User talk:LeoFrank

Merry Christmas

--Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

RE: Metroman87 (talk · contribs)

Hello, LeoFrank. You have new messages at Aarem's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

thanks

Hello Abhishek,

Thanks for your msg.

Yeah I've been a bit inactive due to my studies, but hopefully will be dropping by from time to time.

I've been meaning to create a couple of new pages - two new domestic airports have been opened in Maldives; Fuvahmulah Airport (IATA code: FVM) and Maamigili Airport aka. Villa Airport (IATA code: VAM). But the thing is there's almost no 'official' info about these airports anywhere - not even on government websites. So I haven't created wiki pages for them as they might get deleted by the lack of references.

Perhaps you can help me with creating these pages.

I'm reachable on gmail: xostedenzyme@gmail.com Also you can check out my page on: http://www.facebook.com/8qblog

See you around, 8qblog (talk)

Thanks

Dear Abhishek, I am new to Wikipedia (wrt editing articles). I will definitely ensure that I provide edit summary for all the future changes. And thanks a ton for your message.

Regards, Suneel Nanduri — Preceding unsigned comment added by DebutDreams (talk • contribs) 18:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hello Abhishek, I am New To Wikipedia. I had Added Some Pics To Jet Airways Page,Kaziranga Forest Page,etc. But all the Changes are reverted. Can you tell me Why they have been reverted? Shrikargg (talk) 05:51, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

==Thanks==

February 2012

That is what i was requesting the editors, as to discusses it first on talk page. regards :) --Omer123hussain (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

It was already discussed and decided to remove them, but you still seem to be revert warring. — Abhishek  ^Talk 07:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Removing scripts

Hi Abhishek, I noticed your edit summary on Bay of Bengal: "rm scripts from lead per WT:IN". Whilst I don't disagree with your edit, I can't find anything on WT:IN that refers to this. Can you point me in the right direction please? Also, if a decision like this has been made, then surely it should be moved to the Manual of Style, rather than buried in a talk page somewhere. Bazonka (talk) 08:20, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

The consensus has been archived. You can find it here. — Abhishek  ^Talk 08:56, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. You may want to see my comment here. Also, the lead of Arabian Sea could do with a script cull. I'm unsure which parts to remove and which to leave - I'm reluctant to get rid of the whole lot. Bazonka (talk) 22:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Invitation!

Hello my fellow Wikipedian, I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Mangalore. We work on organising and improving articles related to Mangalore. If you would be interested in joining feel free to add yourself to the Members section!

Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 17:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

re:February 2012

That did appear to me as vandalism. There has been no news whatsoever that Singapore Airlines will launch flights this April only. Also, the edit literally ruined the table so i reverted the edits to fix it. How isn't an edit like that not vandalism? --Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

No it isn't. Read WP:NOTVAND thoroughly. — Abhishek  ^Talk 13:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay, agreed! It looks like im the vandal here..! :P --Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

You are neither . Only when the intentions of such edits become clear to add false info, they could be vandalism. — Abhishek  ^Talk 13:26, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I always had this habit of hitting the keys hard. Nearly half of my talk page archives are all about people asking me to slow down/be careful. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

SpiceJet

Hey! The Jeeja Ghosh incident does appear to be notable enough to be put up on the page. Also the rest of the info that i have put up in the criticism Section. If not under the incidents section, it can me moved to the history section. But it needs to stay as the news has also spread fast on Facebook. To be frank, it looks like the war is between you and the rest there. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Also, the subho(something) is NOT MY ACCOUNT!!! And im ready to shout that out loud!! You can have our IPs tracked if possible. Any such fake claims are not welcomed. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Go through th link I have quoted in my ES, they aren't notable. — Abhishek  ^Talk 14:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with the Jeeja Ghosh thing being a light issue. query for that on Google news and you will find a shitload of articles. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:24, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Just coz you disagree, you cannot go against consensus. If you think the policy needs to be changed, then discuss on WT:AIRLINE. — Abhishek  ^Talk 13:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay! Done there... I have also mentioned the two socks that are trying to put the info back on. BTW, how can you reach a consensus on you own? Its just the two of us here and we are in a conflict. We can't reach no consensus like this. So i started a discussion at WT:AIRLINE. The Jeeja Ghosh incident IS quite significant. I wonder why you still dont agree. It spun the entire differently-abled community into discussions. Now the DGCA too is involved.--Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm not talking about what the two of us are involved in. I said that the decision on what events are notable for an airline has been done through consensus years ago, much before even I started editing.:P And BTW, sorting out a dispute is not consensus :P — Abhishek  ^Talk 14:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Arabian Sea other names

The name of the body of water separating the Oman sea from the Indian ocean , historically and geographically had many different names as :

• Akhzar Sea-(GreenSea) -persian sea-Makran-Mokran- Mecran Sea-[1] Sea of Daria- Sindh usagaraha(meaning "Sea of Sindh" in Sanskrit) and Erythraean Sea ,Sindh Sea ,The Erythraean Sea ,Chah Bahar,Mare indicum, Mare Rubrum, Mare indicum,vagh vagh - Sea of Moheet-E Ajam and ... so name of the Arab sea, has been disputed by some historian in Iran - India and Pakistan. they blive that the arabian sea was first brought to the maps by colonialism in past 400 years.

