User talk:107.15.192.226: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:39, 28 September 2014

"Not normalized"

Still fighting the good fight, I see. I found an article about Metacritic's algorithm. Perhaps interesting, perhaps not. Anyway, it might be useful when pointing people toward what Metacritic does. Looks more-or-less like a weighted average with some secret tweaks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting Metacritic explanation

Instead of removing any explanation of what Metacritic scores mean, I would suggest using corrected wording such as

At Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average score out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the film received an average score of 49 based on 37 reviews.

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	STOP Editing and You May Be Blocking From Editing Dragonrap2 (talk) 22:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :At [[Metacritic]], which assigns a [[weighted mean|weighted average]] score out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the film received an average score of 49 based on 37 reviews.
 as suggested by Erik at [[WT:Manual of Style/Film/Archive 6#Metacritic's so-called "normalized" scores]]. --[[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] (<small>[[User_talk:Ahecht|<span style="color:#FFF;background:#00f;display:inline-block;line-height:1.1em;vertical-align:-0.3em;font-size:75%;text-align:center;"><b>TALK<br />PAGE</b></span>]]</small>) 17:47, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
+== A barnstar for you! ==
+{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
+|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Editors Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
+|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar'''
+|-
+|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | STOP Editing and You May Be Blocking From Editing [[User:Dragonrap2|Dragonrap2]] ([[User talk:Dragonrap2|talk]]) 22:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
+|}