</ref> continuous Green-T, double-wide, [[hook turn]], [[jughandle]], median u-turn, [[Michigan left]], paired, [[quadrant roadway intersection|quadrant]], [[Seagull intersection|seagulls]], [[slip lane]], split, [[staggered junction|staggered]], [[superstreet]], [[Texas T]], [[Texas U-turn]] and [[Turnaround (road)|turnarounds]].<ref name=umd>{{cite web|url=http://attap.umd.edu/uaid.php |title=Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program |publisher=University of Maryland |accessdate=2014-04-12 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140503005838/http://attap.umd.edu/uaid.php |archivedate=2014-05-03 }}</ref>
Signalized designs include [[advanced stop line]], [[Bowtie (road)|bowtie]], [[box junction]], [[continuous-flow intersection]],<ref name=Hummer>{{cite web|url=http://www.urbanstreet.info/1st_symp_proceedings/Ec019_e3.pdf |title=Unconventional Left-Turn Alternatives for Urban and Suburban Arterials |accessdate=13 June 2007 |author=Hummer, Joseph E. and Jonathan D. Reid |publisher=Transportation Research Board |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930055756/http://www.urbanstreet.info/1st_symp_proceedings/Ec019_e3.pdf |archive-date=30 September 2007 }}</ref> continuous Green-T, double-wide, [[hook turn]], [[jughandle]], median u-turn, [[Michigan left]], paired, [[quadrant roadway intersection|quadrant]], [[Seagull intersection|seagulls]], [[slip lane]], split, [[staggered junction|staggered]], [[superstreet]], [[Texas T]], [[Texas U-turn]] and [[Turnaround (road)|turnarounds]].<ref name=umd>{{cite web|url=http://attap.umd.edu/uaid.php |title=Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program |publisher=University of Maryland |accessdate=2014-04-12 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140503005838/http://attap.umd.edu/uaid.php |archive-date=2014-05-03 }}</ref>


Non-signalized designs include unsignalized variations on continuous-flow 3 and 4-leg, median u-turn and superstreet, along with Maryland T/J, [[roundabout]] and [[traffic circle]].<ref name=umd/>
Non-signalized designs include unsignalized variations on continuous-flow 3 and 4-leg, median u-turn and superstreet, along with Maryland T/J, [[roundabout]] and [[traffic circle]].<ref name=umd/>
Line 34: Line 34:
==Safety==
==Safety==


In the EU it is estimated that around 5,000 out of 26,100 people who are killed in car crashes are killed in a junction collision, in 2015, while it was around 8,000 in 2006.<ref name=ERSO>{{cite book |author = European Road Safety Observatory |date = June 2017 |url = https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/dacota/bfs2017_junctions.pdf |title = Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2017: Junctions |publisher = European Road Safety Observatory |page = }}{{page needed|date=July 2018}}</ref> During the 2006–2015 decade, this means around 20% of road fatalities occur at junctions.<ref name=ERSO/>
In the EU it is estimated that around 5,000 out of 26,100 people who are killed in car crashes are killed in a junction collision, in 2015, while it was around 8,000 in 2006.<ref name=ERSO>{{cite book |author = European Road Safety Observatory |date = June 2017 |url = https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/dacota/bfs2017_junctions.pdf |title = Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2017: Junctions |publisher = European Road Safety Observatory }}{{page needed|date=July 2018}}</ref> During the 2006–2015 decade, this means around 20% of road fatalities occur at junctions.<ref name=ERSO/>


By kind of users junctions fatalities are car users, 34%; pedestrians, 23%; motorcycle, 21%; pedal-cycle 12%; and other road users, the remaining.<ref name=ERSO/>
By kind of users junctions fatalities are car users, 34%; pedestrians, 23%; motorcycle, 21%; pedal-cycle 12%; and other road users, the remaining.<ref name=ERSO/>

Revision as of 13:30, 5 December 2020

A junction is where two or more roads meet.

History

Roads began as a means of linking locations of interest: towns, forts and geographic features such as river fords. Where roads met outside of an existing settlement, these junctions often led to a new settlement. Scotch Corner is an example of such a location.

In the United Kingdom and other countries, the practice of giving names to junctions emerged, to help travellers find their way. Junctions took the name of a prominent nearby business or a point of interest.

As of the road networks increased in density and traffic flows followed suit, managing the flow of traffic across the junction became of increasing importance, to minimize delays and improve safety. The first innovation was to add traffic control devices, such as stop signs and traffic lights that regulated traffic flow. Next came lane controls that limited what each lane of traffic was allowed to do while crossing. Turns across oncoming traffic might be prohibited, or allowed only when oncoming and crossing traffic was stopped.

This was followed by specialized junction designs that incorporated information about traffic volumes, speeds, driver intent and many other factors.

Types

The most basic distinction among junction types is whether or not the roads cross at the same or different elevations. More expensive, grade-separated interchanges generally offer higher throughput at higher cost. Single-grade intersections are lower cost and lower throughput. Each main type comes in many variants.[1]

Interchange

At interchanges, roads pass above or below each other, using grade separation and slip roads. The terms motorway junction and highway junction typically refer to this layout. They can be further subdivided into those with and without signal controls.

