Jump to content

User talk:Stodieck: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on Talk:Three_surface_aircraft. (TW)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page is closed due to abuse.
Perhaps you'd like to write something at [[Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association]]? Even if it's a [[WP:STUB|stub]], that would help Wikipedia out; however, a placeholder isn't much use. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 05:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
I did not create a placeholder. I edited the placeholder.


{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately this organization refers to itself online almost exclusively as "CTIA", a mnemonic with numerous online aliases. I wrote this edit after being invited to a CTIA conference and finding that I could not find out the meaning of "CTIA" even after visiting the official website and after searching Wikipedia and Google for "CTIA". This is a large, important organization. I will make further edits as I learn more about it.
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 -->


== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! ==
In the mean time, why don't you do something useful? Go eliminate this garbage entry, "Codeless". I am not sure how to purge a whole entry.


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
:Great, I look forward to seeing the article! As for [[Codeless]], that doesn't seem to be an article. Could you provide me with a link to the problem you're talking about? Thanks, [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 10:00, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
"Codeless" Seems to have been purged


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Here is another in Wikitravel, a nice piece of satire but dangerous. Maybe we should start a "Comediapedia".
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/15&oldid=750692309 -->


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
San Serriffe "Alas, independent San Serriffe rapidly turned into an autocratic dictatorship under the rule of General Pica" "The national sport of San Serriffe is kerning"


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
"By train"
"San Serriffe once has an extensive network of narrow-gauge trains pulled by water buffalo. However, after General Melior decreed that only girls who had never had sexual intercourse may act as train conductors, the system ground to a halt due to a lack of eligible workers and was sold off as scrap."


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
==Your recent edits==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|link=]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button [[File:Insert-signature.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] or [[File:Signature icon.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 00:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
== Wikipedia Help Survey ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/10&oldid=813413927 -->


== Monadnock Building ==
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a [[m:Wikimedia Fellowships|Wikimedia Community Fellow]] working on [[w:Wikipedia:Help Project/Community fellowship|a project to improve Wikipedia's help system]]. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out [https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_8uFecCwmOU6h7es this brief survey] about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.


Please feel free to write an article about the [[Monadnock Building (San Francisco)]], and then maybe we can figure out how to disambiguate it. Simply dumping a parenthetical statement about a subject without an article into the lead paragraph of an article (a featured article at that) isn't how it's done. If an article exists, we can provide a hatnote leading to the other one. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 22:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your time, <br />
[[w:User:the wub|the wub]] ([[w:User talk:the wub|talk]]) 17:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC) <small>(Delivered using [[m:Global message delivery|Global message delivery]])</small>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0211 -->


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
== You're expected to maintain a collegiate atmosphere ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
Your edit here:


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stabilizer_(aircraft)&diff=497666479&oldid=497555820


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Stated in the subject line:
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/10&oldid=866998363 -->


== December 2018 ==
'Glider Mav, these are very elementary errors. What are your references'
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Cabo de Hornos]], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> &#8209;&#8209;'''[[User:Venomous Sniper|<span style="color:forestgreen;">V.</span><span style="color:maroon;">S.</span>]]<small>([[Special:Contributions/Venomous_Sniper|<span style="color:blue;">C</span>]])([[User talk:Venomous Sniper|<span style="color:blue;">T</span>]])</small>''' 14:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)


== Cabo de Hornos ==
Which seemed to me being deliberately offensive, and in actual fact was false, since the parts you seemed to be referring to were not, in fact done by me.


You wrote "This redirect make it impossible to have an article in Spanish about two locations called "Cabo de Hornos". What were you thinking?" in the edit summary for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cabo_de_Hornos&diff=prev&oldid=874481627 this edit]. What happens in the Spanish article has nothing to do with what happens here. If there are two places called "Cabo de Hornos", you can turn the article into a disambiguation article, but please don't just blank the article. --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] ([[User talk:Slashme|talk]]) 15:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
These types of false accusations, particularly those in subject lines. cannot be easily corrected and can get taken out of context.


