User talk:Toddst1: Difference between revisions
→★ the smallest barstar I could find: new section |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
--Friendly Yours, Enzoakavpn 21:29, 26 January 2012 (UTC) |
--Friendly Yours, Enzoakavpn 21:29, 26 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
== ★ the smallest barstar I could find == |
|||
[[User:Fred Gandt]] is a sharp and skilled editor, and you kick him like this? You hurt the project. [[User:Alarbus|Alarbus]] ([[User talk:Alarbus|talk]]) 07:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:54, 27 January 2012
This administrator believes the SOPA/PIPA blackout was absurd and has signed this protest against the blackout. |
This is Toddst1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
SOPA
Hello. I am from the French Wikipedia. I am also calling for the resignation of people from the foundation after they decided that they should support the loss of our neutrality. If ever something is set up somewhere in order to secure that move, please let me know. Thierry Caro (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for contacting me. I wish you luck.
- I didn't know about that fiasco they called a discussion about the blackout until it was closed. What a joke that was. Toddst1 (talk) 23:25, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- I also wasn't aware of the discussion until it was closed. However I do believe even an entity like Wikipedia has a right to self defence. Taroaldo (talk) 23:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Please explain
I was about to Get quite cross with you for calling me a meatpuppet, whatever that is, right out of the blue with no provocation on my part at all, until I noticed that you share my views about the disgraceful blackout, which has exploited the voluntary work of many thousands of volunteers like myself for political aims. I wouldn't have minded the blackout so much had the political aims not been so completely fat-headed.
If you please re-read my comment on the USP Networks entry, you will see that I'm just trying to explain why WPoel might have a legitimate reason for his entry, and doing no more than that. I know him, and worked occasionally for him, and he told me that there was a dispute over the entry so I went to have a look. Does that make me a 'meatpuppet'? It seems rather a harsh reaction and surely outside the guidelines you are given for relating to contributors to Wikipedia. AndrewRMClarke (talk) 22:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Wpoel has recruited a number of his buddies to help his cause which is clearly a violation of WP:meat. He's been blocked for that. I'm afraid that makes you one too. You seem like a borderline case so I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. You need to stop editing on his behalf. See discussion on user talk:Wpoel. Toddst1 (talk) 23:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of VP-Info
I removed the prod from VP-Info after finding a detailed 3-page magazine review and a number of passing mentions which suggest it's historically significant. I think it would survive at Afd, however the article is a mess and needs a lot of cleanup. – Pnm (talk) 21:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. Sounds good. Toddst1 (talk) 22:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
I did not know that there was any regulation of Userspace beyond "no copyright infringement". I shall not revert it, as I had/have no intention of non-adherence to any policies: thank you for letting me know that there are policies for userspace, and that my content violated them. St John Chrysostom view/my bias 17:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I'm confident that you have no intent to disrupt and this was just lack of knowledge which happens all the time here - even to an administrator like me. Toddst1 (talk) 16:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
VPN's Garage Deletion
VPN's Garage is a fansite about The Sims. Since Mod The Sims, Simprograms and other fansites are mentioned, in my opinion I think that the page about VPN's Garage should not be cancelled. Thanks.
--Friendly Yours, Enzoakavpn 21:29, 26 January 2012 (UTC)