Talk:Two and a Half Men: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 173.209.243.70 - "→Feminism: " |
|||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
SINCE YOU BRING UP SEXUAL POLITICS... Why is it not mentioned that Judith divorced Alan after realizing she was a lesbian? http://twohalfmen.wikia.com/wiki/Judith_Harper-Melnick <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.209.243.70|173.209.243.70]] ([[User talk:173.209.243.70|talk]]) 20:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
SINCE YOU BRING UP SEXUAL POLITICS... Why is it not mentioned that Judith divorced Alan after realizing she was a lesbian? http://twohalfmen.wikia.com/wiki/Judith_Harper-Melnick <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.209.243.70|173.209.243.70]] ([[User talk:173.209.243.70|talk]]) 20:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::::This show has received plenty of criticisms from various groups, not counting those who criticize its apparent lack of quality. I don't see this show as anti-feminist in any particular way. Fyi, Alan deserves everything he gets for being one of those creepy "nice guys". Yerghhh.--[[Special:Contributions/86.182.217.178|86.182.217.178]] ([[User talk:86.182.217.178|talk]]) 18:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== New Criticism Section == |
== New Criticism Section == |
Revision as of 18:29, 9 April 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Two and a Half Men article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
Two and a Half Men was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Two and a Half Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100314071422/http://omg.yahoo.com:80/news/charlie-sheen-returning-to-work-next-tuesday/37179 to http://omg.yahoo.com/news/charlie-sheen-returning-to-work-next-tuesday/37179
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110313062618/http://www.cnn.com:80/2011/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/03/10/sheen.apology.cryer.ppl/ to http://www.cnn.com/2011/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/03/10/sheen.apology.cryer.ppl/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Two and a Half Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100521005547/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/ap/20100518/ap_en_ot/us_tv_sheen_cbs to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100518/ap_en_ot/us_tv_sheen_cbs
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Feminism
I love this show be cause it is standing up against Feminism. This is evident with Alan inexplicably paying large amounts of alimony for two ex wives, and also be cause Rose tortured and killed Charlie. Why does this article not contain any information that Two And A Half Men was created to promote Men's Rights?! In Correct (talk) 12:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Can you cite your sources? pcuser42 (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for replying. I will look for them now. In Correct (talk) 22:33, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Feminism and Mens Rights might not be the correct word to describe it. Although I observed Judith to have feminist intentions, I was mainly wanting to add to the article a sentence about the male characters were struggling emotionally from failed relationships. I have found a source with the interview about Lee Aronsohn, but the source is from The Daily Beast. In Correct (talk) 22:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for replying. I will look for them now. In Correct (talk) 22:33, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
SINCE YOU BRING UP SEXUAL POLITICS... Why is it not mentioned that Judith divorced Alan after realizing she was a lesbian? http://twohalfmen.wikia.com/wiki/Judith_Harper-Melnick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.209.243.70 (talk) 20:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- This show has received plenty of criticisms from various groups, not counting those who criticize its apparent lack of quality. I don't see this show as anti-feminist in any particular way. Fyi, Alan deserves everything he gets for being one of those creepy "nice guys". Yerghhh.--86.182.217.178 (talk) 18:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
New Criticism Section
Please do not misunderstand be cause I like Two And A Half Men (or the first few seasons as I have not seen the more recent seasons) but I ended up creating a small Criticism section. I was going to place the information into the Production Background (premise) section but there is no such section. There is only a "Production" section which mentions the problems that occurred during production. (more like Controversy. perhaps the "Production" section should be renamed "Controversy" or perhaps "Controversy and Criticism"??) Currently, the Criticism is at the end of the "Production" (more like Controversy) section. The information I found doesn't seem to fit a "Premise" section. It seemed to be fit better in a "Criticism" section. But please do not accuse me of trying to smear this show. I am not trying to smear it or promote it. I only wanted to add a few sentences or perhaps a paragraph. In Correct (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Renaming The "Production" Section
I think it should be split and renamed as "Controversy" and "Criticism" or perhaps renamed "Controversy and Criticism" because that section is slightly more about Controversy occurring during the production. I did not find any information about the background, premise, or technical aspects. Who else agrees? In Correct (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)