==Disambiguation link notification for May 28==
While administrators can edit subject lines, due to the fact that subject lines are quite difficult to correct, you must NOT criticize other editors AT ALL in subject lines.[[User:GliderMaven|GliderMaven]] ([[User talk:GliderMaven|talk]]) 01:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[List of pumped-storage hydroelectric power stations]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Storage capacity]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_pumped-storage_hydroelectric_power_stations check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_pumped-storage_hydroelectric_power_stations?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are [[WP:INTDABLINK|usually incorrect]], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].)</small>
'''The comment was made entirely in error and I apologize. I could not find the name of the editor who made the entry.''' --[[User:Stodieck|Stodieck]] ([[User talk:Stodieck#top|talk]]) 05:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
==Your recent edits==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|link=]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button [[File:Insert-signature.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] or [[File:Signature icon.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 21:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==
== Stodieck aka Amphorus ==


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
&mdash; Cheers, [[User:Steelpillow|Steelpillow]] ([[User Talk:Steelpillow|Talk]]) 20:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Block reduced to 72 hours ==


If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Based on an email I received explaining the circumstances, I am reducing the block for abusing multiple accounts from 1 month to 72 hours from the original block time. It will expire Mon, 16 July 2012 22:22:33 GMT, just over a day from this post. I feel this is a more than fair adjustment, and the shortest block I've ever done at SPI. The indef block on the puppet account still stands. I will accept that you weren't familiar and give credit to admitting your actions, but there was still enough overlap that it was abusive, even if that wasn't the intention. It isn't necessary that I agree with your other points (I don't, by the way) in order to extend some good faith in trusting you on the main point, the reason for the secondary account.
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 -->


== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
You need to read [[WP:SOCK]] and learn the acceptable ways and uses for alternate accounts if you are going to use on in the future, in particular, those alt accounts shouldn't ever edit the same articles that your main account does. Not declaring an alt account is allowed under very limited circumstances and always has the risk of ending up at SPI and the accounts being linked. As for content dispute, that is beyond my consideration or the scope of SPI, so I will leave that to you and the other editors, and perhaps [[WP:DRN]]. Please note, if you have found to abuse multiple accounts in the future, you can expect a much longer block, or an indef block. Hopefully we can just put this behind and move forward with the business (and pleasure) of building an encyclopedia. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<small>2&cent;</small>]] [[Special:Contributions/Dennis_Brown|<small>&copy;</small>]] 13:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
== Edit warring ==
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your edit warring was clearly a factor in your recent block, if not the main reason. I suggest that now your block has expired, reverting to your old behaviour and undoing everyone else's work is going to lead to another ban very quickly. It would be much better if you engaged in a talk page discussion to explain the point of view regarding aircraft stabilisers that you seem so intent on pushing. --[[User:Biker Biker|Biker Biker]] ([[User talk:Biker Biker|talk]]) 07:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Edit warring is wp:orthodox in WP when required. It takes 2. I am not pushing a POV. I am trying to bring the content standards of aircraft sections up to the level of common elementary texts. I have engaged in talk page discussions. If you can't discuss the topics involved don't bother me. Your comments are inappropriate and are recorded here for posterity. You don't seem to have any knowledge the subject. Edit warring had nothing to do with the recent very short block. --[[User:Stodieck|Stodieck]] ([[User talk:Stodieck#top|talk]]) 08:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)--[[User:Stodieck|Stodieck]] ([[User talk:Stodieck#top|talk]]) 08:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=990308077 -->


== July 2012 ==
== Mirai photo ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|✉→]]'''[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]'''[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|←✎]]) 09:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->


