User talk:72.42.146.36: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:07, 23 January 2011

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Great Britain has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Diannaa ^(Talk) 04:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Atheism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Hongkongresident (talk) 07:26, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Is there a reason you are deleting cited content from article mainspace? Tiderolls 07:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Bill Maher. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Spitfire^Tally-ho! 08:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Coon vs. Coon and Friends constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Religious toleration

I have reverted your deletion of some sourced material from Religious Toleration. You included no edit summary explaining your reasons. I would be happy to discuss this at the article Talk page. Please be aware of WP:3RR. Jonathanwallace (talk) 13:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After you reverted the edit again, I posted an inquiry at WP:EAR to which you are welcome to respond. Jonathanwallace (talk) 03:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:47, 22 January 2011 edit Jonathanwallace (talk \| contribs) 2,815 edits →Religious toleration ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:07, 23 January 2011 edit undo Jonathanwallace (talk \| contribs) 2,815 edits →Religious toleration: posted at EAR Next edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	I have reverted your deletion of some sourced material from [[Religious Toleration]]. You included no edit summary explaining your reasons. I would be happy to discuss this at the article Talk page. Please be aware of [[WP:3RR]]. [[User:Jonathanwallace\|Jonathanwallace]] ([[User talk:Jonathanwallace\|talk]]) 13:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)		I have reverted your deletion of some sourced material from [[Religious Toleration]]. You included no edit summary explaining your reasons. I would be happy to discuss this at the article Talk page. Please be aware of [[WP:3RR]]. [[User:Jonathanwallace\|Jonathanwallace]] ([[User talk:Jonathanwallace\|talk]]) 13:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
			:After you reverted the edit again, I posted an inquiry at [[WP:EAR]] to which you are welcome to respond. [[User:Jonathanwallace\|Jonathanwallace]] ([[User talk:Jonathanwallace\|talk]]) 03:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)