Jump to content

User talk:Akulkis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Akulkis (talk | contribs)
Akulkis (talk | contribs)
Line 29: Line 29:


: If you didn't do the deleting to put your opinions there it would be fine (in my book) but when that delete key, or backspace key removes other's work, thats what ticks me off. Believe you me, I'm open to both sides. --[[User:Mustafarox|~**_mustafarox_**~]] ([[User talk:Mustafarox|talk]]) 03:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
: If you didn't do the deleting to put your opinions there it would be fine (in my book) but when that delete key, or backspace key removes other's work, thats what ticks me off. Believe you me, I'm open to both sides. --[[User:Mustafarox|~**_mustafarox_**~]] ([[User talk:Mustafarox|talk]]) 03:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
::I made ADDITIONS you illiterate dork. [[User:Akulkis|Akulkis]] ([[User talk:Akulkis#top|talk]]) 03:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC) The person doing the deletions is DanielEng (probably some Dworkinite who can't handle the truth getting out). [[User:Akulkis|Akulkis]] ([[User talk:Akulkis#top|talk]]) 03:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
::I made ADDITIONS you illiterate dork. The person doing the deletions is DanielEng (probably some Dworkinite who can't handle the truth getting out). [[User:Akulkis|Akulkis]] ([[User talk:Akulkis#top|talk]]) 03:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:09, 11 January 2008

Hi Akulkis, I agree with alot of what you have said on the NLP article and talk page. Just can you tone the language. Making personal remarks is not acceptable on wikipedia by anyone. His group of editors are experts at trolling techniques designed to incite irrate replies, I suggest you think about it before replying with the same sort of fire. We don't want to give them any excuses or replies they can use at arbitration. --Comaze 03:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Basically where we are at the moment on the NLP page is that anything that is stated must be attributed to an authoratative source, it must be verifiable. You may have had experience where NLP has worked but this must be backed up by solid evidence from reputable sources, and balanced with the view that criticises the use of NLP. --Comaze 06:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Akulkis - here's one more editor asking you to observe the Wikipedia policy against personal attacks. In this case I'm talking about your remarks on Talk:Joseph McCarthy, in which you called KarlBunker a "Marxist zealot" without "any sense of honor", who should "go away" and "grow up". There has been more than enough of that kind of thing on that talk page, and I'm sick of it. The talk page is for discussion of the article - not your opinion of Marxism and definitely not your opinion of the other editors. ←Hob 10:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Hello Akulkis. One of your recent edits was undone by an automated bot as likely abuse of editing privileges. Our welcome page provides information for new users who would like to contribute. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you feel you have recieved this notice in error, please contact the bot owner. Thank you for your interest in our project. // Tawkerbot2 07:32, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neuro-linguistic programming

Hello, thanks for your contributions to the NLP workshop page. Your participation is welcome. However, this article has been the subject of an arbitration case the result of which are some very strict guidelines on participating on this page. You probably weren't aware of them, but there is a strict no incivility policy. People who violate that policy may be blocked and their comments removed. You recently said: The idiocy of your argument against NLP is quite laughable, Camridge, and your AGENDA to push a point of view DESPITE DEMONSTRABLE FACTS is quite flagrant. Please don't make comments like this -- don't cast aspersions on other peoples' opinions simply because they differ from yours, or fail to assume good faith about another Wikipedian. Thanks again. · Katefan0(scribble)/poll 14:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katefan0. You may want to look at Akulkis' history also. He has been making personal attacks for months, and has even made attacks on other editors within the past weeks during the workshop. I am in the process of making a formal complaint against him and Comaze for general disruptive behaviour, multiple deletions, obsessive editing, the recruitment of meatpuppets, and other such misdeeds. Camridge 03:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's pretty funny coming from User:Headley Down, a (now-banned) abusive master of sock-puppetry (running into the dozens of names) and meatpuppetry. Akulkis (talk) 00:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please do not edit other people's user pages

Talk pages are where comments and criticisms should go. Please do not edit my userpage again. I have removed your added sentence. Not that I'm ashamed of being a Marxist or wish to hide it - note the "This user is a Trotskyist" userbox. You do know who Trotsky is, right, with your extensive knowledge of how being a "devout Marxist" can be demonstrated by writing and language? Kalkin 17:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You Marxist twits just can't stand being called out for the misanthropic assholes that you are, can you. Akulkis (talk) 05:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please try and be more civil, Akulkis! I understand that you're just expressing your opinions, but please do so more constructively, or failing that, keep them to yourself. People might assume you're insulting them if you don't :-) Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for DEMONSTRATING the precise humor-deficiency I was talking about. Sheesh! Akulkis (talk) 02:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feminism???

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as feminism. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. --~**_mustafarox_**~ (talk) 02:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you didn't do the deleting to put your opinions there it would be fine (in my book) but when that delete key, or backspace key removes other's work, thats what ticks me off. Believe you me, I'm open to both sides. --~**_mustafarox_**~ (talk) 03:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I made ADDITIONS you illiterate dork. The person doing the deletions is DanielEng (probably some Dworkinite who can't handle the truth getting out). Akulkis (talk) 03:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]