Signalized (traffic-light controlled) interchanges include such "diamond" designs as the diverging diamond,[2] Michigan urban diamond, three-level diamond, and tight diamond. Others include center-turn overpass, contraflow left, single loop, and single-point urban overpass.[3]

Non-signalized designs include the cloverleaf, contraflow left, dogbone (restricted dumbbell), double crossover merging,[2][4][5] dumbbell (grade-separated bowtie), echelon, free-flow interchange, partial cloverleaf, raindrop, single and double roundabouts (grade-separated roundabout), single-point urban, stack, and windmill.[3]

Autobahnkreuz (literally "autobahn cross"), short form kreuz, and abbreviated as AK, is a four-way interchange on the German autobahn network. Autobahndreieck (literally "autobahn triangle"), short form dreieck, and abbreviated as AD, is a three-way interchange on the German autobahn network.

Intersection

At intersections, roads cross at-grade. They also can be further subdivided into those with and without signal controls.

Signalized designs include advanced stop line, bowtie, box junction, continuous-flow intersection,[6] continuous Green-T, double-wide, hook turn, jughandle, median u-turn, Michigan left, paired, quadrant, seagulls, slip lane, split, staggered, superstreet, Texas T, Texas U-turn and turnarounds.[3]

Non-signalized designs include unsignalized variations on continuous-flow 3 and 4-leg, median u-turn and superstreet, along with Maryland T/J, roundabout and traffic circle.[3]

Safety

In the EU it is estimated that around 5,000 out of 26,100 people who are killed in car crashes are killed in a junction collision, in 2015, while it was around 8,000 in 2006.[7] During the 2006–2015 decade, this means around 20% of road fatalities occur at junctions.[7]

By kind of users junctions fatalities are car users, 34%; pedestrians, 23%; motorcycle, 21%; pedal-cycle 12%; and other road users, the remaining.[7]

Causes of fatalities

It has been considered that several causes might lead to fatalities; for instance:[7]

  • Observation missed – the largest category, encompassing all factors that cause a driver or rider to not notice something:
    • Physical factors:
      • Temporary obstruction to view
      • Permanent obstruction to view
      • Permanent sight obstruction
    • Human factors:
      • Faulty diagnosis – a misunderstanding of another road user's actions or the road conditions
      • Distraction
      • Inadequate plan – the details of the situation, as interpreted by the road user, are lacking in quantity and/or quality (including their correspondence to reality)
      • Inattention
  • Faulty diagnosis (not leading to observation missed)
    • Information failure – the road user judged the situation incorrectly and made a decision based upon the incorrect judgement (e.g. thinking that another vehicle is moving when it is not, and thus colliding with it)
    • Communication failure – a miscommunication between road users
  • Inadequate plan (not leading to observation missed)
    • Insufficient knowledge

Pedestrians

Intersections generally must manage pedestrian as well as vehicle traffic. Pedestrian aids include crosswalks, pedestrian-directed traffic signals ("walk light") and over/underpasses. Walk lights may be accompanied by audio signals to aid the visually impaired. Medians can offer pedestrian islands, allowing pedestrians to divide their crossings into a separate segment for each traffic direction, possibly with a separate signal for each.

Protected intersections for bicycles

Protected intersection design based on a common Dutch model, preserving the physical segregation of the cycle lane throughout the intersection

A number of features make this protected intersection much safer. A corner refuge island, a setback crossing of the pedestrians and cyclists, generally between 1.5–7 metres of setback, a forward stop bar, which allows cyclists to stop for a traffic light well ahead of motor traffic who must stop behind the crosswalk. Separate signal staging or at least an advance green for cyclists and pedestrians is used to give cyclists and pedestrians no conflicts or a head start over traffic. The design makes a right turn on red, and sometimes left on red depending on the geometry of the intersection in question, possible in many cases, often without stopping.[8]

Cyclists ideally have a protected bike lane on the approach to the intersection, separated by a concrete median with splay kerbs if possible, and have a protected bike lane width of at least 2 metres if possible (one way). In the Netherlands, most one way cycle paths are at least 2.5 metres wide.[9]

Bicycle traffic can be accommodated with the low grade bike lanes in the roadway or higher grade and much safer protected bicycle paths that are physically separated from the roadway.

See also

References

  1. ^ Hughes, Warren; Jagannathan, Ram; Sengupta, Dibu & Hummer, Joe (April 2010). Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR) (Report). Federal Highway Administration.
  2. ^ a b Hughes, Warren; Jagannathan, Ram (October 2009). "Double Crossover Diamond Interchange". Federal Highway Administration. FHWA-HRT-09-054. Retrieved April 22, 2012.
  3. ^ a b c d "Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program". University of Maryland. Archived from the original on 2014-05-03. Retrieved 2014-04-12.
  4. ^ "Double Crossover Merging Interchange".
  5. ^ Gingrich, Michael A., Sr. (June 2011). "DCMI (Double Crossover Merging Interchange)" (PDF). Institute of Transportation Engineers. Retrieved January 23, 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ Hummer, Joseph E. and Jonathan D. Reid. "Unconventional Left-Turn Alternatives for Urban and Suburban Arterials" (PDF). Transportation Research Board. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 13 June 2007.
  7. ^ a b c d European Road Safety Observatory (June 2017). Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2017: Junctions (PDF). European Road Safety Observatory.[page needed]
  8. ^ http://www.protectedintersection.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Falbo_ProtectedIntersection_Transcript1.pdf
  9. ^ "How wide is a Dutch cycle path?". 2011-06-29.