Jump to content

Tulsi Gabbard 2020 presidential campaign: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Democratic primary campaign: that's WP:DUE and obviously also true. News coverage vs polling data is available at NYT: https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/elections/democratic-polls.html And also via https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/warren-has-recently-been-mentioned-more-on-fox-news-than-other-networks/ which is a representative article in a long series about weekly news coverage.
Reverted to revision 938482880 by MrX (talk): The content MrX deleted did not belong in the article per WP:DUE. This article is not about other candidates. Discuss on the talk page. (TW)
Line 70: Line 70:


===Media coverage===
===Media coverage===
Gabbard has received little news coverage relative to her polling position.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.axios.com/andrew-yang-2020-media-attention-acc2652a-e43b-45fb-8e88-42e606ab0be8.html|title=Andrew Yang gets media cold shoulder|last=Rothschild|first=Neal|last2=Fischer|first2=Sara|date=September 3, 2019|website=Axios|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031222316/https://www.axios.com/andrew-yang-2020-media-attention-acc2652a-e43b-45fb-8e88-42e606ab0be8.html|archive-date=2019-10-31|access-date=2019-10-10}} </ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/elections/democratic-polls.html|title=Which Democrats Are Leading the 2020 Presidential Race?|date=January 31, 2020|publisher=[[New York Times]]|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200131191335/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/elections/democratic-polls.html|archive-date=2020-01-31||access-date=2020-01-31}} </ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/warren-has-recently-been-mentioned-more-on-fox-news-than-other-networks/|title=Warren Has Recently Been Mentioned More On Fox News Than Other Networks |last=Mehta|first=Dhrumil|date=October 14, 2019|website=fivethirtyeight.com|language=en|access-date=2020-01-31}} </ref>
In addition, much of the coverage her campaign has received has been negative. In May 2019, Rolling Stone's [[Matt Taibbi]] stated, "we have hit a new low in campaign hit pieces" after critical coverage of Gabbard's campaign in The Daily Beast, CNN and Politico.<ref>{{cite news|last=Taibbi|first=Matt| url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/taibbi-tulsi-gabbard-bernie-sanders-trump-2020-838156|title=We've Hit a New Low in Campaign Hit Pieces|work=Rolling Stone|date=May 21, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> Following the [[2020 Democratic Party presidential debates and forums#Second debates (July 30–31, 2019)|second presidential debate]], Sky News' James Morrow stated, the media has "Russia paranoia"<ref>{{cite news |last=Morrow|first=James|url=https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6067825857001|title=Democrat elites tarring Gabbard as a "Russian stooge"|work=Sky News Australia|date=August 4, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> and [[A.B. Stoddard]], the associate editor of Real Clear Politics described the situation as "there are serious knives out for Tulsi Gabbard".<ref>{{cite news|last=Keilar|first=Brianna|url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1908/01/crn.02.html|title=Gabbard Confronted On Syria And Remarks About Assad|work=CNN|date=August 1, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref>
In addition, much of the coverage her campaign has received has been negative. In May 2019, Rolling Stone's [[Matt Taibbi]] stated, "we have hit a new low in campaign hit pieces" after critical coverage of Gabbard's campaign in The Daily Beast, CNN and Politico.<ref>{{cite news|last=Taibbi|first=Matt| url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/taibbi-tulsi-gabbard-bernie-sanders-trump-2020-838156|title=We've Hit a New Low in Campaign Hit Pieces|work=Rolling Stone|date=May 21, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> Following the [[2020 Democratic Party presidential debates and forums#Second debates (July 30–31, 2019)|second presidential debate]], Sky News' James Morrow stated, the media has "Russia paranoia"<ref>{{cite news |last=Morrow|first=James|url=https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6067825857001|title=Democrat elites tarring Gabbard as a "Russian stooge"|work=Sky News Australia|date=August 4, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> and [[A.B. Stoddard]], the associate editor of Real Clear Politics described the situation as "there are serious knives out for Tulsi Gabbard".<ref>{{cite news|last=Keilar|first=Brianna|url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1908/01/crn.02.html|title=Gabbard Confronted On Syria And Remarks About Assad|work=CNN|date=August 1, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref>


Line 77: Line 76:
In 2019, [[Cecily Strong]] played Gabbard on [[Saturday Night Live]], during the [[2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries]].
In 2019, [[Cecily Strong]] played Gabbard on [[Saturday Night Live]], during the [[2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries]].


A December 23 [[Democratic National Committee|DNC]] fund-raising video left out Tulsi Gabbard, sparking a "Where's Tulsi?" tweet by [[Andrew Yang 2020 presidential campaign|Andrew Yang]]. The tweet was deleted when Yang found out Gabbard had not yet qualified for the January debate, although it does feature [[Michael Bloomberg 2020 presidential campaign|Mike Blomberg]] and [[Deval Patrick]]. [[Julian Castro 2020 presidential campaign|Julian Castro]] was also left off the video. The DNC has not explained its criteria for inclusion.<ref>{{cite web|website=The Hill |title=Yang asks 'Where's Tulsi?' after video of Democratic candidates leaves her out|author=JOHN BOWDEN|date=Dec 24, 2019 |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/475887-yang-asks-wheres-tulsi-after-video-of-dem-candidates-leaves-her-out}}</ref>
A December 23 [[Democratic National Committee|DNC]] fund-raising video left out Tulsi Gabbard, sparking a "Where's Tulsi?" tweet by [[Andrew Yang 2020 presidential campaign|Andrew Yang]]. The tweet was deleted when Yang found out Gabbard had not yet qualified for the January debate, although it does feature [[Michael Bloomberg 2020 presidential campaign|Mike Blomberg]] and [[Deval Patrick]]. [[Julian Castro 2020 presidential campaign|Julian Castro]] was also left off the video. The DNC has not explained its criteria for inclusion.<ref>{{cite web|website=The Hill |title=Yang asks 'Where's Tulsi?' after video of Democratic candidates leaves her out|author=JOHN BOWDEN|date=Dec 24, 2019 |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/475887-yang-asks-wheres-tulsi-after-video-of-dem-candidates-leaves-her-out?fbclid=IwAR1mUTNUrbfm2CLY9v0mXxgw_Eg4o-VsDfb4BzSVEVs5651PrnADHi-hIU4}}</ref>

