User talk:Rawn3012

January 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2020–2021 China–India skirmishes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 21:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maharana Pratap’s reconquest of Mewar (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maharana Pratap’s reconquest of Mewar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Rawn3012! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GraziePrego (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Singoli. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Imperial^[AFCND] 05:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Mandalgarh and Banas, you may be blocked from editing. Imperial^[AFCND] 05:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Capture of Gagron (1444). Imperial^[AFCND] 05:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Provide me the source of capturing of 24 forts were captured along with gagraun. If you will not, the changes made by me will be applicable Rawn3012 (talk) 06:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

It's your responsibility to find sources, not ours. ''Flux55'' (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Nvm that. What I meant was that you should add RELIABLE sources to your edits ''Flux55'' (talk) 06:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Rc Majumdar in Vol 6 of A history and culture of Indian People

The course of this campaign is described in great detail by the Muslim histo¬ rians, but it is apparent from their accounts that Mahmud failed to conquer any part of the Maharana’s territory except Ajmer. As noted elsewhere, (p. 162) a verse from the Chitor KIrtistambha in¬ scription claims that Maharana Kumbha defeated the kings of Gujarat and Malwa. On this Sir Wolseley Haig remarks: “The more famous column of victory at Chitor is said to commemorate victories over Mahmud of Gujarat and Mahmud of Malwa. If this is so it, ‘like some tall bully lifts its head and lies’.”12 It is therefore necessary to quote Nizam-ud-dm’s version of the battle that took place as Mahmud, after conquering Ajmer, turned towards Mandalgarh: “Konbha also sent out his army from the fort dividing it into three detachments. The division, which confronted Taj Khan, and that which was opposed to ‘All Khan, fought with arrows and lances and there was a great battle; and a large number of Mahmud Shah’s troops were slain, while an innumerable host of Rajputs became

food for the sword . (At sunset) the two parties took up their

quarters in their respective stations. In the morning the amirs and vazirs collected in the royal pavilion, and submitted that as during that year the troops had been fighting repeated campaigns and the rainy season was near, it would be fitting and proper, if he would rest and repose for a few days in the capital city of Shadlabad, in order to repair the damage and injury to the army; and make after the rains, with a fully equipped army, a king-like attempt to cap¬ ture the fort. Sultan Mahmud returned and rested for some days.”.1? Rawn3012 (talk) 06:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Satish Chandra in Medival India from 1206 to 1526

"The Conflict with Sultans of Gujarat and Malwa occupied Kumbha throughout his life. During most of the time he had to contend with Rathors of Marwar too.Although sorely poccesd he was able to maintain his kingdom back. Kumbhalgarh was besiged sevral times by Sultan of Gujarat and Sultan of Malwa was able to raid as far as inland in Ajmer and other boder areas but Rana was able to repulse those attacks and retain most of his conquests exept Ranthambore' outlying areas"

Rawn3012 (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I have given you the sources as it clearly mentions that Kumbha only lost ajmer and Ranthbore once and that too was recaptured Rawn3012 (talk) 06:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Well, you should probably put that in the article's talk page instead of here ''Flux55'' (talk) 06:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Imperial^[AFCND] 08:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring, as you did at Capture of Gagron (1444). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 15:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mewar-Malwa Conflict has been accepted

Mewar-Malwa Conflict, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 12:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Mewar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kingdom and Padmavati. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding deletion discussion on Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) article

Hi,

The article Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) has been proposed for deletion .

You may participate in the deletion discussion of this article.

Regards.

Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maharana Pratap’s reconquest of Mewar

Hello, Rawn3012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maharana Pratap’s reconquest of Mewar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Inviting to take a part in a delete disscussion

Hey Rawn3012, I've nominated Battle of Jhain for deletion, can you share your views here at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Jhain. Hashid 13:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmad Shah II's invasion of Mewar (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmad Shah II's invasion of Mewar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 14:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

hello

Hello! Rawn, I have a request for you, Can you send me your gmail? 122.161.93.251 (talk) 09:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

@Rawn3012Pinging you again in case you were not notified 122.161.93.251 (talk) 10:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi! If you want e-mail me, you can mail me at thewholezone1@gmail.com

Regards

Rawn3012 (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Thoughts?

@Rawn3012, you've shown great knowledge regarding Rajput history. I was wondering what would you think about renaming Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty to Pratihara dyansty. I've determined that it is the common name via ngrams. And also we might finally have a neutral ground on the Rajput-Gurjar dispute, with the title being more neutral sounding. PadFoot (talk) 14:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

@PadFoot2008 Yes, I think the same too. If we with sureshot cannot say that Pratihars were Rajputs or either Gurjars then why adding Gurjara in the title? It's misleading.

Regards

Rawn3012 (talk) 15:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

@Rawn3012, I have opened an RM to move the page to Pratihara dynasty. PadFoot (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)