Talk:Tiny Dancer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:31, 23 August 2013

Songs Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Rock music Start‑class Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OR

Removed OR. A link to a google search and a mail-order site are hardly reliable sources.212.140.167.99 21:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

possible addition

do you think that we should add that it's the last track on "Edit Music for A Film" by UNKLE?

possible addition #2

the version of "ironoc & chipmunk" appered in the movie street dance

Why does the user "Everything counts" keep removing references of this song in the WKRP episode? The song appeared in the episode and there is no disputing that so I am not sure why he keeps removing it.

Tiny Dancer also appears on WKRP in Cincinnati, Season 2, Episode 17: The Americanization of Ivan. The character Ivan, a Russian visitor who wishes to defect to the United States with the help of the radio station employees says to both Bailey Quarters and Les Nessman, "Hold me closer tiny dancer." The song also plays at the end of the episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.53.101.212 (talk) 03:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Demark

Can't believe the article doesn't mention the latest version of the song. It was a hit in the UK earlier this year by Marco Demark--82.0.207.86 (talk) 23:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Elton John - Madman Across the Water.jpg

The image Image:Elton John - Madman Across the Water.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there the personal on the Ben Folds cover?

But not the original Elton John Version? The whole Ben Folds part is too long, all it needs is a quick mention not half of the page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.141.136.178 (talk) 02:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

agree, and changed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.190.254.108 (talk) 17:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this - but still think that Ben Folds' Five has a section that is way too big on the article. I don't understand why that's the one (actually just noticed Tim McGraw's addition as well, but it still seems out of place) cover of the song that they provide full LP info for... It seems inconsistent and silly.

I think both the fucking ben folds and tim mcgraw bullshit should be removed. i don't think any fucking GREAT artist like Elton should have his singles' wiki pages full of wankers. someone remove it... thanks - gagan

That's not how Wikipedia works. This isn't about only one song being allowed per article; this is an encyclopedia, and all information needs to be covered. Also, tone down the insults and keep it civil. Referring to things that you personally don't like as "bullshit" or people you don't agree with as "tools" is uncalled for and will result in a ban.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
-I agree with this - but still think that Ben Folds' Five has a section that is way too big on the article. I don't understand why that's the one cover of the song that they provide full LP info for... It seems inconsistent and silly.
+I agree with this - but still think that Ben Folds' Five has a section that is way too big on the article. I don't understand why that's the one (actually just noticed Tim McGraw's addition as well, but it still seems out of place) cover of the song that they provide full LP info for... It seems inconsistent and silly.
+I think both the fucking ben folds and tim mcgraw bullshit should be removed. i don't think any fucking GREAT artist like Elton should have his singles' wiki pages full of wankers.  someone remove it... thanks - gagan
+:That's not how Wikipedia works. This isn't about only one song being allowed per article; this is an encyclopedia, and all information needs to be covered. Also, tone down the insults and keep it civil. Referring to things that you personally don't like as "bullshit" or people you don't agree with as "tools" is uncalled for and will result in a ban.--<font face="Arial Black">[[User:Gen. Quon|<font color="#B22222">Gen. Quon</font>]] [[User talk:Gen. Quon|<font color="#708090">(Talk)</font>]]</font>  20:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)