In January 2020, [[CNN]] was criticized for "snubbing" Gabbard when CNN invited candidate [[Deval Patrick]] to their town halls leading up to the New Hampshire primary but did not invite Gabbard, although Gabbard polls at 4.8 percent on average in the first primary state and Patrick polls at 0 percent.<ref>{{cite web|website=The Hill |title=CNN's blatant and bizarre Tulsi Gabbard snub|first=Joe|last=Concha|date=January 31, 2020|access-date=January 31, 2020 |url=https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/480788-cnns-blatant-and-bizarre-tulsi-gabbard-snub}}</ref>


===Polling===
===Polling===
Line 94: Line 91:
On the day Gabbard held her [[#Launch|campaign launch]] event, NBC reported that "the main English-language news sites employed by Russia in its 2016 election meddling shows Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii ... has become a favorite of the sites Moscow used when it interfered in 2016."<ref>{{cite news |last=Haltiwanger|first=John|title=Tulsi Gabbard accuses NBC of trying to smear her as 'Kremlin stooge' to 'discredit' her 2020 campaign |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/tulsi-gabbard-lashes-out-at-nbc-over-russia-propaganda-report-2019-2 |work=Business Insider |date=February 4, 2019}}</ref> In October 2019, ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported that "an independent analysis of the Russian news media found that [[RT (TV network)|RT]], the Kremlin-backed news agency, mentioned Gabbard frequently for a candidate polling in single digits, according to data collected by the [[Alliance for Securing Democracy]]."<ref>{{cite news |first=Lisa |last=Lerer |date=October 12, 2019 |title=What, Exactly, Is Tulsi Gabbard Up To? |work=New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/us/politics/tulsi-gabbard.html }}</ref>
On the day Gabbard held her [[#Launch|campaign launch]] event, NBC reported that "the main English-language news sites employed by Russia in its 2016 election meddling shows Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii ... has become a favorite of the sites Moscow used when it interfered in 2016."<ref>{{cite news |last=Haltiwanger|first=John|title=Tulsi Gabbard accuses NBC of trying to smear her as 'Kremlin stooge' to 'discredit' her 2020 campaign |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/tulsi-gabbard-lashes-out-at-nbc-over-russia-propaganda-report-2019-2 |work=Business Insider |date=February 4, 2019}}</ref> In October 2019, ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported that "an independent analysis of the Russian news media found that [[RT (TV network)|RT]], the Kremlin-backed news agency, mentioned Gabbard frequently for a candidate polling in single digits, according to data collected by the [[Alliance for Securing Democracy]]."<ref>{{cite news |first=Lisa |last=Lerer |date=October 12, 2019 |title=What, Exactly, Is Tulsi Gabbard Up To? |work=New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/us/politics/tulsi-gabbard.html }}</ref>


