User talk:Zefr: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Please stop wikihounding me: rant noted |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[WP:MEDHOW]]: Useful Wikipedia tips for editing medical and general content |
[[WP:MEDHOW]]: Useful Wikipedia tips for editing medical and general content |
||
== Please stop wikihounding me == |
|||
I would like to ask you to stop [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding|wikihounding]] me. Here is a recap of the events: |
|||
* After a 1-year break on [[intermittent fasting]], I started contributing to it again yesterday. Today, you reverted an edit I've made on [[NAFLD]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-alcoholic_fatty_liver_disease&diff=918751722&oldid=918732790]. |
|||
* Incorrect use of my user history: On the [[NAFLD]] article, it was never explicitly nor implicitly agreed to strictly comply with MEDRS, and MEDRS allows primary sources in some occasions. Proof is that the article currently contains other primary sources (eg, [https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1053/jhep.2002.30690]), which you did not revert (solely mine). This thus cannot be qualified as an "unambiguous error or violation of Wikipedia policy". Per [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding]]: «Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles.», from [[WP:MEDRS]]: «For biomedical content, primary sources should generally not be used. [...] Text that relies on primary sources should usually have minimal undue weight, only be used to describe conclusions made by the source, and must describe these findings clearly so that all editors even those without specialist knowledge can check sources. Primary sources should never be cited in support of a conclusion that is not clearly made by the authors (see WP:Synthesis).» --> I argue that 24 words of an article of 10 pages (5686 words without the bibliography), represents only 0.0042% of the whole article, and thus cannot be qualified as undue weight. I will anyway not counter-revert, but this is arguably NOT an unambiguous error that would have warranted the use of my history. |
|||
* Temporal coincidence: You did not contribute to the [[NAFLD]] page since about a year. Now exactly the day after I start contributing again to [[Intermittent fasting]], you revert my edit on [[NAFLD]] (after reverting several of mines on [[Intermittent fasting]] of course -- I'm not arguing about IF article, but about using my history to revert me on my other contributions elsewhere on Wikipedia). |
|||
* Incoherent editing (additional argument of incorrect use of my user history): You added a non MEDRS source (harvard) in Intermittent fasting, and allowed (did not revert) an outdated 2013 opinion source. The latter even after it was explicitly decided to strictly adhere to [[WP:MEDRS]]. If strict adherence to these guidelines is your motive, why accept these sources on other articles? Why follow me after to revert my edits that you would otherwise accept from others or yourselves? |
|||
=> Thus, I [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding|do not enjoy]] the fact that you followed me around on my contributions on Wikipedia. Please avoid doing that. Thank you. --[[User:Signimu|Signimu]] ([[User talk:Signimu|talk]]) 16:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:59, 30 September 2019
MEDRS tutorials for new medical editors
Wikiproject Medicine tutorial for new medical editors
Wikiproject Medicine resources summary
2017 Published review of medical content on Wikipedia
PDF for editing Wikipedia articles on Medicine
WP:MEDHOW: Useful Wikipedia tips for editing medical and general content