Talk:Chevrolet Captiva

Merge

Although the Chev Captiva and Holden Captiva are fundamentally the same car they will be sold with different specifications and in very different markets. In Australia we will think of this car as a Holden, not a Chev - That's my two cents worth, I think the Chev and Holden pages should both stay: davidmwaters@yahoo.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by David Waters (talk • contribs) 14:10, June 30, 2006

Name Change

At what point should the primary name of the article be changed to Chevrolet Captiva, rather than its Daewoo counterpart? As with all Daewoo products, it is now designed, from the beginning, to be a Chevrolet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avisron (talk • contribs) 01:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Considering the Captiva/Winstorm is sold as a Daewoo, Holden and a Chevrolet, using the original Daewoo name avoids bias. If the next generation Captiva is launched as a Chevrolet (à la Chevrolet Cruze v. Daewoo Lacetti Premiere) then the titles will probably get changed because current Daewoos now seem to be global efforts. OSX (talk • contributions) 01:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Daewoo Kalos which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 09:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chevrolet Aveo which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 03:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

USDM Captiva Sport

GM is going to start selling a rebadged Saturn Vue as the Chevrolet Captiva Sport for rental fleets only in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.235.92.237 (talk) 03:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Correct, but this is based on the Opel Antara/Saturn Vue. The "Chevrolet Captiva Sport" is different to the regular "Chevrolet Captiva"; they just happen to share very similar names.

There is a hatnote at the very top of this article reading, "For the "Chevrolet Captiva Sport" sold in the Americas, see Opel Antara." OSX (talk • contributions) 07:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Opel Antara

I'm a bit confused. What's the difference between Chevy Captiva and Opel Antara. From the dimension figures I gathered, they look the same vehicle, may be a bit different sheet metals.---North wiki (talk) 22:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Not much. The Antara is effectively the Captiva (i.e. chassis, suspension, powertrains) with a new body including interior. Opel is a more expensive brand than Chevrolet in Europe, so Opel can sell the Antara for a higher price than Chevrolet can for its Captiva, despite the Antara costing about the same to produce. I know this is the case because the Antara and Captiva are both sold in Australia as Holdens and the Opel-based model is several thousand dollars cheaper.

The Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain follow the same concept; that is, shared underpinnings and powetrains with different bodies. OSX (talk • contributions) 11:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Opel Antara is the short version (5 seats), corresponding to an Chevrolet/Holden Captiva 5. L.Willms (talk) 08:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

File:2011 Holden Captiva.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:2011 Holden Captiva.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Classification

A discussion is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles on whether how to classify the car. BaboneCar (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chevrolet Captiva. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId%3D105466
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayServlet?target=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.emerald.gm.com%2Fgmnews%2Fviewmonthlyreleasedetail.do%3Fdomain%3D520&docid=21505
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927115307/http://www.wheelsmag.com.au/wheels/site/articleIDs/5AF5DC88746CD7A0CA25725900163A60?open&template=domWheels to http://www.wheelsmag.com.au/wheels/site/articleIDs/5AF5DC88746CD7A0CA25725900163A60?open&template=domWheels
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://pr.hankyung.com/newsRead.php?md=A01&tm=1&no=352343

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

A rather spurious edit

I was reading through the page when I saw this sentence critical of the car which is both unsourced and rather opinionated language unfit for an encyclopaedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chevrolet_Captiva&type=revision&diff=1065450388&oldid=1049478302
To me, it looks more like vandalism. Any opinions? I will delete it if no-one objects.2800:150:15B:8CE:1902:5EF9:F589:D11B (talk) 20:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)