On October 18, 2019, [[Hillary Clinton]] was reported to have said that Russia was "grooming" a female Democrat to run as a [[Third party (United States)|third-party]] candidate who would help President Trump win reelection by a [[spoiler effect]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/hillary-clinton-says-russia-grooming-3rd-party-candidate-u-s-n1068786|title=Hillary Clinton suggests Republicans are grooming Tulsi Gabbard for third-party run |author1=Dareh Gregorian|author2=Monica Alba|author3=Maura Barrett |date=October 24, 2019 |work=[[NBC News]]|access-date=January 7, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/18/hillary-clinton-suggests-putin-has-kompromat-trump-russians-will-back-tulsi-gabbard-third-party-bid/ |title=Hillary Clinton suggests Putin has kompromat on Trump, Russia will back Tulsi Gabbard third-party bid |last=Blake |first=Aaron |date=October 19, 2019 |work=Washington Post |access-date=October 19, 2019 |quote=Clinton did not provide any evidence for her claim}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/18/hillary-clinton-hints-russia-is-grooming-tulsi-gabbard-as-third-party-candidate |title=Hillary Clinton hints Russia is grooming Tulsi Gabbard as third-party candidate |last=Joan |first=Greve |date=October 19, 2019 |website= |publisher=The Guardian |access-date=October 19, 2019 |quote=...the former secretary of state told David Plouffe in his "Campaign HQ" podcast without providing evidence.}}</ref> An aide to Clinton confirmed that Clinton was referring to Gabbard,<ref>{{cite tweet |author=[[CBS Evening News]] |user=CBSEveningNews |number=1185367390089035776 |date=October 18, 2019 |title="Hillary Clinton did not mention Tulsi Gabbard by name, but an aide confirms that's that who she was talking about when she made this stunning claim that the Russians had already hit on a way to meddle in the 2020 election...," @nancycordes reports https://cbsn.ws/32v9W9E |access-date=October 23, 2019}}{{Better source|date=January 2020}}</ref> who has repeatedly said that she would not run as a third-party candidate.<ref>{{cite news |title=Hillary Clinton says Russians are 'grooming' a 2020 candidate for third-party run |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-russians-grooming-2020-candidate-party-run/story?id=66371944 |work=ABC News |date=October 18, 2019|quote=Gabbard has previously said on multiple occasions that she will not run as a third-party candidate should she fail to net the Democratic presidential nomination.}}</ref><ref>{{cite AV media | date = October 19, 2019 | title = Stein says Clinton promoting 'unhinged conspiracy theory' | url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oFSSWRJ2Yo|publisher=CNN | via = [[YouTube]]}}</ref> Gabbard thanked Clinton on Twitter for "com[ing] out from behind the curtain" of what she called "a concerted campaign to destroy [her] reputation".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/18/hillary-clinton-suggests-putin-has-kompromat-trump-russians-will-back-tulsi-gabbard-third-party-bid|title=Hillary Clinton suggests Putin has kompromat on Trump, Russia will back Tulsi Gabbard third-party bid|last=Blake|first=Aaron|date=2019-10-18|work=Washington Post|access-date=2019-10-18}}</ref> Fellow 2020 candidate [[Marianne Williamson]]<ref>{{cite tweet |author=Marianne Williamson|user=marwilliamson |number=1185407428248006657 |date=October 18, 2019 |title=The Democratic establishment has got to stop smearing women it finds inconvenient! The character assassination of women who don’t toe the party line will backfire. Stay strong @TulsiGabbard . You deserve respect and you have mine. |access-date=October 23, 2019}}</ref> spoke out in defense of Gabbard later that day; followed on the 19<sup>th</sup> by [[Beto O'Rourke]]<ref>{{cite web |last1=Larsen |first1=Emily |title=Beto O'Rourke defends Tulsi Gabbard against Hillary Clinton's Russian grooming claim |url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/beto-orourke-defends-tulsi-gabbard-against-hillary-clintons-russian-grooming-claim |website=Washington Examiner |accessdate=January 11, 2020 |date=October 20, 2019}}</ref> and [[Andrew Yang]];<ref>{{cite tweet |author=Andrew Yang|user=AndrewYang |number=1185371843957526528 |date=October 18, 2019 |title=Tulsi Gabbard deserves much more respect and thanks than this. She literally just got back from serving our country abroad. |access-date=January 11, 2019}}</ref> on the 20<sup>th</sup> by [[Pete Buttigieg]];<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/20/politics/pete-buttigieg-tulsi-gabbard-russia-cnntv/index.html|title=Pete Buttigieg dismisses claim that Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset'|last=Duster|first=Chandelis|date=|website=CNN|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2019-10-23}}</ref> and on the 21<sup>st</sup> by [[John Delaney (Maryland politician)|John Delaney]],<ref>{{cite tweet|author=The Hill |user=thehill |number=1186297128248852482|title=.@JohnDelaney: "@TulsiGabbard is a friend of mine. We came into Congress together in 2012, so I consider Tulsi to be a very good friend. As best I can tell there's absolutely no basis for any of those allegations."|date=October 21, 2019|access-date=October 23, 2019}}{{Better source|date=January 2020}}</ref> [[Bernie Sanders]],<ref>{{cite web |last1=Zhao |first1=Christina |title=Bernie Sanders becomes latest 2020 candidate to defend Tulsi Gabbard over Russia accusation: Here are the others |url=https://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-becomes-latest-2020-candidate-defend-tulsi-gabbard-over-russia-accusation-here-are-1466818 |website=Newsweek |accessdate=January 11, 2020 |date=October 21, 2019}}</ref> and [[Mike Gravel]].<ref>{{cite tweet |author=Mike Gravel |user=mikegravel |number=1186476769613733888 |date=October 21, 2019 |title=Say whatever you will about Tulsi's stances on the issues. To suggest that a soldier who put her life on the line—a lot more than Hillary Clinton has ever done for the fucking country!—is committing treason is an absolute disgrace. Not that we should expect more from Hillary.|access-date=January 11, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191022180056/https:/twitter.com/mikegravel/status/1186476769613733888 |archive-date=October 22, 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref>
On October 18, 2019, [[Hillary Clinton]] was reported to have said that Russia was "grooming" a female Democrat to run as a [[Third party (United States)|third-party]] candidate who would help President Trump win reelection by a [[spoiler effect]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/hillary-clinton-says-russia-grooming-3rd-party-candidate-u-s-n1068786|title=Hillary Clinton suggests Republicans are grooming Tulsi Gabbard for third-party run |author1=Dareh Gregorian|author2=Monica Alba|author3=Maura Barrett |date=October 24, 2019 |work=[[NBC News]]|access-date=January 7, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/18/hillary-clinton-suggests-putin-has-kompromat-trump-russians-will-back-tulsi-gabbard-third-party-bid/ |title=Hillary Clinton suggests Putin has kompromat on Trump, Russia will back Tulsi Gabbard third-party bid |last=Blake |first=Aaron |date=October 19, 2019 |work=Washington Post |access-date=October 19, 2019 |quote=Clinton did not provide any evidence for her claim}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/18/hillary-clinton-hints-russia-is-grooming-tulsi-gabbard-as-third-party-candidate |title=Hillary Clinton hints Russia is grooming Tulsi Gabbard as third-party candidate |last=Joan |first=Greve |date=October 19, 2019 |website= |publisher=The Guardian |access-date=October 19, 2019 |quote=...the former secretary of state told David Plouffe in his "Campaign HQ" podcast without providing evidence.}}</ref> Gabbard thanked Clinton on Twitter for "com[ing] out from behind the curtain" of what she called "a concerted campaign to destroy [her] reputation".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/18/hillary-clinton-suggests-putin-has-kompromat-trump-russians-will-back-tulsi-gabbard-third-party-bid|title=Hillary Clinton suggests Putin has kompromat on Trump, Russia will back Tulsi Gabbard third-party bid|last=Blake|first=Aaron|date=2019-10-18|work=Washington Post|access-date=2019-10-18}}</ref>


After Gabbard filed a [[Gabbard v. Clinton|defamation lawsuit]] against Hillary Clinton on 22 January 2020, U.S. President [[Donald Trump]] defended Gabbard at the [[World Economic Forum]] in Davos where he said, the people who accused him of "Russian collusion" also made the "Russian asset" accusations against [[Jill Stein]] and Gabbard. President Trump said about Stein and Gabbard, "I don't know either of them, but I know they're not Russian agents." Trump called the press dishonest and corrupt and accused it of "playing in" these accusations.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Hains |first1=Tim |title=Trump: I Don't Know Tulsi Gabbard Or Jill Stein, But I Know They're Not Russian Agents |url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/01/22/trump_i_dont_know_tulsi_gabbard_or_jill_stein_but_i_know_theyre_not_russian_agents.html |publisher=RealClearPolitics |date=22 January 2020|accessdate=26 January 2020}}</ref>
After Gabbard filed a [[Gabbard v. Clinton|defamation lawsuit]] against Hillary Clinton on 22 January 2020, U.S. President [[Donald Trump]] defended Gabbard at the [[World Economic Forum]] in Davos where he said, the people who accused him of "Russian collusion" also made the "Russian asset" accusations against [[Jill Stein]] and Gabbard. President Trump said about Stein and Gabbard, "I don't know either of them, but I know they're not Russian agents." Trump called the press dishonest and corrupt and accused it of "playing in" these accusations.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Hains |first1=Tim |title=Trump: I Don't Know Tulsi Gabbard Or Jill Stein, But I Know They're Not Russian Agents |url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/01/22/trump_i_dont_know_tulsi_gabbard_or_jill_stein_but_i_know_theyre_not_russian_agents.html |publisher=RealClearPolitics |date=22 January 2020|accessdate=26 January 2020}}</ref>

