Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl: Difference between revisions
Mr.Mario 192 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
I deleted this originally because it was off the topic it was posted under and it doesn't belong on the Brawl talk page. Perhaps you should move this to the SSB and SSBM pages or the Series page.[[User:Satoryu|Satoryu]] ([[User talk:Satoryu|talk]]) 00:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC) |
I deleted this originally because it was off the topic it was posted under and it doesn't belong on the Brawl talk page. Perhaps you should move this to the SSB and SSBM pages or the Series page.[[User:Satoryu|Satoryu]] ([[User talk:Satoryu|talk]]) 00:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I am posting it here because there are lots of people who edit this article, and not the other ones. While we wait, I figured I would get some generated interest into it. [[User:Tinkleheimer|<span style="color:green">Trevor</span>]] [[User_talk:Tinkleheimer|<span style="color:green">"Tinkleheimer"</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Tinkleheimer|<span style="color:green">Haworth</span>]] 01:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC) |
:I am posting it here because there are lots of people who edit this article, and not the other ones. While we wait, I figured I would get some generated interest into it. [[User:Tinkleheimer|<span style="color:green">Trevor</span>]] [[User_talk:Tinkleheimer|<span style="color:green">"Tinkleheimer"</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Tinkleheimer|<span style="color:green">Haworth</span>]] 01:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I'd be happy to help. I'll work on [[Super Smash Bros.]] |
|||
== Vault == |
== Vault == |
Revision as of 01:27, 14 December 2007
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Super Smash Bros. Brawl article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Super Smash Bros. Brawl at the Reference desk. |
Super Smash Bros. Brawl was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Archived
You know how it is Powerslave 21:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
While we wait, why not work on others for GA?
I thought I put up a discussion already, but I guess it deleted (before the archive). We should start working together to get Super Smash Bros. and Super Smash Bros. Melee up to GA status. If anyone would want to help out, and possibly make it a mini-project, just post here. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 21:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- That's a great idea. For all the people who say "Wait till Brawl comes out," well, SSB and Melee are out, so we should work on those pages. Good idea Tinkleheimer. Powerslave 22:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- User:Son was the one who mentioned it first, I just expanded on the idea. :). Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 22:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I deleted this originally because it was off the topic it was posted under and it doesn't belong on the Brawl talk page. Perhaps you should move this to the SSB and SSBM pages or the Series page.Satoryu (talk) 00:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- I am posting it here because there are lots of people who edit this article, and not the other ones. While we wait, I figured I would get some generated interest into it. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 01:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to help. I'll work on Super Smash Bros.
Vault
I noticed someone changed the collectibles section to vault after today's update. Although it is likely that this function has to do with collectibles, it wasn't confirmed. Should this be removed and returned to the way it was? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Armageddon (talk • contribs)
- Hell yes. Until we know precisely what it's for, it shouldn't be mentioned yet. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 23:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Done. Though I expect a challenge.Satoryu (talk) 00:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
The Stickers, Trophies, Stage Builder and Album updates show pictures with green backgrounds, the same colour as Vault on the main menu. This means they are in the Vault. However, CDs and Coins aren't in the Vault and will have to be moved somewhere else. M4192 (talk) 05:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but that does not pass for confirmation. Unless they are confirmed to be in the Vault section via a Dojo or similar official update, then it is speculation to say they are. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 05:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- But that's like saying that The Subspace Emissary was never officially confirmed to be found under the Solo option. It's speculation to say that it's found there. M4192 (talk) 23:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Pre-eminent CoroCoro preperations
As you likely know, CoroCoro is having a 30 page feature in its latest issue, to be released today (Japan timezone) to subscribers and tomorrow to everyone else. Supposedly, information on characters will be included, possibly including characters that haven't yet been revealed. We need to decide how we'll handle any new information and the flood of vandalism and unsourced material that will come attached to any major announcements in the issue. Time is of the essence as subscribers will be receiving the issue within the next few hours. ShadowUltra (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Obviously we'd continue to use the standard "only add to the article if it's notable" mentality, but as far as sourcing, I say we wait for legit newssites (IGN, Gamespot, 1UP, Kotaku, Joystiq, etc.) to post info from the articles. Using fourm and blogposts as citations comes with the pitfall of not being able to prove that info is true, as those aren't proper primary or secondary sources, unless said posts can be proven to be by people in the industry, which is only easy to do on company forums or blogs. Arrowned (talk) 23:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- If someone can produce a full citation from a magazine (which most spammers won't) I don't see why it can't be considered. If someone proves that they actually are willing to source info with a magazine ref, it might be worth discussing. On a secondary note, some magazines post articles into an online database; while I don't know if CoroCoro does this, or if we can find a useful translation, we should keep our eyes open.--CM (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Maybe someone could see the SSB Series article in Japanese??? --Mr.Mario 192 (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)