Talk:List of deprogrammers: Difference between revisions
→Recent removals: yes... |
|||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
...Which is why I went and found new references. <span class="vcard"><span class="nickname">[[User:Zambelo|Zambelo]]</span>; [[User talk:Zambelo|talk]]</span> 03:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC) |
...Which is why I went and found new references. <span class="vcard"><span class="nickname">[[User:Zambelo|Zambelo]]</span>; [[User talk:Zambelo|talk]]</span> 03:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
== RFC: The inclusion of names, the validity of references, and BLP == |
|||
{{rfc|reli}} |
|||
A number of entries to the article were removed recently, |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deprogrammers&diff=prev&oldid=628016948] - "rmv names, notability not established - see WP:NLIST)" |
|||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deprogrammers&diff=628028356&oldid=628027646] - "Please read and comprehend WP:NLIST and WP:LISTPEOPLE before putting these back)" |
|||
I was requested to find new sources, then re-add [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deprogrammers&diff=next&oldid=628028576], which I then did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deprogrammers&diff=next&oldid=628106641] - however these were again removed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deprogrammers&diff=next&oldid=628160322]. |
|||
The question is - do the entries merit inclusion based on the provided references as seen here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_deprogrammers&diff=next&oldid=628106641], or are they in violation of BLP? Which ones? |
|||
<span class="vcard"><span class="nickname">[[User:Zambelo|Zambelo]]</span>; [[User talk:Zambelo|talk]]</span> 03:26, 4 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:26, 4 October 2014
 | Biography Redirect‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Notability of members on this list
I have twice removed names from this list where notability was not established, which is a requirement for standalone lists of people. The provided citations do not establish notability. For example, I removed "Wendy Ford" from this list. The only citation provided is for a list of names found in a discarded Rolodex from the Cult Awareness Network. That is not a reliable source, and certainly does not establish notability. Tgeairn (talk) 02:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Recent removals
Why were referenced entries removed? User:Cwobeel. Zambelo; talk 05:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
I would appreciate an answer. Again entries were removed, despite new sources being added. Zambelo; talk 03:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- You have repeatedly been told that the names were added in violation of WP:BLP policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
...Which is why I went and found new references. Zambelo; talk 03:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
RFC: The inclusion of names, the validity of references, and BLP
 |
|
A number of entries to the article were removed recently,
- [1] - "rmv names, notability not established - see WP:NLIST)"
- [2] - "Please read and comprehend WP:NLIST and WP:LISTPEOPLE before putting these back)"
I was requested to find new sources, then re-add [3], which I then did [4] - however these were again removed [5].
The question is - do the entries merit inclusion based on the provided references as seen here [6], or are they in violation of BLP? Which ones? Zambelo; talk 03:26, 4 October 2014 (UTC)