====Campaign advertisement defacing====
Some of Gabbard's campaign advertisement signs were target of [[Vandalism#Political|political vandalism]] in New Hampshire when unknown persons defaced signs by gluing the [[Hammer and sickle|hammer and sickle]] symbol from the national flag of [[Soviet Union]] onto them. Gabbard's campaign said this was "a continuation of the campaign of smears and intimidation that has been waged against Tulsi since she announced her candidacy."<ref> {{Cite web|url=https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-campaign-signs-soviet-communist-symbol-1480099|title=Tulsi Gabbard Campaign Signs Vandalized With Soviet Communist Symbol in New Hampshire|last=Crowley|first=James|date=January 2, 2020|work=Newsweek|language=en|access-date=January 10, 2020}}</ref>


====Defamation lawsuit====
====Defamation lawsuit====

On January 22, 2020, Gabbard filed a [[United States defamation law|defamation lawsuit]] against Clinton, seeking damages in excess of $50 million, after her lawyers had requested a public retraction in November 2019.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Peterson |first1=Beatrice |title=Rep. Tulsi Gabbard files defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep-tulsi-gabbard-files-defamation-lawsuit-hillary-clinton/story?id=68449011 |accessdate=January 22, 2020 |publisher=ABC News |date=January 22, 2020}}</ref> Defamation law experts are divided on Gabbard's chances of success in the lawsuit.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=Time|author=Madeleine Carlisle|date=January 23, 2020|title='A Fighting Chance': Tulsi Gabbard Could Possibly Win Her Defamation Suit Against Hillary Clinton|url=https://time.com/5769731/tulsi-gabbard-hillary-clinton-lawsuit/|quote=Legal experts are split over whether Gabbard can win the case.}}</ref> According to CNN's Dan Merica, it offers Gabbard's campaign much-needed publicity approaching the primaries.<ref>{{cite web |last1=CNN |first1=Dan Merica |title=Tulsi Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for defamation over Russia remarks |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/22/politics/tulsi-gabbard-hillary-clinton-lawsuit/index.html |website=CNN |accessdate=25 January 2020}}</ref> ''New York Mag''{{'}}s Ed Kilgore writes that the lawsuit is probably intended to score Gabbard points in the court of public opinion.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kilgore |first1=Ed |title=Tulsi Gabbard Unlikely to Win Her Defamation Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton |url=http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/01/gabbard-unlikely-to-win-defamation-suit-against-hillary.html |website=Intelligencer |publisher=New York Magazine |accessdate=25 January 2020 |language=en-us |date=22 January 2020}}</ref> On January 31, Hillary Clinton finally accepted the delivery of the legal documents of the lawsuit after she had declined accepting the document delivery three times before.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Calicchio |first1=Dom |title=Tulsi Gabbard’s $50M lawsuit against Hillary Clinton moving forward after Clinton’s lawyer accepts legal docs, attorney says |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tulsi-gabbards-50m-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-moving-forward-after-clintons-lawyer-accepts-legal-docs-attorney-says |publisher=[[Fox News]] |accessdate=31 January 2020 |language=en-us |date=31 January 2020}}</ref>
On January 22, 2020, Gabbard filed a [[United States defamation law|defamation lawsuit]] against Clinton, seeking damages in excess of $50 million, after her lawyers had requested a public retraction in November 2019.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Peterson |first1=Beatrice |title=Rep. Tulsi Gabbard files defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep-tulsi-gabbard-files-defamation-lawsuit-hillary-clinton/story?id=68449011 |accessdate=January 22, 2020 |publisher=ABC News |date=January 22, 2020}}</ref> Defamation law experts are divided on Gabbard's chances of success in the lawsuit.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=Time|author=Madeleine Carlisle|date=January 23, 2020|title='A Fighting Chance': Tulsi Gabbard Could Possibly Win Her Defamation Suit Against Hillary Clinton|url=https://time.com/5769731/tulsi-gabbard-hillary-clinton-lawsuit/|quote=Legal experts are split over whether Gabbard can win the case.}}</ref> According to CNN's Dan Merica, it offers Gabbard's campaign much-needed publicity approaching the primaries.<ref>{{cite web |last1=CNN |first1=Dan Merica |title=Tulsi Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for defamation over Russia remarks |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/22/politics/tulsi-gabbard-hillary-clinton-lawsuit/index.html |website=CNN |accessdate=25 January 2020}}</ref> ''New York Mag''{{'}}s Ed Kilgore writes that the lawsuit is probably intended to score Gabbard points in the court of public opinion.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kilgore |first1=Ed |title=Tulsi Gabbard Unlikely to Win Her Defamation Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton |url=http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/01/gabbard-unlikely-to-win-defamation-suit-against-hillary.html |website=Intelligencer |publisher=New York Magazine |accessdate=25 January 2020 |language=en-us |date=22 January 2020}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 00:52, 1 February 2020

Tulsi Gabbard 2020 presidential campaign
Campaign2020 United States presidential election (Democratic Party primaries)
CandidateTulsi Gabbard
U.S. Representative (2013–present)
Member of the Hawaii House of Representatives (2002–2004)
AffiliationDemocratic Party
StatusAnnounced: January 11, 2019
Formal launch: February 2, 2019
HeadquartersKapolei, Hawaii
Key peopleErika Tsuji (spokesperson)[1]
ReceiptsUS$9,095,132.92[2] (2019-09-30)
SloganLead with Love[3]
Website
www.tulsi2020.com
This article is part of a series about
Tulsi Gabbard
U.S. Representative
from Hawaii's 2nd district

The 2020 presidential campaign of Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. Representative for Hawaii's 2nd congressional district, began on January 11, 2019.[4] Gabbard is polling at about 1 to 2 percent.[5][6] If she were to win, she would become the first female, Hindu, and Samoan president in American history, and she would be the youngest person to ever hold the office.[7] She has made reducing military activity abroad a central message of her campaign.[8]

Gabbard speaking to the California Democratic Party State Convention in June 2019.

