Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Brandiose: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pinging GoldRomean
No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
::::: [[User:Kimikel|Kimikel]] ([[User talk:Kimikel|talk]]) 00:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
::::: [[User:Kimikel|Kimikel]] ([[User talk:Kimikel|talk]]) 00:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|GoldRomean}} Is the above ALT approved? If not, what else needs to be done? [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 01:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|GoldRomean}} Is the above ALT approved? If not, what else needs to be done? [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 01:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|Z1720}} {{ping|Kimikel}} Apologies, I wrote a reply, probably forgot to publish it, and forgot about this till now. I think there needs to be better sourcing for the alt, like, a source that more directly backs up the hook. I want a second opinion anyway, but that's just my two cents. Sorry again :D. [[User:GoldRomean|GoldRomean]] ([[User talk:GoldRomean|talk]]) 22:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
{{Pending DYK American hooks}}
{{Pending DYK American hooks}}

Revision as of 22:11, 19 July 2024

Brandiose

  • Reviewed:
Created by Kimikel (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Kimikel (talk) 15:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC).

  • I think I'll review this, but I'll have to request a second opinion as this will be my first DYK review. GoldRomean (talk) 01:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - The source provided says that the $4 million in sales is based on the team name, not Brandiose's design.
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: My first DYK review and I'm not sure about the hook, so requesting another reviewer. Thank you. GoldRomean (talk) 02:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

  • In addition to the original source, I added another (the NYT link) that directly attributes the merchandise sales to Brandiose's rebrand. Kimikel (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
    • @Kimikel:: Is Brandiose responsible for the name change/rebrand? If so, perhaps you could remove "design" from the hook, maybe that would work better?
      • @GoldRomean: The name itself was chosen by a fan poll. Brandiose was responsible for the design of all the branding. Based on that, if there's a better way to phrase that part of the hook, I'd have no problems with it. Kimikel (talk)
        • @Kimikel: What about "... that Brandiose's design work for the Rocket City Trash Pandas helped the team sell $4 million in merchandise before it played its first game?" But I'm still hesitant... I'll leave for more experienced DYK people. GoldRomean (talk) 00:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
          • Yeah, I agree. Proposing:
ALT1: ... that Brandiose's design work for the Rocket City Trash Pandas helped the team sell $4 million in merchandise before it played its first game?
Kimikel (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
@GoldRomean: Is the above ALT approved? If not, what else needs to be done? Z1720 (talk) 01:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
@Z1720: @Kimikel: Apologies, I wrote a reply, probably forgot to publish it, and forgot about this till now. I think there needs to be better sourcing for the alt, like, a source that more directly backs up the hook. I want a second opinion anyway, but that's just my two cents. Sorry again :D. GoldRomean (talk) 22:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)