User talk:Fæ: Difference between revisions
→Unblock request: If Fæ is requesting a lifting of restrictions that are covered by the topic ban, Fæ should discuss the reasons why those restrictions were placed and present an argument for why they are no longer needed. |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Fæ, please read [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block]] and submit a properly formatted appeal. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 16:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
:Fæ, please read [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block]] and submit a properly formatted appeal. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 16:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
::I don't see how [[Linda Wright]] is in any way covered by a topic ban that includes "transgender topics and issues" and "human sexuality, broadly construed". [[Assyrian statue (BM 124963)]] is full of content that involves human sexuality and is covered by the topic ban. If Fæ is requesting a lifting of restrictions that are covered by the topic ban, Fæ should discuss the reasons why those restrictions were placed and present an argument for why they are no longer needed. And, of course, Fæ should use the proper format. There are administrators who scan those unblock requests and purposely respond to those involving editors and pages they have zero previous involvement in. This Is A Good Thing. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 16:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
::I don't see how [[Linda Wright]] is in any way covered by a topic ban that includes "transgender topics and issues" and "human sexuality, broadly construed". [[Assyrian statue (BM 124963)]] is full of content that involves human sexuality and is covered by the topic ban. If Fæ is requesting a lifting of restrictions that are covered by the topic ban, Fæ should discuss the reasons why those restrictions were placed and present an argument for why they are no longer needed. And, of course, Fæ should use the proper format. There are administrators who scan those unblock requests and purposely respond to those involving editors and pages they have zero previous involvement in. This Is A Good Thing. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 16:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
{{ping|Cullen328}} The format of this thread is in line with the note by Spartaz on 28 November last year, {{tq|If I am not active at that time you can put up an unblock request.}} I have seen no indication that Spartaz is inactive. Refer to [[User_talk:Fæ/2020#Blocked]]. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|talk]]) 17:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:50, 26 February 2021
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
 | When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email.  Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking. |
 | Fæ is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Unblock request
@Spartaz and Cullen328: In response to User_talk:Fæ/2020#Blocked, I understand that the TBan includes "transgender topics and issues" and "human sexuality, broadly construed". This is not a ban against editing biographies, and as this is based on the prior Arbcom restrictions, is not intended to include historical articles about artefacts such as the article I created for Assyrian statue (BM 124963) or historical articles about women rights political activists, as they are not about human sexuality or non-"human sexuality" sections about living people such as Linda Wright, another article I created some time ago and these articles ought to be maintained.
Hopefully, this TBan can be lifted sometime before my project retirement, considering I am active in LGBTQ open knowledge and editathons elsewhere.
Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Fæ, please read Wikipedia:Appealing a block and submit a properly formatted appeal. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see how Linda Wright is in any way covered by a topic ban that includes "transgender topics and issues" and "human sexuality, broadly construed". Assyrian statue (BM 124963) is full of content that involves human sexuality and is covered by the topic ban. If Fæ is requesting a lifting of restrictions that are covered by the topic ban, Fæ should discuss the reasons why those restrictions were placed and present an argument for why they are no longer needed. And, of course, Fæ should use the proper format. There are administrators who scan those unblock requests and purposely respond to those involving editors and pages they have zero previous involvement in. This Is A Good Thing. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
@Cullen328: The format of this thread is in line with the note by Spartaz on 28 November last year, If I am not active at that time you can put up an unblock request.
I have seen no indication that Spartaz is inactive. Refer to User_talk:Fæ/2020#Blocked. --Fæ (talk) 17:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)