User talk:Second Quantization: Difference between revisions
David Gerard (talk | contribs) →Sorcha Faal: new section |
Carcharoth (talk | contribs) →Misunderstanding on timings: new section |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Nominated: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorcha Faal (2nd nomination)]] - essentially, it's a BLP of someone barely notable with no high-quality sources about the subject, and should be deleted forthwith as a BLP hazard - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 17:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
Nominated: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorcha Faal (2nd nomination)]] - essentially, it's a BLP of someone barely notable with no high-quality sources about the subject, and should be deleted forthwith as a BLP hazard - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 17:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Misunderstanding on timings == |
|||
You may want to ask Delicious carbuncle yourself, but my impression is that what you said [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=548569226 here] is wrong. ArbCom (or least those arbitrators paying attention at the time, I was one of those but didn't look at the matter as closely as I should have done) were independently aware of this back in 2009, but the matter wasn't followed up then (it was, I believe, passed to the functionaries list but nothing much happened). I believe Delicious carbuncle had concerns in 2010, but I don't think he e-mailed ArbCom about it at that point (you may want to check this with him). I think a week or so ago was the first time he e-mailed ArbCom about this, so he hadn't been waiting three years for us to do something, more like waiting three years to follow up his concerns, then e-mailing us, then waiting four days, then, after not hearing from us, well you know what happened after that. I just hope there are not other concerns that he has known about for years and not followed up yet. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 21:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:11, 4 April 2013
Archive 1,2,3,4, 5 /Suggestion Box
 | Second Quantization is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
Sorcha Faal
Nominated: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorcha Faal (2nd nomination) - essentially, it's a BLP of someone barely notable with no high-quality sources about the subject, and should be deleted forthwith as a BLP hazard - David Gerard (talk) 17:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Misunderstanding on timings
You may want to ask Delicious carbuncle yourself, but my impression is that what you said here is wrong. ArbCom (or least those arbitrators paying attention at the time, I was one of those but didn't look at the matter as closely as I should have done) were independently aware of this back in 2009, but the matter wasn't followed up then (it was, I believe, passed to the functionaries list but nothing much happened). I believe Delicious carbuncle had concerns in 2010, but I don't think he e-mailed ArbCom about it at that point (you may want to check this with him). I think a week or so ago was the first time he e-mailed ArbCom about this, so he hadn't been waiting three years for us to do something, more like waiting three years to follow up his concerns, then e-mailing us, then waiting four days, then, after not hearing from us, well you know what happened after that. I just hope there are not other concerns that he has known about for years and not followed up yet. Carcharoth (talk) 21:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)