Jump to content

User talk:Peaceworld111: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
re
Are you a Traitor?: new section
Line 138: Line 138:
::::::The reason is simple. Unless a [[WP:Consensus]] major changes can't be made. And so far you have not got one in your favor. [[User:Khestwol|Khestwol]] ([[User talk:Khestwol|talk]]) 15:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
::::::The reason is simple. Unless a [[WP:Consensus]] major changes can't be made. And so far you have not got one in your favor. [[User:Khestwol|Khestwol]] ([[User talk:Khestwol|talk]]) 15:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
:::::::[[User:Khestwol|Khestwol]] There is no such policy that consensus needs to be established for major changes. Let's be clear and let's get straight to the point, you yourself have no issue ''with'' major changes, as you've stated yourself, your only issue is the addition of "ISIL claim" and "Ahmadiyya Caliphate". Please explain what is your issue with them? (1) What is your issue with "ISIL claim" (2) What is your issue with "Ahmadiyya Caliphate".'''''<font color="green">[[User:Peaceworld111|--Peace]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Peaceworld111|world]]</font>''''' 15:16, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
:::::::[[User:Khestwol|Khestwol]] There is no such policy that consensus needs to be established for major changes. Let's be clear and let's get straight to the point, you yourself have no issue ''with'' major changes, as you've stated yourself, your only issue is the addition of "ISIL claim" and "Ahmadiyya Caliphate". Please explain what is your issue with them? (1) What is your issue with "ISIL claim" (2) What is your issue with "Ahmadiyya Caliphate".'''''<font color="green">[[User:Peaceworld111|--Peace]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Peaceworld111|world]]</font>''''' 15:16, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

== Are you a Traitor? ==

I'm guessing you're a treacherous qadiani who allies with the enemies of Islam to make war against Muslims? It seems like that's the case. You guys did that in India when you sided with the British against the Muslims there and now you're doing it again but virtually. You people are worse than the plain enemies of Islam because you pretend to be Muslim, but conceal your kufr! Allah knows if you people are considered simply munafiqeen or simply kuffar / mushrikeen. Know that "The Hypocrites will be in the lowest depths of the Fire". [Quran 4:145]. [[User:Sakimonk|<span style="text-shadow:lightgray 3px 3px 2px;"><font color="Royalblue">'''''Sakimonk'''''</font></span>]][[User Talk:Sakimonk|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><sup> talk</sup></span>]] 22:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:26, 7 August 2015

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Galway Mosque requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Luxure Σ 03:49, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lahore Ahmadiyya Emirs

Category:Lahore Ahmadiyya Emirs, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Talib Dawud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Kirk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hesse may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Der-Islam-gehoert-nun-offiziell-zu-Deutschland.html Der Islam gehört nun offiziell zu Deutschland] (Islam is a part of Germany now, quoting a famous speech of President [[Christian Wulff]], by Freia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redoing Khatam ul nabiyyeen

I am thinking of redoing the page. Need someone to help me do it. Thinking of replacing the current page entirely with sourced page which can withstand almost all kinds of scrutiny from wiki and still not be deleted. Please reply if you are willing to helpFreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FreeatlastChitchat Not sure if I can be of much help, as I'm busy with uni. I haven't made major edits since summer. I'll keep it in watch though and see your work.--Peaceworld 10:15, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Peaceworld111!

Hi

I am right now on mobile and it becomes difficult for me to edit Wikipedia. It is 12:30 am here. I shall answer your questions tomorrow. If you want it now message me on my watsapp no. on my userpage. I ll answer you there. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 19:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirzai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You had participated on, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, you should see Wikipedia:Article for deletion/Death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmadiyya in Palestine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharia court (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmadiyya in Indonesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batavia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Ghana

Thanks for this revert. Seems to me that alot of people have a problem with the population of Ahmadis in Ghana.—M@sssly 07:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Masssly and thank you for making Islam in Ghana a decent article.--Peaceworld 09:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam in Tuvalu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British and South Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ahmadiyya in Indonesia

