User talk:Carnildo: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:45, 16 February 2006

Please do not spam my talk page to solicit my support for either side in a WP:VFD, WP:IFD, WP:CFD, WP:TFD, WP:RFD, WP:VFU, or other deletion-related vote. Thank you.

Archives: The beginning through April 22, 2005 April 22, 2005 to August 3, 2005 August 3, 2005 to November 4, 2005 November 5, 2005 to January 24, 2006 January 24, 2006 to February 15, 2006

Image:Saltmarsh-Grass.JPG

Hi Carnildo - saw your bot had tagged this as no license. Other (more recent) pics by the same user are tagged gfdl, so I guess this one can be tagged presumed gfdl. - MPF 11:53, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OrphanBot does not tag images. Image:Saltmarsh-Grass.JPG was tagged as "no license" by CLW on [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Saltmarsh-Grass.JPG&diff=38194793&oldid=26835513 4 February 2006]. --Carnildo 07:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tripod image

It's a screenshot from a movie. That is it's copyright status.- JustPhil 11:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pot on stove.jpg

Hey Carnildo, you recently uploaded Image:Pot on stove.jpg, which has no licensing information. Based on the source information you provided, you're the copyright holder, so could you hop on over there and release it under the GFDL or public domain or something to that effect? Thanks! —BorgHunter ^ubx (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Airdosechernobyl graph

Hi, I have started to take some steps towards making a more copyright free version of the graph. I have taken public doman data from the OECD (same source as the graph), plus some other data which is freely avaiable, and some data from a data book, I have redone the calculations in excel and drawn a new graph which displays similar data.

If I then cite the sources of data when I upload the graph, as I calculated the lines for the graph and made the drawing, do you think that I will legally own the copyright and thus be able to sign it away ?Cadmium

If you make the image yourself from data, then yes, you do own the copyright. --Carnildo 07:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphanbot's deletion of Image:Shooting.jpg

I have made the entry, but this may have been too late. Orphanbot has deleted it. It is a lovely picture. It shows Ian Smith at the Bulawayo Farmers' Fair about two days after he became Prime Minister of Rhodesia. There was a lot of grumbling about "lazy kaffir" waiters in the beer tent and Smith picked up a rifle and took aim at one of the waiters. This caused much amusement amongst the onlookers. The picture was taken by a middle-aged reporter from the Bulawayo Times. The latter paper went defunct in 1981 and the photographer must be dead by now. The picture has been used all around the world in numerous publications and web sites. There cannot be any copyright in it.

Any chance of restoring it?.

Bob

ps : I have put a revised tag on the image and taken the liberty of restoring it to one of the articles. Hope this is OK. Bob

image help

does that mean that the picture of dog eat dog will also be deleted from my user page? Dog Eat Dog World 16:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i found it!!!!

Wheeljack picture removal

You removed a picture of a Wheeljack toy I put on the Wheeljack page. This is a picture of my toy Wheeljack I took with my digital camera. How do I add copyright info to it exactly?

Image copyright problem with Image:Robert_Jordan.jpg

Well, this image has no copyright info. Well, owners said that we can use it for only non-comercial use. Well, I don't know how to set up copyright notice on Image:Robert_Joran.jpg so can use set it insted of me...

Thanks

Wladimir 19:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We can't use images that are licensed for non-commercial use only. --Carnildo 07:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image copyright problem with Image:SJHS.jpg

The image was taken on a digital camera and uploaded to the school's website about 3 years ago. There is no known copyright on the image. I must apologize as I am still new to Wikipedia and am still learning. If you could assist me in this matter, I would be most grateful.

--GuyOfOwnage 21:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re tmccrannold.jpg

Hi. you left this message on my talk page... "Thanks for uploading Image:Tcrannold.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: Template:TemplateName.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 00:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)" ...I thought that I had already resolved this problem with RFJFR (another user) back in October... guess not. Delete the image if you wish - I don't know the copyright owner.

