User talk:76.20.88.33

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Taking of Pelham 123 (2009 film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Taking of Pelham 123 (2009 film) was changed by 76.20.88.33 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948877 on 2016-05-04T05:56:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Besides Wikipedia, what other Websites are Appropriate for Questions about any Movie?}}(76.20.88.33 (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)).

You could try IMDb or Rotten Tomatoes. JohnCD (talk) 22:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at I Know What You Did Last Summer. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at I Know What You Did Last Summer.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please review WP:FILMPLOT as I noted above. Your edits are increasing the length of the plot beyond the guideline. You need to discuss this at the article's talk page and obtain a consensus for doing so. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago (talk) 13:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Taking of Pelham 123 (2009 film).

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Opencooper (talk) 00:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to 22 Jump Street

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Ueutyi (talk) 04:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions. Jac16888 ^Talk 18:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

Hello, I'm Mdann52. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Batman: Mask of the Phantasm— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mdann52 (talk) 17:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jac16888 ^Talk 20:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.20.88.33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It is True that the Cloaked Figure is a Good Person automatically in Batman Mask of Phantasm, so why did I get blocked? (76.20.88.33 (talk) 22:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC))

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 23:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help Me

For Disturbia 2007 Film, is it okay to say that the Guy was Talking on a Cellphone in the Beginning?
(76.20.88.33 (talk) 18:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)).