User talk:Sunny719

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sunny719! Thank you for your contributions. I am SerChevalerie and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! SerChevalerie (talk) 20:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Extended Confirmed

I'm hoping you're not using all of those Internet Archive Bot edits as a way to reach the 500 edits for extended confirmed user access level. That's considered gaming the system and will lead to that being removed from your account. Ravensfire (talk) 21:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

All 521 edits (at the time of this writing) are with the use of the bot. I counted only 5 times that an original link was found to be dead and an archive link actually useful. Otherwise, it just adds to any article's download time. I've reverted any of these additions to pages on my watch list. There is no justification for it, although setting up an archive link is permitted when creating a reference. However, not this mindless use of the bot. Dhtwiki (talk) 01:10, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

– bradv🍁 14:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sunny719 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why was I blocked, I am simply just editing and making typos everywhere.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Why was I blocked, I am simply just editing and making typos everywhere. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Why was I blocked, I am simply just editing and making typos everywhere. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Why was I blocked, I am simply just editing and making typos everywhere. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}