Ta. ZPMMaker 21:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blsoldclass2.jpg

Hello, this image was published between 1964 and 1923. It is used on the Seevak site with no copyright clearances, renewals, notices, or attributions. These two images are public domain. --Muchosucko 21:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gallio.gif and Gassner2.jpg

Please wait a couple of days before deleting. Both pics are PD-old and appear on the first page of a Google image search with the full names of the persons. Thanks--J heisenberg 23:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alex_Smith.jpg

Hi, can you tell me how to find out if the picture is copyrighted or not. I want to know why you think this picture is copyrighted. This was my first picture, so i wasn't sure on how to find out the copyright of the picture. Thanks.Giantsrule 23:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bot removing unsourced images from pages after 5 days instead of 7

It seems as if your bot is removing unsourced images from pages 5 days after they're marked with the unsourced tag, instead 7 as recommended. See Image:Universityofdayton.jpg. Thanks. Peyna 23:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's by design. By removing images two days before the earliest they can be deleted, it gives other users watching the article notification that the image has a problem, and a chance to fix the lack of source or copyright information. --Carnildo 00:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, thanks for the reply. Peyna 01:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you understand...

how it was probably an accident, sorry dude. How do you get or make a bot.--Gators222 00:30, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Gators222

Image copyright problem with Image:HFHS_Mumbai_Building.jpg

I actually do want the above image that I uploaded to be deleted. --Amit 00:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this now seems deleted. --Amit 04:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image copyright problem with Image:Kahn's_Rochester_Sanctuary.jpeg

This is a photograph that I took myself- What should I do about this? Sorry it took so long to respond. --Jimbo35353 14 Feb 2006

Re: Image copyright problem with Image:01holly.jpg

The image is a Charmed Season 8 Promo picture that was released before the start of season 8, I found it at http://charmed.fan-sites.org. Could you please fix the copyright as I do not know how to do it? --Chimufu 02:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Warnings

Stop spamming me with your image warnings, I don't care. --Tykell 15:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've been added to the "don't notify" list. This will take effect the next time OrphanBot starts running. --Carnildo 18:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB

Hello. Sorry if this has been covered before, but I'm seeing a lot of people tagging photos as promo, and citing the IMDB. Image:Gambon3.jpg is an example. What are your thoughts on this, from experience. Copy vios, or acceptable? The JPS 20:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NES_Metroid_Map.jpg

Carnildo: Thanks for uploading Image:NES_Metroid_Map.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 13:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kris18: Thank you for notifying me about my mistake on Image:NES_Metroid_Map.jpg, but unfortunately I do not know the correct lisense. I would like to keep it on Wikipedia for use but I understand the policy and I guess I have to let it be deleted by an admin. Kris18 21:41, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Bloody_April.jpg and Ion_Dissonance.jpg

For Bloody April, my friend is friends with the band and they said they were fine putting the picture on the site, i have problems with putting pictures up, so i need some help because i am planning to do this more in the future. as for ion dissonance, this photo is given on many sites as a promo for their cds. please also reverse this, thx.

-- User:Panasonicyouth99 20:57, 14 Feburary 2006 (UTC)

Kristen Kreuk

Even if all the text has been photoshopped out? Oh well. And thanks for the heads-up about my page. Nightscream 04:14, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, even if the text has been photoshopped out. --Carnildo 07:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Robert Jordan

So than delete it, well I didn't know about non-comercial use... Sorry one more time...

Wladimir 15:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this image has no copyright info. Well, owners said that we can use it for only non-comercial use. Well, I don't know how to set up copyright notice on Image:Robert_Joran.jpg so can use set it insted of me...

Thanks

Wladimir 19:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

We can't use images that are licensed for non-commercial use only. --Carnildo 07:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

@@ Line 141: / Line 141: @@
 == Image Robert Jordan ==
-So than delete it, well I didn't know
+So than delete it, well I didn't know about non-comercial use... Sorry one more time...
 [[User:Wladimir|Wladimir]] 15:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)