Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 June 11: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Fix indents |
KoshVorlon (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
*KoshVorln statements for the most part are very misleading and very inaccurate. The only that I created was from ''over a year ago'', and completely different from the image listed for deletion by KoshVorln, and totally unrelated to this image. The image listed here is a photograph taken by [[User:Victorgrigas]] who has contributed many of his photographs for use on Wikipedia, all of which are very generously licensed. The "second" image was a cropped version of his image that I uploaded, and licensed under the same license the original image, with a reference to the source of an image. PeterSymonds has stated his opinion on that matter above in retrospect of reviewing the original photograph. I certainly do not appriciate KoshVorln's lack of good faith and furthermore misrepresentation of the facts in this mater, all of which can easily be verified. // [[User:Laughing Man|laughing man]] 23:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC) |
*KoshVorln statements for the most part are very misleading and very inaccurate. The only that I created was from ''over a year ago'', and completely different from the image listed for deletion by KoshVorln, and totally unrelated to this image. The image listed here is a photograph taken by [[User:Victorgrigas]] who has contributed many of his photographs for use on Wikipedia, all of which are very generously licensed. The "second" image was a cropped version of his image that I uploaded, and licensed under the same license the original image, with a reference to the source of an image. PeterSymonds has stated his opinion on that matter above in retrospect of reviewing the original photograph. I certainly do not appriciate KoshVorln's lack of good faith and furthermore misrepresentation of the facts in this mater, all of which can easily be verified. // [[User:Laughing Man|laughing man]] 23:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
: Laughing Man, please read [[WP:NPA|this]]. You have a copyrighted image on your page. Copyrighted images are not allowed on userpages per policy. I'm tagging it and asking that it be removed per policy. No bad faith about it. |
|||
'''The only bad faith here''' is your putting it back on your page after it was deleted. [[User:KoshVorlon| Just say '''"NO"''' to [WP:FUR|FUR]] 16:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:Image:InHerOwnWrite.JPG]]==== |
====[[:Image:InHerOwnWrite.JPG]]==== |
Revision as of 16:27, 12 June 2008
June 11
- Obsolete and orphaned. No need for this image when you can simply use the
border
attribute with Image:Flag of France.svg. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 21:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC) - commons while the borders argument may be valid for use in WP, it may be useful in other wikimedia projects Fasach Nua (talk) 06:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Weatherman90 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, now used for vandalism. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 19:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- WhisperToMe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, higher quality version of photo is now on commons (Image: Large Philadelphia Landsat.jpg). BlueAzure (talk) 01:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- RadicalBender (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, higher quality version of photo is now on commons (Image: Us-atlantic-fleet-1907.jpg). BlueAzure (talk) 01:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Orphan, higher quality version of photo is now on commons (Image: Catacombs-700px.jpg). BlueAzure (talk) 01:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- News agency photo from the Press Trust of India, fails WP:NFCC#2. Kelly hi! 02:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- See also Image:Mumbai 20080212.jpg, which has the same problem. Kelly hi! 02:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- I am removing one of them from the article and getting them low resolution-ized. That should keep them in conformity of with WP:NFCC#2. A week old discussion on Elcobbola's talk page should clear the air. Also a special thanks to Kelly, for informing me about this deletion on my talk page.
- Actually, I'm afraid that we can't use them even at low resolution. The problem is that they're from a news agency which is in the business of selling their photographs. When we use them here, we dilute their market value (at least in theory). Kelly hi! 04:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have now nominated Image:Mumbai_violence_20080205.jpg for speedy deletion per {{db-author}} KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 (talk) 05:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I'm afraid that we can't use them even at low resolution. The problem is that they're from a news agency which is in the business of selling their photographs. When we use them here, we dilute their market value (at least in theory). Kelly hi! 04:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- I am removing one of them from the article and getting them low resolution-ized. That should keep them in conformity of with WP:NFCC#2. A week old discussion on Elcobbola's talk page should clear the air. Also a special thanks to Kelly, for informing me about this deletion on my talk page.
