User talk:JustPlaneEditing

Discussion

Please come to the WP:Cricket talk page to share your opinion about an ongoing discussion whether to add attendances in cricket articles or not. Please come there to share your views. Thanks :) Itz arka (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Warning escalation

Hi JustPlane, I noticed your recent warning at this user's talk page. I think you're basically L4ing him for the same thing I L2'd him for. That is, the inappropriate summaries were made on Feb 1. He probably shouldn't receive a new warning unless there is a new offense. A sudden warning escalation for something that happened five days ago would be confusing, and would likely result in him lashing out again. I respectfully suggest you consider removing the warning. (Also as a piece of unsolicited advice: I would probably avoid the "atrocious, childish, appalling, arrogant" language in the future, as it is personal-attack-y and would only serve to inflame whomever is receiving the warning.) Thanks, and happy editing! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for clearing it up JustPlaneEditing (talk) 04:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Reverting

You reverted my edits at both the 3 train and List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes articles for literary no reason. How pity. What next? You're going to block me now? Oh, I'm so scared. These websites are mostly dead anyway. You're saying I'm arrogant, childish, and all that shit, but yet, you were the one who revered my edits for nothing and then saying "not needed". Who's being childish and arrogant now? How about you leave me the hell alone so I can return to editing without you getting in my way? No? How amusing. Take all of that smartass comments elsewhere. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 00:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Another thing is that you don't even edit any of the New York City Subway articles, so how the hell are you going to revert my edits and then play the living ass out of me? JoesphBarbaro (talk) 00:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Haha people just can't be proven wrong in this day of age even when you get a few chances. Your comments are conceited and I'm not going to waste time with this puerile editor thank you. JustPlaneEditing (talk) 05:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

I can see you're being a dick. Notice how you didn't even answer to my reply? You're such a fool. I'm not even going to waste time with your ass neither. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 12:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Notice how you didn't you answer to my reply? Hypocrite and your in violation of the 3RR unless you get a WP:RS for your edit. JustPlaneEditing (talk) 12:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm a hypocrite, but yet you're the one talking smack and staying silent? Why don't you shut the hell up? And I hope your ass is happy now that I made two changes to the 3 train article. You can have all this mouth here, but you're gonna be a pussy in person. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

A pussy and being silent (when clearly you were the one being silent about WP:RS), wow you are a genius. Why cant you put a source up, if you do that I'll shut up, simple. JustPlaneEditing (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

The source is right in your face. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Wow, you won't get away with it that easy JustPlaneEditing (talk) 12:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

You don't even edit any of the NYCS articles anyway. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

So? What difference does that make? JustPlaneEditing (talk) 12:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Both stations are named Harlem - 148 Street and Times Square - 42nd Street, respectively, so why does it bother you so much to revert those edits? Any good reasons? JoesphBarbaro (talk) 12:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)