User talk:Abcassionchan

Hello there!

If you have any questions or other requests regarding to my contribution or whatever stuff, here is a place where you can message me! :)

Even any complaints, proposed deletion or whatever etc. can also be in here. You can also request for more userbox.

Enjoy your stay :)

Abcassionchan (talk) 10:57, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

See also: achieve1

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Based on this KuroiBot stuff and other fooling around, it's clear that you aren't mature enough at this time to be editing Wikipedia. I have blocked this account for 1 year. Please feel free to come back at that time if you think you are ready to be serious about your editing. Looie496 (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abcassionchan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I'm seriously ready about editing and clearly understood the Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Also, I would like to cut short the block period. Thank-you. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 03:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh I see, thanks alot :) クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 04:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Carmen Reece for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Carmen Reece, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmen Reece until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

24th October 2010

This user is asking that her block be reviewed:

Abcassionchan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I had understand what have been blocked for. Neither do I want to cause damage nor disruption. I would make a useful contribution instead. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 08:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The block is no longer necessary because I had understand what have been blocked for. Neither do I want to cause damage nor disruption. I would make a useful contribution instead. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 08:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The block is no longer necessary because I had understand what have been blocked for. Neither do I want to cause damage nor disruption. I would make a useful contribution instead. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 08:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The block is no longer necessary because I had understand what have been blocked for. Neither do I want to cause damage nor disruption. I would make a useful contribution instead. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 08:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}