Background

Gabbard had been a rising figure in the Democratic Party in the lead-up to the 2016 election cycle, when she served as Vice-Chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).[9]

On October 19, 2018, Politico reported that Gabbard was "weighing a 2020 presidential bid" but would not make an announcement until after the 2018 midterm elections.[10] On December 12, 2018, Gabbard said on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews that she was "seriously considering" running for president in 2020.[11]

Democratic primary campaign

Launch

Gabbard confirmed her intention to seek the Democratic presidential nomination on January 11, 2019, in an interview with CNN's Van Jones.[4] On January 24, she formally launched her campaign by releasing a video on her website, which stated:

We have people in positions of power who are not thinking of the well being of the people and our planet. ... Every time we launch these interventionist regime change wars, it is not only our veterans who pay the price for that. Every single one of us pays the price. We have spent trillions of your taxpayer dollars to pay for these wars taking those dollars away from our communities and our people who need them at home.[12]

The following week, NBC News notified the Gabbard campaign they would be publishing a story[13] the week after her campaign kickoff rally, where NBC would assert Gabbard were supported by the "Russian propaganda machine".[14] Instead, NBC released the story two hours before her campaign kickoff in Hawaii on February 2.[13] Glenn Greenwald criticized NBC for relying on a firm that had previously tried to imitate "an elaborate 'false flag' operation" that would plant the idea that Alabama Senatorial candidate Roy Moore was being supported by a "Russian botnet".[15]

Campaign management

Shortly after the announcement, campaign manager Rania Batrice and consulting firm Revolution Messaging departed from the campaign. Politico reported that sources "familiar with the campaign" referred to Gabbard as "indecisive and impulsive".[1] Her staff though insists that the vacancy in the campaign manager position is the result of "careful deliberation, not campaign dysfunction."[16]

Debates

Further information: 2020 Democratic Party presidential debates and forums

Gabbard was the most searched for candidate on Google after both the first and second Democratic primary debates.[17] During the second debate, Gabbard pointedly criticized Kamala Harris's record as attorney general of California, accusing her of holding innocent people on death row and pointing out Harris's prosecution of marijuana crimes after admitting her own use.[18][19]

In May 2019, the DNC announced that candidates would need to have at least 130,000 individual donors and have received at least 2 percent support in four qualifying polls between June 28 and August 28 in order to qualify for the third primary debate.[20] Such polls could be national or early primary state polls, published by any of the 16 DNC-certified organizations.[21] By August 2, the campaign had met the qualifying donor threshold, but had not yet reached the polling threshold.[22]

Tulsi Gabbard poll results during qualification period for September 2019 debates of the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

On August 23, the Gabbard campaign criticized the lack of transparency in the stark drop in number of polls released by DNC-qualified polling organizations from six in the two weeks following the first debate to two in the two weeks following the second debate — where Gabbard had one of the strongest on-stage performances. (Five polls were released in the two weeks following the third debate.)

Gabbard also criticized the DNC for failure to publish their criteria for deeming certain polling organizations as “certified” and not explaining why other "very credible, recognized" polls were not "certified". She argued that the process of developing criteria for poll selection "should not be made in secret by party bosses”; that there were oddities regarding where DNC-certified polls were not taking place; and that the lack of “transparency" was creating a "lack of trust in the process".[23][24][25][26][27][28][29]

By August 26, two days before the deadline, the Gabbard campaign had exceeded the threshold on only two qualifying polls. The campaign called on the DNC to expand the selection of polls considered for qualification, noting that Gabbard had exceeded the 2 percent threshold in 24 other polls, including several from respected polling firms, that were not considered in the DNC's list.[29][30][31][32]

By September 24, Gabbard qualified for the October debate by receiving the fourth qualifying poll result at or above two percent.[33] By November 6, she qualified for the November debate by receiving the fourth qualifying poll result at or above three percent.[34]

Tulsi Gabbard poll results during qualification period for December 2019 debate of the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

On December 9, Gabbard announced she will not attend the December debate "regardless of whether or not there are qualifying polls." At the time of her announcement she had met the donors requirement and was one poll short of meeting the polling requirement for that debate.[35][36] Between the November debate and her announcement there had been no qualifying polls in the early primary states and two nationwide polls. One day before the end of the qualification period for the December debate, Boston Globe's Joe Battenfeld wrote that Gabbard and several other candidates "never had much of a chance" to qualify or the December debate because of the low number of DNC-certified polls after the November debate. Battenfeld accused the Democratic party of "meddling" in the 2020 race by deciding which polls are qualifying and by preventing lower polling candidates from speaking at television debates months before the first votes are cast.[37]

Fundraising

In mid-2017 Gabbard pledged to no longer accept money from political action committees.[38]

In the first quarter of 2019, the campaign raised $4,495,770, with $1,995,770 from individual donations and $2,500,000 transferred from Gabbard's congressional campaign.[39] The campaign has met the polling and the individual donor requirements of the DNC's qualifying criteria for participating in the June and July 2019 debates.[40]

In the second quarter, the campaign raised $1,567,204 bringing the total to $6,062,974[39] with 69 percent coming from "small dollar" donors giving $200 or less.[41]

In the third quarter, the campaign raised $3,032,159 bringing the total to $9,095,133 with 68 percent coming from "small dollar" donors giving $200 or less.[39][42] The campaign has met DNC's 200,000 individual donors qualifying criterion for participating in the December 2019 debate.[35]

In the fourth quarter, the campaign raised $3.4 million.[43]

By 26 January 2020, the campaign has met DNC's 225,000 individual donors qualifying criterion for participating in the February 2020 debate.[44]

