Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayana Evans: Difference between revisions
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::{{u|Chicdat}} which of the criteria listed at the link below does the subject meet? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals [[User:MurielMary|MurielMary]] ([[User talk:MurielMary|talk]]) 18:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC) |
::{{u|Chicdat}} which of the criteria listed at the link below does the subject meet? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals [[User:MurielMary|MurielMary]] ([[User talk:MurielMary|talk]]) 18:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
In re: to the Notability checklist: |
*In re: to the Notability checklist: |
||
Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals: |
Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals: |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. YES - OPERATION CATSUIT In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. YES, WITH INDEPENDENT REVIEWS IN HYPERALLERGIC, NEW YORK TIMES, NY ART BEAT, MADAME NOIR, AP NEWS, ETC. |
3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. YES - OPERATION CATSUIT In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. YES, WITH INDEPENDENT REVIEWS IN HYPERALLERGIC, NEW YORK TIMES, NY ART BEAT, MADAME NOIR, AP NEWS, ETC. |
||
4. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. B) A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF A SIGNIFICANT EXHIBITION - "The next year she completed a 10-hour endurance based, citywide performance and 100 person performative dinner party in the Barnes Foundation museum as part of "A Person of the Crowd" which was a major performance art survey featuring Marina Abramovic, Tania Bruguera, and William Pope L., among others." THE BARNES FOUNDATION IS A SIGNIFICANT INSTITUTION, IN ADDITION, OTHER NOTABLE VENUS INCLUDE EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO AND QUEENS MUSEUM. |
4. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. B) A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF A SIGNIFICANT EXHIBITION - "The next year she completed a 10-hour endurance based, citywide performance and 100 person performative dinner party in the Barnes Foundation museum as part of "A Person of the Crowd" which was a major performance art survey featuring Marina Abramovic, Tania Bruguera, and William Pope L., among others." THE BARNES FOUNDATION IS A SIGNIFICANT INSTITUTION, IN ADDITION, OTHER NOTABLE VENUS INCLUDE EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO AND QUEENS MUSEUM. ALSO YES ON C) CRITICAL ATTENTION SEE AWARDS; FELLOWSHIPS; ARTICLES; AND EXHIBITIONS. |
||
Excuse the caps. I think the article sufficiently meets the requirements on notability strengthened by reliable sources. |
Excuse the caps. I think the article sufficiently meets the requirements on notability strengthened by reliable sources. I moved the post to 'published after a peer review from a user on freenode. [[User:Matriarch-info|Matriarch-info]] ([[User talk:Matriarch-info|talk]]) 00:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
* The problem with this article is not that the subject is not notable, but that much of the article has been copy/pasted from copyrighted sources. That material MUST be removed and possibly revdel'd. [[User:Vexations|Vexations]] ([[User talk:Vexations|talk]]) 13:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC) |
* The problem with this article is not that the subject is not notable, but that much of the article has been copy/pasted from copyrighted sources. That material MUST be removed and possibly revdel'd. [[User:Vexations|Vexations]] ([[User talk:Vexations|talk]]) 13:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
*When I run it through a plagiarism checker it only caught on to the Wikipedia articles and the quotes which are cited. Please give some indication of as to which parts are copy-pasted as I think you may be referring to the quotes. [[User:Matriarch-info|Matriarch-info]] ([[User talk:Matriarch-info|talk]]) 00:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:57, 11 January 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ayana Evans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable artist MurielMary (talk) 07:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Draft was declined by two AfC reviewers then improved and moved to main article space. Still insufficient evidence that subject meets the notability criteria for an artist. MurielMary (talk) 07:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The references and text, as well as WP:NBIO and WP:POTENTIAL, convince me that this article is notable. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 11:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Chicdat which of the criteria listed at the link below does the subject meet? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals MurielMary (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- In re: to the Notability checklist:
Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:
1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. YES, SEE FRANKLIN FURNACE AWARD, NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE, PROFESSORSHIP AT BROWN UNIVERSITY, INCLUSION IN ART HISTORY TEXTBOOK (Re-envisioning the Contemporary Art Canon: Perspectives in a Global World. Taylor & Francis)
2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. DEFINITELY THE "I JUST CAME HERE TO FIND A HUSBAND"-SERIES IS A CONCEPT WHICH GAINED POPULARITY WITHIN BOTH THE ART WORLD AND THE MAINSTREAM. SHE IS ALSO PRAISED FOR HER PUBLIC GUERILLA STYLE WORK, AND SIGNATURE CATSUIT AS MENTIONED IN NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE AND Re-envisioning the Contemporary Art Canon: Perspectives in a Global World. Taylor & Francis.
3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. YES - OPERATION CATSUIT In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. YES, WITH INDEPENDENT REVIEWS IN HYPERALLERGIC, NEW YORK TIMES, NY ART BEAT, MADAME NOIR, AP NEWS, ETC.
4. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. B) A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF A SIGNIFICANT EXHIBITION - "The next year she completed a 10-hour endurance based, citywide performance and 100 person performative dinner party in the Barnes Foundation museum as part of "A Person of the Crowd" which was a major performance art survey featuring Marina Abramovic, Tania Bruguera, and William Pope L., among others." THE BARNES FOUNDATION IS A SIGNIFICANT INSTITUTION, IN ADDITION, OTHER NOTABLE VENUS INCLUDE EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO AND QUEENS MUSEUM. ALSO YES ON C) CRITICAL ATTENTION SEE AWARDS; FELLOWSHIPS; ARTICLES; AND EXHIBITIONS.
Excuse the caps. I think the article sufficiently meets the requirements on notability strengthened by reliable sources. I moved the post to 'published after a peer review from a user on freenode. Matriarch-info (talk) 00:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- The problem with this article is not that the subject is not notable, but that much of the article has been copy/pasted from copyrighted sources. That material MUST be removed and possibly revdel'd. Vexations (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- When I run it through a plagiarism checker it only caught on to the Wikipedia articles and the quotes which are cited. Please give some indication of as to which parts are copy-pasted as I think you may be referring to the quotes. Matriarch-info (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)