Thank you for your contribution to [[Toyota Mirai]]. As per [[WP:CARPIX]], there is no such thing as an obsolete photo - any version or generation of that vehicle is a valid candidate for the lead image because the article covers the entire history of the vehicle - not just the latest. However, we do try to avoid using the same photo twice in the same article. In this case, your photo is used as the main image in the 2nd generation infobox. Using the same photo as the lead image and also as the main image for a generation infobox is consider overuse of that image. <span style="border:1px solid blue;border-radius:4px;color:blue;box-shadow: 3px 3px 4px grey;">[[User:Stepho-wrs|'''&nbsp;Stepho&nbsp;''']]&nbsp;<span style="font-size:xx-small; vertical-align:top">[[User Talk:Stepho-wrs|talk]]&nbsp;</span></span> 23:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
{{unblock reviewed|reason= Making edits on 5 separate pages does not constitute warring or a reversion to warring. Warring takes two equal parties. You have simply censored one party. You have apparently been influenced by comments from that party or a proxy. Some edits made tonight where made because they constitute reversal of technical facts that has led to a number of deaths dating back to the Wright Brothers. This continues to this day among experimenters in this arena. (That is thinking that a canard is a "horizontal stabilizer".) This distortion being systematically propagated by a single editor. There is no legitimate reason for this activity. It is irresponsible. It is generally an overt corruption of historical usage. Even the editor has commented on the fact that he is "probably wrong" technically, (he has been told this directly by at least 3 editors). His edits are always accompanied by claims of having consensus among editors when talk sessions on the pages in question are blank. On active talk pages it is clear that few editors understand the issue, no vote has been taken, and no consensus has ever been created. The editors are never informed of edits made in their name. Long talk discussions have taken place with this editor simply ignoring encyclopedic references and selecting those that happen to align with his own, generally not responding to points made at all. The editor has simply taken possession of certain WP pages in circumvention of WP policy, and this condition pre-exists my involvement. Comments made by Biker Biker show that he is allowing himself to be used as a puppet. He has never participated in the editing or talk sessions of the pages under discussion, has no apparent knowledge of the subject, and his phrasings and accusations are straight from Steelpillow. (I.e. meat puppet). I am requesting an immediate lift of this block. BTW I have noticed that WP policies on warring are actually reversed in different areas. [[User:Stodieck|Stodieck]] ([[User talk:Stodieck#top|talk]]) 11:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
|decline=[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stabilizer_(aircraft)&diff=502754735&oldid=502265717 Revert one], [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stabilizer_(aircraft)&diff=502759028&oldid=502755142 revert two]. You've just returned from a block for sockpuppet-assisted edit warring, why do you think it's acceptable to continue it using just one account? [[User:MaxSem|Max Semenik]] ([[User talk:MaxSem|talk]]) 12:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
}}
<br />
I have just returned from a phony sock puppet accusation from Steelpillow. That was actually an attempt to change to a private ID. Steelpillow pubically compromised the new ID as soon as I started using it, so it was abandoned on the 1st day and hasn't been used since. That is part of the reason the block was reduced to 72 hours. It was not a sockpuppet-assisted edit. There was nothing to be gained by that. The accusation was harassment. Harassment is the reason for seeking a private ID. That was already adjudicated by the admin involved. It is not a factor here.


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
If you would like to read about a death related to the type of edits I have tried to make, try the current edition of flying magazine, in the "Aftermath" column by Peter Garrison. --[[User:Stodieck|Stodieck]] ([[User talk:Stodieck#top|talk]]) 12:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
Just to address Stodieck's jibe about my lack of knowledge. Firstly that is immaterial, Wikipedia is not about personal knowledge, but about the ability to find verifiable content and to present it in a neutral manner - anything else is original research. Secondly, how can he possibly know what my knowledge is, and to my previous point why should that matter? --[[User:Biker Biker|Biker Biker]] ([[User talk:Biker Biker|talk]]) 14:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
</td></tr>

</table>
Good, now show me the verifiable content to justify the reverts you just made. Otherwise you are acting as a meat puppet for the editor who's edits you just reverted to. Thank you for proving my point. --[[User:Stodieck|Stodieck]] ([[User talk:Stodieck#top|talk]]) 14:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1056563129 -->
:Zzzzzz..... --[[User:Biker Biker|Biker Biker]] ([[User talk:Biker Biker|talk]]) 17:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

== TUSC token 193fd97e637c45d39956ffad56f7d364 ==

[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~magnus/tusc.php TUSC]

==[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|Sockpuppetry]] case==
{| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
|| [[File:Puppeter template.svg|35px]]
|}
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] case. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stodieck]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to cases]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:Biker Biker|Biker Biker]] ([[User talk:Biker Biker|talk]]) 07:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
*Be forewarned that this is twice you have evaded a block and socked. Very likely, the next block will be an indef block and you won't be welcomed here at all. I strongly suggest you just ride out the block and learn a lesson or two. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<small>2&cent;</small>]] [[Special:Contributions/Dennis_Brown|<small>&copy;</small>]] <small><b>[[WP:WikiProject Editor Retention|Join WER]]</b></small> 13:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for block evasion with IPs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Jafeluv|Jafeluv]] ([[User talk:Jafeluv|talk]]) 13:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

== Welcome back ==

Hi, welcome back.