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ahmadiyya in Saudi Arabia

Hello! Your submission of Ahmadiyya in Saudi Arabia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Can you explain what did u just do here? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muslim_population_growth&diff=657303483&oldid=657303413 198.16.164.205 (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:198.16.164.205 It doesn't belong on an article entitled "Muslim population growth." Just like the following doesn't belong on the page, nor on any unrelated page: "It is important to understand that Sunnis regard Shias as heretics and blasphemers" and the Sunnis, who consider themselves the orthodox Muslim denomination and regard the Shia as heretical denomination" and Orthodox clerics often despise Sufis considering them heretical and deviant Muslims" and Sunnis and Shia regard each other as heretical Non-Muslim".--Peaceworld 11:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What did you mean by oops in your message? Second you are citing a Christian source about Ahmadis on Muslim population growth. Aren't you trying to stretch the reality a bit too far? Third don't divert issue to Shias and Sufis. Fact is Ahmadis make up 1% percent of the total 'Muslim' population which is insignificant overall. Fourth Ahmadiyya came into existence a full 1000 years after the beginning of Islam. You want to include your particulars but your particulars clearly do require further clarification. 198.16.164.205 (talk) 18:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What does age of existence has got to do with population growth?
1% makes it larger than some of the major religions of the world. It's not insignificant. It's a major denomination of Islam. Second, the article is on population growth, not on proportions of each denominations.
What is your exact issue with a Christian source, does it fail WP:RS, WP:NPOV? eventhough the article does mention "according to..." to maintain neutrality.--Peaceworld 10:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are also in violation of WP:SPA because you have hardly made any edits outside of these two topics Ahmadiyya and Islam. 198.16.164.205 (talk) 12:59, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please respond to the topic at hand under your registered account, as adivsed here. Just because I'm creating a large number of articles and watching pages related Ahmadiyya, particularly when such pages face high levels of vandalism reflected by their level of persecution in the real world, doesn't mean I'm an SPA.--Peaceworld

DYK nomination of Ahmadiyya in Saudi Arabia

Hello! Your submission of Ahmadiyya in Saudi Arabia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 06:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Hello, Peaceworld111. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

e-mail

Hello, Peaceworld111. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Thank you Doug. Appreciate your help.--Peaceworld 20:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I've been around for awhile and have a few DYKs, so know some of these "tricks". Good luck.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ahmadiyya in the United States

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Caliphate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Unless you get consensus, please do not edit-war to add ISIL to the template. Thanks. Khestwol (talk) 13:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While I have zero self-interest in adding ISIL in the template, I am only following the construction in Caliphate. More importantly however, please don't go about placing false warnings: It would be a good idea if you actually read what the consensus was Khestwol, entitled "Should ISIS/ISL be listed as a caliphate?" which is not the same thing as ISIL claiming to be one, a topic which happens to be relevant enough to be given a mention in the lede and a devoted section in Caliphate.--Peaceworld 14:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think another user than me has well explained why ISIL should not be listed in the template. The reasons can be found on the template's Talk page. I recommend to not make changes when consensus goes against you. Thank you. Khestwol (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Khestwol, Actually, the user that you refer to states that he/she has "no objection to the template listing ISIL as a related subject," which is the fact that ISIL claims to be a Caliphate, hence my addtion "ISIL claim".--Peaceworld
Regardless, he and me had explicitly opposed your suggestions. So I will be happy if you not again add ISIL, and also the Ahmadiyya Caliphate for that matter. Cheers, Khestwol (talk) 14:28, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
KhestwolYou are confusing yourself. I modified my additions inline with the suggestions. Neither you nor Amatulic liked my original categorization of the caliphates, so I changed it to a list instead, inline with the only alternative suggestion. The consensus including the two opposing views were regarding listing ISIL as a caliphate which I took into account relabelled it as "ISIL claim". Why not Ahmadiyya Caliphate? Why not Ahmadiyya Caliphate explicitly in face of several smaller less well known Caliphates? --Peaceworld 14:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The reason is simple. Unless a WP:Consensus major changes can't be made. And so far you have not got one in your favor. Khestwol (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Khestwol There is no such policy that consensus needs to be established for major changes. Let's be clear and let's get straight to the point, you yourself have no issue with major changes, as you've stated yourself, your only issue is the addition of "ISIL claim" and "Ahmadiyya Caliphate". Please explain what is your issue with them? (1) What is your issue with "ISIL claim" (2) What is your issue with "Ahmadiyya Caliphate".--Peaceworld 15:16, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a Traitor?

I'm guessing you're a treacherous qadiani who allies with the enemies of Islam to make war against Muslims? It seems like that's the case. You guys did that in India when you sided with the British against the Muslims there and now you're doing it again but virtually. You people are worse than the plain enemies of Islam because you pretend to be Muslim, but conceal your kufr! Allah knows if you people are considered simply munafiqeen or simply kuffar / mushrikeen. Know that "The Hypocrites will be in the lowest depths of the Fire". [Quran 4:145]. Sakimonk talk 22:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]