User talk:AnM2002: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:34, 6 December 2020

Welcome!

Hello, AnadiDoD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Ways to improve Army Education Corps (India)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. AnadiDoD, thanks for creating Army Education Corps (India)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 14:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok AnadiDoD (talk) 07:07, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sports in Jammu and Kashmir

Hi. I am asking people related to the Wiki Project: Jammu and Kashmir or related to Kashmir in anyway for help related to improving the Wikipedia page Sports in Jammu and Kashmir. The aim is to make it a good article, and also rated as a Good Quality article ( GA) or higher ( FA). Images are also needed as well. LOOKING FORWARD TO A GREAT COLLABORATIVE EFFORT!!! Happy Editing. :) DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi AnadiDoD! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:24, Monday, August 19, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

WikiProject India

WikiProject India

Namaste, AnadiDoD. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.

Subscribe

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok AnadiDoD (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Shehla Rashid, you may be blocked from editing. It is also very unhelpful having edit summaries that describe changing 4,000 to 3,000 as "corrected grammatical errors, rephrased sentences, removed excess citations". The source cited said 4,000.[1] -- Toddy1 (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1: Calm down! then examine what has been edited and why. I'll be CIVIL instead of Biting fellow editors. Before beginning I will apologise for not making my edit summaries detailed and avoiding such lax altercations. I'll correct this by explaining my edits here line-by-line. I request you read 'carefully' and 'patiently'

The inaccurate data thing you talk about arose because this citation[2] said so. I don't know if you completely understand WP:RS or not because in all respects Hindustan Times is a far more reliable source than that SCOOPWHOOP video. You just saw SCOOPWHOOP and instantly made up your mind that I was vandalising, completely disregarding WP:GF
I don't know what was wrong with this [3] edit where I just rephrased the sentences to better suit WP:NPOV and in what sense replacing POV phrases like pioneering visualised with organising leading a ground for Wikipedia:Vandalism. A rephrased a misleading statement saying, the political space there [was] too restricted to -> but felt that the political space there was too restricted." Please don't bring WP:BLP in your defence coz nowhere does it say that ' an editor is vandalising if they remove aggrandising phrases with more neutral ones .' Here, also you completely stabbed WP:GF.
My second edit[4] apart from focusing completely on flawed grammar and phrasing included correcting these numbers you quote according to WP:RS, removing excessive citations as my unhelpful edit summary mentioned and the mention of her social media activation/de-activation which has 'no encyclopaedic value' WP:NOT.
Still if you feel I was vandalising then it just indicates your own 'POV' and incivility. I won't undo your revert but I'll post my diffs for discussions on the talk page under Controversy about receiving money to join JKPM, Father's complaint and phrasing issues. Hope you believe in cooperation!AnM2002 (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I simply used a standardised warning template - you have had them from other people too - since you had received a level 2 in July, a level 3 seemed appropriate. See Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace. I added some customised text at the end of the message.

Regarding the details of your edit, I suggest that it is better to discuss them on the article talk page. That is what article talk pages are for. It also means that other editors interested in the article can understand what you are saying, and express an opinion.

fair enough! I have added my rationale and diffs with inputs needed on the article talk page.AnM2002 (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my point of view on the article. I believe it needs a scrub to make sure that statements are supported by the citations given for them. -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1: Even after going through the issues you discussed on the article talk page thrice I couldn't understand how any of them amounted to Vandalism. I would really like to know what made my edits disruptive and vandalising apart from few phrasing issues. Still I'll adhere to WP:CIVIL instead of undoing the reverts with the minor changes suggested on the talk page. AnM2002 (talk) 09:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 Ok [[User:AnadiDoD|AnadiDoD]] ([[User talk:AnadiDoD#top|talk]]) 07:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
-== Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution ==
-[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/AnM2002|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from [[:COVID-19 pandemic in India]] into [[:COVID-19 pandemic in Jammu and Kashmir]]. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's licensing]] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and [[Help:Link#Wikilinks|linking]] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>[[page name]]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 12:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
-{{yo|Diannaa}} please refer to the edit summaries of both pages and u will find the attributions saying I moved the data to dedicated articles to cut down the clutter on the main article. If I missed somewhere then I'll be more careful next time.[[User:AnM2002|AnM2002]] ([[User talk:AnM2002#top|talk]]) 13:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
-:The edit in question was {{diff|COVID-19 pandemic in Jammu and Kashmir|961034793|960858331|this one}}. The ''destination'' article is the place to add the attribution edit summary. Not the source article.— [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 13:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
-{{yo|Diannaa}} {{WikiThanks}} {{Thumbs up}} I'll be diligent with my edit summaries next time. [[User:AnM2002|AnM2002]] ([[User talk:AnM2002#top|talk]]) 15:06, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 == December 2020 ==