Lawsuit against Google

On July 27, 2019, Tulsi Now Inc. filed a lawsuit against Google alleging that the internet company suspended, for no proper cause, the campaign's Google Ads account for several hours after the first primary debate. Gabbard declared: "Google plays favorites, with no warning, no transparency — an accountability (until now)."[45] The lawsuit contends that Google had treated the campaign's mail differently than it treated other campaigns' mail and seeks "an injunction against Google from further meddling in the election and damages of at least $50 million."[46]

Media coverage

In addition, much of the coverage her campaign has received has been negative. In May 2019, Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi stated, "we have hit a new low in campaign hit pieces" after critical coverage of Gabbard's campaign in The Daily Beast, CNN and Politico.[47] Following the second presidential debate, Sky News' James Morrow stated, the media has "Russia paranoia"[48] and A.B. Stoddard, the associate editor of Real Clear Politics described the situation as "there are serious knives out for Tulsi Gabbard".[49]

In September 2019, Vanity Fair summarized the media coverage of Gabbard's presidential campaign as "the press hates Gabbard even more than it hates Sanders".[50] The Hill's news anchor Krystal Ball and Chief Washington Correspondent Saagar Enjeti both describe Gabbard as "the most unfairly maligned person in Washington".[51] Lexico-statistical analysis confirmed that she received the most negative coverage during the June-September period.[52]

In 2019, Cecily Strong played Gabbard on Saturday Night Live, during the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries.

A December 23 DNC fund-raising video left out Tulsi Gabbard, sparking a "Where's Tulsi?" tweet by Andrew Yang. The tweet was deleted when Yang found out Gabbard had not yet qualified for the January debate, although it does feature Mike Blomberg and Deval Patrick. Julian Castro was also left off the video. The DNC has not explained its criteria for inclusion.[53]

Polling

Tulsi Gabbard poll results during qualification period for February 2020 debate of the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

Gabbard has polled in single digits in national polls. Gabbard has polled at 1 percent in several major polls.[54][55][56] In a poll conducted between July 9 and 18 of registered Democrats in New Hampshire, Gabbard and former Representative Beto O'Rourke were tied in sixth place at 2 percent.[57] On August 23, 2019, Gabbard's campaign stated that she had received 2 percent or more in 26 national and statewide polls, but only two of the polls were certified by the DNC.[58]

On August 19, 2019, Gabbard garnered 4.8 percent of the Iowa State Fair Straw Poll, placing 7th in a field of 24.[59][60][61]

Gabbard received 4 percent in the early primary states subset of two non-qualifying Morning Consult national polls from August 25 [62] and September 1.[63][64] On September 4 she received 1 percent in the same states in qualifying polls sponsored by CBS News.

Tulsi Gabbard poll results in New Hampshire

Between the debates of July 31 and September 12, Gabbard's polling results in the early primary state New Hampshire were 1 percent in one qualifying poll and an average of 4.6 percent in five non-qualifying polls. Gabbard, who did not qualify for the September debate, received 5 percent in an August 6 poll from Gravis Marketing[65] and 6 percent in polls from Emerson College on September 9 [66][67] and HarrisX on September 11, thereby reaching the 4th place in the "Granite state".[68][69] Professor Spencer Kimball, Director of Emerson College Polling, said he is "not surprised" about Gabbard's rise to 6 percent in the poll because his polling institute has been watching Gabbard "slowly building her support for awhile". Kimball added, Gabbard's military service "likely resonates with a strong military tradition" among New Hampshire voters.[66] A large majority of her supporters are male.[70] By November 27, Gabbard held the fifth position in New Hampshire with 5.0 percent in the RealClearPolitics polling average.[71]

"Russian asset" accusations

On the day Gabbard held her campaign launch event, NBC reported that "the main English-language news sites employed by Russia in its 2016 election meddling shows Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii ... has become a favorite of the sites Moscow used when it interfered in 2016."[72] In October 2019, The New York Times reported that "an independent analysis of the Russian news media found that RT, the Kremlin-backed news agency, mentioned Gabbard frequently for a candidate polling in single digits, according to data collected by the Alliance for Securing Democracy."[73]

On October 18, 2019, Hillary Clinton was reported to have said that Russia was "grooming" a female Democrat to run as a third-party candidate who would help President Trump win reelection by a spoiler effect.[74][75][76] Gabbard thanked Clinton on Twitter for "com[ing] out from behind the curtain" of what she called "a concerted campaign to destroy [her] reputation".[77]

After Gabbard filed a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton on 22 January 2020, U.S. President Donald Trump defended Gabbard at the World Economic Forum in Davos where he said, the people who accused him of "Russian collusion" also made the "Russian asset" accusations against Jill Stein and Gabbard. President Trump said about Stein and Gabbard, "I don't know either of them, but I know they're not Russian agents." Trump called the press dishonest and corrupt and accused it of "playing in" these accusations.[78]