- Associated Press photo, fails WP:NFCC#2. Kelly hi! 02:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- User:Victorgrigas (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is a photograph of a copyrighted image. This is also the third time that Laughing Man has placed this image on his page. The first attempt was [1]deleted here, the second attempt was also [2]deleted. He brought it right back again and it was speedied [3] June 9 However at that time the administrator who deleted it previously stated he could not find that it was a copyvio from the link provided, he reverted the request for speedy. I placed it back up with a link to the site this image actually comes from with an instruction as to where this image appears. The speedy was again reverted by Admin John on June 10. The image is a copy of the "smiling face" image used in the Anime series "Ghost in the shell" in particular, is used by the character named "The laughing man", and even though the exact image is not being used, he's using is a photograph of a bumper sticker which is that image, and therefore, it's still a copyrighted image and therefore it cannot exist in userspace at all. The original image (as near as I can find it) exists [4] here I am requesting that this image be deleted and The Laughing Man be warned about gaming the system and / or recreating deleted material. F.U.R hurts Wikipedia 13:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Statement by declining admin I originally deleted this, but I shouldn't have done in my opinion. The image is graffiti that has original lighting, distance and colour. It is similar to the logo, but not in a way that it can be perceived as a copyvio. In my opinion this is a very sketchy copyright claim. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- KoshVorln statements for the most part are very misleading and very inaccurate. The only that I created was from over a year ago, and completely different from the image listed for deletion by KoshVorln, and totally unrelated to this image. The image listed here is a photograph taken by User:Victorgrigas who has contributed many of his photographs for use on Wikipedia, all of which are very generously licensed. The "second" image was a cropped version of his image that I uploaded, and licensed under the same license the original image, with a reference to the source of an image. PeterSymonds has stated his opinion on that matter above in retrospect of reviewing the original photograph. I certainly do not appriciate KoshVorln's lack of good faith and furthermore misrepresentation of the facts in this mater, all of which can easily be verified. // laughing man 23:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Laughing Man, please read this. You have a copyrighted image on your page. Copyrighted images are not allowed on userpages per policy. I'm tagging it and asking that it be removed per policy. No bad faith about it.
The only bad faith here is your putting it back on your page after it was deleted. Just say "NO" to [WP:FUR|FUR 16:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- ConoscoTutto (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image is being used to illustrate a discography, which is specifically listed as unacceptable use of a non-free image. The fair use rationale states that it is being used to identify the living person on the cover, which is also an unacceptable use of the non-free image. Papa November (talk) 15:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- MovieMadness (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Per WP:NFC#Images_2, non-free images cannot be used to show what a living person looks like. This image is only used in the infobox of the article, and the concert it advertises is not the subject of that article. Papa November (talk) 17:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Non-free album cover image is only being used to illustrate a discography, which is explicitly against non-free content policy Papa November (talk) 17:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- ConoscoTutto (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Non-free album cover image is only being used to illustrate a discography, which is explicitly against non-free content policy Papa November (talk) 17:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
speedy delete - copyrighted image of living person Fasach Nua (talk) 05:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I tend to agree with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete could be from any episode, does not meet WP:NFC#8 Fasach Nua (talk) 05:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree with the assessment. It captures a specific (and significant) part of the plot, illustrating the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I tend to agree with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I tend to agree with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I tend to agree with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree with the assessment. It captures a specific (and significant) part of the plot, illustrating the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- MatthewFenton (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and replace - I tend to agree (though only slightly) with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. another image would be better - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I tend to agree with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wolf of Fenric (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I tend to agree with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I tend to agree with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. As well, it has the imprint of the channel it was captured from - a major no-no, to my reckoning - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree with the assessment. It captures a specific (and significant) part of the plot, illustrating the story all by it's lonesome. An improvement of the image would be to see the Doc - with injuries - up and walking about - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not fair use. This is illustrative but not informative and the precise description of the scene portrayed is not essential to the reader's understanding of the subject. Unjustifiable. fails wp:nfc#8, by a long way. Troikoalogo (talk) 21:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I tend to agree with the assessment. It doesn't capture a specific moment of the plot to tell the story all by it's lonesome. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- delete - ill chosen image that fails WP:NFC#8, purely decorative 05:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Blanket reasoning without arguments. Please elaborate on why it fails #8, and try to do so without insulting the uploader ("ill chosen"). — Edokter • Talk • 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)