Jump to content

Talk:Ouija

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.133.154.17 (talk) at 18:24, 28 January 2023 (What is my favourite colour: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconParanormal B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSkepticism B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2022 and 11 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RabiaAkb, Lifting world, Idinptl82, Fiona B Howard, Sourdough4444, Beth.h.blair, Bodmind (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Coyotewalk, Supervalid, Andrew hulley, Sweetasy.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Individual Opinion?

The Catholic Church explicity condemns all practice of sorcery, witchcraft, and divination, etc. CCC 2116 declares that ""All forms" of divination are to be rejected." Unless you are claiming that Ouija boards are not practices of divination, then I don't know what could be the issue. KEleison (talk) 06:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The issue, as stated, is that WP disallows “individual research.” You cannot add text on the basis of what YOU claim to be true. Find a citation to back this up. RobP (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's also true that the Ouija board parlour game is not a "practice of sorcery, witchcraft, and divination", any more than the Magic 8 Ball or Eeny Meeny Miney Moe or a card trick or a routine meant to discover your soap opera name. I don't know if the Catholic Church has specifically claimed it is one, but to put it in OP's words, "Ouija boards are not practices of divination". Categorically. Laodah 19:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Ouija boards are not practices of divination" Wow, everybody's been using them wrong for over 100 years...

Ouija boards, older consoles, copyrights-infringing consoles and the likes on the rise because of NIntendo's Switch console problems!

It's weird to acknowledge, but just as other consoles, even illegally sold potentially copyrights-infringing consoles and even this Ouija board seen here are massively salesnumbers-wise on the rise now. This trend is mainly there, because either it's a new trend in general or people are looking for good alternatives to buy instead of a Nintendo Switch console. Europe has it now the worst as there are not only general console problems viewable, but also price intransparency problems. This is crucial not to own in Europe as an issue that your pricing looks intransparent to people. Suggestion for games providers: look for what you have to go by price transparency-wise up until buyers buy up your product in question as a result. --94.134.91.213 (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"It's weird to acknowledge"? How about it's neither a fact nor is it relevant to this article. PacificBoy 16:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is my favourite colour

Ohhh 86.133.154.17 (talk) 18:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]