Persian sea

File:ParsSeaMokran.JPG

from the book documents on persian gulf

arabian sea or Mokran sea is a part of Indian ocean and Persian Gulf . [2] there is a dispute among some of the writers in Iran and Pakistan and India in reference to the term "Arabian Sea" Pakistani some times refer to it as Mecran or Makran sea and Iranian also call it sometimes Makran sea /"Persian sea" or pars Sea.there have been a request from persian TV to call arabian sea as persian sea in revenge to the change of the persian gulf names by some Arab nationalist to Arabian gulf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maahmaah (talk • contribs) 10:10, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Please take it to the article's talk page, not here. Thanks, — Abhishek  ^Talk 17:09, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Author Gogna

Hello, GOOD DAY ! Kindly, email me at gerryfromsun@gmail.com. I want that "You publish my Article on Wikipedia." Thanks ! _Gerry Gogna Website :- www.gerrygogna.co.in — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.205.73.19 (talk) 14:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I'm not here to promote any entity. If you are notable enough, someone will add an article about you in sometime. We do not believe in doing things in a jiffy here in wikipedia. — Abhishek  ^Talk 15:50, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit on IXM

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

How come a airport without any international service got a custom status??? it does not mean that the ip address starts with 117 was mine.There are millions of users with the same ip address due to the same service provider.get to know something about ip, dns etc Naanmahan (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I know enough about IPs and DNS. The conclusion was based on what we call Duck Evidence. — Abhishek  ^Talk 07:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

And you better stop reverting and including scripts in articles. Go through the discussion here. — Abhishek  ^Talk 07:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

so can i claim that all the contribution of ip 117 in the complete wikipedia is mine??? Lol.Naanmahan (talk) 07:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Go through WP:DUCK first and then talk instead of blabbering nonsense. I know that IPs are dynamic and keep changing for every user and that all IPs starting with 117 are not yours. And yes of course, wikipedia does have tools to determine which IPs an editor has used over the years for the sake of its own integrity. — Abhishek  ^Talk 07:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

yeah then how come you had given me some link which was edited by someone with the the ip 117 and thinking that it was mine ??? lets stop our conversation here !! wikipedia having a great contributor who can identify the user through IP in the perfect manner Naanmahan (talk) 07:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Scripts to article.

Hi. I recently got a message from you to highlight to warn me considering that I am in edit war on addting scripts to articles. But I am also a user just like you to do some good work here; and no edit wars as you thought. But I am seriously puzzled what made or how come (all) more experienced users came to a conclision to remove scripts especially from article like country or state or a territory. I understand the point on some cases complexity is there in adding scripts for individual articles (personalities) for diff reasons like they might be born in one place, grow-up at diff place and finally living in a diff place. This is a perfect example for arguing whether to add one or all or none of the scripts. But applying the same concept to state, city is definetely doing a injustice. When all the cities or state have their own official declaration of languages and even when they exist to govern and function on this basis doing administartive, judicial, work in office; then how can the scripts be removed or taken away. Users like you must understand one thing that a native script is there in the articles to only represent a view for all non-english names how it appears and convey its usage on this very (and only) broad sense. Tell me one way to represent language/symbol of how it is used locally other than adding its respective native script. There is no way. One thing for sure that who ever might have brought this issue must have done only on one purpose and that is something to deal with individual article's citing the same example I gave you before here referring to some actor or actress. But this does not apply for things that constitute people like states or towns. It will be good of all if they really fully understand this and make a line of bar where to accept to add article's native scripts and where-not to add scripts. Its high time people like you must be invloved on this to allow to make the change to include scripts only on the purpose of representation, a depiction like a image. ----Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

You lack knowledge on our policy on edit warring. Not discussing and reverting without any reason is nothing but an edit war. Regarding your rationale on including scripts, why would an English language reader want to know how the name of the subject looks like in the local language? And besides, the consensus on removal of the scripts was by long term experienced editors who knew what they were doing. And a consensus is an agreement to abide by while editing. If you feel it needs to be modified, then take it to the projects page and not here. — Abhishek  ^Talk 15:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

I admit your point that a long term experienced users came to a consensus and so we have to abibe by it. I felt there could have been a better decision to have a line of bar where to allow and disallow scripts. The rest I agree on the discussion and hope atleast from now they do not pin-point on some selective articles that have scripts under it and immediately commission to remove them. ----Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 04:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Rapid Transit in India#Monorail

It seems you have removed local languages from the page "Rapid transit in India" but the page of monorail section still looks clumsy. Please improve it as you started the editing. Ashok4himself (talk) 09:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)