Defamation lawsuit

On January 22, 2020, Gabbard filed a defamation lawsuit against Clinton, seeking damages in excess of $50 million, after her lawyers had requested a public retraction in November 2019.[79] Defamation law experts are divided on Gabbard's chances of success in the lawsuit.[80] According to CNN's Dan Merica, it offers Gabbard's campaign much-needed publicity approaching the primaries.[81] New York Mag's Ed Kilgore writes that the lawsuit is probably intended to score Gabbard points in the court of public opinion.[82]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Strauss, Daniel; Thompson, Alex (January 29, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard campaign in disarray". Politico.
  2. ^ https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00693713/
  3. ^ DeRensis, Hunter (January 14, 2019). "Are the Democrats ready for Tulsi Gabbard?". The National Interest. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
  4. ^ a b Kelly, Caroline. "Rep. Gabbard says she will run for president in 2020". CNN. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
  5. ^ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-and-sanders-are-breaking-away-from-the-pack-of-candidates-among-democrats-nationwide-washington-post-abc-news-poll-finds/2020/01/25/068ca9b8-3eef-11ea-baca-eb7ace0a3455_story.html
  6. ^ https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/480721-bloomberg-surges-past-warren-into-third-place-in-new-national-poll
  7. ^ Astor, Maggie (January 11, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard, Representative From Hawaii, Announces Democratic Presidential Bid". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  8. ^ Dovere, Edward-Isaac (September 5, 2019). "The Enduring Mystery of Tulsi Gabbard". The Atlantic. Retrieved November 19, 2019.
  9. ^ Alcindor, Yamiche (February 28, 2016). "Tulsi Gabbard, Rising Democratic Star, Endorses Bernie Sanders". The New York Times. Retrieved January 12, 2019.
  10. ^ Thompson, Alex (October 19, 2018). "Tulsi Gabbard weighing 2020 presidential bid". POLITICO. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  11. ^ MSNBC, Tulsi Gabbard: "I'm Seriously Considering" Running For President | Hardball | MSNBC, retrieved December 17, 2018
  12. ^ McAvoy, Audrey (January 24, 2019). "Hawaii's Gabbard formally launches campaign for president". Associated Press. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  13. ^ a b Taibbi, Matt (August 9, 2019). "Who's Afraid of Tulsi Gabbard?". Rolling Stone. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  14. ^ Windrem, Robert; Popken, Ben (February 2, 2019). "Russia's propaganda machine discovers 2020 Democratic candidate Tulsi Gabbard". NBC News. Retrieved August 15, 2019.
  15. ^ Greenwald, Glenn (February 3, 2019). "NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party". The Intercept. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  16. ^ Wang, Amy B (July 28, 2019). "'A different type of vibe': What does Tulsi Gabbard's 2020 run say about America?". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 13, 2019.
  17. ^ Cummings, William (August 1, 2019). "Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is again the most-searched candidate on Google during Democratic debate". USA Today. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  18. ^ Flynn, Meagan (August 1, 2019). "'You owe them an apology': Gabbard's attack highlights Harris's complex death penalty record". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  19. ^ Greenwood, Max; Easley, Jonathan (August 4, 2019). "Harris shows she can take debate punch after Gabbard attack". The Hill. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  20. ^ Epstein, Reid J. (August 28, 2019). "Democratic Candidates Jostle, and Gripe, as Debates Winnow the Field". The New York Times. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  21. ^ Prokop, Andrew (August 29, 2019). "Here's the finalized lineup for the September Democratic debate". Vox. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  22. ^ Axelrod, Tal (August 2, 2019). "Gabbard reaches donor threshold for September debate". The Hill. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  23. ^ "Tulsi Gabbard's campaign wants the DNC to change debate qualifying poll requirements - Politics News - ABC News Radio". abcnewsradioonline.com. August 23, 2019. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  24. ^ Spangler, Todd; Aschbrenner, Annah. "As debate lineup solidifies, some 2020 Democrats cry foul over polling requirements". TheStarPress. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  25. ^ Prince, Molly (August 23, 2019). "Tulsi's 2020 Campaign Urges DNC To Adjust Debate Criteria As She Sits Just Shy Of Qualifying | Daily Wire". www.dailywire.com. Retrieved September 2, 2019.[better source needed]
  26. ^ Aschbrenner, Annah; Wu, Nicholas (August 29, 2019). "Lineup cut in half: Here's who made the third Democratic presidential debate". USA TODAY. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  27. ^ "Gabbard campaign wants more transparency in Dem debate requirements – Indica News". indicanews.com. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  28. ^ Santucci, Jeanine (August 29, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard tells Fox News host Tucker Carlson that DNC debate criteria isn't transparent". USA Today. Retrieved August 29, 2019.
  29. ^ a b Gabbard, Tulsi (August 23, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard's Campaign Calls On the DNC to Ensure Fairness and Transparency in Debate Requirements". Politico. Retrieved August 30, 2019.
  30. ^ Skelley, Geoffrey (August 26, 2019). "Here's Who's Qualified For The Third Democratic Debate". Fivethirtyeight.com. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  31. ^ McLaughlin, Seth (August 26, 2019). "Rep. Tulsi Gabbard knocks DNC over debate qualifying rules". Washington Times. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
  32. ^ Jha, Ritu (August 26, 2019). "Gabbard campaign wants more transparency in Dem debate requirements". Indica News. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
  33. ^ Stevens, Matt (September 24, 2019). "There Are Now 12 Candidates in the Next Democratic Debate". New York Times. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
  34. ^ Montellaro, Zach (November 6, 2019). "Gabbard and Klobuchar hit debate polling thresholds". Politico. Retrieved November 6, 2019.
  35. ^ a b Behrmann, Savannah (December 10, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard says she will skip the December Democratic debate". USA Today. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
  36. ^ Ball, Krystal; Enjeti, Saagar (December 10, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard reacts to Afghanistan report, calls out Pete's McKinsey work". The Hill. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
  37. ^ Battenfeld, Joe (December 11, 2019). "Battenfeld: Democratic National Committee needs to practice a little diversity". The Boston Globe. Retrieved December 12, 2019.
  38. ^ Ahmed, Akbar Shahid (January 31, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard Claims Anti-War Credentials After Accepting Over $100,000 From Arms Dealers". Huffington Post. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  39. ^ a b c "GABBARD, TULSI Candidate for President ID: P00009183". Federal Election Commission. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  40. ^ Strauss, Daniel; Montellaro, Zach (May 24, 2019). "Jay Inslee hits 65,000-donor threshold to make the Democratic debates". Politico. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  41. ^ "In 2020 Democratic Fund-Raising, Five Candidates Stand Out". New York Times. July 16, 2019. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  42. ^ McMinn, Sean; Hurt, Alyson (October 16, 2019). "Tracking The Money Race Behind The Presidential Campaign". National Public Radio. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  43. ^ Montellaro, Zach (January 2, 2020). "Gabbard raises $3.4 million but lags behind 2020 frontrunners". Politico. Retrieved January 2, 2020.
