User:Novalis69: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hello. Please leave |
*Hello there. Please leave your messages on my [[User_talk:Novalis69|talk page]]. Thank you. |
||
*Bonjour-là. Veuillez laisser vos messages sur ma [[User_talk:Novalis69|page de dicussion]]. Mèsi an pil. |
|||
*Servus Leute. Bitte hinterlassen Sie Ihre Nachrichten auf meiner [[User_talk:Novalis69|Diskussionsseite]]. Dank u. |
|||
As far as my name is concerned, 69 refers to my year of birth (1969); "Novalis" is a tribute to my parents: my mother is a German-speaking Alsatian Jew, my father a Creole-speaking Haitian. |
|||
Hello, if you have carefully read all of my contributions on the talk pages, then you will have noticed that my initial comments emphasize the mechanical concerns of articles, call attention to useless comments, and occasional responses to hypersensitive people who take critiques too personally; your characterization is distorted. Since you self-identify as an expert, then I will take the time to explain my misgivings, such as: |
|||
(1) The etymology of "creole." It is derived from the Spanish and Portuguese "criado," or (literally "raised"), indicating a dependent of an affluent household (socially considered "minors"), suggesting the lower social status of those born in the Americas, because it was argued that the American climates negatively affected the physical and intellectual condition of those born there (yes it sounds irrational). The term "creole" applied to ALL American-born non-natives, including Africans until the nineteenth century, so the European-creole elision is retroactive essentialism. |
|||
(2) Under "Recognition and renaissance," what are the sources of your assertion? |
|||
(3) Same question for the first paragraph of the section "Substrate and superstrate"---for those of us who are unfamiliar with these terms (such as I), it would be helpful to more clearly explain these terms, and since it ISN'T common knowledge, then citations are needed. |
|||
(4) The first paragraph of the section "Shared features" is inconsistent in its citations; the first sentence contains weasel words and needs to be substantiated. |
|||
(5) The section "Gradualist and developmental hypotheses" is also inconsistent in its citations. |
|||
I stand by my tag requesting more verification and sources, and will re-insert it. The citations that are given are fine, but again, since you self-identify as an expert, I would suggest that you keep in mind the (inexpert) general audience that would appreciate more careful citations and brief, cogent definitions of the specialized vocabulary. I the future, I will enter suggestions in the talk page before I insert tags. Kemet 14:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:23, 28 August 2014
- Hello there. Please leave your messages on my talk page. Thank you.
- Bonjour-là. Veuillez laisser vos messages sur ma page de dicussion. Mèsi an pil.
- Servus Leute. Bitte hinterlassen Sie Ihre Nachrichten auf meiner Diskussionsseite. Dank u.
As far as my name is concerned, 69 refers to my year of birth (1969); "Novalis" is a tribute to my parents: my mother is a German-speaking Alsatian Jew, my father a Creole-speaking Haitian.