User talk:ScrapIronIV

You couldn't even put a bet on that!

At 20:15 on 30 October 2015 you completed an edit on Peppa Pig. A minute later, on the same day, you edited John Wayne. Just how does your mind work? Cassianto^Talk 09:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

There are some who would claim it doesn't :-) it was probably me just monitoring my watch list, which is an eclectic mess... Scr★pIron^IV 14:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Spam Barnstar
		I'll second the congratulations, only this time it's from a fellow experienced Wikipedia editor. Always good to have another ally on the lookout for WP:COI and WP:SOAPBOX edits. Keep up the good work! Drm310 (talk) 04:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Looks quite tasty - Thank you so much! Scr★pIron^IV 21:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for protecting my user page form vandals!  InsertCleverPhraseHere  21:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your vigilance ScrapIronIV! Loslazos (talk) 13:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

For noticing stealthy sock puppetry. Thank you.

Lavenderly (talk) 23:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for keeping a keen eye out.

Lavenderly (talk) 13:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Branford College

Thanks for catching that. I have fond memories of the place. Doug Weller talk 19:45, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Glad to be useful on occasion :-) Scr★pIron^IV 20:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Estate values on pages of Old Hollywood stars

I have not added Richard Burton's estate figures back to his page yet. However, I added it in originally due to the fact this sort of detail appears in the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tallulah_Bankhead#Retirement_and_death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr#Later_years https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlene_Dietrich#Estate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Garland#Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincente_Minnelli#Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greta_Garbo#Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Dressler#Death

On the basis of this particular detail appearing in so many articles and being considered relevant information, I think reverting the details on Richard Burtons page is incorrect. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlieh 55 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If you see this information on other pages, such cruft should be removed. It is not justification for including it in new articles, or adding it to existing ones. Scr★pIron^IV 12:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

College Football, Ice Hockey, and Hurling/Gaelic football for Fenway Park - DylanFaraci98

I am providing the link for each team/event in the table. And 85-90% of the time it shows exactly what is shown in the table. It kind of pisses me off because this is the second time this has happened.

In addition to linking, you must supply a reliable source that specifies that these games were held in this location. Unsourced additions have been challenged, and are not to be restored without a citation to a reliable source. Scr★pIron^IV 12:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Francesca Reale

Why are you removing my content? Mjbmaster (talk) 06:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

The issue is that you keep adding peacock terms like "upscale", "popular" and "affluent" without citing any sources. Such editorializing and puffery is not within Wikipedia's standards of neutral writing. Scr★pIron^IV 12:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Endocytosis

What is the story with this editor? Is he a sock? If so, why has he not been blocked? I've just reverted several edits he's made, so I'd like to know more, please. Thanks. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 14:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Keeping Up Appearances

I am not sure why my contributions "isn't a ref". Please clarify. What I was trying to show was that the Bucket reference has an antecedent in British comedy. Thank you. Spycoops — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spycoops (talk • contribs) 00:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ScrapIronIV. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you.

Dear Sir/ Madam, I am Daniel Hatem and had made those claims of drawing the Blue Lantern in the 80's as I had as a young College student artist for the College paper and comic. It was published as I had indicated and had only wished the citation of the initial drawing be made. It was never for commercial purposes as it was a college comic but the truth as to the date and source of the drawing should be noted. Since I received nothing from anybody for this and it was not in a for profit publication, I was only interested in the notation for the TRUTH. The other artist might have commercialized the character, I had published it first. I asked this as I am sick of the lies as to the initial drawing dates and artist. You have the proof in the Heights Newspaper that has been available at Boston College and is still in publication. Merely noting that his was the first commercial publication is adequate but MINE was the first drawing of this Character and was published in a commonly read newspaper archived . You can make note of this anywhere you like but the claims that he was the first artist to draw it are provably false. I give credit to him for his commercial use, but my publication was of this character and it was first. The claim that commercial purposes are the only noted ones are wrong. All I asked for is the truthful notation of the origin. Where or when he draw his rendition is irrelevant to my claim as mine was drawn first. Thank you for hearing me out. Please just give credit where credit is due. If DC wishes to sue, they can collect exactly ZERO as that is all I got for this publication then and in royalties. Just stick with the truth as that is all I asked. Thank you for hearing me out. If you wish people to trust Wikipedia, make it truthful. On this topic it is not yet correctly noted. Please handle this as you wish. I said my peace and the truth is there to see. Thanks, Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18C:8700:D610:41AD:930:8F66:450A (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Do you remember

this[1]? If so, you may want to read this[2]....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)