  44. ^ Jester, Julia (January 26, 2020). "With today's plethora of polls, @AndrewYang becomes the 7th candidate to make it onto the February DNC debate stage in #FITN New Hampshire. @TulsiGabbard now has 2 of 4 qualifying polls — her campaign confirms to @NBCNews that Gabbard has reached the 225k unique donor threshold". NBC News. Retrieved January 29, 2020.
  45. ^ Patrick, Kate (July 31, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard sues Google for $50M over censorship claims". The Times. Retrieved August 30, 2019.
  46. ^ Daisuke Wakabayashi (July 25, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard, Democratic Presidential Candidate, Sues Google for $50 Million". New York Times. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  47. ^ Taibbi, Matt (May 21, 2019). "We've Hit a New Low in Campaign Hit Pieces". Rolling Stone. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  48. ^ Morrow, James (August 4, 2019). "Democrat elites tarring Gabbard as a "Russian stooge"". Sky News Australia. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  49. ^ Keilar, Brianna (August 1, 2019). "Gabbard Confronted On Syria And Remarks About Assad". CNN. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  50. ^ Frank, T.A. (September 20, 2019). "Veepstakes 2020: Which Democrats Are Secretly Running for Second Place?". Vanity Fair. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
  51. ^ Ball, Krystal; Enjeti, Saagar (September 26, 2019). "Saagar Enjeti: Tulsi's outstanding answer on identity politics". The Hill. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
  52. ^ Bajak, Aleszu (September 30, 2019), Gabbard, Booker and Biden get most negative media coverage over last four months, Storybench
  53. ^ JOHN BOWDEN (December 24, 2019). "Yang asks 'Where's Tulsi?' after video of Democratic candidates leaves her out". The Hill.
  54. ^ Blair, Chad (May 22, 2019). "Gabbard Continues To Poll Poorly In Presidential Field". Honolulu Civil Beat. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  55. ^ "2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination". RealClear Politics. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  56. ^ Gasparino, Charles; Moynihan, Lydia (May 24, 2019). "Biden, Buttigieg, Gabbard hit Wall Street for money despite class warfare rhetoric". Fox Business. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  57. ^ Rodrigo, Chris Mills (July 21, 2019). "New CBS poll shows Biden with 7-point lead in New Hampshire". The Hill.
  58. ^ "Tulsi Gabbard's campaign wants the DNC to change debate qualifying poll requirements". ABC News Radio. August 23, 2019. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  59. ^ Lynch, James (August 19, 2019). "Biden edges Warren in Iowa State Fair straw poll". The Gazette. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  60. ^ Lynch, James (August 19, 2019). "Biden edges Warren in Iowa State Fair poll". The Courier. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  61. ^ Howell, Michael (August 19, 2019). "Biden narrowly beats out Warren in State Fair Straw Poll". CBS 2. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  62. ^ "Political Intelligence" (PDF). Morning Consult. August 26, 2019. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  63. ^ Griffiths, Shawn (September 4, 2019). "4 Important Take Aways from the IVN 2020 Presidential Survey". Independent Voter News. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  64. ^ "Political Intelligence" (PDF). Morning Consult. September 3, 2019. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  65. ^ Halaschak, Zachary (August 13, 2019). "Sanders leads Biden in New Hampshire poll". Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  66. ^ a b Graham, Michael (September 10, 2019). "Warren Surges, Sanders Sags in Latest Granite State Poll". NH Journal. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  67. ^ Kimball, Spencer (September 10, 2019). "Sanders Slips in New Hampshire; Biden, Warren Take Lead". Emerson Polling. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  68. ^ DiStaso, John (September 12, 2019). "NH Primary Source: Poll for No Labels group shows Biden, Sanders tied in NH". WMUR. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  69. ^ Nawaz, Amna; Desjardins, Lisa (September 12, 2019). "What's at stake for the 10 candidates in the 3rd Democratic debate". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
  70. ^ Skelley, Geoffrey (November 12, 2019). "What We Know About Tulsi Gabbard's Base". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved November 19, 2019.
  71. ^ Pramuk, Jacob (November 27, 2019). "Latest 2020 Democratic primary polls show Buttigieg surge in Iowa and New Hampshire, and Biden lead in Nevada and South Carolina". CNBC. Retrieved November 27, 2019.
  72. ^ Haltiwanger, John (February 4, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard accuses NBC of trying to smear her as 'Kremlin stooge' to 'discredit' her 2020 campaign". Business Insider.
  73. ^ Lerer, Lisa (October 12, 2019). "What, Exactly, Is Tulsi Gabbard Up To?". New York Times.
  74. ^ Dareh Gregorian; Monica Alba; Maura Barrett (October 24, 2019). "Hillary Clinton suggests Republicans are grooming Tulsi Gabbard for third-party run". NBC News. Retrieved January 7, 2020.
  75. ^ Blake, Aaron (October 19, 2019). "Hillary Clinton suggests Putin has kompromat on Trump, Russia will back Tulsi Gabbard third-party bid". Washington Post. Retrieved October 19, 2019. Clinton did not provide any evidence for her claim
  76. ^ Joan, Greve (October 19, 2019). "Hillary Clinton hints Russia is grooming Tulsi Gabbard as third-party candidate". The Guardian. Retrieved October 19, 2019. ...the former secretary of state told David Plouffe in his "Campaign HQ" podcast without providing evidence.
  77. ^ Blake, Aaron (October 18, 2019). "Hillary Clinton suggests Putin has kompromat on Trump, Russia will back Tulsi Gabbard third-party bid". Washington Post. Retrieved October 18, 2019.
  78. ^ Hains, Tim (January 22, 2020). "Trump: I Don't Know Tulsi Gabbard Or Jill Stein, But I Know They're Not Russian Agents". RealClearPolitics. Retrieved January 26, 2020.
  79. ^ Peterson, Beatrice (January 22, 2020). "Rep. Tulsi Gabbard files defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton". ABC News. Retrieved January 22, 2020.
  80. ^ Madeleine Carlisle (January 23, 2020). "'A Fighting Chance': Tulsi Gabbard Could Possibly Win Her Defamation Suit Against Hillary Clinton". Time. Legal experts are split over whether Gabbard can win the case.
  81. ^ CNN, Dan Merica. "Tulsi Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for defamation over Russia remarks". CNN. Retrieved January 25, 2020. {{cite web}}: |last1= has generic name (help)
  82. ^ Kilgore, Ed (January 22, 2020). "Tulsi Gabbard Unlikely to Win Her Defamation Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton". Intelligencer. New York Magazine. Retrieved January 25, 2020.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tulsi Gabbard presidential campaign, 2020.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tulsi_Gabbard_2020_presidential_campaign&oldid=938571339"