Jump to content

User talk:98.220.43.195: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on New Order. (TW)
Line 38: Line 38:


please see
please see

== July 2009 ==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:New Order|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:New Order]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:JD554|JD554]] ([[User talk:JD554|talk]]) 06:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''

Revision as of 06:48, 6 July 2009

You should think about doing a page for Jay like I did for Michael. Maybe we could mirror the layout of the pages since they are twins. I still need to add birthdate, place of birth, etc. to Michael's page. --Ghost (talk) 12:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out at christian death. It's got a long way to go, but it's great to see somebody helping out. — Werdna talk 13:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 98, Thanks for your message on my talkpage and sorry for the delay in responding. Judging by what followed on Valorkaend's talkpage, it doesn't seem like you needed any help, really! Well done to get such a civil conversation going :-) It is always the best way to edit.

My personal advice, and for what it is worth I will repeat this on multiple pages, is to do an exhaustive search for reliable third party sources (newspaper and magazine articles, books etc), to add references to every single statement in the article that you can source and to delete anything that you cannot find in them. I know that User:J Readings has offered to help in this. This way 'rumours' and other Original research can be cleaned out, and the encyclopedia entry fair and balanced according to the sources that are out there. For example, the Black Death and youtube video thing would, I bet, either be easily sourced or not in the article. --Slp1 (talk) 13:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


???

What is going on at the GLJ page? I haven't checked in for awhile and I just looked and saw all of the recent edits!! Who is Bennysara?--Ghost (talk) 15:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know that he lives in CA, but that's about it. I thought that the way it was written seemed like it was him too, but I would be surprised if it was. I think he knows about how wikipedia frowns on actual band members getting involved with the edits. Most likely it's someone trying to stir the pot and start the drama all over again. Let's just both keep an eye on it for now so that the article stays balanced. If it keeps up we could always have someone like michig or friedfish lock the article to prevent further editing. --Ghost (talk) 18:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what bennysara's IP is, but see if Kristen knows JB's IP # or her daughter's IP #. bennysara could be a play on her daughter's name. --Ghost (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of changing the section about Jay's lawsuit to read more like this:

In October 1997, Jay sued Michael to stop him from using the GLJ name. At their mother's urging, Jay dropped the case with predjudice. While this did mean he couldn't take Michael to court again over using the band's name, it did not give Michael exclusive rights as currently being claimed.

What do you think? I'll keep an eye on the page too, I see we have yet another new editor! --Ghost (talk) 12:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thank you

Just a quick note to inform you of my reply to your post on my talk page. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 19:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL

What you said about John Travolta was sick but hilarious at the same time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.52.62.214 (talk) 12:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Gene Snitsky. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 03:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please see

July 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on New Order. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. JD554 (talk) 06:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.