Please be aware that if you return to your previous editing behaviour, the outcome is likely to be the same. For this reason Wikipedians recommend that you stay away from contentious edits, and most especially from the topics that caused trouble last time such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_lifting_surface_aircraft&diff=530772594&oldid=530772318 this edit] which I just reverted. It is a repeat of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_lifting_surface_aircraft&diff=529351086&oldid=506108074 this] anonymous edit made, and reverted by me, just over a week ago, and that looks suspiciously like your previous behaviour. If you are determined to return to the same topics, you will need to take great care not to cause upset.

I look forward to the return of your more constructive edits, you understand aircraft design better than most people. &mdash; Cheers, [[User:Steelpillow|Steelpillow]] ([[User Talk:Steelpillow|Talk]]) 17:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] ==
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:0.5em;width:20em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;margin-left: 1.5em;width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Thank you for your recent submission to [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]]. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.<br>
<div class="plainlinks">
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at [[Wikipedia&#32;talk:Articles for creation/Luísa Sobral]].
* To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
* If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Articles for creation help desk]], or on the <span class="noprint plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:{{urlencode:Mrt3366|WIKI}}|action=edit&section=new}} reviewer's talk page]</span>. Please remember to link to the submission!
*You can also get [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help live chat help from experienced editors].
:Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="brown">Mr</font><font face="verdana" color="red">&nbsp;T</font>]][[User talk:Mrt3366|<font size="1"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mrt3366|action=edit&section=new&preload=User_talk:Mrt3366/new_section}} <font color="green"><sup>(New thread?)</sup></font>]</span> 05:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div>
== July 2013 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563057877 your edit] to [[Stabilizer (aircraft)]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:Stabilizer (aircraft)|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}&section=new my operator's talk page].
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
*<nowiki>to relieve pilot input forces; conversely small aircraft with [[Stabilator|all-moving stabilizers</nowiki>{{red|'''&#41;'''}}<nowiki>]] use [[anti-servo tab]]s are used to reduce control forces.</nowiki>
Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 03:39, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

==July 2013==
Stodieck I have removed some of your comments on the [[Talk:Three surface aircraft]] as they do not appear to relate to improving the article, please stick to consensus building and not comments on others, thanks. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 18:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|stop attacking]] other editors, as you did on [[:Talk:Three_surface_aircraft]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub><font color="maroon">[[User talk:The Bushranger|One ping only]]</font></sub> 11:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:45, 24 February 2023

This page is closed due to abuse.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monadnock Building

[edit]

Please feel free to write an article about the Monadnock Building (San Francisco), and then maybe we can figure out how to disambiguate it. Simply dumping a parenthetical statement about a subject without an article into the lead paragraph of an article (a featured article at that) isn't how it's done. If an article exists, we can provide a hatnote leading to the other one. Acroterion (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cabo de Hornos, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ‑‑V.S.(C)(T) 14:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cabo de Hornos

[edit]

You wrote "This redirect make it impossible to have an article in Spanish about two locations called "Cabo de Hornos". What were you thinking?" in the edit summary for this edit. What happens in the Spanish article has nothing to do with what happens here. If there are two places called "Cabo de Hornos", you can turn the article into a disambiguation article, but please don't just blank the article. --Slashme (talk) 15:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of pumped-storage hydroelectric power stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storage capacity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mirai photo

[edit]

Thank you for your contribution to Toyota Mirai. As per WP:CARPIX, there is no such thing as an obsolete photo - any version or generation of that vehicle is a valid candidate for the lead image because the article covers the entire history of the vehicle - not just the latest. However, we do try to avoid using the same photo twice in the same article. In this case, your photo is used as the main image in the 2nd generation infobox. Using the same photo as the lead image and also as the main image for a generation infobox is consider overuse of that image.  Stepho  talk  23:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]