Talk:Enterobacter: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Micro}}. Tag: |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject Microbiology|importance=mid |attention= yes}} |
|||
|class=stub |
|||
}} |
|||
|importance=mid |
|||
|attention= yes}} |
|||
==Technical Material== |
==Technical Material== |
||
| Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
Causes opportunistic infections in compromised (usually hospitalised) host. Urinary and Respiratory tract most common sites of infection. |
Causes opportunistic infections in compromised (usually hospitalised) host. Urinary and Respiratory tract most common sites of infection. |
||
:What is considered excessively technical? As a biology student, I would find that information useful. [[User:Wixteria|Wixteria]] 03:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
:What is considered excessively technical? As a biology student, I would find that information useful. [[User:Wixteria|Wixteria]] 03:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
:That is also the sort of imformation I am usually looking to find. maybe a new a section with this information could be set up and anyone not requiring it can quickly scroll past. I am also abit bothered about the picture. I am quite sure that there is more than one organism in this photo. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.105.26.173|91.105.26.173]] ([[User talk:91.105.26.173|talk]]) 10:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:: Hmm... I found ''Enterobacter faecalis'' to be Gram positive. It a bacillus-shaped bacterium that was either ''Enterobacter faecalis'' or ''Bacillus megaterium'', and it couldn't have been the latter because Bacillus undergoes beta-hemolysis while ''Enterobacter faecalis'' doesn't. I guess not all species of ''Enterobacter'' are Gram negative then. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/142.26.194.190|142.26.194.190]] ([[User talk:142.26.194.190|talk]]) 22:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Inconsistency == |
|||
Introduction: "It is also a fecal coliform, along with Escherichia." |
|||
Diagnosis: "and is a non fecal coliform" |
|||
Um - can't be both! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.191.134.255|75.191.134.255]] ([[User talk:75.191.134.255|talk]]) 05:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Added "Dubious" tags to these two statements. Perhaps someone who has access to a "Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology" or other bacteriology reference source can clarify this for us? I believe that to be classified as a "fecal coliform" a bacterium must be a member of the coliform group of organisms and it must be able to grow at 45 degrees Celsius. I don't believe that Enterobacter matches this second criterion, but this would need to be verified from a reliable source to be sure. [[User:Schoenhg|Schoenhg]] ([[User talk:Schoenhg|talk]]) 09:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Found a reliable source and was able to discern whether Enterobacter is in fact a fecal coliform...according to the definition it is not. The Enterobacter article has thus been updated to reflect this and the appropriate reference has been added.[[User:Schoenhg|Schoenhg]] ([[User talk:Schoenhg|talk]]) 15:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Wiki Education assignment: Disease Ecology 6200== |
|||
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Auburn_University_College_of_Forestry,_Wildlife_and_Environment/Disease_Ecology_6200_(Fall_2023) | assignments = [[User:Mrj0037|Mrj0037]] | reviewers = [[User:Sokmleopard|Sokmleopard]] | start_date = 2023-08-17 | end_date = 2023-12-08 }} |
|||
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Sokmleopard|Sokmleopard]] ([[User talk:Sokmleopard|talk]]) 19:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)</span> |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:39, 1 February 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Technical Material
[edit]I removed the following excessively technical material (and the cleanup tempalte) from the article:
Gram Stain: Small Gram-negative rods, found in clusters.
On Blood Agar: forms small to medium colonies, round in shape, mucod and opaque in colour, flat. On MacConkey Agar: Normal coloured agar, purplish colonies, small round, slightly raised, moist On XLD plates: Fermentative - yellow agar, large yellow-cream colonies, slightly raised, moist.
Catalase: positive, Oxidase: negative, Urea: negative, Indole: negative, MR: negative, VP: positive, Citrate: negative, Gas from Glucose: positive, Motile, TSI: A/A with gas production
Causes opportunistic infections in compromised (usually hospitalised) host. Urinary and Respiratory tract most common sites of infection.
- What is considered excessively technical? As a biology student, I would find that information useful. Wixteria 03:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- That is also the sort of imformation I am usually looking to find. maybe a new a section with this information could be set up and anyone not requiring it can quickly scroll past. I am also abit bothered about the picture. I am quite sure that there is more than one organism in this photo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.105.26.173 (talk) 10:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm... I found Enterobacter faecalis to be Gram positive. It a bacillus-shaped bacterium that was either Enterobacter faecalis or Bacillus megaterium, and it couldn't have been the latter because Bacillus undergoes beta-hemolysis while Enterobacter faecalis doesn't. I guess not all species of Enterobacter are Gram negative then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.26.194.190 (talk) 22:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Inconsistency
[edit]Introduction: "It is also a fecal coliform, along with Escherichia."
Diagnosis: "and is a non fecal coliform"
Um - can't be both! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.191.134.255 (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Added "Dubious" tags to these two statements. Perhaps someone who has access to a "Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology" or other bacteriology reference source can clarify this for us? I believe that to be classified as a "fecal coliform" a bacterium must be a member of the coliform group of organisms and it must be able to grow at 45 degrees Celsius. I don't believe that Enterobacter matches this second criterion, but this would need to be verified from a reliable source to be sure. Schoenhg (talk) 09:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Found a reliable source and was able to discern whether Enterobacter is in fact a fecal coliform...according to the definition it is not. The Enterobacter article has thus been updated to reflect this and the appropriate reference has been added.Schoenhg (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Disease Ecology 6200
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mrj0037 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Sokmleopard.
— Assignment last updated by Sokmleopard (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)