User talk:Psychiatrick: Difference between revisions
Psychiatrick (talk | contribs) →Thanks for speaking up: reply to Christian Roess's question |
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I agree with what you wrote to User:Woland1234 on December 13, 2010. That account continues to make inappropriate deletions (still) with no justification or edit summary. Personally, I recognize that many if not all are absurd. I'm reporting this account. Do you want to make a report also? [[User:Christian Roess|Christian Roess]] ([[User talk:Christian Roess|talk]]) 09:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
I agree with what you wrote to User:Woland1234 on December 13, 2010. That account continues to make inappropriate deletions (still) with no justification or edit summary. Personally, I recognize that many if not all are absurd. I'm reporting this account. Do you want to make a report also? [[User:Christian Roess|Christian Roess]] ([[User talk:Christian Roess|talk]]) 09:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
:No worries if you don't want to get involved to the extent I mentioned above. I've been reading through the various policies and it is hard to nail down precisely what kind of "abuse" is going on here. I'm going to sit on this for a few days and make a personal appeal to User:Woland1234 and also take this to the "Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents". This User '''never''' leaves edit summaries and almost always deletes, usually categories. Or adds a category, then later deletes it, and adds it later, then deletes it again. (ie., see [[Fredric Jameson]], where the ''Category:Postmodern theory'' and ''Category:Science fiction critics'' has been appearing and disappearing from this article). Let me know if you have any suggestions on how to deal with this. [[User:Christian Roess|Christian Roess]] ([[User talk:Christian Roess|talk]]) 10:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
:No worries if you don't want to get involved to the extent I mentioned above. I've been reading through the various policies and it is hard to nail down precisely what kind of "abuse" is going on here. I'm going to sit on this for a few days and make a personal appeal to User:Woland1234 and also take this to the "Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents". This User '''never''' leaves edit summaries and almost always deletes, usually categories. Or adds a category, then later deletes it, and adds it later, then deletes it again. (ie., see [[Fredric Jameson]], where the ''Category:Postmodern theory'' and ''Category:Science fiction critics'' has been appearing and disappearing from this article). Let me know if you have any suggestions on how to deal with this. [[User:Christian Roess|Christian Roess]] ([[User talk:Christian Roess|talk]]) 10:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
::My supposition is that an account can just be used to make the impression of working hard in Wikipedia in order to obtain additional [[WP:Userrights|user rights]] and opportunities. I would also like you to put this issue on the ‘[[Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]’. [[User:Psychiatrick|Psychiatrick]] ([[User talk:Psychiatrick#top|talk]]) 14:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:33, 22 December 2010
Interesting links: Alex Bakharev Ghirlandajo (Andrey) Смартасс SkyBon (Artem Karimov) Cherurbino Yaroslav Blanter Ole Førsten Serebr Mstislavl
Please ask your questions here. I'll try to answer them on your user talk page. Psychiatrick (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Rufus May new page
may be of interest to you. cheers Earlypsychosis (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Google Books link to book cover
It's generally accepted to link to Google books pages in a citation to a specific page, because that allows quick verification. But linking to the book cover in a list of books is made redundant by the ISBN link, which is vendor-neutral. Tijfo098 (talk) 20:06, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Global Initiative on Psychiatry, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ammado.com/nonprofit/45806.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- All has been reworded. Psychiatrick (talk) 10:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for speaking up
I agree with what you wrote to User:Woland1234 on December 13, 2010. That account continues to make inappropriate deletions (still) with no justification or edit summary. Personally, I recognize that many if not all are absurd. I'm reporting this account. Do you want to make a report also? Christian Roess (talk) 09:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- No worries if you don't want to get involved to the extent I mentioned above. I've been reading through the various policies and it is hard to nail down precisely what kind of "abuse" is going on here. I'm going to sit on this for a few days and make a personal appeal to User:Woland1234 and also take this to the "Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents". This User never leaves edit summaries and almost always deletes, usually categories. Or adds a category, then later deletes it, and adds it later, then deletes it again. (ie., see Fredric Jameson, where the Category:Postmodern theory and Category:Science fiction critics has been appearing and disappearing from this article). Let me know if you have any suggestions on how to deal with this. Christian Roess (talk) 10:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- My supposition is that an account can just be used to make the impression of working hard in Wikipedia in order to obtain additional user rights and opportunities. I would also like you to put this issue on the ‘Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents’. Psychiatrick (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)