Talk:Narragansett people: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:52, 27 August 2018

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Indigenous peoples of North America B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Connecticut C‑class High‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Massachusetts / Rhode Island C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Low-importance).

Historically, they watch a large piece of land in

What does 'watch' mean in this context? --Bletch 19:35, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I removed this paragraph as it seems factually inacurate and does not relate to the prior paragraph in any way.Gblaz 21:03, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

History 1800-2000?

also would like to know — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.185.4.21 (talk) 04:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC) It would be interesting to have some gaps filled in here.--Parkwells (talk) 01:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Narragansett people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Narragansett people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Narragansett people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Narragansett people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120511065048/http://www.preservation.ri.gov/pdfs_zips_downloads/national_pdfs/charlestown/char_historic-village-of-the-narragansetts.pdf to http://www.preservation.ri.gov/pdfs_zips_downloads/national_pdfs/charlestown/char_historic-village-of-the-narragansetts.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Narragansett people/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The Narragansett page says that the Naragansett sided with Wampanoag against the English while the Pequot sided with the Puritans. The Pequot page says the opposite, that the Narragansett sided with the English against the Pequot, without mentioning the Wampanoag in an alliance with either. The two articles in discussing King Philip's War should not call the Puritans "the English" at that point. At this hour I can't research into who sided with who, but I intend to. Alcaeus285 01:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC) alcaeus285[reply]

Last edited at 01:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 00:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Narragansett people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent revert

I undid user Dilidor's reversion of my recent edits. The grounds he gave for his revert were that my edits were "original research"; however they were properly cited to sources. They improved the article by making the meaning of the name "Narragansett" more explicit, and giving more detail on archaeological site "R.I. 110", which was named in the previous version but its location not given, nor any reference provided.Wwallacee (talk) 11:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of an encyclopedia is to outline what scholars have published in their research—not to do your own research. You have indeed cited original sources such as Roger Williams, and you do quote from older historical treatments from the 1800s, but you use those sources to draw your own conclusions rather than tell the reader what Roger Williams concluded. Your theories are interesting, but you need to be able to credit them to a published source, not put them forth here and then point to Williams to support your conclusions. —Dilidor (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 11:03, 25 August 2018 edit Wwallacee (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,182 edits →Recent revert: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:52, 27 August 2018 edit undo Dilidor (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 16,319 edits →Recent revert Next edit →
Line 95:		Line 95:

	I undid user [[User:Dilidor\|Dilidor]]'s reversion of my recent edits. The grounds he gave for his revert were that my edits were "original research"; however they were properly cited to sources. They improved the article by making the meaning of the name "Narragansett" more explicit, and giving more detail on archaeological site "R.I. 110", which was named in the previous version but its location not given, nor any reference provided.[[User:Wwallacee\|Wwallacee]] ([[User talk:Wwallacee\|talk]]) 11:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)		I undid user [[User:Dilidor\|Dilidor]]'s reversion of my recent edits. The grounds he gave for his revert were that my edits were "original research"; however they were properly cited to sources. They improved the article by making the meaning of the name "Narragansett" more explicit, and giving more detail on archaeological site "R.I. 110", which was named in the previous version but its location not given, nor any reference provided.[[User:Wwallacee\|Wwallacee]] ([[User talk:Wwallacee\|talk]]) 11:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
			:The purpose of an encyclopedia is to outline what scholars have published in their research—''not'' to do your own research. You have indeed cited original sources such as Roger Williams, and you do quote from older historical treatments from the 1800s, but you use those sources to draw your own conclusions rather than tell the reader what Roger Williams concluded. Your theories are interesting, but you need to be able to credit them to a published source, not put them forth here and then point to Williams to support ''your'' conclusions. —[[User:Dilidor\|Dilidor]] ([[User talk:Dilidor\|talk]]) 09:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)